• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Beyond the PDF2 - Amsterdam, March 2013
 

Beyond the PDF2 - Amsterdam, March 2013

on

  • 494 views

My slides from the session "New Models of Content Dissemination" - see http://lanyrd.com/2013/btpdf2/schedule/

My slides from the session "New Models of Content Dissemination" - see http://lanyrd.com/2013/btpdf2/schedule/

Statistics

Views

Total Views
494
Views on SlideShare
441
Embed Views
53

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
6
Comments
0

1 Embed 53

https://twitter.com 53

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

CC Attribution License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Beyond the PDF2 - Amsterdam, March 2013 Beyond the PDF2 - Amsterdam, March 2013 Presentation Transcript

    • Beyond the PDF: New modes of dissemination Experiments from PLOSTheo Bloom, Editorial Director for Biology, PLOS Amsterdam, March 2013
    • Take-home / talking points / provocation• Trying to fix a big interconnected system - it‟s not easy or fast• One change at a time brings people along• Steps are good if they‟re in the right direction• Partner with others wherever it makes sense• Experiments are good: adapt to the results 2
    • The idealised cycle of research communication Do some scienceDiscuss ideas Write a description Read/use other Share it with people’s work the world 3
    • The real-life cycle is more complicated Do some science Discuss ideas Write a descriptionRead / use other people’s work Rejection. Try Submit it to another journal a journalGet promoted Do more work as requested Get grants Resubmit Be judged by publications Publication
    • http://www.sciencemag.org/content/321/5885/36.1.full.pdf
    • The real-life cycle has some big problems Problem 4: poorProblem 1: links fromAccess to what underlying data and Do someyou want to read science methods to write-upand (re) use Discuss ideas Write a description Read / use other people’s work Rejection. Try Submit it to another journal a journal Get promoted Problem 5: Do more work as requested Problem 3:Problem 2: Get grants Resubmit because ofpublication venue Be judged by problem 2, repeatas a measure of publications cycles at differentpublication quality Publication journals;and/or impact publication is delayed
    • The real-life cycle has some big problems Problem 4: poorProblem 1: links fromAccess to what underlying data and Do someyou want to read science methods to write-upand (re) use Discuss ideas Write a description Read / use other people’s work Rejection. Try Submit it to another journal a journal Get promoted Problem 5: Do more work as requested Problem 3:Problem 2: Get grants Resubmit because ofpublication venue Be judged by problem 2, repeatas a measure of publications cycles at differentpublication quality Publication journals;and/or impact publication is delayed All subject areas; not assessing „impact‟
    • We haven‟t „solved‟ problems 1-3• Beyond CC-BY: explore better ways to do openness (metadata, data, reusability); and accessibility• Beyond ALMs: make altmetrics optimally useful and encourage wider adoption• Beyond PLOS ONE: more formal experiments with peer review this year – increase openness; structure reviewer information; portable reviews? … We have made some progress in these areas 8
    • Problem 4: poor links from underlying data and methods to write-upDo some science Write a description
    • Do some science Write adescription Store some of the data somewhere…
    • Do some science Integrated collection of methods, results, data, metadata Write a narrative Store all of the description that is data somewhere inextricably linked to the data and methods useful and link to publication
    • Steps towards better data handlingWhat to do with „homeless‟ data?Partnership with Dryad (www.datadryad.org)• Unstructured data „packages‟ associated with published articles• Freely available - CC0• A unique identifier (DOI) for each package• Statistics for access• Seamless tying together of article and dataPartnership with figshare (www.figshare.org)• figshare widget displays Supporting Information files directly in the article• search, magnify, download singly or as a packagePlanning in hand for „data papers‟ (www.ploscompbiol.org)• Describes reusable dataset to support reuse• Publishes associated metadata• Ensures valuable data is actionable for reuse• Data accessible in a recognized, stable repository
    • Can we revolutionize speed? Problem 5:PLOS Currents: Influenza - InspirationSeeking Lessons in Swine Flu Fight“Another problem is communication.Officials and experts say they have learned a lot about humanswine influenza. But relatively little of that information...hasbeen reported and published. Some experts said researcherswere waiting to publish in journals, which can take months orlonger.”New York Times, August 10th, 2009Lawrence K. Altman, M.D. 13
    • Rapid technical and scope reviewAuthors may revise but can be published almostimmediately post-reviewContent is peer-reviewed, citable, publiclyarchived, and included in PubMed
    • What comes out: flexible (familiar) format
    • PLOS Currents as an experiment• Swine flu epidemic faded away - then a new one started• We said “submissions do not have to be full-length articles” – but what did we get?• What use-cases make most sense for Currents?• Can we try harder with non-traditional article formats? – Single findings – Negative results – Replications – Methods and protocols• Publish all results with as little delay as possible 16
    • Back to issue 1: Access vs. accessibility• Readable by machines as well as people• Intelligible 17
    • Where do people go for information? • open review via wiki • PLoS Comput Biol article “version of record” • A high-quality Wikipedia article that can be edited and updated 18
    • Take-home / talking points• Trying to fix a big interconnected system - it‟s not easy or fast• One change at a time brings people along• Steps are good if they‟re in the right direction• Partner with others wherever it makes sense• Experiments are good: adapt to the results• We need to work with real people – authors, readers – as well as with machines 19
    • Open Access tbloom@plos.org 20