What is Global Health?: Miguel Ángel González Block - Presentation Transcript
National Institute of Public Health Development of Global Health in Mexico Miguel Ángel González Block Nelly Salgado Laura Magana Lisa de María
Global Public Goods
Local, national and international values of global health significance
Disease control
Best practices
International health regulations
Universal human rights
Validated knowledge
The virtuous circle of global public goods
Local public goods
Malaria control
Equity policy
Regional public goods
Malaria elimination
Equity legitimation
Global public goods
Prospect for malaria eradication
Universal human rights
Outline
A marriage of convenience: the early history of public health education and research in Mexico
Capacity building: the Foundation of the National Institute of Public Health
Strategic Alliances and global leadership
Conclusions
Global institutions in the formative period
Social institutions to address orphanage
The Balmis expedition: the first global, vertical public health campaign
Pasteur’s influence in Mexico: scientific advice at the margin of power
Pasteur’s influence in Mexico: scientific advice at the margin of power
Consejo Superior de Salubridad
First international conferences
Dr. Eduardo Liceaga
Foundations of modern public health in Mexico
School of Public Health of Mexico. 1922
Rockefeller collaboration 1920´s-1950s
The era of vertical campaigns: 1950s-1970s
Godparenthood and social capital = =
Religious cults to address epidemics and floods
The Balmis expedition: the first global, vertical public health campaign
A marriage of convenience
The School of Public Health 1922-1987
Capacity building: the Foundation of the National Institute of Public Health
Center for Public Health Research (CISP) in 1984
Generate the evidence base for the structural reform
Scientific excellence and relevance
Public health research and training
generation, reproduction, and transfer of knowledge on health conditions and social response at the population level
Attracted young scientists for the development of a critical mass in research
Greater acceptance by the Establishment
International support through Scientific Advisory Committee
Pillars of institution building
The conceptual base
The production base
The reproduction base, and
The utilization base
The National Institute of Public Health: 1987-2000s
Strengthening of public health research
170 researchers
High specialty model
Health sector fragmentation
New challenges with decentralization
New Challenges, Strategic Alliances and Global Leadership
At the threshold of a new era
Combination of challenges and opportunities
Growing interdependence raised the visibility of public health threats
An unprecedented investments in global health
development agenda
security agendas
New public and private actors
Extraordinary opportunities for relaunching institution building in public health
Innovative responses to current realities, both at the global and the local levels
Global movement to establish, expand, and strengthen NPHIs
Key components of the institutional architecture for improving health system performance in developing countries
Diversity, complexity, and change
Diversity
between and within different geographical areas
Poverty, exclusion, and discrimination
WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health
Complexity
triple burden of ill-health
biomedical and communications technologies
new managerial innovations
new financial formulas
health care as a fundamental human right
renewed tendency of vertical programs
Change
from standardized, pre-packaged interventions
towards matching global solutions to local needs
Policy making moving from technical and highly hierarchical approach towards recognizing new actors and processes in a political and participatory environment.
New Alliances
Globalization is changing public health perspectives on the origin and scale of risks
Role and importance of national and local capacities to respond effectively to them
National and local public health authorities are now being called to re-build their capacities to respond to multiple risks, ranging from natural disasters to pandemics and bioterrorism
Scale of risks varies from localized problems to rapidly spreading global threats
New capacities to
co-ordinate health sector responses effectively
shape interdisciplinary teams
respond at both the national and global levels
relate government and civil society organizations
Capacity limitations to engage in balanced collaboration North and South
Cross-national, comparative health systems analyses are led mostly by institutions in the North
Bibliometric analysis found that 74% of all international health systems research publications are led by high-income country authors
Seven countries concentrate 60% of the papers led by developing country institutions
Authors from institutions in the United States and the United Kingdom concentrated between them as many as 68% of the papers led by high-income countries
Predominance of technical capacity from the North and in a handful of developing countries when addressing global public health issues
Role for National Institutes of Public Health in the South
Imperative to participate and lead in regional and global networking mechanisms
Institutional development should be based on the relative advantages of partners to lead research, training, surveillance, and health system development efforts
Advantages could be assessed on the basis of technical capacities as well as on the closeness to problems of national and global significance
Well balanced and reciprocal collaboration across institutes in the North and South, and particularly the capacity to network across neighboring countries and regions in the developing world.
Health status evaluation and analysis
Public health surveillance, problem investigation, and risk control
Prevention and health promotion
Social participation in health
Planning and management
Regulation and enforcement
Evaluation and promotion of equitable access to necessary health services
Human resource development and training
Quality assurance in personal and population-based health services
Public health research
11. E mergency and disaster mitigation
Core NPHI functions correspond with essential public health functions
International Association of National Public Health Institutes (IANPHI)
Global initiative dedicated to creating, strengthening and linking national public health institutes to improve the scientific basis for public health policies and programs.
