Oliver Thomae, R.P.F.
3116-5th St. South
Cranbrook, B.C., V1C 6H7
250 426-3122 arbourtech@telus.net
Al Skucas, Director, Rockies Region
Trails B.C.
3200-4th St. South
Cranbrook, B.C.
V1C 5N5
July, 30 2005
Dear Al Skucas,
Re: Assessment of Nelway to Yahk Route Options
I am pleased to submit the draft report describing the assessment of the Nelway to Yahk trail
route options we discussed.
This report is based on the best readily available information pertaining to the area of interest.
Map data was obtained from the Geographic Data B.C. warehouse, forest companies and other
sources. Most features are current but some are a few years old which means that there may be
minor changes in land ownership and road development and deactivation which are not captured
in this mapping. However, overall it should provide a fairly realistic picture of jurisdictions and
interests which are traversed by the route.
Thank you for choosing ArbourTech for this project.
Yours truly,
Oliver Thomae, R.P.F.
ArbourTech Forest Management Services
Encl.: Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report

Trans Canada Trail
Nelway to Yahk
Route Assessment Report
Prepared for:
Al Skucas, Regional Director, Trails B.C.
Prepared by: Oliver Thomae, R.P.F.
ArbourTech Forest Management Services
July, 2005

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 3
Table of Contents
1.0 Acknowledgements: ......................................................................................................................................................... 4
2.0 Summary:.......................................................................................................................................................................... 5
3.0 Background: ..................................................................................................................................................................... 6
4.1 B.C. Government Guiding Principles:........................................................................................................................ 8
4.2 Trans Canada Trail Foundation Guiding Principles: ............................................................................................... 9
4.3 Other Considerations ................................................................................................................................................. 10
6.0 Methods:.......................................................................................................................................................................... 12
7.0 Route Area Description: ................................................................................................................................................ 12
8.0 Route Options:................................................................................................................................................................ 16
8.1 Nelway to Kootenay Summit ..................................................................................................................................... 16
8.11 Nelway-Stagleap Sector via Rosebud Lake and Stagleap Creek...................................................................... 16
8.12 Nelway – Lost Pass Sector ................................................................................................................................... 22
8.2 Kootenay Summit to Creston .................................................................................................................................... 27
8.21 Stagleap – Creston Sector via Monk, Boundary and Dodge Creek ................................................................ 28
8.22 Lost Pass – Creston Sector via Corn Creek ...................................................................................................... 34
8.23 Stagleap – Creston Sector via Summit Creek ................................................................................................... 39
8.3 Creston to Yahk.......................................................................................................................................................... 45
8.31 Creston–Yahk Sector via Thompson Mountain ............................................................................................... 46
8.32 Creston-Yahk Sector via Birch Creek ............................................................................................................... 49
8.33 Creston to Yahk via Mt. Thompson midslope. ................................................................................................. 57
8.34 Creston to Yahk Sector via Arrow and Kid Creek Options ............................................................................ 58
9.0 Route Development Costs .............................................................................................................................................. 62
10.0 Discussion: .................................................................................................................................................................... 63
11.0 Implementation Steps: ................................................................................................................................................. 65
12.0 Conclusions:.................................................................................................................................................................. 67
13.0 Recommendations: ....................................................................................................................................................... 68
14.0 References:.................................................................................................................................................................... 68
Appendix 1 Trail Classification Ratings Adapted from B.C. Parks Trail Planning and Construction Manual......... 69
Appendix 2 Contact List ..................................................................................................................................................... 70

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 4
1.0 Acknowledgements:
The following people contributed valuable advice, assistance and/or information which supported the
development of this report.
Al Skucas, Regional Director, Trails B.C., Rockies Region
Alex Johnston Creston Resident
Anja Tolman B.C. Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management
Arn von Maydell Area Manager, Bridges, Ministry of Transportation
Dave Waugh Regional District of Central Kootenay
Gillian Cooper Creston Valley Wildlife Center
Grant Irvine Senior Transportation Planning Engineer
Hans Buchwald Vector Road Landowner
Jack Marra Tembec Industries Inc.
Jack and Janet Sadler Proprietors of Yahk General Store
Jeff Nicolajsen GIS Department, Regional District of East Kootenay
Jim Smith Creston Valley Forest Corp.
Keith Vonk Lost Creek Resident
Kevin Maloney Nelway Resident and Forestry Technician
Lawrence Lavender Councillor, Town of Creston
Leon Mueller Councillor, Town of Creston
Lola Monty Stagleap Ranch
Lou Comin and John Solly Backcountry Horsemen
Mike Leblanc Trans Canada Trail Foundation Coordinator
Mike Pascuzzo (and Chris Kulak) Woodlands Manager, J.H. Huscroft Ltd.
Pat Smith Creston Trails Committee
Peter Rodenstein, David Sachs Imasco Minerals Inc.
Ralph Moore East Kootenay Environmental Society
Raymond Gaudart Trails B.C., Director, West Kootenays
Rick Logan Kootenay Lake Forest District
Rob Babiarz Ministry of Forests Engineering Officer
Roy Simon Jenson Creek Landowner
Salmo Public Library Historical Dewdney Trail Information
Steve Flett Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 5
2.0 Summary:
The area of interest for this assessment lies within the Selkirk and southwestern Purcell mountain ranges.
Terrain is rugged, and development of various kinds occupies the valley corridors.
Local volunteers, resource companies and government staff were consulted to catalogue route options which
have been or could be considered for the Trans Canada Trail from Nelway to Yahk. Additional route concepts
delineated from mapping were also added. Most routes were visited in the field, and characterized using
resource inventory mapping, to allow for their comparison.
The area of interest was split into 3 sectors, Nelway to the Kootenay Summit, Kootenay Summit to Creston, and
Creston to Yahk. In each sector at least 3 route options are possible to travel west-east.
Unfortunately no route option is vastly superior to others, making the choice of an option a challenge. All
options have a balance of features of interest as well as issues. Several issues identified have the potential to
knock an option out of consideration. For example, highway bridges without pedestrian capability, private land
blocking access, or a road through Indian Reserve each have the potential to become an irresolvable barrier.
The single most critical factor in making any of the routes proposed workable, is a crossing of the Kootenay
River in the Creston valley. The two sequential bridges on Highway 3 do not have full pedestrian capacity. An
alternative exists for the western bridge, and there may be a solution in offsetting the roadway slightly on the
main channel bridge to allow a dedicated pedestrian walkway. Discussions with Ministry of Transportation
which were started in the late 1990s need to be resumed to implement a solution. Several other smaller highway
bridges have similar limitations but they may be easier to resolve. Meanwhile, users continue to travel across
the bridges as they are.
If the bridge/river crossings can be resolved it will be possible to develop a trail route which can accommodate
at least two modes-of-transport, likely hiking and cycling. There are portions of each route option which can
accommodate horses, cross country-skiing and/or snowmobiling as well.
The most optimistic route options, once bridge crossing issues are resolved, could be developed for
approximately $50,000, or less if volunteers are capable and willing to take on the work. However, if bridges
and highways require separate trail corridors, and additional trail is required to circumnavigate private lands, the
total cost could well be 10 times that amount, and little opportunity will be available for volunteers to do the
work.
A route option that can be implemented by 2010 is outlined. A more direct route which accommodates more
modes-of-transport and more average Canadians could be developed over a slightly longer time frame.
Due to the uncertainty over trail routing, lack of signage and marking, and rugged terrain; trail use and demand
for trail use in this area remain low. Local volunteers who worked with enthusiasm on trail planning and
development a few years ago need support and assistance to overcome the enormous administrative and physical
challenges involved with trail establishment.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 6
3.0 Background:
In the late 1990’s a citizen’s initiative to establish a trail across Canada was begun. Preliminary scoping by
project leaders identified a general route through southern British Columbia not unlike the historic Dewdney
Trail which linked Victoria and Vancouver to Ft. Steele in 1865, roughly along today’s Highway 3 corridor.
Transport modes for the new trail are to include hiking, cycling, horses, cross-country skiing and snowmobiling
where terrain and weather conditions allow.
The current map of the designated route as found on the B.C. Trans Canada Trail web site is as follows:
Although considerable route assessment work has been done by numerous dedicated volunteers and contractors,
the trail route from Nelway to Yahk is still somewhat uncertain. This route section is characterized by portions
of steep and high terrain, a mixture of private and crown lands, and a variety of utility and transport corridors.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 7
The Chamber of Commerce office in Creston gets frequent enquiries on the Trans Canada Trail, and have been
telling people it is not finished here yet, encouraging them to pick up the trail elsewhere. They would like to be
able to direct visitors to useable trails.
This project was initiated to work with volunteers to assess the route options in consideration of the diverse
challenges this segment poses, and to assist Trails B.C. to select a preferred route for seeking approvals,
registration and development.
For the purpose of this assessment Nelway is given as the western control point1, and Yahk is the eastern control
point. These points were specified by the Director, Rockies Region, Trails B.C. considering that the route from
the west to Nelway is fairly certain and useable, and a previous route assessment report indicates a route from
Yahk to Cranbrook would be feasible.
Amenities are available 25 km north of Nelway in Salmo, and directly en-route in Creston and Yahk.
Scenic Pend O’Reille river west of Nelway Pastoral views near Nelway.
1
A field check was made comparing the Salmo River route against the Pend O’Reille road route to Nelway to ascertain
that this should indeed be the western control point. The Salmo river road had been suggested by previous trail
planners, as it was the Dewdney Trail, and has better alignment. However the road is rough, poorly maintained,
remote, and is blocked by private land and the Salmo River. Owner Kevin Maloney is opposed to having the trail cross
his property. According to Raymond Gaudart, to circumvent this private land, a potential crossing of the Salmo river
was considered using a Ministry of Transportation bailey bridge possibly to be installed by Canadian military near an
existing water monitoring station. However, the Salmo river at the potential crossing site is wide with poor natural
abutments. Overall, this route has limited features of interest and requires extensive work, in comparison to
continuing along the Pend O’Reille road, which is currently useable, regularly maintained, has light traffic and is very
scenic.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 8
4.0 Guiding Principles
4.1 B.C. Government Guiding Principles:
The following guiding principles are quoted from the B.C. Trans Canada Trail website. Emphasis has been
added by this writer.
Guiding Principles for the Trans Canada Trail in British Columbia
These Guiding Principles provide broad policy direction for managers and users of the Trans Canada Trail in
British Columbia and are subject to the legislation, regulations and policies of British Columbia. A companion
document being developed (The Users Code of Ethics) provides trail users with further information regarding
trail etiquette. These principles are endorsed by the Province of British Columbia, the Trails Society of British
Columbia and the Trans Canada Trail Foundation. It should be recognized that the primary emphasis is to
ensure that hikers can use the entire trail by the year 2000 and that the trail may not be open for all users by
that time.
1: The Trans Canada Trail in BC (TCT) will provide a continuous recreational corridor from Victoria to the
Alberta border. There will also be a portion of the TCT through northeastern BC, providing a link between
Alberta and the Yukon. Wherever possible, practical, and safe to do so it will make use of existing trails and
corridors.
2: A Trans Canada Trail through BC will exist in perpetuity. Where necessary, the specific route may be
relocated to 1) meet public safety requirements; 2) address geotechnical concerns and/or environmental
impacts; or 3) address significant land and resource development interests.
3: The trail will support the following core uses where appropriate and supported by the local community and
managing agency: hiking, cross country skiing, bicycling, horseback riding and snowmobiling.
4: The Trans Canada Trail as a whole is not intended to be a linear park or protected area. Portions of the trail
run through existing parks and protected areas. Designation of future parks and protected areas is an outcome of
broader land use planning processes such as Land and Resource Management Plans (LRMP), and such areas
may incorporate parts of the Trans Canada Trail.
5: The trail will seek to highlight and respect the natural and cultural heritage of British Columbia.
6: Management of the trail shall take place at the most local level possible.
7: Trail managers will practice a "good neighbor" policy with adjacent landowners and leaseholders.
8: It is recognized that the trail will traverse a variety of landscapes in BC, including parks and protected areas,
urban and rural landscapes, working forests and other landscapes modified by resource development activities.
In some locations, resource development activities will occur adjacent to, across, under, above or on the
trail.
9: The trail will contribute to the social and economic well being of the province by providing appropriate
recreational, economic and educational opportunities.
10: The establishment of the Trans Canada Trail is done without prejudice to First Nations treaty
negotiations.
11: Trail designation and management will be consistent with regional and sub-regional land use plans.
12: In some instances, certain routes may be identified and recognized as interim until such time as a more
suitable alignment can be secured.
13: Not all portions of the trail will support all uses, or be passable in all seasons. Sections may be closed
temporarily to meet public safety or environmental objectives, and sections may not be open to some of the five

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 9
core uses. Different route alignments may be established to support the range of trail uses (i.e., trail users may
be separated on certain segments, either by using different routes, or by physically separating users on the
same route).
14: Proposed route alignments and design standards will be cost effective, considering costs of trail
construction and maintenance and probable levels and types of use.
15: Existing legal motorized access will continue. Changes in usage may occur following community and
agency consultation.
16: Where the trail is on private or leased Crown land, formal agreements will be sought as required with
landowners and leaseholders. The trail will not use private or leased Crown lands without the consent of the
land or lease holder; where agreements cannot be reached, alternate routes will be established. Lands will not be
expropriated for the purposes of the trail.
17: Existing resource management commitments on Crown lands will continue. Future commitments can be
made and will consider the existence of the trail through existing planning processes.
4.2 Trans Canada Trail Foundation Guiding Principles:
Community Support The essential ingredient of any trail is that it be embraced by the
community it is intended to serve. Any proposed route of the Trans
Canada Trail that cannot demonstrate broad-based community support must
be re-considered.
Sustainability A trail requires ongoing investment in the form of management,
maintenance, patrolling, amenities etc.. To sustain a trail over time, there
must be a dedicated group in place that assumes this responsibility and is
accountable to the community. Community support is the cornerstone to
trail sustainability.
Infrastructure Travelers on the Trans Canada Trail will require basic amenities to ensure a
rewarding experience on the Trail. Infrastructure such as food,
accommodation, fuel, access to tourist information must be available to the
traveler to a reasonable degree. Travelers must be made to feel welcome in
the community. Once again, the development of adequate infrastructure
on a trail begins with community acceptance and support of the trail.
Degree of Difficulty The Trans Canada Trail is intended to be accessible to the “average
traveler” as distinct from the traveler seeking and capable of “extreme
experiences”. The route of the Trail should, wherever the Canadian
geography permits, be accessible to travelers that are in average physical
shape and have average competence as hikers, cyclists, horseback riders,
cross-country skiers or snowmobilers.
Safety Traveler safety is of utmost importance on any trail. Routing decisions must
be first and foremost predicated on the security of the users.
Experiential The route of the Trail must strive to provide the traveler with typical
Canadian experiences. The Trail should be viewed as a stage for a
distinctive and memorable experience in history, culture, nature, geology,
adventure etc.. The Trail is more than just a path on the ground, it should
connect and involve travelers in the wonders and activities of the area.
Time to Complete The Trans Canada Trail is striving to be substantially complete by 2010.
Any proposed route that cannot be realistically completed by that date

