Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Chapter 9 – Introduction to Contracts

2,758

Published on

Powerpoint from textbook Business Law - the ethical, global, and e-commerce environment to accompany BA 330 course at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Powerpoint from textbook Business Law - the ethical, global, and e-commerce environment to accompany BA 330 course at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Published in: Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
2,758
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
39
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Donald Lambert and Don Barron were friends and had a long-standing professional relationship based on their public service together on the Louisiana State Board of Licensed Contractors from the 1980s. In 1998, Barron’s business began experiencing financial strain. Barron and Lambert talked by phone during the summer of 1998 about Barron’s personal problems and financial difficulties, and Lambert was concerned about his friend’s depressed mental state. On November 11, 1998, Lambert flew from New Orleans to Farmerville to meet with Barron. Prior to Lambert’s flight, Barron’s employee had faxed and overnighted copies of various construction contracts and correspondence relating to Barron’s problematic construction projects for Lambert to review. Lambert contends that, while standing on the airport runway before he boarded the plane for his return trip home that day, he and Barron contracted for Lambert to provide consulting services for Barron. Lambert told Barron at that time that he customarily charged his clients $3,100 per month, and the minimum term for his services was one year. He also charged 10 percent of any amount recouped by his clients in settlement. In late 2000, Lambert billed Barron for a $34,100 balance owed on the alleged oral contract. Lambert’s letter dated October 30, 2000, requested payment and stated, “I have preformed (sic) my service for you and I must request that you pay me the balance due me of $34,100.” Two weeks later, Barron wrote Lambert a letter rejecting the claim. Lambert sued. The trial court dismissed Lambert’s suit, and Lambert appealed.
  • Court: “This case involves the special setting of parties with a prior friendship and the aid and advice freely given between friends that existed before Lambert first broached the subject of a consulting contract…. From our review of the testimony of the two men, we also conclude that there was no clear agreement given by Barron…. Absent a direct oral or written acceptance by Barron, Lambert’s proof of the contract rests on his receipt of certain documentation of Barron’s troubled construction projects and invoices for consulting fees sent to Barron. The bulk of the documentation regarding Barron’s five construction projects was forwarded to Lambert days before the Farmerville meeting. Lambert’s review of the details of those construction contracts and Barron’s problems with the projects would have been performed in preparation for the Farmerville meeting without any contract binding his friend. More importantly, Barron provided Lambert that documentation without any indication that his friend’s review of the projects would require compensation…. From our review of this evidence, we find that the trial court could determine that no tacit acceptance of Lambert’s offer for services was made by Barron. Particularly lacking from the record is evidence of any substantive business benefit realized by Barron from his consultant friend. The trial court ultimately held that the parties’ relationship was that of a “friend helping a friend,” such that Lambert could not have reasonably believed that a contract had been formed.”
  • Click to add notes
  • Click to add notes
  • Click to add notes
  • Click to add notes
  • Number of CISG parties as of 11-20-08. Hyperlink is to the CISG texts on the UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) website.
  • Click to add notes
  • Click to add notes
  • Hyperlink is to the opinion (pdf format) on the court’s website.
  • Click to add notes
  • False. False. The elements include (1) agreement (offer and acceptance) (2) between competent parties (3) based on genuine assent of the parties that is (4) supported by consideration, (5) made for a lawful purpose, and (6) in the form required by law, if any . True. True. False. The UCC applies ONLY to the sale of goods.
  • The correct answer is (c). (a) refers to a valid contract. (b) refers to a voidable contract.
  • The correct answer is (c). The CISG is an international body of law regarding the sale of goods.
  • Opportunity to discuss the contracting each person does almost every day.
  • Transcript