IANPHI links today over 60 national public health institutes globally,
Scientific focal points for ministries of health
Critical mass of skills and knowledge to provide leadership for protecting and enhancing the public’s health
The International Association of National Public Health Insitutes (IANPHI) Objectives
Develop an internationally accepted NPHI Framework and a Toolkit for use in assessing and guiding the development of NPHIs
Work collaboratively with low-resource countries to strengthen existing NPHIs and to create new ones
Increase public health advocacy and knowledge
Create a new international community of public health leadership
Improve the health of populations by helping to create and strengthen NPHIs and fostering an international community for NPHI leadership development, peer assistance, and public health advocacy.
What is a NPHI?
A science-based organization or network of organizations
Provides national leadership and expertise
Multi-faceted organizations that include people with a wide range of skills and experience
Perform critical public health functions
A trusted source of counsel for policy- and decision-makers
Part of the government (usually under the Ministry of Health) or closely attached to it
Core attributes of a NPHI
National scope of influence
National recognition
Limitations of political influence
Scientific basis for programs and policies
Focus on the major public health problems affecting the country
Adequate human and financial resources
Adequate infrastructure support
Linkages with key organizations
Accountability
Conclusions
International efforts to establish solid health research systems are yielding positive results in many developing countries
Rich array of institutions
Networking is proving its value
Research systems cannot be conceived in isolation given diversity, complexity and rapid change
Alliances are critical for institution-building efforts
Institutions are vehicles whereby human beings mobilize their talents, values, and interests towards the pursuit of shared goals
National and networked institutes will be key players in launching the new era of public health
REFERENCES
Binder S, Adigun L, Dusenbury C, Greenspan A, Tanhuanpää P. National public health institutes: Contributing to the public good. J Public Health Policy. 2008 ; 29:3–21.
Birn, AE. A marriage of concenience. The Rockefeller Foundation and Revolutionary Mexico. Rochester, Rochester UP, 2006.
Bossert T Larrañaga O Giedion U et.al (2003). Decentralization and Equity of Resource Allocation: Evidence from Colombia and Chile. Bulletin of the World Health Organization , 91, 95-100.
Bruce M. Altevogt, Andrew M. Pope, Martha N. Hill, and Kenneth I. Shine (Eds.). Research Priorities in Emergency Preparedness and Response for Public Health Systems. A Letter Report. Committee on Research Priorities in Emergency Preparedness and Response for Public Health Systems. Washington DC, Institute of Medicine, 2008.
Frenk, J. La Nueva Salud Pública. México, 2004
Frenk J & MA González Block, Institutional Development for Public Health: Learning the Lessons, Renewing the Commitment. Commentary. Journal of Public Health Policy (2008) 29, 449–458.
Garret L (2007). The challenge of global health. Foreign Affairs , 86, 14-38.
Gonzalez-Block M.A, Leadership, Institution Building and Pay-Back of Health Systems Research in Mexico. Draft, INSP 2008.
Gonzalez-Block M.A, The state of international collaboration for health systems research: what do publications tell? Health Research Policy and Systems 2006, 4: 7. http://www.health-policy-systems.com/content/4/1/7
Hutton G (2002). Decentralization and the sector-wide approach in the health sector. Basle, SDS.
Irwin A Valentine N Brown C et. at. (2006). The Commission on Social Determinants of Health: Tackling the Social Roots of Health Inequities. PLoS Med 3(6): e106 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030106 .
Molineux D Nantulya V (2004). Linking Disease Control Programmes in Rural Africa: A Pro-Poor Strategy to Reach Abuja Targets and Millennium Development Goals. British Medical Journal 328: 7448 1129 – 32.
Rodríguez-López MH. Commentary. A perspective from Mexico. J Public Health Policy . 2008;29:26-31.
Soberón G, Frenk J, Sepúlveda J. The health care reform in Mexico: Before and after the 1985 earthquakes. Am J Public Health. 1986;76:673-80.
Unger JP De Paepe P and Green A (2003). A code of best practice for disease control Programmes to avoid damaging health care services in developing countries. International Journal of Health Planning and Management , 18 , S27-S39.
WHO 1996. Investing in Health Research and Development. Report to the Ad Hoc Committee on Health Research Relating to future interventions Options (document
As proposed by the Declarations of the Alma Ata and more
As proposed by the Declarations of the Alma Ata and challenged by the Millennium
Development Goals, action by players and stakeholders of diverse specialties and
backgrounds is required to achieve health for all. This assembled expert panel
drawn from different backgrounds will enrich the discussion with their own experiences. less
0 comments
Post a comment