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 10
must be re-considered, even if it is officially registered – other routing
options must be identified.
4.3 Other Considerations
In addition to the guiding principles, the following considerations were used to guide route selection and
assessment:
• Avoid private land.
• Incorporate existing features and facilities.
• Keep trail grades to under 10% wherever possible.
• Trail routes should be as direct as possible, minimizing elevation range.
• The lowest elevation route that would bypass obstacles and private land is preferred.
• Use routes with lowest levels of motorized use.
• Respect local and Provincial recreation access zoning.
• Select routes that minimize the amount of additional maintenance required to keep trail serviceable.
• Highways, except low speed limit portions through urban areas, are not considered suitable for horses
• Public roads are not considered suitable for skiing or snowmobiling
• Cross-country skiing and snowmobiling are limited to elevations over 1200m to ensure a reasonable
quality of snow and duration of use.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 11
5.0 Previous Route Assessments:
Over the past several years, Trans Canada Trail routes have been proposed by volunteers and contractors
working on trail planning using limited available resources.
1) Initial work by trail volunteers was mapped onto Forest Cover and other map bases, and digitized by the B.C.
Government Land Use Coordination Office (LUCO) in 1998 and posted on the B.C. Government data ftp
site2. Some routes were fairly precise as they followed existing roads or trails, and others were more general
concepts.
The LUCO mapping indicates the trail bypassing Nelway following the Salmo river eastward from just
northwest of Remac along the Salmo River road to Highway 6, from where two options are shown.
The southern option proceeds north to the Highway 3/6 junction and east along Highway 3. Just east of the
junction, it proceeds east along the Lost creek road to Lost creek pass, appearing to follow either the gas line or
powerline corridor over the pass, and down to the Highway 3 chainup area. Here it crosses Highway 3 and
proceeds south on the Char creek road and a new trail connector proceeds south over a 1900m pass and back
down to the Monk creek Forest Service Road. On this road it proceeds eastward, following an old road
connector into the upper Priest River and along the Boundary creek road. A steep powerline road is depicted to
connect to the Dodge creek Forest Service road leading down into the Creston valley. From the west side of the
valley, a system of dykes is followed parallel to the International border and a water crossing over the Kootenay
river is shown over to Rykerts and up along Highway 21 to Creston.
The northern option also shares the Lost Creek route over the Kootenay summit and across Highway 3 into Char
creek, but immediately turns east along Summit creek appearing to use partly the gas line right-of-way, and
partly new trail, to the Creston Valley. The LUCO mapping does not indicate this trail following some old road
segments mapped in its proximity, but there appears to have been the potential to locate a few kilometers of this
route on old road grades. In the Creston valley, the route follows the dyke along the Kootenay river north along
dykes next to the Kootenay River channel, crossing the Kootenay river near Duck Lake, continuing northeast
along the northern Duck lake dyke, and up Highway 3a to Kuskanook, where it proceeds northeast along
Boulder creek, Skelly creek and via Perry creek into Cranbrook. As this route does not share the control point
(Yahk) specified for this project, it was not considered in this assessment.
2) The results of work by West Kootenay trail volunteers was captured in a publication by Mussio Ventures
and Trails B.C. titled Trans Canada Trail, the British Columbia Route, copyright 2001.
The Mussio Ventures guide indicates a primary trail route, alternatives and future route options as follows:
The indicated route comes east from Waneta along the Pend D’Oreille river road onto the Salmo river road,
bypassing Nelway. It then crosses the Salmo river to use Highway 6 to travel northward to the Highway 3/6
junction. From here it follows Highway 3 eastward to the Lost creek road and continues up this road over the
Kootenay summit along the original Dewdney trail. From the summit area it continues eastward to connect to
Highway 3 at the chain-up area east of Stagleap Park. An alternate route would use the Highway 3 corridor
through Kootenay summit in Stagleap Park. An additional alternate route would exit Highway 3 at the Stagleap
Park summit on the Monk Creek Forest Service road to Boundary creek and on to Dodge creek leading to the
Creston valley. Highway 3 is indicated as the primary route from the Kootenay summit to Creston, with a future
route indicated on the south side of Summit creek. All routes indicated would use the Kootenay river bridge in
Creston to cross the Kootenay river. The main route continues east along Highway 3 through Creston, with an
alternate indicated along the Lakeview-Arrow creek road north of Creston. Highway 3 is indicated as the
primary route east of Creston to Yahk, with an “abandoned rail” line shown as proposed route to Yahk as well.
One additional alternate follows Kidd creek to the Moyie river drainage bypassing Yahk.
2
ftp://nelftp.env.gov.bc.ca/pub/outgoing/data/luco/

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 12
3) The Regional District of Central Kootenay commissioned a report prepared by Hanne Smith-Heintz in
March 2001, entitled Trans Canada Trail, Linking Communities Initiative, Kootenay Loop Trail Project, Final
Report. This project was a cooperative effort by “four trail stewardship groups, several communities and the
Regional District of Central Kootenay, in an effort to make progress on the vision of linking communities to the
Trans Canda Trail via trails”. Funding was provided by the Ministry of Community Development, Cooperatives
and Volunteers. The report depicts the Trans Canada Trail along the Salmo river and then proceeding eastward
along Lost creek. A connector trail is proposed along the Highway 3/6 corridor to Salmo, Nelson and Castlegar.
4) As noted in the introduction, the current Trails B.C. Trans Canada Trail website indicates the route
approximately along the Highway 3 (Crowsnest Highway) corridor.
6.0 Methods:
1) Digital map data was requested and obtained from the Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management. Data
supplied was limited to contours, water features, and partial roads coverage. The Kootenay Lake and Arrow-
Boundary forest districts provided additional data for land ownership. More current roads mapping was
provided by Tembec Inc., J.H. Huscroft Ltd., Creston Valley Forest Corp. and B.C. Timber Sales.
2) Trails B.C. Director, Al Skucas, provided existing paper background maps, and information on route location
reconnaissance work which he and others had already conducted. A variety of reference materials were also
provided including current route mapping, trail standards etc.
3) Trail volunteers were contacted to obtain updated information on route concepts they had in mind, or thought
might be viable.
4) Field reconnaissance was undertaken to assess route concepts for their technical, logistical and jurisdictional
feasibility. Reconnaissance work attempted to connect existing trails and low use roads in consideration of the
TCT Foundation objective of accommodating average Canadians. In consideration of travelers attempting to
traverse extensive portions of the Provincial or National trail, route concepts sought to provide reasonably direct
alignment, with minimal drastic elevation changes, , while at the same time either directly or indirectly
incorporating features and views.
5) Route reconnaissance was recorded by Global Positioning System for transfer to digital mapping.
6) Primary route options are shown as solid line, with alternates shown in dashed line. The routes are
segmented into uniform characteristics which are then recorded in a spreadsheet table.
7) Route segments are classified into categories representing their current condition, mode of transport
capability and required development. Approximate cost estimates for development activities are computed.
8) Each segment is described and discussed in the report text.
9) A route assessment comparison matrix was prepared.
7.0 Route Area Description:
Nelway is situated at an elevation of 780m and the destination, Yahk, is at 860m elevation 89.3 km to the east as
the crow flies.
Ecology
The study area ecology is summarized in Ecosection Summaries For The Kootenay Boundary Region, by
Quesnel, H.J., and Thiessen, F.N., Ministry of Forests, 1993. As it is succinct and complete it is simply quoted
here for reference.
“Selkirk Foothills Ecosection (Area from Nelway to Salmo, western 1/4 of study area)

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 13
This ecosection extends from within Washington and Idaho, south of the international border, to Monashee pass, in
the north, and from the upper part of the Kettle River, in the west, to the Salmo river valley, in the east. This
ecosection is a subdued mountain area dissected by wide valleys and trenches.
The mountains have less relief than ranges to the north and east. Elevations range from 450m in the valley bottoms to
2400m on the highest peaks. The area covers the eastern Okanagan highland and southern Selkirk mountains. These
mountains and highlands are underlain by folded sedimentary and metamorphic rocks, some volcanics, and granitic
intrusives. Shallow and deep colluvial deposits and associated bedrock are the most common landforms. Less
extensive deposits or moraine, glaciofluvial, and recent fluvials occur on lower slopes and valley bottoms. Rain
shadows are common in the valleys around Castlegar and Trail.
The most common sequences of biogeoclimatic zones consists of low elevation Interior Cedar-Hemlock and mid to
high elevation Engelmann Spruce – Subalpine Fir. High elevation Alpine Tundra occurs only on a few high ridges.
The driest part of the ecosection has Interior Douglas-fir at low elevations near Lower Arrow lake. Low elevations in
this ecosection have the greatest diversity of tree species in British Columbia. Seral stands include western larch,
Douglas-fir, lodgepole pine, western white pine, ponderosa pine, and, occasionally, grand fir on low to mid elevations
and lodgepole pine at higher elevations. Subalpine parkland sites may have alpine larch. The Alpine Tundra has
extensive areas of willows, bear-grass, sedges, grasses, Sitka valerian and mountain heathers.
Floodplains, riparian areas, and lakes are important habitat for bird species including osprey, bald eagle, and great
blue heron. Drier areas on low to mid elevations are utilized by mule deer, white-tailed deer, elk, and black bear.
High elevation forested areas with interspersed avalanche tracks provide habitat for grizzly bear, black bear, elk, mule
deer, moose, and caribou. Alpine parkland areas have caribou, grizzly bear, mule deer, elk, wolverine, and white-
tailed ptarmigan.
This landscape is drained by the Columbia (Lower Arrow lake), the Granby, and the Salmo rivers. The main valley
orientation is north-south with the tributary valleys flowing east or west. Recreational opportunities in this hilly,
forested landscape, occur at all elevations and throughout the year. In the valley bottoms, opportunities are
concentrated on Christina and Arrow lakes which provide for boating, swimming, and fishing. The Columbia river
provides a long season for boating and fishing. The Granby river is popular for boating during high water. The
upland areas provide dispersed recreation during all seasons for camping, hiking, hunting, and snowmobiling.
Accessible areas of the alpine are used for skiing and snowmobiling.
Southern Columbia Mountains Ecosections (Eastern 3/4 of study area.)
This ecosection extends from within Idaho and Montana, south of the international border, to Crawford bay and the
west arm of Kootenay lake, in the north, and from the mouth of the Slocan river, in the west, to Moyie lake, in the
east. The ecosection has high ridges and mountains interspersed with wide valleys and trenches. It includes the
southern half of Kootenay lake and the Creston valley. Elevations range from 500m to over 2300m. There are no
glaciers in this part of the Columbia mountains. This area covers the southern Selkirk and southwestern Purcell
mountains. It is more subdued and rounded than northern parts of these mountain ranges. Bedrock types include
granitic batholiths, folded sedimentary rocks, and low grade metamorphic rocks. Shallow culluvium, with associated
bedrock are the most common landforms. Less extensive deposits of deep colluvium, moraine, and glaciofluvial
occur at lower elevations. Minor deposits of recent flucvial occur around the larger rivers. Precipitation is high on
mountain slopes.
The sequence of biogeoclimatic zones is low to mid elevation Interior Cedar-Hemlock and high elevation Engelmann
Spruce – Subalpine Fir. High elevation Alpine Tundra occurs occasionally on some mountains. Seral stands include
Douglas-fir, western larch, western white pine, and lodgepole pine at low to mid elevation, and lodgepole pine and
whitebark pine and at high elevations. Alpine larch occurs in the subalpine parkland and in the upper elevations of
the Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir zone. A unique feature of the ecosection is bear-grass as a dominant herb at
mid to high elevation. The Alpine Tundra is dominated by rock, snow, and ice. Vegetated areas form a minor
component of this zone and have willows, buttercups, bear-grass, sedges, grasses, and mountain-heathers.
In the Creston valley, the Kootenay river floodplain produces substantial numbers of diving and dabbling ducks,
western grebe, red-necked grebe, great blue heron, and Forster’s tern. The Creston valley wetlands are also an
important migratory staging area for the Canada goose, tundra swan, and other waterfowl. The Coeur d’Alene

