ACA 2011 SERU Presentation (2/9/11)


Published on

Presentation by Dr. Gale Stewart, Director of Assessment for Student Affairs and Research Associate Lauren Ratliff from the Office of the President. Explains SERU and importance of student participation.

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

ACA 2011 SERU Presentation (2/9/11)

  1. 1. 2011 Student Experience in the Research University (SERU): The Ultimate Student Survey<br />A project sponsored by <br />the Office of the President, <br />the Office of the Executive Vice President and Provost, <br />and the Division of Student Affairs<br />1<br />
  2. 2. Background<br />Developed by UC-Berkeley Center for Studies in Higher Education <br />Administered online in the UC from 2002-present<br />Focused on understanding student experience at large research universities<br />Designed as longitudinal study using census of all undergraduates<br />2<br />
  3. 3. Recent History<br />Research institutions outside UC began participation in 2008<br />Other institutions include: Rutgers, U Florida, U Michigan, U Minnesota, U Oregon, U Pittsburgh <br />UT Austin first participated in 2010<br />3<br />
  4. 4. SERU at UT Austin<br />Sponsored by the Office of the President, the Office of the Executive Vice President and Provost, and the Division of Student Affairs<br />UT joined the project late in 2009<br />Did not have as much time to prepare as we would have liked<br />UT signed a 3-year contract with UC-Berkeley<br />AY 2010-2011 is Year 2<br />4<br />
  5. 5. Spring 2010 SERU Pilot Results<br />21% of students answered initial questions (n=7,365), however only 15% of students persisted through the entire instrument<br />Representativeness<br />Good representation by ethnicity and college<br />Over-representation of females<br />Under-representation of Freshmen<br />5<br />
  6. 6. Spring 2010 SERU Pilot Results<br />Website for results:<br />Areas covered include:<br />Time allocation<br />Academic and Personal Development<br />Academic Engagement<br />Evaluation of the Major<br />Cost of Education<br />Background Information<br />Campus Climate for Diversity<br />Family Education Levels<br />6<br />
  7. 7. 7<br />
  8. 8. 8<br />
  9. 9. 9<br />
  10. 10. Spring 2010 SERU SampleFindings<br />58% of students often* raised his/her standard for acceptable effort due to the high standards of a faculty member<br />59% often* communicated with a faculty member by email or in person<br />43% often* interacted with faculty during lecture class sessions<br />32% often* talked with the instructor outside of class about issues or concepts derived from the course<br />*Often = somewhat often + often + very often<br />10<br />
  11. 11. Spring 2010 SERU SampleFindings<br />83% were satisfied* with the variety of courses available in their major<br />92% were satisfied* with the quality of upper division courses in their major<br />91% were satisfied* with their access to faculty outside of class<br />Most important factors in deciding on their major: <br />(1) Interest in subject area<br />(2) Intellectual curiosity<br />(3) Preparation for a fulfilling career<br />*Satisfied = somewhat satisfied + satisfied + very satisfied<br />11<br />
  12. 12. Spring 2010 SERU SampleFindings<br />91% agree* that they feel they belong at this campus<br />90% are satisfied** with their overall academic experience<br />86% are satisfied** with the value of the education for the price they’re paying<br />86% say that faculty provide prompt and useful feedback on student work (% “yes”)<br />*Agree = somewhat agree + agree + strongly agree<br />**Satisfied = somewhat satisfied + satisfied + very satisfied<br />12<br />
  13. 13. Plans for 2011<br />Launch date was Tuesday, February 1, 2011<br />Over 35,000 undergraduate students will be invited to participate via email<br />Non-respondents will be re-contacted weekly<br />Some by contacts within Colleges/Schools<br />Response rates will be updated regularly and posted online<br /> College Competitions planned<br />We hope to end data collection after Spring Break<br />13<br />
  14. 14. Response Rate<br />Getting a much higher response rate is critical<br />Higher response allows us to drill down to the academic program level<br />Higher response allows us to follow individual students longitudinally through their UT careers<br />14<br />
  15. 15. Marketing<br />Kick-off planned the first week of February<br />Banners and tables scheduled periodically throughout the first six weeks <br />Student support via SG and Senate<br />Articles in Daily Texan<br />Facebook and Twitter<br />Videos on TV monitors<br />Incentives: iPad, $250 toward books x 4, and tickets to basketball, baseball games<br />15<br />
  16. 16. YourHelp Is Important<br />Encourage your students to complete the survey<br />Enlist student participation via your department’s newsletter and/or email system<br />Tell your colleagues about the survey<br />Talk about the college competition – keep track of college response rates ( <br />Talk it up! <br />Contact us for results or for more information<br />16<br />
  17. 17. For More Information<br />Website for 2010 results:<br /><br />Lauren Ratliff, Research Associate, Office of the President<br /><br />(512)232-8280<br />Gale Stuart, Ph.D., Director of Assessment, Division of Student Affairs<br /><br />(512)232-9608<br />Thank you!<br />17<br />