Getting From Understanding to Execution: Making Implicit Processes Actionable and Measurable

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Group

    Getting From Understanding to Execution: Making Implicit Processes Actionable and Measurable - Presentation Transcript

    1. Angelo Baratta President Performance innovation Getting From Understanding to Execution
    2. What is the constraint?
      • At any given point in time
      • There is at least one constraint
      • Which limits a system's performance
      • Relative to its goal
      • Finding that constraint and dealing with it should be a key management activity.
    3. OrgChart view  Command & Control
      • Single component – people
      • Personal vantage point.
      • Doesn’t provide a full picture.
      • Who is responsible?
      • Who did this or didn’t do this?
      • Who gets blame/credit?
      • Who should we replace ….?
      Vantage Point responsibility
    4. Process Vantage Point  Customer View
        • Do we understand the need that we are trying to fulfill?
        • How well is the process fulfilling the needs?
        • How effectively is the need being fulfilled? How much waste is in the process?
        • What element should we change in order to do better?
        •  Multiple integrated components
      responsibility  accountability 
    5. Performance Management Tools & Techniques (Lean, Root-Cause …) 1 2 3 4
    6. Full Process Framework
      • A process is a mechanism of interdependent components for fulfilling a customer need:
        • That produces a defined output
        • From some consumed input
        • Using a sequence of operations – the transform method
        • Executed by an operator - people and/or technology
        • Based on a mental model and emotional mindset .
        • Exhibiting measurable performance
      Transform
    7. Anatomy of a process
      • We sell the product of 3 by 3 numbers
    8. Task Method via example
      • Alternative ways to define the method:
      • Task level flow
      • Example
      • Procedure
    9. 3 Tier Model for Account ability
      • What we do.
        • We execute tasks to produce an output. Tasks relate to functions and jobs.
      • What’s left when we’re done.
        • We produce an output in order to achieve an outcome. Outputs relate a culmination of tasks & the flow of value.
      •  What we got out of it.
        • We achieve an outcome to fulfill a vision. Outcomes relate to system goals.
    10. Output Model
    11. Separate value effort from drag effort – 3 Streams pure waste drag burden Value throughput waste
    12. 3 Tiers + 3 Streams = big picture Value Stream Control Stream Failure Stream Actual RE/FM Predicted RE/FM Ideal – Zero Risk
    13. Add controls
    14. Add failure
    15. Org Chart focused view  Task objective bias Functional/Individual objectives
    16. Process Performance Framework change change P D C A
    17. Thank You!
      • Angelo Baratta
      • President
      • Performance Innovation
      • Contact Information:
      • 905-270-7591
      • [email_address]

    + Nathaniel PalmerNathaniel Palmer, 2 years ago

    custom

    393 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 393
      • 393 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 33
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories

    Groups / Events