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 14
salamander, a species unique to this ecosection, occurs in riparian areas, wetlands, meadows, and floodplains in the
dry and very dry parts of the Interior Cedar-Hemlock zone. Floodplain and riparian areas also have white-tailed deer,
elk, and caribou. Parkland areas have caribou, grouse, white-tailed ptarmigan, and Columbia ground squirrel, while
rugged warm aspects support mountain goat. The South Selkirk caribou herd is internationally significant. In
Canada, the habitat for this species is limited to an area from the international border near Stagleap Park north to
Porcupine creek.
This landscape is dominated by steep to subdued and rounded mountains. The main valley is dominated by the
Kootenay river and the west and south arms of Kootenay lake. Kootenay lake provides year-round recreation for
boating, fishing, and camping. The area is very scenic and the hillsides adjacent to the main valleys are an important
visual resource. Recreational opportunities are found at all elevations and occur all seasons. These include camping,
viewing, hunting, fishing, skiing, and snowmobiling. When accessible, skiing and snowmobiling occur in subalpine
and alpine areas.”
The east-west corridor in which this trail route is to be located is bisected by the north-south flowing Kootenay
River in the Creston valley; a major river ranging from about one hundred to several hundred meters in width,
and surrounded by sloughs, wetlands, oxbows and dykes. From the U.S. border to Kootenay Lake, there is only
one bridge crossing and that is located on Highway 3. A second bridge on that same route crosses an old
Kootenay River channel parallel to the main river just to the west. Several other smaller rivers and tributaries
must also be crossed on this route.
In addition this route must cross a major north-south oriented mountain range, the Nelson Range of the Selkirk
Mountains, between the Salmo and Creston valleys.
Land status is primarily Crown land, but significantly large blocks of private land exist along most of the valley
corridors. The study area falls within the traditional territory of the Ktunaxa Kinbasket tribes. Several Indian
Reserves for the Lower Kootenay Band of the Ktunaxa Kinbasket Tribal Council are situated along the Creston
valley. Blocks of Agricultural Land Reserve are designated in the Nelway to Salmo corridor, Creston valley,
lower Arrow creek, lower Goat river, and the corridor from Kid creek to Goatfell.
Many valley corridors have been developed with gas and electrical utility corridors, timber harvesting roads
and/or mining roads. Most of the trail length on Crown land is Provincial Forest, which is used for timber
harvesting and other resource activities. The study corridor contains mining and quarrying areas, domestic and
community watersheds, electrical transmission lines and gas pipelines.
Special features include a small picnic site located on the south end of Rosebud lake. Stagleap Provincial Park
has hiking trails, a warming hut, toilets and a picnic area. A cabin is jointly managed by the Creston
Snowmobile club and Ministry of Forests at Char creek, and a second cabin is jointly managed by the Creston
Cross Country Ski Club and Ministry of Forests in Ripple creek. Hiking trails are currently established at/to
Heather lake near Stagleap Park, Nun lake, the “Rim” overlooking the Creston valley from the east, and an
interpretive trail at Ladyslipper northeast of Creston. The Boundary lake forest service recreation site has
campsites, picnic tables, outhouses, and wharves. The Creston Valley Wildlife Management Area has trails and
interpretive facilities as well as a visitor center. Yahk Provincial Park provides camping in a shady riverside
setting.
Amenities including camping, lodging, food services, fuel, and supplies are available in Salmo, Creston (and
surrounds), and Yahk. Communication via cell phone is limited to the major urban areas as shown on the
current Telus Mobility coverage map below. All route options have similar cell coverge, limited to the Creston
valley.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 15
Telus Mobility Cell Phone Coverage Map (as at July, 2005)
The Kootenay Boundary Land Use Plan Implementation Strategy3 indicates that the proposed trail corridor
contains the following resource values and features:
• Most of the area is designated for low to medium emphasis biodiversity management
• Nelway to Creston and Yahk are in regional connectivity corridors
• Nelway to Creston has high quality grizzly bear habitat
• Ungulate winter range habitat is found in low elevation valley bottoms
• Kootenay Summit is mountain caribou habitat
• Dozens of domestic watersheds are located along the valley corridors
• Community watersheds are designated on Arrow, Cameron, Camp Run, Duck, Floyd, Mortimer,
Russell, South Rykert, Sullivan, Teetzel, Twin Bays, and Urmston Creeks.4
• The Highway 3 corridor is Class 1 regionally significant visual area
• Major valleys are designated as human settlement corridors
• Timber Enhanced Development Zones are designated at Dodge Creek, and between Creston and Yahk
A search of the B.C. Conservation Data Center5, covering the Interior Cedar-Hemlock and Engelmann Spruce
Subalpine Fir zones (finest level of resolution available) within the Arrow Boundary and Kootenay Lake Forest
Districts, yielded the following numbers of species at risk or of concern:
• 8 mammals
• 11 birds
• 8 fish
• 108 plants
• 6 reptiles
• 11 slugs/snails
• 4 clams/mussels
• 2 insects
• 1 bat
• 1 turtle
Many of these species are associated with aquatic habitats which should not be impacted with trail development.
Others are less specific, but generally, development of the trail using existing roads and trails, and a minimal
footprint of additional connector trail as proposed, should not pose additional risk to these species.
3
Kootenay Boundary Land Use Plan, Implementation Strategy, June 1997, Kootenay Inter-Agency Management
Committee.
4
Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management Website: Community Watershed Data June, 2005,
http://srmwww.gov.bc.ca/cgo-bin/env_exec/wwwa[[s/waterbpt/cwsnew
5
http://srmapps.gov.bc.ca/apps/eswp/search

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 16
Most of the potential routes traverse Crown land assigned to forest companies or woodlot owners for timber
harvesting rights. Opportunities to link harvest roads and skid trails into a trail corridor were assessed. Tembec
Inc., J.H. Huscroft, Creston Valley Forest Corp, and B.C. Timber Sales staff have greatly assisted in providing
road data and/or suggesting route corridors that minimize conflict between industrial and trail use. Existing
forest roads (not considering highways and public roads) provide access valued at over $500,000 if they had to
be constructed as virgin trail.
8.0 Route Options:
For the purpose of assessment, route options have been configured to reflect southern, intermediate or northern
alignments. However, it is possible for example, to mix and match a southern route in the west with a more
northern option in the east. The trail route has been sequentially numbered in segments for correlation with map
and spreadsheet data. Each segment has somewhat uniform administrative or physical characteristics which
suggest it to be managed as an entity for planning purposes. Numbering is assigned in intervals of 5 to allow for
finer resolution numbering in future more detailed planning and layout.
Only segments with elevations generally above 1200m elevation were considered suitable for skiing and
snowmobiling. Lower segments are useable at times but conditions may be quite variable. For cycling and
cross-country skiing, grades averaging over 10% were not considered suitable for average Canadians. It was
assumed that equestrian use would not be appropriate on highway shoulders due to the high speed of traffic.
Modes of transport are classified by the potential of the segment when completed, and may not currently be
useable. Codes are as follows:
H Hiking
C Cycling (may require mountain bike where off public road shoulder)
E Equestrian
S Cross-country skiing
M Snowmobiling
8.1 Nelway to Kootenay Summit
In addition to following the highway 6 and 3 corridors, there are 3 primary route options from Nelway to the
Kootenay summit.
• Nelway to Stagleap Park via Rosebud lake and Stagleap creek.
• Nelway to Lost Pass via Highway 6 and Lost creek
• Nelway to Lost Pass via Rosebud lake and Lost creek.
With Nelway designated as a control point, all route options would commence at the junction of the Pend
d’Oreille Road and Highway 6 at Nelway, immediately north of the United States border crossing. Nelway
itself does not currently provide any amenities other than public toilets and information available at the Canada
Customs office. Nelway may however provide an economic opportunity in the future for development of a
small facility providing food, lodging and supplies. Visitors otherwise would need to go out of their way to
Salmo, about 25 km north along Highway 6, to find amenities. (If the Lost Creek option via Vector road is
chosen as the trail route, Salmo would only be about half that distance out of the way for travelers.)
8.11 Nelway-Stagleap Sector via Rosebud Lake and Stagleap Creek (NWSL), 32.4 km total length.
This route combines numerous secondary or abandoned existing roads, with a significant component of new trail
that would have to be constructed.
NWSL 05 (2.2km, HCE)
The route would use the Highway 6 shoulder for the first 2.2 kilometers.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 17
The Canada Customs building at the border crossing in Highway 6 shoulder between Nelway and Salmo.
Nelway.
NWSL 10 (3.4km, HCE) and NWSL 15 (0.6km, HCE connector to Rosebud Lake)
This option would use the Rosebud lake road to avoid Highway 6. This route follows a gentle, two-lane, gravel,
public road to Rosebud lake. Via a 0.6km level connector, a small picnic/camp site is available along the shore
of this scenic, small lake, along with a bear-proof garbage receptacle. The Regional District is considering
development of a Regional Park at or near this site6. Part way around the lake on the north side, the road is
gated and marked “private land, no-trespassing”. The road continues on through the private land and has gentle
grades that would make an ideal trail route that links back onto this option, if an agreement could be arranged
with the landowners.
Rosebud lake road is scenic with modest grades, good sight Rosebud lake has several shoreline picnic/camp sites.
lines, and passing room.
NWSL 20 (0.6km, HCE)
Because the road around the lake is gated off, the trail route concept discussed here would circumnavigate the
lake and lakeshore private lands on the south side, partly using this segment of powerline road. Permission
would be required from B.C. Transmission Corp.
6
Kevin Maloney, Pers. Comm.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 18
Road through private land is gated but would make ideal trail route An electrical transmission line runs east-west south of Rosebud
if agreement could be reached with private land owners. lake. Parts of the road would be suitable as trail.
NWSL 25 (1.6km, HCE)
This is a currently useable alternate, of unknown status, but has poor horizontal alignment adding 0.7 km to the
route length. It uses the existing powerline access roads, and could serve until a more direct, almost level
connector trail (NWSL30) could be constructed across the base of a small hill.
NWSL 30 (0.9km, HCE)
This segment would need to be constructed across a moderately-sloped base of a steep knoll to get a near level
connector with good horizontal alignment. This segment has only been map-assessed for feasibility and may
need to be modified at layout.
NWSL 35 (1.3km, HCE)
This segment follows an existing non-status road to a powerline across the small, upper valley corridor of
Eldorado Creek. There is much evidence of grizzly bear activity in this area as the lush valley bottom provides
spring forage. This area is used by visitors from Salmo to Nelson and beyond for motorized and non-motorized
recreation.
Existing powerline access road. Grizzly bears use roadway extensively in spring.
NWSL 40 (1.5km, HCE)
This segment follows under a powerline on the powerline maintenance road. Grades are steep for cycling in
places but it is useable in its current state and some maintenance by B.C. Transmission Corp. can be anticipated.
NWSL 45 (5.7km, HCE)

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 19
This segment would require new trail construction along the upper shoulder of the South Salmo river. Access
for work crews is poor. Terrain is moderate to steep but soils appear to be workable judging from field check of
the north end. Vegetation is fairly lush so a 3m right-of-way clearing should be considered. Grades could be
very gentle for most of the segment just bypassing a block of private land, indicated on the ownership mapping,
(but not confirmed) near Rainy creek. At least one-half of this segment passes through what is mapped as
operable timber, so it may be that in time, the timber operator, here B.C. Timber Sales, might be interested to
build logging road that could be used as trail. Rainy creek and an unnamed stream at the southeast end may
require footbridges. As this is a northeast aspect, it will be important to maintain good drainage along this
segment. Terrain hazard mapping should also be checked.
NWSL 50 (0.5km, HCE)
This segment would use an existing Forest Service road and bridge across the South Salmo river at Lead creek.
Existing Forest Service road at Lead creek indicating deactivation. Forest Service road bridge across Stagleap Creek.
NWSL 55 (1.4km, HCE)
This segment would use an old road grade which is currently serving as a trail. It had been recently brushed out
just prior to field reconnaissance. A few dozen meters are washed out and wet area which could/should be
repaired. Periodic brushing would be required along this segment which parallels the South Salmo river to its
confluence with Stagleap creek. It is not known who did the brushing work but perhaps a local group would
continue to take on maintenance.
This segment passes through what is indicated on the ownership mapping as a Provincial Reserve which may be
reserved for sand and gravel quarry purposes. Therefore it may be necessary to realign the trail if quarrying
takes place.
Although somewhat grown in, this segment is currently being used Wet section should have drainage enhanced.
as a trail.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 20
NWSL 60 (0.4km, HCE)
This is a connector segment to proceed from the NWSL 55 trail to an old road shown on government maps
indicated as NWSL65. There may be old road or trail grade useable for the connector, but it appears to be
obscure due to impacts of highway construction, water erosion and brush encroachment.
NWSL 65 (1.4km, HCE)
This segment would use an old road grade that is substantially grown over. It was only partially field checked
due to heavy brush invasion. Some drainage improvement is likely to be necessary.
NWSL 70 (1.4km, HCE)
This segment currently serves as a quarry access road posted “no entry”. It appears to receive limited use and
would make an attractive trail route, being reasonably separated from the highway above and the creek below.
Permission to use as trail would need to be obtained from Ministry of Transportation.
This segment is currently posted no entry due to its access This segment would make a scenic trail corridor if
to a quarry. authorization can be obtained from Ministry of
Transportation.
NWSL 75 (6.9km, HCE)
This segment continues to follow parallel to Stagleap creek and Highway 3 on an old mapped road grade. The
grade is partially visible but heavily grown in. At the west end it starts above a quarry. The east end could not
be found in several reconnaissance traverses, and may have been excavated during quarry construction.
Two examples of old road grade which is heavily grown in and erosion damaged.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 21
Views looking at fill slope below Highway 3 at the base of which this segment would be located.
NWSL 80 (0.6km, HCE)
This segment would use an existing quarry access road situated within Stagleap Provincial Park. This road
needs some drainage improvement as a highway culvert spills its discharge partly onto the road grade. Although
a quarry access road, it does not appear to be posted “no-entry”.
Quarry access road showing water damage on surface. Winter avalanche control takes place in this area.
NWSL 85 (2.5km, HC)
This segment would use the Highway 3 shoulder over the Kootenay Summit in Stagleap Park. A log structure
warming hut, toilets, picnic area and subalpine trails are located at the summit. In mid to late winter, avalanche
control activities in the summit area may lead to closure of the road at times.
Warming hut and toilets at summit. Sign posted on door of warming hut indicates it is available for
day use only.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 22
Warming hut has wood stove, picnic table and interpretive View across Bridal Lake to a picnic area on the east shore.
information.
Sign posted on warming hut reminds visitors that the Kootenay View of Bridal Lake at Kootenay summit. Stagleap FSR departs
summit is avalanche hazard area. highway in center of photo.
8.12 Nelway – Lost Pass Sector – includes NWSL 05 (NWLP) 30.0km direct up to 40.2km total length if
required to use Vector Rd. option.
The Lost Pass route has been nominated by local planning groups for several years, as it has good east-west
alignment, and somewhat follows the original route of the Dewdney Trail. However, in recent years issues have
surfaced regarding road status across private land in the lower end of the valley, as discussed further below. A
mining operation is also located in this drainage, but discussion with senior staff7 has indicated a willingness to
work out road use if the private land issue can be resolved. There are additional blocks of private land further
up Lost creek as well. With the uncertainty in the lower blocks, there may also be unresolved status issues
through these. Further research into land ownership, road status and future resource development interests is
recommended, should this option be favoured.
The route has some avalanche hazard potential in the headwaters of Lost creek.
NWLP 05 (8.2 km, HC) and NWLPR 05
This segment picks up from the Rosebud lake road turnoff and continues north on Highway 6, using the
highway shoulder. The Salmo river bridge is problematic as it does not provide for pedestrian travel. It is
however short and visibility is good in both directions.
7
David Sachs, President, IMASCO, Pers. Comm.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 23
Highway 6 has good shoulders, reasonable visibility, and The bridge across South Salmo river however, has no
modest traffic levels. pedestrian capacity.
An alternative originally intended for the South Salmo river option is shown on the Land Use Coordinating
Office mapping using an old abandoned railway or highway grade for 4.2 km near Highway 6 which would
allow the trail to be located off the highway except for the South Salmo river bridge crossing. If to be used by
horses, they would have to ford the river or a new dedicated pedestrian bridge would need to be added. The
grade is heavily grown over and obscure in places. For estimating purposes it has been assumed to require
equivalent to new-trail construction, but it may be considerably less if the grade is still intact. The original
Dewdney Trail did not have a South Salmo river crossing, rather crossing the Salmo River north of the
confluence with the South Salmo river.
A further alternative is to follow the NWSL route to Rosebud Lake, and then follow an old highway grade west
and north to near the Salmo river bridge, then use the highway across the bridge and then back onto the
Dewdney Trail route. This route has good grades and scenic vistas, but requires repairs to a major washout.8
The same uncertainty over the Lost creek road private lands affects this option. Most optimistically this option
would have a route length of 34.8km.
NWLP 10 (1.8 km, HC)
This segment would use the Highway 3 shoulder from the Highway 3/6 junction to the Lost Creek road
entrance. A small highway rest stop is located on the south side of Highway 3 across from the Lost creek road
entrance.
NWLP 15 (1.3km, HCE) (Alternates through Lot 9784 and Vector Road)
This segment would proceed from Highway 3 up the Lost creek road through private land currently owned by
Kieth Vonk. The Vonk’s have purchased this property within the past two years and are currently involved in
litigation over the road right-of-way which they say is private, and they have gated the road and posted it “no-
trespassing”. They have located a mobile, and have plans to build a permanent residence fairly close to the road,
and therefore do not want the road open to the public.9 The Lost Creek road is used by B.C. Hydro, Terasen
Gas, IMASCO, and others.
According to the Ministry of Forests engineering officer10, the lower Lost creek road is not a Forest Service road
and may well be a private right-of-way. The B.C. Timber Sales Program is the forestry operator here but do not
have any plans to acquire access to this area in the foreseeable future. However, it is believed by some to be the
original route of the Dewdney Trail which may make it qualify as a “Section 4” highway.11 The status of the
road access is uncertain at this time, and cannot be relied upon for a trail route.
8
Kevin Maloney, Pers. Comm.
9
Kieth Vonk, Owner Lot 9785, Pers. Comm.
10
Rob Babiarz, Arrow Boundary Forest District Engineering Officer, Pers. Comm.
11
Dave Wahn, Planner, Regional District of Central Kootenay, Pers. Comm.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 24
Two options could be considered to bypass this private land barrier. One involves locating a trail off Highway 3
beginning somewhat to the west (without encroaching on Stagleap Ranch, whose owners are opposed to the trail
crossing their land12). An existing trail corridor is located about 50-100m north of the highway along a steep
bank. It has a wide tread, is substantially overgrown in a few places, and has extensive knapweed invasion, but
provides scenic vistas and is far enough from the highway and South Salmo river to make them unobtrusive. If
it could be agreeable to the next landowner, it could climb up the slope to cross over to the Lost creek road just
north of Vonk’s property, on another private parcel which had the Dewdney Trail crossing it, (Lot 9784) owned
by Karen Bryant. Karen Bryant could not be reached via her last known contact. If this route is to be further
considered, contact should be made to determine if she is still owner and/or would be agreeable to
accommodating the trail through her property. This option would have a negligible impact on overall trail
length or viability, but would require administrative, layout and construction work to be implemented.
Signs and locked gates have made the Lost creek road inaccessible Lost Creek Rest Area south of Highway 3
to the public from Highway 3.
Along the South boundary of Stagleap Ranch, a cleared roadway Views to the highway and river below indicate the degree of
along a terrace margin would make an ideal trail if negotiations separation.
with the owners could allow for its use.
12
Lola Monty, Stagleap Ranch, Pers. Comm..

