FOTE09 - James Ballard & Richard Davis: Integrating VLEs with Repositories

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Event

    FOTE09 - James Ballard & Richard Davis: Integrating VLEs with Repositories - Presentation Transcript

    1. Interoperation: VLEs and Repositories   James Ballard Richard M. Davis ULCC FOTE 2009, 02/10/09
    2.  
      •  
      •  
      •  
      • "Interoperability is not enough... 
      • what we need now, 
      • is interoperatio n!"
      • Paul Walk (UKOLN) 2007
      • http://blog.paulwalk.net/2007/05/29/interoperability-is-not-enough/
    3. Repositories -> VLEs
      • Who might use a repository?
        •   Tutors
        •   Publishers
        •   Awarding Bodies
        •   Library / Learning Resources
        •   Students
    4. Repositories -> Moodle1.9
      • Each repository defines its own use:
        •   File Folders
        •   IMS / SCORM – MR CUTE
        •   NLN Materials
        •   Web-links
        •   Bespoke Integrations
    5. Moodle 2.0 - Repository API Separating content from delivery
    6. Repository File Picker
        • One interface to all available repositories
    7. Moodle and SWORD
      • CLASM Project:
        • Can we make it easy for tutors to deposit to institutional repository?
        • What benefits and value do repositories add to a VLE?
    8.           This slide intentionally left blank.
    9.  
    10. Digital repositories
        • Institutional Repository
          • Research outputs
          • Open Access
          • RAE/REF
        • Subject Repository
        • Learning Object Repository
        • Image/multimedia Repository
        • Other repositories
          • Code
          • Administrativia
          • ...
      •  
    11. Digital repositories
        • Institutional Repository
          • Research outputs
          • Open Access
          • RAE/REF
        • Subject Repository
        • Learning Object Repository
        • Image/multimedia Repository
        • Other repositories
          • Code
          • Administrativia
          • ...
      •  
    12. Digital repositories
        • Institutional Repository
          • Research outputs
          • Open Access
          • RAE/REF
        • Subject Repository
        • Learning Object Repository
        • Image/multimedia Repository
        • Other repositories
          • Code
          • Administrativia
          • ...
    13. Digital repositories
        • Institutional Repository
          • Research outputs
          • Open Access
          • RAE/REF
        • Subject Repository
        • Learning Object Repository
        • Image/multimedia Repository
        • Other repositories
          • Code
          • Administrativia
          • ...
    14. Digital repositories
        • Institutional Repository
          • Research outputs
          • Open Access
          • RAE/REF
        • Subject Repository
        • Learning Object Repository
        • Image/multimedia Repository
        • Other repositories
          • Administrativia
          • Code
          • ...
    15. Digital repositories:  a differentiation
      • ... differentiated from other digital collections by the following characteristics:
      •  
        • content is deposited in a repository, whether by the content creator, owner or third party
        • the repository architecture manages content and metadata
        • the repository offers a minimum set of basic services e.g. put, get, search, access control
        • the repository must be sustainable and trusted , well- supported and well-managed
      •  
      • Rachel Heery and Sheila Anderson (2005). Digital Repositories Review (UKOLN/AHDS/JISC). http://tinyurl.com/ybzxmqz
    16. CLASM: Another use for  repositories
      • Digitising and distributing copyright 
      • material for use in teaching/learning.
      •  
      • Copyright Licensing issues:
      • CLA requirements
        • control
        • audit
      •  
      • Institutional workflow involves
        • teaching staff - request
        • library staff - confirm, copy
        • student - access
    17. CLASM: Another use for  repositories
      • Digitising and distributing copyright 
      • material for use in teaching/learning.
      •  
      • Copyright Licensing issues:
      • CLA requirements
        • control
        • audit
      •  
      • Institutional workflow involves
        • teaching staff - request
        • library staff - confirm, copy
        • student - access
    18. CLASM: Workflow
    19. CLA www.CLA.co.uk
    20. CLASM
    21. The future is interoperational
    22. The future is interoperational
    23.   [email_address] r.davis@ulcc.ac.uk     South Park cartoons: www.sp-studio.de

    + University of London Computer Centre (ULCC)University of London Computer Centre (ULCC), 2 months ago

    custom

    88 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    James & Richard's talk at ULCC's Future of Technolo more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 88
      • 78 on SlideShare
      • 10 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 2
    Most viewed embeds
    • 10 views on http://fote-conference.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 10 views on http://fote-conference.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Groups / Events