    • 1. Introduction to Contracts The Agreement: Offer The Agreement: Acceptance Consideration Reality of Consent© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
    • 2. Capacity to Contract Illegality Writing Rights of Third Parties Performance and Remedies© 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
    • 3. Introduction to Contracts Contracts are agreements made up of big words and little type. Sam Ewing, quoted in Saturday Evening Post May 1993 © 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
    • 4. Learning Objectives Nature of contracts Basic elements of a contract Basic contract types Non-contract obligations9-4
    • 5. Contracts Not every promise is legally enforceable But when a set of promises has the status of contract, a person injured by a breach of that contract is entitled to call on the government (courts) to force the breaching party to honor the contract Contract law is ancient law, but has evolved to reflect social change9-5
    • 6. Elements of a Contract (1) agreement (2) between competent parties (3) based on genuine assent of the parties that is (4) supported by consideration, (5) made for a lawful purpose, and (6) in the form required by law, if any See Figure 1, page 2929-6
    • 7. Lambert v. Barron Facts:  Lambert and Barron had friendly as well as professional relationship  Barron had financial troubles, so Lambert flew from New Orleans to Farmerville to meet with Barron  Lambert claims that he and Barron orally contracted for Lambert to provide consulting services for one year at a monthly rate of $3100  Barron paid one invoice, but refused to pay on a second, claiming that he had not agreed to such a price or term9-7
    • 8. Lambert v. Barron Procedural History and Issue:  Lambert sued for breach of contract and lost  Issue on appeal: was there a valid contract? Trial Court Ruling:  Two competing views without evidence that contract was formed or that substantive business benefit was realized by Barron from his friend  No contract formed, lower court ruling affirmed9-8
    • 9. Contract Concepts and Types Bilateral contracts: two parties make promises to one another Unilateral contracts: one party makes a promise  Frequent buyer cards are offers for unilateral contracts; gaining points on the cards accept the offer and create a contract9-9
    • 10. Contract Concepts and Types  Valid contract: binding and enforceable agreement  Voidable contract: agreement otherwise binding, but due to circumstances surrounding execution or lack of capacity, may be rejected at option of one party  Void contract: agreement without legal effect because prohibited by law9 - 10
    • 11. Contract Concepts and Types  Express contract: agreement of parties manifested by words, written or oral  Implied contract: agreement not shown by words, but by acts and conduct of parties  Difference between express & implied contracts relates to manner of proving the existence of the contract, not the effect; one or the other arises9 - 11
    • 12. Sources of Governing Law  Two bodies of law govern contracts:  Article 2 of Uniform Commercial Code  Common law of contracts  Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is statutory law in every state, but the common law of contracts is evolving  UCC contains nine articles9 - 12
    • 13. UCC Article 2  Article 2 expressly applies to contracts for the sale of goods [2–102] (numbers in brackets refer to specific Code sections)  UCC [1–105]: goods are tangible, movable, personal property  Does not apply to sale of services, intangible property (stocks, intellectual property), or real estate9 - 13
    • 14. The UCC and Hybrid Contracts  Many contracts involve goods and services  Test that courts most frequently apply to decide whether Article 2 applies is to ask which element – goods or services – predominates in the contract  See Pass v. Shelby Aviation9 - 14
    • 15. The UCC or Common Law9 - 15
    • 16. International Contract Law  United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) is body of contract rules that harmonizes contract principles from many legal systems  Seventy-one nations, including the United States and Canada, are parties to the CISG  See UN Commission on International Trade Law website9 - 16
    • 17. International Contract Law  CISG automatically applies to a contract for the sale of goods between commercial parties from nations that agreed to the CISG unless the parties expressly opt out of the CISG in their contract9 - 17
    • 18. Non-Contract Obligations  Sometimes the law enforces an obligation to pay for certain losses or benefits even in the absence of mutual agreement and exchange of value; the court then applies:  Quasi-contract theory  Promissory estoppel9 - 18
    • 19. Quasi-Contract Theory  Quasi-contract is an obligation imposed by law to prevent unjust enrichment of one party in certain circumstances  E.g., work performed by painter thinking work justified by contract & other party, who receives benefit of work, denies work was justified  E.g., minor buys something but wrecks it, agreement is void by law, but the minor must pay the damages9 - 19
    • 20. Quasi-Contract Remedies  Plaintiff recovers either the reasonable value of the benefit conferred on the defendant (reasonable price) or value of labor (quantum meruit)9 - 20
    • 21. Promissory Estoppel  A court may apply doctrine of promissory estoppel when one party relies upon another party’s promise to his or her detriment (detrimental reliance), but there’s no contract  Court will force promisor to fulfill promise or pay compensation  Example: Holt v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.9 - 21
    • 22. Holt v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. Facts & Procedural History:  Holt was a Home Depot manager for four years  Home Depot assured employees that an open- door policy allowed complaints to management about supervisors without penalty  Home Depot moved Holt and family to Connecticut, but soon after, Holt began to have difficulties with his immediate supervisor  Holt told a senior manager about the problems  Called Impact Line to begin formal complaint  Six days later, Home Depot fired Holt9 - 22
    • 23. Holt v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. Procedural History:  Holt sued claiming promissory estoppel  Jury found for Holt, awarding $467,000 damages Appellate Decision and Ruling:  Jury could reasonably find that Home Depot’s promise not to retaliate against employees was so clear and emphatic that Holt could reasonably believe it was inviolable; evidence indicated Holt terminated because of complaint about supervisor9 - 23
    • 24. Review9- 24
    • 25. Test Your Knowledge True=A, False = B  Every promise is legally enforceable  The main element of a contract is fairness  In a bilateral contract, two parties make promises to one another  The UCC is statutory law in every state  The UCC applies to the sale of goods and services9 - 25
    • 26. Test Your Knowledge Multiple Choice  A void contract refers to an agreement that is: (a) Binding and enforceable agreement (b) Otherwise binding, but due to circumstances surrounding execution or lack of capacity, may be rejected at option of one party (c) Without legal effect because prohibited by law9 - 26
    • 27. Test Your Knowledge Multiple Choice  Non-contract obligations include all of the following except: (a) Quasi-contract theory (b) Promissory estoppel (c) The CISG doctrine (d) Quantum meruit9 - 27
    • 28. Thought Question What contracts have you entered into recently?9 - 28

    ×