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 25
Where the original route was eliminated by rock blasting for the At the boundary of Lot 9784, the trail is marked “no-trespassing,
highway, a high quality bypass trail was constructed. and becomes obscure.
Dewdney Trail route and historical features in Nelway to Lost pass corridor.13
13
Bishop, D. and Field, Salmo Arts and Museum Society, Dewdney Trail, 1865, Sept. 1989.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 26
A second option would involve continuing 8.7km north on Highway 3/6 from the junction, and proceeding east
on Vector road. This road climbs steeply up the slope through a series of switchbacks, passes through private
land owned by Hans Buchwald, then proceeds south to connect to the Lost creek road east of the properties in
question noted above. Hans Buchwald does not object to the trail passing through his property, but is not certain
of the status of the road through his land. This poses some risk to route delineation in case of change of
ownership. Road status should be verified if this route is favoured.
This option would not require new trail construction but would require additional marking. It would add
approximately 10 km to the trail route and some additional climb and descent.
It is recommended that dialogue be maintained with Peter Rodenstein, Plant Manager for Imasco in Creston, and
Kieth Vonk, landowner of Lot 9785, as they are involved in litigation to resolve the road access situation for this
area.
NWLP 20 (0.2km, HCE)
This portion is a short segment indicated according to ownership data to be on Crown land between large private
parcels.
NWLP 25 (0.5km, HCE)
This segment would use the Lost Creek road through another large block indicated on the ownership layer to be
private land. At this time there do not appear to be issues with use of the road through this property, but its
status should be checked if this route is to be further considered.
NWLP 30 (1.1km, HCE)
This segment of non-status road appears to be situated on Crown land, overtop of the original Dewdney Trail.
NWLP 35 (1.5km, HCE)
This segment of the Lost creek road passes through a block of land indicated on ownership mapping as private.
However it appears by current use that it is recognized resource road established over the original Dewdney
Trail. Status should be confirmed prior to formalizing use.
NWLP 40 (11.1km, HCESM)
This segment also follows the Lost creek road along the powerline which generally follows the Dewdney Trail.
A few remnants of Dewdney Trail are reported to be visible near Lost creek just off the road.
NWLP 45 (2.2km, HEM) and alternate NWLPDT
This segment is the highest segment of the Lost creek powerline road which climbs steeply on the south side of
the Lost creek valley headwaters to the Lost pass summit at 1930m elevation. A spur north continues to the gas
line crossing at the summit.
Alternatively the actual Dewdney Trail route, NWLPDT, is slightly to the north, following the gas line corridor
over the summit and continuing down mid-slope. The western portion of the trail is not very distinct through
some of this area, having been broken up by gas line, powerline and road construction, and heavy vegetation
growth. Tread width is generally about 30cm, and grades are moderate averaging 12%14. The trail is signed at
the summit. Entrance points are not easy to find due to extensive alder invasion, and the easternmost part is
very wet through marshy ground for considerable length. Here large spruce trees have been fallen along the trail
to get across wet areas. The trail has been heavily disturbed by a major avalanche path. There is evidence of
light use, possibly including pack horses. In its current state it would be difficult to ride a horse through; but
possible to lead a packhorse through. If this trail was to be used it would require significantly improved
14
Kevin Maloney, Pers. Comm.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 27
marking, brushing, debris clearing through avalanche zone, avalanche warning signs, and tread improvement
through wet areas.
Trail placards are posted on the summit portion, but it is not shown The summit ridge is rocky and open. Here the trail is moderately
as a Forest Service Trail on Recreation Maps. easy to follow.
The trail crosses the gas line right of way just east of the summit. Gradually the trail becomes more grown in.
In the timbered area the trail is barely discernable. A 100m wide avalanche path has strewn debris across the trail.
8.2 Kootenay Summit to Creston
In addition to the highway corridor, there are several route alternatives from the Kootenay summit to Creston.
Several additional variations are possible.
• Stagleap Park to Creston via Stagleap creek, Monk creek, Boundary creek and Dodge creek Forest
Service roads
• Lost Pass to Creston via North Summit, Maryland and Corn creeks.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 28
• Lost Pass to Creston via Summit creek riparian
• Lost Pass to Creston via Summit creek midslope
8.21 Stagleap – Creston Sector via Monk, Boundary and Dodge Creek (SLDC) 73.2 km total length
Continuing east from Stagleap Park, the southernmost option is to take the Stagleap Forest Service road through
Stagleap Park to the Monk creek forest service road and on to the Boundary creek Forest Service road and over
a ridge to the Dodge creek forest service road which descends into the Creston valley. For assessment this
sector here is described as incorporating a route into Creston using the old ferry crossing across the Kootenay
river, even though no crossing is currently available there. This route could alernatively continue north along
West Creston road crossing the Kootenay river on the main bridge on Highway 3.
This sector is remote and long with no amenities except for the Boundary lake recreation site. Resource roads
make up most of this sector which would otherwise be very difficult to construct and maintain. The area is
scenic, lush, and serene giving the sense of a backcountry environment. Development cost would be limited to
signage and optional construction of a 2.1 km connector trail to avoid using the existing steep powerline road.
The Stagleap Park boundary summit on the Stagleap Forest Service road is 1970m high and as the segment
within the park is on a north aspect and well shaded, it does not become snowfree until the end of June in an
average snow year.
Land Use Coordination Office mapping from 1998 indicates a route option from Highway 3 to the Monk creek
FSR via Char creek. This route would use existing roads for about 2/3 of the length and require new connector
trail for 4.0 km over a 1900m high pass. Other variations near the pass are also possible. This option offers
little advantage, a 70m lower pass over the Stagleap Forest Service road option, but would require more work to
develop. It would however support snowmobile use which is restricted in Stagleap Park.
SLDC 05 (2.9km, HCES)
This section would use the existing Stagleap Forest Service road as it departs from the highway 3 summit in
Stagleap Park to the south. It winds up and over a ridge to a summit at 1980m elevation at the southern Park
boundary, and then descends to connect to the Boundary creek Forest Service road via the Monk creek Forest
Service road. This road is not expected to have any logging traffic for the foreseeable future as restrictions for
Caribou habitat have curtailed further timber harvesting for several decades.15
The Stagleap FSR is not maintained. However, the road is in good condition.
15
Mike Pascuzzo, Woodlands Manager, J.H. Huscroft Ltd., Pers. Comm.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 29
Snowmobiles are not permitted in the Park. Snow prohibits use of this road for hiking/cycling over the pass to
the end of June.
SLDC 10 (5.2km, HCES)
This segment descends from the southern Stagleap Park boundary along a tributary to Monk creek, across a
powerline, and onto the main Monk creek forest service road.
SLDC 15 (7.8km, HCESM)
This segment would use the Monk creek forest service road to the junction with the Maryland creek Forest
Service road (FSR) in the upper Priest river drainage.
Sign at junction of Monk Creek FSR with Maryland Creek Monk Creek FSR parallels a powerline corridor.
FSR.
SLDC 20 (18.3km, HCESM)
This segment connects to the Monk and Maryland creek FSRs and continues east as the Boundary creek FSR.
This road is a moderate use timber haul road and also supports transmission line maintenance. Just over 3
kilometers down from the junction a 200m spur south leads to the Boundary Lake Forest Service recreation site.
This site provides cartop boat launch, camping, toilets, wharves, firerings, and picnic tables.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 30
Ministry of Forests recreation guide indicates that this site This small lake is suited to non-motorized boating.
receives heavy use during summer.
The Boundary Creek road closely follows the Boundary This lush valley provides many wildlife viewing
creek channel. opportunities.
SLDC 25 (4.3km, HCESM)
This segment would use a newly constructed road built by J.H. Huscroft Ltd. for timber harvesting.
This newly constructed road is built to high standards and makes At the road terminus, a trail would need to be constructed to
an attractive route. connect to an upper spur.
SLDC 30 (2.1km, HCES)
This trail segment would need to be constructed on moderate to steep terrain along a small creek. It would be
most efficient to work down from the upper road which is accessed from Creston. A few switchbacks will be

