9922610 Trista 論文寫作二

383 views
339 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
383
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
39
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

9922610 Trista 論文寫作二

  1. 1. Enhancing self-regulated learningskills through the implementationof an e-portfolio tool Presenter: Tsui-Yu Trista Lin Instructor: Dr. Pi-Ying Teresa Hsu Date: March 23rd , 2011 1
  2. 2. Citation 2
  3. 3. Contents IntroductionLiterature Review Methodology Results Conclusions Reflections 3
  4. 4. IntroductionLiterature Review Methodology Results Conclusions Reflections 4
  5. 5. IntroductionThe e-portfolio as a tool forconstructing and managing students’ own knowledge 5
  6. 6. IntroductionLiterature Review Methodology Results Conclusions Reflections 6
  7. 7. Literature Review 7
  8. 8. 8
  9. 9. E-portfolios: purposes and processes 9
  10. 10. E-portfolio in Self-regulated Learning 10
  11. 11. Purpose 11
  12. 12. Research question 12
  13. 13. IntroductionLiterature Review Methodology Results Conclusions Reflections 13
  14. 14. Methodology Participants 41 undergraduate students Location University of Piraeus, Greece SLSQ, TACONET, TELEPEERS Instrument MySelf e-Portfolio, Self-monitoring rubrics Period 2009 Spring Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient,Statistical analyses Pearson r correlation 14
  15. 15. Procedure• Learning strategies • Gathering• Prior domain information specific knowledge • Self-regulation about e-portfolio assignment• Self presentation • Self-judgments• Goal setting • Self-reaction• Strategic planning • Rubrics of self- monitoring 15
  16. 16. IntroductionLiterature Review Methodology Results Conclusions Reflections 16
  17. 17. 17
  18. 18. 18
  19. 19. Self-assessment Myself e- portfolio rubrics Self- Student’s Self-regulation engagement monitoring learning α= 0.886 α= 0.754 α= 0.970 19
  20. 20. ‘Forethought Phase’ ‘Performance ‘Self-Reflection’ ‘Self- Pearson Correlation Control’ .461** Reflection’ .543* Cognitive Factors Sig(2-taliled) .004 .000 Pearson Correlation .478** .569** Motivational Factors Sig(2-taliled) .002 .002 Affective Factors Pearson Correlation .514** .620** Sig(2-taliled) .001 .000 Pearson Correlation .468** .370* Social Factors Sig(2-taliled) .003 .022Note: *Correlation is significant 0.05 level (2-tailed). **Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). 20
  21. 21. IntroductionLiterature Review Methodology Results Conclusions Reflections 21
  22. 22. Conclusions 22
  23. 23. IntroductionLiterature Review Methodology Results Conclusions Reflections 23
  24. 24. Reflections 24
  25. 25. Reflections 25
  26. 26. 26
  27. 27. 27
  28. 28. 28
  29. 29. 29
  30. 30. 30
  31. 31. 31
  32. 32. 32
  33. 33. 33
  34. 34. 34
  35. 35. 35
  36. 36. 36
  37. 37. 37
  38. 38. 38
  39. 39. 39
  40. 40. 40
  41. 41. 41
  42. 42. 42
  43. 43. 43
  44. 44. 44
  45. 45. 45
  46. 46. 46
  47. 47. 47
  48. 48. 48

×