Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
  • Like
The Mind of the User
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Now you can save presentations on your phone or tablet

Available for both IPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

The Mind of the User

  • 372 views
Published

Colleen Roller's presentation from the Boston UPA mini conference 2011.

Colleen Roller's presentation from the Boston UPA mini conference 2011.

Published in Technology , Health & Medicine
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
372
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0

Actions

Shares
Downloads
8
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. The Mind of the UserWhen 98% is more than 100%:How number format affects judgment & decisions Colleen Roller UX Matters Columnist On Decision Architecture
  • 2. Do you know… How well do people understand and interpret numeric data? Does the format of numeric data have an impact? How should we display numeric data?
  • 3. This presentation Reviews research that reveals how people perceive and use data Suggests UX design principles and best practices
  • 4. A study Rate the attractiveness of a simple gamble (on a scale from 0-20)  1st group (rating = 9.4)  7 out of 36 chance to win $9  2nd group (rating = 14.9)  7 out of 36 chance to win $9  29 out of 36 chance to lose 5 cents Bateman/Dent/Peters/Slovic/Starmer - 2007
  • 5. Judgment & decision making Must be able to attach meaning to data Meaning is determined via  Context – a reference point or upper/ lower bound  Comparison – against the contextThe ease with which meaning can be deriveddictates the extent to which data will be used.
  • 6. A study Which bowl did people prefer: A. 100 beans, 7 of which are red B. 10 beans, 1 of which is red Denes-Raj/Epstein - 1994
  • 7. A study Which disease is more dangerous? A. Kills 1286 out of every 10,000 people B. Kills 24 out of every 100 people Yamagishi 1997
  • 8. A study Will a mental patient commit a violent act within 6 months of being discharged from the hospital? A. 20 out of every 100 patients commit a violent act (41% refused to discharge) B. 20% chance that the patient will commit a violent act (21% refused to discharge) Slovic/Monahan/MacGregor - 2000
  • 9. Quiz Which is more easily understood: A. A 30% chance of rain B. A 3 in 10 chance of rain
  • 10. 30% chance of rain Common misinterpretations:  It will rain in 30% of the area  It will rain 30% of the time  It will rain on 30% on days like this Gigerenzer/Edwards - 2003
  • 11. Problems with probability What the doctor said:  You have a 30% - 50% chance of developing a sexual problem What the patient heard:  In 30% - 50% of your sexual encounters, something will go awry Gigerenzer/Edwards - 2003
  • 12. Summary People tend to  Comprehend frequencies better than probability/percent  20 out of 100, rather than 20%  Focus on the numerator (and ignore the denominator)  9 out of 100 is bigger than 1 out of 10  Different expressions of equivalent data - e.g., 30 out of 1000 is more than 3 out of 10
  • 13. A study Purchase equipment for use in the event of an airline crash landing: A. Chance of saving 150 lives B. Chance of saving 98% of 150 lives Slovic et al. - 2002
  • 14. 85% is more than 100% Even 85% of 150 is more than “150”! Slovic et al. - 2002
  • 15. CalculationsProbability Frequency  1% of car trips result in an  100 out of 10,000 car trips accident. In 55% of the result in an accident. trips that result in an Among the 100 trips that accident, the driver is result in an accident, the drunk. In 5% of the car driver is drunk in 55 of trips that do not result in them. Among the 9900 car an accident, the driver is trips that don’t result in an drunk. If the driver is accident, the driver is drunk drunk, what is the in 500 of them. How many probability of an accident? car trips where the driver is drunk result in an accident?
  • 16. Study: Rates of return Allocate money across two investment funds – stocks v. bonds  Group A: shown 1-yr rates of return 63%  Group B: shown 30-yr rates of return 81% Benartzi/Thaler, 2001
  • 17. Data on the page 61% Versus75% Hibbard/Slovic/Peters/Finucane - 2002
  • 18. No neutral design What information – and how it is presented – drives decision outcomes
  • 19. Numeric ability Almost half of the general population has difficulty with simple numeric tasks National Adult Literacy Survey
  • 20. Numeracy Those who are numeric  Readily understand and use numeric data effectively Those who are non-numeric  Informed less by numbers, and more by other non-numeric sources of info
  • 21. Number format Best Practices
  • 22. Determine the right criteria Determine what decision criteria people should be using  Highlight them (salience)  Make it easy to evaluate, compute, & attach meaning
  • 23. Frequency v. probability Convey absolute risks over relative risks  3 out of 1000 will have a stroke is better than  50% higher chance of stroke  Don’t use decimals (.03)
  • 24. Apples to apples comparisons When presenting various probabilities, keep the denominator consistent  20 out of 1000 compared to 1 out of 1000 is better than  1 out of 50 compared to 1 out of 1000
  • 25. Attach meaning Use labels to show standard of performance  Example: unacceptable, acceptable, excellent  Labels provide expert guidance and easy mental processing
  • 26. Mapping A higher number means better quality  Reduces cognitive load  Subtle, but influential
  • 27. Quiz Which one results in better comprehension and better choices: A. Number of patients per registered nurse B. Number of registered nurses per 100 patients
  • 28. Variety of visual display
  • 29. Consecutive v. random Schapira/Nattinger/McHorney - 2001
  • 30. Placement of solid dots
  • 31. Conveying small risks To help people understand the meaning of small risks  Show context by providing a range of probabilities and risks for comparison  Example: being hit by a car v. x-rays v. lighting v. asbestos
  • 32. Emotion v. probability When consequences are marked by strong emotion  All or none – sensitive to the possibility rather than the probability
  • 33. Final thoughts Determine what info is most important  What should people base the decision on? Design for meaning and ease  Via context and comparison  Facilitate easy computation Test – multiple methods  Test drive, A/B testing, website metrics, think aloud, observe/probe in usability testing
  • 34. Questions/discussion Colleen Roller UX Matters Columnist on Decision Architecture http://uxmatters.com/
  • 35. Reference articles Simple Tools for Understanding Risks: From Innumeracy to Insight – G. Gigerenzer & A. Edwards, 2003 Numeracy and Decision Making – E. Peters et al., 2006 Numeracy and the Perception and Communication of Risk – E. Peters, 2008 Strategies for Reporting Health Plan Performance Information to Consumers: Evidence from Controlled Studies – J. Hibbard, et al., 2002 Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality – P. Slovic et al., 2004 Numeracy Skill and the Communication, Comprehension, and Use of Risk- Benefit Information – E. Peters et al., 2007 Reducing the Influence of Anecdotal Reasoning on People’s Health Care Decisions: Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Statistics? - A. Fagerlin et al., 2005 Bringing Meaning to Numbers: The Impact of Evaluative Categories on Decisions – E. Peters et al., 2009 When a 12.86% Mortality is More Dangerous than 24.14%: Implications for Risk Communication – K Yamagishi, 1997