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 31
required to keep the grade to about 10%. With a wider clearing and larger radius switchbacks, this segment
could be made snowmobile accessible. Snowmobiles have an alternate route option on the powerline road
above.
SLDC 35 (1.1km, HCESM)
This segment would follow a newly constructed road through a recently harvested block, already planted.
SLDC 40 (11.8km, HCESM)
This segment would follow the Dodge creek Forest Service road as it descends at about 8-10% slope for over 10
km into the Creston Valley. Some vistas are found along the road where powerlines cross.
The Dodge Creek road climbs steeply through rolling terrain. View of the Creston valley, Creston in midground, from the Dodge
Creek FSR.
SLDC 45 (2.8km, HCE)
This segment would follow a deactivated Forest Service road. Frequent waterbars make it unpleasant for
motorized travel but for hiking, cycling or horseback it would be workable. The road is no longer maintained so
as roadside brush develops it would need to be cut periodically.
This road has been deactivated with frequent waterbars. The road is still useable although some caution is required
crossing waterbars.
SLDC 50 (7.8km, HCE)
This segment would follow Reclamation road north to the old ferry crossing near the junction of Reclamation
road with West Creston road. This road is a level, rural, paved road with low traffic levels, but with narrow
shoulders and large ditch. Visibility is excellent.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 32
Reclamation road showing narrow shoulder. Junction of Reclamation road and West Creston Rd.
SLDC 55 (0.1km, HCE)
An unnamed road, of unknown status, (possibly a part of the dyke system) departs east from the junction of
Reclamation road and West Creston road along the dyke to the river shoreline. A collection of behives is kept
near the shore.
Behives are maintained near the shoreline. A river water level guage is located at the waterfront at the
old ferry crossing..
SLDC 60 (0.2 km, HC)
This segment is a water crossing over a quiet reach of the Kootenay river. The crossing is approximately 100m
across and could be done with canoe, rowboats, raft or some sort of cable ferry. A bridge could be considered
but would have to comply with the Navigable Waters Act. If there is no way to keep a publicly available
watercraft at this site, somehow fastened to cables such that it could be accessed from either side; a service
provider could be arranged, so that travelers would call a number and a service would be dispatched for a fee,
not unlike early 20th century ferry service. If a large enough craft was used, equestrian use could be added.
Following are photos of some crossings used elsewhere. Whatever method of crossing is considered it would
likely provide a novelty factor to the approach to Creston. Examples of water crossings are shown below.16
16
All photos of crossings are from Internet search.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 33
Wooden pedestrian bridges are attractive but not likely feasible for Bridge clearance would need to comply with Navigable Water Act.
this span without center piers..
Example of hand powered cable ferry across river in Belize, A cable wound around a drum is turned by this crank
Central America.
Primitive cable ferry in Mexico. Historic cable ferry on the Kettle River
Coin operated cable ferry in Norway. Motorized cable ferry in Walnut Grove California.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 34
SLDC 65 (5.5km, HCE)
On the east side of the Kootenay river, this route would use an apparent public road called Kootenay river road
that traverses Indian Reserve 1C. It is used as a walking, cycling horseback route by locals and passes through
scenic agricultural lands.
Contact was made with lower Kootenay band of the Ktunaxa Kinbasket Tribal Council to try to arrange a
meeting but none was possible in time for this report. Route options should be discussed with the Lower
Kootenay Band to minimize impacts on cultural heritage values and aboriginal rights, as well as to determine
what role they would like to play in the trail project.
On the north side of the river, Kootenay River Road Kootenay river road then turns east and is paved. View here
meanders along the dyke and then turns north to the old is looking west.
Goat river channel. .
SLDC 70 (0.6km, HCE)
This route would use a short segment of Highway 21 to travel north to connect with Valley View road which is
common to, and described with, the Stagleap to Summit creek option (SLSC). This highway segment has fair,
partly-paved shoulders and good visibility.
View of Highway 21 looking north.
8.22 Lost Pass – Creston Sector via Corn Creek (LPCC) 84.7km total length into Creston
For this assessment, this route is considered to commence at the Lost pass summit at 1930m elevation and
descend via upper Summit creek, along and across Highway 3, up the Maryland creek Forest Service road, and
down the Corn creek road to the Creston valley. In the Creston valley, it could follow north along west Creston
road or cross the Kootenay river at the old ferry crossing site noted in the Stagleap –Dodge creek option, into
Creston. This route has not been fully field assessed, and appears to be somewhat new to the possibilities
considered in previous work.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 35
The route is made up substantially of resource roads used for transmission lines and forestry. Based on contour
mapping and using a 10% target grade, new connector trail of 1.6 km would be needed in Lost pass, and roughly
2.5 km to connect from the Maryland creek road network to the Corn creek road over an 1840m summit.
This route is mostly remote, moderately active, and passes through steep terrain.
An alternative to use the Dewdney Trail route over the Lost pass summit is described in NWLP45 and could
continue here in North Summit creek.
LPCC 05 (1.6km, H(C)E)
From the powerline or gas line road terminus at the Lost pass summit, this segment would require new trail to
the north Summit creek tributary powerline road to avoid having to go straight down the steep gas pipeline
corridor. This trail layout will have to avoid some steep rock faces which can be seen from the summit in the
valley headwaters. As this segment has not been fully field assessed or laid out, it is not certain whether it could
be made suitable for cycling. The road approaches to the summit on either side are very steep and would
necessitate walking. Heavy water barring and erosion on these steep road segments make cycling difficult.
Trail would need to be laid out through this headwater area. Rock Coarse material would make trail construction challenging on the
faces are visible at right and the powerline road terminates in ridge.
cutblock on the left.
LPCC 10 (4.3km, HCE)
This segment could use existing powerline road in the north Summit creek tributary. The road is steep in the
headwaters area and then becomes progressively more gentle as it approaches the highway chain-up area. A
small stream ford and several waterbars will make travel challenging.
The powerline crosses the summit on very steep rocky terrain. From the base of the steep section seen in this photo, the somewhat
rough road meanders at a moderate grade to the Highway 3

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 36
chainup area.
Powerline access road showing small ford. Gas pipeline right-of-way is steep and has little roadway, and a
ford across north Summit creek..
Voluntary snowmobile closure due to caribou habitat. Winter use of Kootenay Summit area is at risk to avalanches and
control activities.
Gas line valve station. Frequent waterbars slow traffic on this Road near junction to Highway 3.
road.
LPCC 15 (9.9km, HC)
This segment would follow Highway 3 from the chain-up area to the Maryland creek Forest Service road using
the highway shoulder.
LPCC 20 (2.6km, HCE)
The main Maryland creek Forest Service road enters a steep, rugged valley and is situated on a steep sidehill.
Being a logging road for J.H. Huscroft Ltd. to access the Maryland, Summit and Boundary creek drainages, it
can have considerable logging traffic at times. The road is narrow and windy with limited visibility.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 37
Constructing a trail parallel to the road would be difficult. The road provides a strategic crossing of Summit
creek from Highway 3.
The signs at the road entrance, although somewhat dilapidated, provide an indication of the risk to users.
The bridge across Summit creek. Maryland creek FSR on right, Summit creek fork on left.
LPCC 25 (4.1km, HCESM)
Following a junction with a road paralleling Summit creek, this segment continues south along Maryland creek
to the junction with the Monk creek Forest Service road. It winds through steep, scenic terrain but has limited
passing room.
LPCC 30 (8.8km, HEM)
This segment follows the Maryland creek forest service road into its headwaters and over an 1840m pass into
the Corn creek headwaters. Cycling and skiing are not indicated because this section has not been field checked.
Based on contour mapping and the road class indicated, it may very well be suitable for all modes of travel.
LPCC 35 (2.5km, HCE)
This new trail segment would be required to connect the Maryland creek road to the Corn creek road. The route
shown is based on map location only, using a 10% grade as a target.
LPCC 40 (23.7km, HCESM)
This segment would follow the Corn creek road which is under permit to J. H. Huscroft Ltd. This road descends
down a long, steep, narrow, rugged valley to the shoulder of the Creston valley. Field reconnaissance was
limited by the presence of a slough part way up the road.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 38
Corn creek headwaters area where trail would connect. Slough part way up Corn creek road.
Corn creek road, here being used by cow moose. Granary road passes through a pastoral setting.
Signs indicate active logging road. Corn creek bridge on West Creston road does not provide
pedestrian capacity.
LPCC 45 (10.2km, HCE)
This segment follows the shoulder of a system of public roads to the Granary road junction with Reclamation
road and West Creston road, then north along West Creston road to the junction with Highway 3. These roads
pass through a scenic rural setting with interesting views. Shoulder width is limited but traffic is very light on
Granary road, and moderate on west Creston road.
From here this option shares segments SLSC 60-65 into the town of Creston.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 39
8.23 Stagleap – Creston Sector via Summit Creek (SLSC) Total length 64.4km
For this assessment, this sector commences at the Kootenay pass summit along Highway 3 to the chainup area
where it shares the segments from the Lost pass to Corn creek option to the Maryland creek road fork into
Summit creek (LPCC 15 and 20). Commencing at the junction it parallels Summit creek on the south side using
midslope forestry roads currently under construction, connected by new trail that would have to be constructed
across steep ground. It rejoins Highway 3 at the Summit creek bridge crossing at the Creston valley, following
it to Highway 21, Valley view road, and the C.P. Rail right-of-way into the center of Creston.
SLSC 05 (3.9km, HCESM)
This segment would use existing logging road to cross Boulais creek and reach the midslope of the south side of
the Summit creek valley.
A mine addit along the roadside. Gas line restoration work motor vehicle prohibition.
SLSC 10 (5.1km, HCESM)
This segment would follow a now partially constructed road planned by J.H. Huscroft. It can be anticipated that
this road will offer several vistas overlooking the Summit Creek valley.
This road along summit creek is currently under Looking ahead at the slope the road will cross.
construction.
SLSC 15 (5.3km, HCE)
This segment would require new connector trail to be constructed across a steep slope. The road from the west
to this location is currently under construction and the road from the east is just beginning to be constructed near
the new Summit creek bridge.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 40
SLSC 20 (16.0km, HCESM)
This segment would use a road currently planned by J.H. Huscroft. This road would be located on the lower to
mid slope of the south side of the Summit creek valley. Expected cutblocks will provide scenic vistas. This
road will provide a new bridge crossing over Summit creek just west of the Highway 3 Summit creek bridge.
The road should be available in about 2 years, with the bridge crossing planned to be constructed in Aug. 2005,
and the majority of the road in 2006.17
Work underway on new Summit creek crossing. Rock being sorted for new Summit creek bridge.
SLSC 25 (0.1km, HCE)
This planned short spur road would partly serve as a connector to the East Kootenay Environmental Society trail
near the Summit creek bridge.
SLSC 30 (0.9km, HCE) and Alternate SLSCE 30 and 35
This segment could incorporate the existing East Kootenay Environmental Society trail which may require some
realignment to match up to the spur road noted above. This is a registered segment of Trans Canada Trail. The
trail would need to be upgraded if it was intended to suit bicycles and horses as well. For the purpose of this
assessment, it has been assumed that it would be upgraded to accommodate mountain bikes.
A portion of the existing balancing rock trail showing steep climb, The summit of balancing rock trail is a lush swamp with enormous
narrow corridor. ferns and a boardwalk.
Alternatively, a reasonable grade and alignment appears to be feasible by taking the SLSC 25 spur road, and
connecting to the highest part of the Balancing Rock trail above the Creston Valley Wildlife Center. This upper
portion of the trail traverses along the edge of a lush swamp with large ferns and skunk cabbage, locally called
Fern Gulley. Interpretive stations have been established along the trail, which is used for interpretive tours by
17
Mike Pascuzzo, Woodlands Manager, J.H. Huscroft Ltd., Pers. Comm.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 41
the wildlife center. From there, a route could be connected to a gated service road used to access powerlines and
a waterline, or a new trail could be constructed, to link to Wildlife road. The service road does not appear to be
mapped, probably because it is on private land owned by Creston Valley Wildlife Center. It runs from 15-25%
grade and has a rutted grown-in surface. A trail route could be developed as generally shown on the map, and
could possibly incorporate some vistas of the Creston Valley. Approval to connect a route through this land
would have to be obtained from the board of the Creston Valley Wildlife Center, East Kootenay Environmental
Society and the local water user group who have their intake structure near the base of the service road..18
Balancing rock. View of Creston valley from upper balancing rock trail.
Servie road at Wildlife road. This grade is 25%. Road is grown over and rutted.
SLSC 35 (3.9km, HCE)
This segment on the Kootenay river floodplain incorporates trail completed by the Creston Valley Wildlife
Center through the Creston Valley Wildlife Management Area, and is currently registered Trans Canada Trail.
It has very gentle grades and a variety of wetland and other features, and was designed to minimize impact on
waterfowl and wildlife.19 It is not however a direct alignment in its current configuration.
18
Gillian Cooper, Creston Valley Wildlife Center, Pers. Comm.
19
Gillian Cooper, Creston Valley Wildlife Center, Pers. Comm.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 42
Trail passing under old Kootenay channel bridge. Trail would link to existing well-maintained interpretive facilities.
Trail near highway is shielded by trees. Current signage indicates registered trail.
Some portions would benefit from improved signage and trail Trail would pass along the edge of former campground.
surfacing.
SLSC 40 (4.0km, HC)
This segment would use Highway 3 to cross the Creston valley to Kootenay river bridge. Highway 3 has wide,
paved shoulders. This segment includes a bridge across old Kootenay channel. This bridge is not suitable for
pedestrian use in its current state. However local trail planners have proposed to create a pedestrian crossing
alongside the bridge or using large culverts to span the narrow channel present there. In the longer term a trail
could be developed off the highway, but options are limited by deep drainage ditches and surrounding private
land.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 43
Highway 3 looking west towards Summit creek shows wide Old Kootenay channel bridge. In midground is site where a
shoulders and good visibility. pedestrian crossing could be constructed.
SLSC 45 (0.2km, HC)
This is the 215m long Kootenay river bridge; the only current crossing of the Kootenay river between the U.S.
border and Kootenay lake. All cycling traffic currently has to use this bridge. However, this bridge has limited
pedestrian/cycling capacity in its current configuration. In 2001, the B.C. government Land Use Coordination
Office and Ministry of Transportation and Highways sponsored an assessment of this bridge to determine the
cost of retrofitting a pedestrian walkway to be hung onto the south side of the existing bridge structure. This
was estimated to cost roughly $430,000; prohibitive for a non-profit group to take on20. At that time, Ministry
of Transportation was intending to proceed with a design, and Trails B.C. was to do a design of the trail
approaches between the bridge structures along Highway 3.
Looking at the bridge’s current configuration, there is a roughly 40cm ledge/curb on each side next to the
guardrail, and another roughly 60cm shoulder outside the white line on each side. The total bridge deck is 8.4m
of which 7.2m is needed for the two traffic lanes. Engineering standards to accommodate a sidewalk require a
1.5m pedestrian corridor and a concrete parapet to separate pedestrians from traffic. This bridge would not have
the capacity to provide this full width. Ministry of Transportation staff recommend that signage be installed as
an interim solution, and that a plan be developed to integrate sidewalk installation with bridge painting due to
occur shortly after 2007. Signage should suggest dismounting from bicycle. The Ministry of Transportation
senior transportation planning engineer feels that reallocation of deck space is not an option as the free space
outside the laneway white lines is required for large trucks passing each other and for snow removal.21
A study done by the Province determined that it would cost Travelers currently use the two shoulder areas to cross the bridge.
$430,000 to add a pedestrian walkway alongside the bridge. Signage is recommended as an interim measure for user safety.
20
Ministry of Transportation and Highways, Sept. 2000, Bridge Engineering Site Meeting Minutes, File: TCT
21
Arn von Maydell, Area Manager, Bridges, and Grant Irvine, Senior Transportation Planning Engineer, Pers.
Comm.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 44
SLSC 50 (2.6km, HC)
This segment would follow along Highway 3 on the shoulder similar to SLSC 40.
SLSC 55 (1.7km, HCE)
This segment would use Highway 21 to avoid a railway underpass along Highway 3, and to favour a lower
traffic and lower speed highway leading towards Creston town center. Equestrian use on this segment should be
discussed with Ministry of Transportation.
Highway 21 offers good shoulders and visibility. Highway 3 railway underpass.
SLSC 60 (1.0km, HCE)
This segment would follow Valley View road to the upper terrace of the town of Creston. Shoulders are limited
width, but the town of Creston is discussing dedication of trail right-of –way with a developer who recently
acquired the property on the south side.22
Valley View road looking northwest.
SLSC 65 (1.8km, HCE)
This segment would follow the Canadian Pacific Railway right-of-way into the center of Creston. The Town of
Creston is currently negotiating an agreement with C.P. Rail to allow them to establish a trail along the right-of-
way (which extends 15 to 30 m on either side of the railway). The town plans to make this a key part of the
town trail system.23 It incorporates scenic vistas, heritage grain elevators, easy access to amenities, and
Creston’s beautiful new Millennium Park.
22
Lawrence Lavender, Town Councillor, Pers. Comm.
23
Lawrence Lavender, Town Councillor, Pers. Comm.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 45
C.P. Rail right-of-way has good grade and views. C.P. Rail right-of-way looking south
Millennium Park Bicycles are not permitted inside the park.
Murals in downtown Creston. Historic grain elevators.
8.3 Creston to Yahk
In addition to the highway route which is frequently used by cyclists, but has several non-pedestrian capable
bridges, possibilities include:
• The C.P. Rail railway grade. This track has limited rail traffic and is possibly to be abandoned in
future providing a rails-to-trails option. However it is being used daily and surrender is uncertain.
A trail alongside the railway on the existing right-of-way was also considered but would have to
deal with wetlands, rock bluffs and other significant obstacles. This option is not further addressed
in this assessment, but would be an excellent trail route if it became available with grades generally
under 2% and a length of 42.6km.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 46
• Creston to Yahk via Mt. Thompson, the Rim trail, Little Moyie River, Carroll creek and Grouse
Mountain Forest Service road.
• Creston to Yahk via Russell, Birch, Carroll creeks, and Grouse Mountain Forest Service road.
• Creston to Yahk via Lipsett, Russell, Birch, Carroll creeks and Grouse Mountain Forest Service
road.
• Creston to Yahk via Arrow, Iron range, Hall, Anchor, Kid, Hazel, Kristina creeks and Grouse
Mountain Forest Service road.
8.31 Creston–Yahk Sector via Thompson Mountain (CRTM) Total length 52.6km (Shares CRYK, CRBR,
CRBRT Segments)
This route leaves central Creston via Erickson road, along Highway 3 to the Canyon turnoff, across the Canyon
bridge and up the Mt. Thompson Forest Service road which climbs steeply to 2130m elevation at a
communication tower site at Mt. Thompson peak. It then proceeds along the Forest Service Rim trail to Little
Moyie river and out Carroll creek to the Grouse mountain (Jenson creek) road system into Yahk. Views are
spectacular but the current Rim trail would limit use to hiking and horseback. It could be possible to reconstruct
the trail to accommodate mountain bikes but this might draw motorized vehicles into this alpine environment.
CRYK 05 (3.2km, HCE)
From the C.P. Rail right-of-way crossing at Erickson road, this segment would follow Erickson road to Highway
3 past orchards, convenience stores, and other amenities. Shoulders are modest and visibility is fair.
Erickson road. Highway 3 in Erickson
Alternatively, particularly if the Canyon bridge is not permissible for use to cross Goat river, a south Creston
option is possible which follows Erickson road west to Highway 21, across the Goat river bridge (which
includes a sidewalk on one side) to 40th Street, east to Riverview road, south to 37th street, north on 27th avenue
to 38th street, east to Crestview road, south to 22 nd street, and finally north on Canyon-Lister road. This route
would go through scenic rural areas for 16 km to arrive at Canyon, still allowing the main route to pass through
Creston and access its amenities.
CRYK 10 (1.7km, HCE)
This is a short piece of Highway 3 passing through Erickson to the Canyon-Lister road turnoff. The Highway
speed limit here is 60km/hour.
CRBR 05, 10 and CRBRT 05 (5.7km, HC and HCE) See segment descriptions below.
These segments are also part of, and are described under, the Creston – Birch creek route described below.
CRTM 05 (6.6km, HEM)

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 47
This segment would follow the moderately-well maintained Thompson Mountain Forest Service road steeply
(average 14%) up the west side of Thompson mountain to the 2130m peak. Traffic on this road is light. An
option to use the old deactivated Sullivan creek road was considered but it is posted “Closed to Public”, has
been deactivated24, lies in a community watershed for Erickson, and has grown in significantly in places.
This road was apparently once used as a fire lookout access. The steep rough road winds up the west side of mount Thompson.
Communication towers on the peak. This site offers 360 degree panoramic views extending into Idaho.
The old Sullivan creek road is posted “closed to public”
CRTM 10 (1.9km, HE)
The Ministry of Forests Rim trail offers outstanding alpine scenery and continuous views. Trail marking could
be improved and a trailhead kiosk would be helpful. However, motorized access has led to extensive vandalism
at the trailhead which is used as a party site. Steep, rocky sections of trail could be modified to reduce grades
24
Jim Smith, Pers. Comm.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 48
and enable bicycle use, and possibly skiing in winter. Otherwise the trail is ready for use and provides a
rewarding experience.
The rocky, sometimes steep, trail follows along the The open ridge offers continuous views.
ridgeline.
CRTM 15 (4.1km, HE)
This segment would require a new connector trail to link from the Rim trail to a forest road in upper Little
Moyie river basin across a steep southeast facing slope. In this case it has been shown to link to a small
unnamed lake in the headwaters. If built to a high standard it may be possible to cycle and ski this segment.
CRTM 20 (6.3km, HCESM)
This segment could use a fairly overgrown logging road with a good surface in upper Little Moyie river. The
road would need some clearing and periodic maintenance to keep alder down.
South Moyie River Road In the headwaters the road becomes very grown in.
CRTM 25 (13.2km, HCESM)
This segment uses the main Little Moyie river logging road, which also serves as a powerline maintenance road.
This road connects to the Carroll creek Forest Service road which leads to Highway 3. The route segments from
the Carroll creek road into Yahk are the same as, and described under, the Creston – Birch creek option (CRBR
65-90; 6.0km).

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 49
Little Moyie road is well signed. At the divide to Carroll creek are two shallow lakes.
Road has good visibility and alignment. Partial views are present along this road.
8.32 Creston-Yahk Sector via Birch Creek (CRBR) Total length 52.1km (Shares CRYK, CRBR, CRBRT
Segments)
This route stays at a relatively low elevation with mostly gentle grades near the C.P. Rail line. The Goat river
canyon, and the Creston Valley Forest Corp. license area, are the main features. Wildlife sightings can be
expected in this rich valley environment. This route would also use Erickson road and Highway 3 to connect
from Creston town center to the Canyon – Lister road.
CRBR 05 (1.9km, HC)
This segment would use Canyon - Lister road to cross the Goat river canyon, then take Whimster road to the
start of the Mount Thompson Lookout Forest Service road. A shorter but steeper alternate may be possible
along the south side of the C.P. Rail tracks just after crossing the Canyon bridge. This alternate is poorly
maintained and has debris piles from being used as a party site. The Canyon bridge does not have full
pedestrian capacity but is currently used by locals. There could be some potential to construct a pedestrian
crossing alongside or underneath the bridge deck on the lower beam, but Ministry of Transportation staff are
unreceptive due to security concerns. Head clearance to the cross braces is also very low. The canyon is also
crossed by a railway bridge and a pipeline within a structure but all would be difficult to add pedestrian capacity
to.
The Canyon area is a spectacular piece of geography but is difficult to view, as viewpoints are posted as private,
tree growth obscures it, and the sheer rock walls are very steep. It appears to be a feature waiting to be better
developed as a visitor attraction.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 50
The Goat river canyon and dam is difficult to view due to the steep The Canyon bridge is not fully pedestrian capable. The speed limit
terrain and private land. is slow, traffic is modest, and visibility is moderate.
It could be possible to construct a pedestrian crossing on the However head clearance is limited by the cross braces about
support beam underneath the bridge. 180cm high at the center.
CRBR 10 (0.8km, HCE)
This segment would use the Mount Thompson Lookout Forest Service road. It has little logging traffic but is
used frequently by recreationists, as it accesses the upper viewpoints and the Rim trail.
The Mt. Thompson Lookout Forest Service Road is a popular recreation road as well as serving communication tower
maintenance.
CRBR 15 (3.1km, HCE)

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 51
This segment uses the Lipsett road in the Creston Valley Forest Corp. operating area. The road meanders with
gentle grades parallel to the railway.
Creston Valley Forest Corp. partial cutting areas leave idyllic trails behind. Jim Smith checks over post harvesting trail
condition.
CRBR 20 (3.0km, HCE)
This segment would require new trail to be constructed. The grade would be near level along benches and side
slopes. Creston Valley Forest Corp. is interested to construct the western portion as a harvest road, and has
applied for the eastern portion as new operating area, which is yet to be approved.25
CRBR 25 (0.8km, HCE) Not part of Sector length.
This segment is an ingress/egress point using Thompson road. It crosses the railway and passes by rural
residences.
Thompson road crossing the railway track. Note chain gate. Thompson road junction with Highway 3.
CRBR 30 (0.6km, HCE)
This segment uses a short section of Thompson road as it climbs steeply along Thompson creek.
CRBR 35 (3.9km, HCE)
This segment requires new trail to be constructed, roughly on contour across a steep sidehill, bypassing private
land.
25
Jim Smith, Creston Valley Forest Corp., Pers. Comm.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 52
Thompson creek is small enough to cross without a bridge.
CRBR 40 (0.7km, HCE)
This small spur road would connect to the Birch Creek Forest Service road.
This spur road indicated on mapping does not exist at present but
may be a planned road. Immature timber suggests it won’t be
constructed in the immediate future.
CRBR 45 (3.0km, HCE)
This segment uses the Birch creek Forest Service road to connect to road through Russell creek above
Kitchener, via a publicly accessible road. However, as Russell creek is the water supply for the Kitchener
Improvement District (KID), KID should be consulted regarding use of this road. A potential connector along
Russell creek to Kitchener is gated through private property, and signs are posted at the watershed boundary.
Russell creek water monitoring station. “Positively no stopping between watershed”?
CRBR 50 (9.8km, HCESM)

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 53
The Birch creek road segment climbs across the slope through Birch creek above a block of private land, and on
towards Carroll creek.
Lower Birch creek quarry area. View from lower Birch creek road.
Slope stabilization along Birch creek road. Bridge across Birch creek.
View from middle Birch creek road. View from upper Birch creek road.
CRBR 55 (1.1km, HCES)
This segment would require construction of a connector trail across a steep sidehill linking the Carroll creek and
Birch creek road systems.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 54
Connector trail would go from cutblock at upper left along the Sideslope on which connector trail would be built at bottom
base of block in center to just above opening on right, which is edge of this cutblock.
on private land.
CRBR 60 (4.8km, HCESM)
This segment would use the Carroll creek road operated by Tembec Inc. The road descends consistently and is
in very good condition with regular waterbars.
End of Carroll creek road at upper cutblock. Interesting harvest treatments at mid elevation.
Valley vistas from openings
CRBR65 (6.4km, HCE)
This segment uses the Carroll creek Forest Service road in the lower valley.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 55
The Carroll creek FSR mainline can have logging traffic at times, The lower road can be used by skiers and snowmobiles for part of
summer or winter. winter.
CRBR 70 (2.2km, HC)
This route would use Highway 3 shoulder to connect to the next segment near Jensen creek.
Highway 3 shoulder looking east.
CRBR 75 (0.8km, HCE)
This segment requires new trail to be built along the south side of Jenson creek to connect to a logging road
above. It first meanders up a fan with gentle terrain and then up a steeper bank where a few switchbacks are
required. The Crown land area is licensed as a Woodlot License #1778. The trail must be carefully located to
avoid private properties. Neighbours and the Woodlot Licensee should be consulted regarded trail routing and
layout.
Lower fan has gentle terrain. Upper cutblock provides view down Moyie River.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 56
CRBR 80 (4.8km, HCE)
This segment would follow the lower Grouse Mountain Forest Service road also known as the Jenson creek
road. Moderate grades and scenic forests make a pleasant coast down to Yahk.
Trail would come from center of photo onto the lower Grouse This is a fairly newly constructed road and is well maintained.
mountain Forest Service road at this landing..
This road is periodically active for log hauling. The road offers views overlooking farming activities.
CRBR 85 (0.1km, HCE)
This segment would use the east end of Railway Ave. in Yahk.
Railway avenue is a short road from Highway 3 across the tracks Several character and heritage buildings are located along nearby
to the Grouse Mountain FSR. parts of Railway Ave. and other areas of Yahk.
CRBR 90 (0.3km, HCE)

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 57
This segment would use Highway 3 with two bridge crossings to connect to the Yahk to Cranbrook trail at the
Yahk - Meadow Creek road.
This bridge in central Yahk has sidewalks. This bridge in East Yahk also has pedestrian capacity on both sides
outside of the arches.
8.33 Creston to Yahk via Mt. Thompson midslope. CRBRT Option Total length 64.9km
This option would use CRYK 05-10, CRBR 05-10 and 45-90, and CRBRT 05-30, as a mid-slope option on the
north face of Thompson mountain. This option has only been partly field checked as it adds 12.8 km of length
and 430m of elevation to the CRBR option. It would however require only 1.6km of new trail where the CRBR
option would require 6.9km. The altenate segments are as follows:
CRBRT 15 (3.0km, HCE)
This segment continues up the Thompson mountain lookout Forest Service road to about one third of the way up
where a spur leads to the northwest.
CRBRT 20 (4.5km, HCESM)
This segment follows a deactivated road believed to be non-status up into the Thompson creek drainage.
Some minor crossditches are present. Road is beginning to grow in from the sides.
CRBRT 15 (1.6km, HCES)
This segment would require a new connector trail linking to an old road in the Thompson creek valley.
CRBRT 20 (0.8km, HCES)

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 58
This segment would use a small section of the Thompson creek Forest Service road to cross Thompson creek
near the headwaters.
CRBRT 25 (3.8km, HCESM)
This segment would use a section of road indicated on Tembec mapping as proposed road. Its current status is
uncertain.
CRBRT 30 (10.3km, HCESM)
This segment uses existing permanent road which descends at moderate grade on a NE face in Russell creek.
The Russell creek road has been built in recent few years but has The lower portion shows some innovative harvesting practices.
had little harvesting activity.
Although the road is open, this sign near Kitchener indicates local A gate just below the tracks is open, but may at times be closed.
feelings about public use.
The balance of this option is the same as CRBR 45-90.
8.34 Creston to Yahk Sector via Arrow and Kid Creek Options (CRYK, CRAR and CRKD) Total length
100.8km
To locate an option on the north side of Highway 3 between Creston and Yahk is challenging. Long wide
valleys oriented north-south make it difficult to find a reasonable alignment without climbing and descending
numerous times. Existing roads are often oriented parallel to streams so any option to link them becomes
convoluted. There are many conceptual approaches that could be considered, and only one is presented here as
an example. As this option had limited field verification it also has few features noted.
This option shares segments CRYK 05-10 with the other Creston to Yahk options.
CRAR 05 (3.2km, HC)

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 59
This segment uses Highway 3 to the start of the Arrow creek road east. This requires crossing the Arrow creek
bridge which is somewhat tight for pedestrian/cycling use. However sight lines are fair and alignment is good.
Arrow creek bridge on Highway 3.
CRAR 10 (1.3km, HCE)
This segment would use Arrow creek road east to get beyond private lands in the valley.
Interesting rural residences are visible from the road.
CRAR 15 (21.6km, HE)
This segment uses reconstructed road through Woodlot License 437 which then becomes an old exploration
road which is very grown in, and winds steeply up to and along the ridgetop.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 60
Entrance sign to Woodlot License 437. Reconstructed road in Woodlot License 437.
The road becomes gradually more grown in but is maintained as a quad trail by hunters.
CRAR 20 (5.1km, HE)
This segment descends steeply into Hall creek
CRAR 25 (5.7km, HCE)
This segment uses the Hall creek forest road along the valley corridor.
CRAR 30 (4.1km, HCE)
This segment follows the Arrow creek main line to Anchor creek.
CRAR 35 (4.8km, HCESM)
This segment follows a steep forest road up Anchor creek.
CRAR 40 (4.8km, HCES)
This would require a new connector trail to upper Peterson creek.
CRAR 45 (2.8km, HCES)
This segment would use a road indicated on the B.C Timber Sales map. Its current status is uncertain.
CRAR 50 (10.4km, HCESM)
This segment would follow a logging road from upper Peterson creek to lower Spider creek and to the junction
with the Kid creek Forest Service road.
CRKD 05 (7.8km, HCE)
This is an ingress/egress road connection to Highway 3, not included in route length. It passes in front of a
shooting range owned by the Creston Valley Rod and Gun Club.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 61
Creston Valley Rod and Gun Club Shooting Range
CRKD 10 (4.2km, HCE)
This segment follows the Kid creek Forest Service road from Spider creek to south Kid creek.
CRKD 15 (2.2km, HCE)
This segment would follow the Kid-South Fork Forest Service road.
Un-maintained Forest Service road. Road is beginning to grow in.
CRKD 20 (7.3km, HCESM)
This segment follows the Kid-South fork road where it is semi-permanently deactivated.
Deactivated creek crossing. Road is blocked to vehicles by deactivation work.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 62
CRKD 25 (2.2km, HCES)
This segment would require new connector trail to be constructed over the ridge into Hazel creek.
CRKD 30 (6.9km, HCESM)
This segment would follow the Hazel creek Forest Service road to a junction with a road leading southeast to
Kristina creek.
CRKDC 30 (4.3km, HCE)
This segment would serve as an ingress/egress to Highway 3.
CRKD 35 (4.9km, HCE)
This segment would follow a spur road to Kristina creek just above private land.
CRKD 40 (1.5km, HCES)
This segment would require a new connector trail across Jensen creek.
CRKD 45 (3.6km, HCE)
This segment would use the upper Jensen creek road.
The remainder of this route would also use CRBR 80-90 into Yahk.
9.0 Route Development Costs
To compare and assess feasibility of route options, a reasonable comparison of development costs is necessary.
For this assessment, the following cost assumptions are used.
Reconnaissance Survey: Once a route option is selected, additional reconnaissance survey will be required to
make minor adjustments, assess required signage and assess required maintenance and improvements. This is
estimated using $50.00/km.
Layout: New trail or redeveloped trail will require detailed layout to ensure the route grades and alignment are
optimized for the target modes-of-transport. This is estimated at $200.00/km.
Clearing: Clearing of brush and undergrowth is required on new trail or grown over existing trail. This is
estimated at $250.00/km.
Construction: This involves hand cut and fill of the trail grade, removal or covering of roots, boardwalks or
other options in wet areas, removal of rocks, and surfacing with local materials where necessary. This is
estimated at $3000.00/km using hand labour.
Signage: This involves installation of trail markers, and directional signs at key junctions. Supplies are
assumed to come from the Trans Canada Trail Foundation.
Drainage: This is where the trail is washed out or where it is extremely wet. Measures to mound a trail grade
and channel water into ditches, cross ditches and streams are required.
This is estimated at $500.00/km average on segments where this is required in spots.
Water Crossings: Major water crossings can consist of log stringers, bridges, or ferries. These costs can vary
widely so are not computed into the trail development estimates. On average these could be about $100,000 to
plan, design, get approvals for and construct multi-use water crossing facilities.
The administrative cost of securing approvals for the various trail segments is not included here. Trail
maintenance is not included here. Where trail is developed specifically as Trans Canada Trail, a heavier burden
for maintenance can be anticipated than where routes are shared with other users. Maintenance should include

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 63
annual inspections, brushing, check of drainage features, grade leveling where rutted, and repair of missing or
damaged signs.
10.0 Discussion:
Primary trail options are depicted on the enclosed maps, and a summary and comparison of route options is
presented in Table 1 below.
Although preliminary attempts at solidifying trail routing were completed in 1998 and 2001 respectively26,
numerous changes in circumstances have occurred that suggest that the route options put forward at that time be
reconsidered. Information on land ownership, new road developments, selection of control points, experience
gained, and a more realistic view of available resources, have led to this review of route options. There are
several route options being considered in this report that may have been discussed previously, but were not
noted in earlier documentation.
All route options fall within the traditional territory of the Ktunaxa Kinbasket First Nations. Consultation and
assessment of cultural heritage values and impacts is recommended.
Only a small fraction of the trail proposed in 1998 and 2001 has actually been physically established over the
past 7 years. Trail is complete and registered on the West side of Creston in the Creston Valley Wildlife
Management Area, built by the Creston Valley Wildlife Center, and in lower Summit creek, built by the East
Kootenay Environmental Society (constructed but not signed). Trail route has been registered to Stagleap Park
along the Summit creek riparian area, but other than the lower 2.7 km, it is not laid out or constructed.
Land ownership mapping used for this analysis was prepared several years ago, and minor land ownership
changes may have occurred that are not reflected in this mapping. Any route to be further considered should
have a more detailed status done to determine what interests, owners and tenures are involved. Those affected
should be consulted before route selection.
There are dozens of route option combinations possible in these sectors. This report has captured major
representative ones only. For trail layout, construction, and signing to occur, a definitive route decision is
required. This may have to take the form of chronologically sequenced routes that fit short, medium and long-
term resource potential.
All route options are somewhat indirect. For a total direct distance of 89.3km between control points, the
shortest, most optimistic route option would require a distance of 146.5km and the least favourable scenario
would require 236.1km. To use a lowest possible pass option would have to follow Highway 3 through
Kootenay pass at 1780m elevation, and avoid any of the higher secondary passes like the Stagleap/Monk creek
Forest Service road at 1930m or Mt. Thompson at 2130m.
Each route option has mode-of-transport limitations. Any sector’s mode of transport is limited to the least
accommodating segment. Mode of transport is typically limited by highway shoulder or bridges when
considering horses, grade and roughness when considering cycling, grade, elevation and roughness when
considering cross-country skiing, and width and elevation when considering snowmobiling.
As Trails B.C. and the Trans Canada Trail Foundation are interested to have a route implemented by 2010, the
year of the winter Olympics in B.C., consideration should be given to what route could be implemented by that
time. The off-highway option that is most immediately useable, (although still at risk to the bridge and private
land issue at Lost Creek), would involve a blend of the Lost Pass to Corn creek and Boundary creek options as
follows:
26
1998 LUCO Trail Map, 2001 Creston Area Trails Committee Minutes.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 64
Most Immediately Useable Off-Highway Option (requires some use of highway)
Nelway to Lost Pass via Rosebud lake.
Lost Pass to Maryland, Boundary, Dodge creek roads, up West Creston road and into Creston on Highway 3
Creston to Mt. Thompson, Rim trail, Little Moyie, Carroll creek, and Grouse Mountain road into Yahk.
This route would require as little as 6.7km of new trail to be built and have a total length of 187km. It would
capture many of the most outstanding historical and natural features and provide high probability for wildlife
viewing. It links in the existing Trans Canada Trail at the Creston Valley Wildlife Management Area, and
connects to the lower Summit creek trail. However it exceeds target grades for a significant length; relies
primarily on motorized resource roads; climbs to 2130m elevation at Mt. Thompson, and 1930m at Lost pass
making a short usable season; and is double the direct distance length. It has three fairly remote sectors that
have the potential for timber harvesting and powerline maintenance traffic. It is subject to resolution of two
difficult water crossings, use of several public roads with narrow shoulders, and completion by the Town of
Creston of a trail through town on the C.P. Rail right-of-way. Cost is estimated at $74,400, excluding major
bridge enhancements. New trail work is in remote areas distant from communities. Its maintenance burden is
low to moderate as it shares logging roads and powerline maintenance roads that receive light but regular use.
Only hiking would be possible over the entire route, but all modes-of-transport would be able to use
considerable amounts of the route. Cycling could be accommodated in future if the high elevation areas were
upgraded appropriately, but would not suit the “average Canadian” and pushing up steep sections would still be
necessary. The route rewards those willing to stay off the main highway and go to the extra effort with some
exceptional experiences. Loop options are available by using Highway 3 to return on each sector.
A more direct route at lower elevation, which can accommodate more modes-of-transport and capability levels
could be developed over the following 5 years along the Summit creek face, and Thompson Russell creek face.
Logging roads currently under construction will be substantially completed, surfaced, seeded and graded,
allowing for good access to the areas where connector trails need to be constructed. New harvest areas along
these roads will provide valley vistas making this an attractive option for longer-term consideration.
Shortest Overall Off-Highway Route (requires some use of highway)
Nelway-Stagleap via Rosebud Lake and Stagleap creek
Stagleap to Creston via Summit creek riparian
Creston –Yahk via Mt. Thompson and Little Moyie (or railway right-of-way when available)
This option requires significant new trail construction, and involves a high elevation segment at 2130m.
Based on topographic mapping only, there appears to be potential to develop a route from Nelway to Lead creek
via Billy creek to Rainy creek. This would involve a 1460m high gentle pass. It would have to get around
private land, avoid domestic watersheds, and climb up and down a ridgeline. This area is B.C. Timber Sales
operating area, and over time they may develop harvest roads that would suit a trail route. To climb up and over
the ridge several switchbacks are required, and to cross and descend down Lead creek is quite circuitous,
making this concept little shorter than the Nelway to Stagleap via Rosebud Lake option, and it would involve
considerably more climb.
If the railway right-of-way from Creston to Yahk was available, it would cut off another 8-9km from the
Creston-Yahk sector, and eliminate the steep climb and remote route involved in Mt. Thompson or other
options. It would also provide a Goat river crossing although the bridge would likely require considerable
modification to safely accommodate pedestrians.
The lowest elevation option would be to use the Nelway to Stagleap option, take the Summit creek riparian or
midslope option to Creston, and the Lipsett, Russell, Birch option to Yahk. The railway would be even lower
elevation for the Creston to Yahk sector.
Lowest Elevation Off Highway Option (requires some use of Highway)
Nelway to Stagleap via Rosebud Lake
Stagleap to Creston via Summit creek riparian or Summit creek midslope roads.
Creston to Yahk via Lipsett, Russell, Birch and Grouse Mountain Forest Service road. (or railway when
available)

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 65
11.0 Implementation Steps:
To select an option and implement it, the following steps are recommended to be completed:
1) All options depend on first addressing the Kootenay river crossing in the Creston valley. A letter to the
Provincial Government explaining the critical nature of this crossing and resumption of meetings with
Ministry of Transportation are recommended before proceeding with route selection and development.
Once this is resolved, or an alternative is selected, then route options can be considered accordingly.
(2005/2006)
2) Conduct meetings of trail interests; and motorized user groups, local politicians, and key resource
operators involved with the areas of interest, to solicit input, and seek their endorsement of a viable
route, and commitment to help implement it. Select/adjust route accordingly. (2005/2006)
3) Meet with Ktunaxa Kinbasket Tribal Council and/or Lower Kootenay Band to invite their input and
participation. Select/adjust route accordingly. (2006)
4) Conduct public open house in Creston to review options and progress to date, and invite input. Adjust
route accordingly. Invite the public to sign up for various volunteer positions/functions such as chair,
secretary, communications, trail layout and construction, footbridge construction, transport,
sponsorships, community liaison, website, marking and signing, etc. (2006)
5) Status the adjusted route to determine what tenures and interests lie along the route. Prepare referrals to
all known interests, and to government agencies with jurisdiction along route. Include Tourism B.C.,
environmental groups and others. Prepare to meet with the agencies if requested. (2006)
6) Prepare monthly media releases to keep the communities and agencies informed of progress and issues.
(2006 and on)
7) Once referral comments are received and route is again adjusted accordingly, lay out, survey and apply
for authorization to construct trail on the segments requiring new trail development. (2007)
8) Meanwhile have willing volunteers assist the Town of Creston with their trail development in town, and
work on restoration and enhancement of established trails like Dewdney Trail and Rim Trail and
brushing of the South Little Moyie road for Ministry of Forests, to prepare them for possible inclusion
in the route. One team could also be preparing signage materials for posting when route is approved.
(2006/2007)
9) When approvals are received, construct new trails and place signage along entire route. (2008)
10) Conduct guided familiarization tours of the route inviting local interests, media and the public. (2009)
11) Prepare documentation on route directions, services, features and safety for inclusion in trail guides and
web site. (2009)

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 66
Table 1 Route Option Comparison Table (note: all costs net of water crossing upgrades); ___ Represents option with a clearly preferred characteristic.
Nelway-Stagleap via Rosebud Lake and Stagleap Creek Stagleap-Creston. via Boundary and Dodge Creek SLDC Creston –Yahk via Mt. Thompson and Little Moyie
NWSL CRTM
Max. Elevation 1780m Max. Elevation 1760m Max. Elevation 2130m
Total Length 32.4km Total Length 73.2km Total Length 50.8km
Km of New Trail 15.3km Km of New Trail 2.1km (Alternate Currently Useable) Km of New Trail 4.9km
Problem Water Xings 0 Problem Water Xings 1 (Kootenay River, Old Ferry Crossing) Problem Water Xings 1 (Canyon Bridge)
Cost Estimate $33,300 Cost Estimate $18,300 (Excluding Water Crossing) Cost Estimate $24,900
Features Rosebud Lake Features Stagleap Park Features Panoramic view from Mt. Thompson
Undeveloped Area Boundary Creek and Rim Trail
Stagleap Creek Boundary Creek Recreation Site Little Moyie river and lakes
Stagleap Park Creston Valley View Jensen Cr. Views
Issues Steep Slopes Issues Caribou Habitat in Stagleap Park Issues Canyon Bridge crossing
Heavy Brush Remoteness Steep road up Mt. Thompson
Bears Water Crossing Over Kootenay River Remote area for trail construction
Terrain Hazards Private Land near Jensen Creek
Travel Modes HCE Except HC On Hwy 3 In Travel Modes HC For Water Crossing, HCE, HCES, Travel Modes HC on highway and canyon bridge,
Stagleap Park. HCESM For Balance HE for steep road, HEM, HCESM
Nelway –Lost Pass via Highway 6 and Lost Creek NWLP Lost Pass to Creston via Maryland and Corn Creeks LPCC Creston-Yahk via Lipsett Birch Cr. Route CRBR
(midslope option tie in at Russell cr. for a length of 64.8km)
Max. Elevation 1930m Max. Elevation 1930m Max. Elevation 1250m (1680 on alternate)
Total Length 30.1km-40.2km Total Length 84.7km Total Length 52.1km
Km of New Trail 0.0km Km of New Trail 4.1km At N. Summit Headwall Or Km of New Trail 8.8km
Dewdney Trail
Kootenay Summit
Problem Water Xings 1 (S.Salmo River Bridge) Problem Water Xings 1 (Kootenay R. On Hwy 3 Or Ferry Xing) Problem Water Xings 1 (Canyon Bridge)
Cost Estimate $4,500 (Excluding Bridge) Cost Estimate $26,900 (Excluding Water Crossing) Cost Estimate $42,300 ($22,700 for alternate)
Features Dewdney Trail Features Dewdney Trail Features Frequent Diverse Vistas
Creston
Nelway
Lost Creek Lost Pass Less elevation drop and gain
Yahk
Historic Sites Maryland Valley
Highway Rest Stop Corn Creek Rural Acreages
Maintained Road Creston Valley Wildlife Center
Issues Private Lands Issues Maryland Creek Road Traffic Issues Passes through community and
Mine Operations Avalanche Areas domestic watersheds.
Avalanche Potential Remoteness
Salmo River Bridge Kootenay River Crossing
Travel Modes HC, HCE, HEM, HCESM Travel Modes HE On Lost Pass, HC On Highway 3 Travel Modes HCE except HC on Canyon bridge
HCE, HEM, HCESM and Highway 3 shoulder near Jensen
Cr. Some HCESM
Nelway – Lost Pass via Rosebud Lake Stagleap to Creston via Summit Creek Mid-slope Roads SLSC Creston-Yahk via Arrow and Kid Creeks CRAR/CRKD
Max. Elevation 1930m Max. Elevation 1760m Max. Elevation 1900m
Total Length 34.8km- Total Length 64.4km Total Length 106.4km
Km of New Trail 1.3km (May Be Optional) Km of New Trail 5.3km Km of New Trail 8.5km
Problem Water Xings 1 (S. Salmo River Bridge) Problem Water Xings 1 (Kootenay R. On Hwy 3) Problem Water Xings 1 (Arrow Cr. Bridge on Hwy. 3)
Cost Estimate $13,000 Cost Estimate $33,100 (Excluding Water Crossing) Cost Estimate $45,300
Features Rosebud Lake Features Stagleap Park Features Arrow Creek Woodlot
Dewdney Trail, Historic Sites Summit Creek Iron Range
Lost Creek Valley Creston Valley Wildlife Center Valleys and Ridges
Highway Rest Stop Interpretive Trail
Maintained Road
Issues Private Lands Issues Use of Kootenay River Bridge Issues Arrow Creek Bridge
Mine Operations Remote Trail To Build On Steep Slope Excessive Length
Avalanche Potential Wait For Use Of Logging Roads Motorized Traffic
Salmo River Bridge Permission To Cross CVWC Land
Travel Modes HC, HCE, HEM, HCESM Travel Modes HC On Highway, HCE At Low Travel Modes HC on highway, HCE at low
Elevations, HCESM At Higher elevations, HCESM at higher
Elevations. elevations.
Short term option could combine Lost Pass/Maryland/Boundary/Dodge Creek route.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 67
12.0 Conclusions:
1) There are at least three route alternatives which can be considered for each sector of the Trans Canada Trail
from Nelway to Yahk. Various minor alternatives exist along these main routes as well.
2) All route alternatives are subject to a satisfactory resolution of crossing the Kootenay river, either using a
modified Highway bridge or a new pedestrian bridge, and similar resolution of secondary river crossings.
3) Nelway and Yahk are separated by a direct horizontal distance of 89.3 km. Route options range in length
from 146 km to 213 km.
4) Nelway (elevation 780m) and Yahk (elevation 860m) are separated by mountain passes ranging in height
from 1780m at Stagleap Park, to 1930m at Lost Pass, and the Kootenay river Creston valley corridor at 540m
elevation. Other points along route options range up to 2130m at Mt. Thompson near Creston. These elevations
compare to 1920m at Elk Pass at what is otherwise the highest point of the trail in Canada.
5) Most routes offer loop opportunities, usually involving Highway 3, which visitors may wish to travel to
return back to their staging point.
6) It is estimated that these routes, once the trail is properly constructed and marked, would take approximately
50-70 hours to walk (2 days per sector) or 20-30 hours to cycle (1 day per sector) one way not including stops.
7) The lowest route would generally be walk or cycle ready in early May through late October. The highest
route is limited to July through September. Conditions for cross-country skiing and snowmobiling would
typically be suitable on portions of the trail from late December to the end of February, and be subject to
avalanche conditions. The periods in between these windows would be somewhat uncertain at higher elevations
but at low elevations they may still be walked or cycled.
8) This route corridor would offer amenities in Salmo, Creston and Yahk. The longest journey between
amenities would be from Salmo to Creston, which could be as short as a one-day cycle link by highway, to as
long as a few days walking.
9) It is estimated that the most immediately viable route could be completed in approximately 5 years for about
$75,000 not including highway bridge enhancements, sign placards, administration and GST. Use of volunteer
labour could reduce this cost. However this route has many characteristics which fall short of the guiding
principles.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 68
13.0 Recommendations:
1) Immediately resume discussions with Ministry of Transportation on options for enhancing the crossing on the
Kootenay river.
2) Once a crossing is resolved, and a route is chosen in principle, the route should be posted on the Trails B.C.
website, and submitted for approvals to each of the affected interests. Failure to obtain authorization or support
on any one segment, could jeopardize the entire route.
3) A decision should be made regarding whether or not to incorporate snowmobile use, as the trail alternatives
selected, and layout work conducted, should consider whether snowmobile use is to be accommodated or
discouraged. If included, the Creston Valley Snowmobile Club should be invited to participate in trail
development.
4) Route marking on completed sections of trail should be enhanced to improve visibility and certainty for
visitors traversing the trail.
5) Consideration should be given to application of dust control to the gravel road sections of the trail where
vehicle traffic is expected.
6) The final route selected should be provided to the Provincial Government in shapefile format to satisfy the
data exchange agreement.
14.0 References:
British Columbia Trans Canada Trail Website, http://www.bctrail.bc.ca/info.html, Ministry of Sustainable
Resource Management.
Creston Trails Committee, Background Binder.
Dewdney Trail,1865, Bishop, D. and Field, Salmo Arts and Museum Society, Sept. 1989
Kootenay Boundary Land Use Plan Implementation Strategy, 1997, Kootenay Inter-Agency Management
Committee.
Park Trail Planning and Construction, B.C. Parks, Participant Workbook, 1996.
Regional District of Central Kootenay Website: http://www.rdck.bc.ca/
The East Kootenay Land Use Plan, 1995, Government of British Columbia.
Trails B.C. Website, http://trailsbc.ca
Trans Canada Trail Foundation Website, http://www.tctrail.ca/index.php
Trans Canada Trail, Linking Communities Initiative, Kootenay Loop Trail Project, Final Report, Mar. 16, 2001.
Hanne Smith Heintz.
Trans Canada Trail, the British Columbia Route, Jason Marleau, 2001, Mussio Ventures Ltd.

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 69
Appendix 1 Trail Classification Ratings Adapted from B.C. Parks Trail Planning and Construction Manual –Shaded Classes Apply To
Trans Canada Trail
Transport Mode Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5
Hiking Day use Day use Day use or overnight Lightly used Overnight or multi-
5-30 minutes long. 10-120 minutes 2-10 hours wilderness trails day Wilderness hiking
Two way traffic long 5-30 km or more Overnight or multi- routes
Max. 8% grades 1-6 km Width 0.5m day Trail development is
Average grade Max. 10% grade Grades up to 15% Width 0.5m avoided
<5% Average <5-8% May have support May have pit toilets No amendities
Width 2 m grade facilities
Width 1.25 m
Cycling Two way, paved Two way, surfaced One way, unsurfaced One way, unsurfaced, N/A
0-5 km 0-10 km Mountain bikes Mountain bikes
Road and Road and mountain Length 10-50 km Length 30-80 km
mountain bikes bikes Width 0.5-0.7 m Cleared width 1 m
Width 2.5 m Width 2 m Clearing width 1-1.5 Cleared height 2.5 m
Max. grade 10% Avg. grade 5-10% m Tread width 0.3-0.5
Average grade 5- Max. grade 10- Clearing height 2.5 m
8% 15% m Avg. grades to 15%.
Avg. grade to 10%, Max. grade to 20-
Max. grade 15-20% 25%
Horseback Day use, 1-15 km Day use or Low use multi-day N/A N/A
Gentle uniform overnight trips
grade 5-40 km 30-50 km
Gravel, well Natural surfacing Low standards
drained Max. grade 15% Riders may need to
Grades 0-10% Clearing height 3 dismount for
Clearing height 3 m sections
m Clearing Width >
Clearing width 2.5 m
>2.5m Tread width >0.5-1
Tread width >1.5 m
m Ford depth < 60
Ford depth < 60 cm smooth bottom
cm smooth bottom
Cross Country Ski Ski racing trails. (Easy) Day use (More difficult) Day (Most difficult) Ski N/A
(Elevations over 1200m Cross Country Up to 15 km use touring route
and average grades Canada Avg. grades up to Up to 22-36 km Up to 40% downhill
under 10%) Regulations. 5% Avg. grades up to grade
Avoid climbs over 15% Single climbs to
5m Max. grades up to 100m
Max. 100 m 25% Trails over 15 km not
elevation change in Avoid climbs over to exceed 1500 m
overall trail. 75 m climb.
Clearing width 3 m Max. 600 m Ungroomed
Clearing height elevation change in
2.5m overall trail.
Wide curves Clearing width 3 m
Shelters every 15- Clearing height 2.5m
20 km Wide curves
Groomed Shelters every 15-20
km
Ungroomed
Snowmobile Day use Day use Day use to multi- N/A N/A
(Elevations over 1200m) 24-40 km 40-80 km day
Max. avg. 8% Max. avg. 10% 80-120 km
Max. grade 25% Max. grade 30% Max. avg. 15%
Cleared width 5m Cleared width 5m Max. grade 25%
Clearing height Clearing height 2.5 Cleared width 2.5 m
2.5 m m Clearing height 2.5
Trail width 3.6m Trail width 3.6m m
Trail width 2.0 m

Trans Canada Trail Nelway to Yahk Route Assessment Report Page 70
Appendix 2 Contact List
Name Affiliation Telephone
Al Skucas, Regional Director, Trails B.C., Rockies Region 250 489-1083
Alex Johnston Creston Resident 250 428-9872
Anja Tolman B.C. Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management 250 387-3393
Arn von Maydell Area Manager, Bridges, Ministry of Transportation 250 354-6518
Dave Waugh Regional District of Central Kootenay 250 352-6665
Gadicke, Ken Creston Snowmobile Club 250 428-2949
Gillian Cooper Creston Valley Wildlife Center 250 402-6906
Grant Irvine Senior Transportation Planning Engineer 250 828-4997
Hans Buchwald Vector Road Landowner No Phone
Hanne Heintz-Smith Linking Communities Report for RDCK 250 362-7767
Jack Marra Tembec Industries Inc. 250 426-6241
Jack and Janet Sadler Proprietors of Yahk General Store 250 424-5100
Jeff Nicolajsen GIS Department, Regional District of East Kootenay 250-489-2791
Jim Smith Creston Valley Forest Corp. 250 428-2818
Keith Vonk Lost Creek Resident 250 551-0192
Kevin Maloney Nelway Resident and Forestry Technician 250 357-0055
Lawrence Lavender Councillor, Town of Creston 250 428-2214
Leon Mueller Councillor, Town of Creston 250 428-2214
Lola Monty Stagleap Ranch 250 357-2263
Lou Comin and John Solly Backcountry Horsemen 250 428-2034
Mike Leblanc Trans Canada Trail Foundation Coordinator 403 949-7764
Mike Pascuzzo (and Chris Woodlands Manager, J.H. Huscroft Ltd. 250 428-3703
Kulak)
Pat Smith Creston Trails Committee 250 428-7094
Peter Rodenstein, David Sachs Imasco Minerals Inc. 250 866-5292
Ralph Moore East Kootenay Environmental Society 250 428-7479
Randy Foggins Woodlot Licensee, Jensen Creek 250 424-5215
Raymond Gaudart Trails B.C., Director, West Kootenays 250 362-5998
Rick Logan Kootenay Lake Forest District 250 825-1151
Rob Babiarz Ministry of Forests Engineering Officer 250 365-8668
Roy Simon Jenson Creek Landowner 250 424-5510
Salmo Public Library Historical Dewdney Trail Information 250 357-2312
Steve Flett Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management 250 354-6379