Virtual Worlds Seminar Business Workshop

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Notes on slide 1

    Avatar=Club Penguin Social=Habbo Sports=Football Superstars
    MMORPG=World of warcraft
    3D Chat=imvuBranded=LegoAdult=3D Poker
    Virtual=Second Life
    City=TwinityGenerators=Metaverse Serious=Sun

    Remove Childrens

    Remove teen Games

    Remove non business

    Current Market leaders

    Over 40% saw positive economic benefit whilst 42% did not know

    Over 50% expect positive economic benefit in 2009

    A third said that the data showed it was a success and another 61% sait the projects ‘felt like a success’

    The reported important benefits where ‘face to face time’, innovation and cost saving

    Nearly 3/4 say that investment will increase in 2009/10

    The most common uses for pilot or deployment were for training and meetings

    Internal meetings were more common than external ones

    More complex uses are being considered now that they feel more confident

    Increasing use of the more and more complex applications of the technology

    Leading options were web conferencing, real face to face and video conferencing

    Telepresence $250k per room, $10-20k per month

    A personal experience dealing with a global team

    3D Web are considered more like face to face than they are web conferencing

    Over 50% said it costs less than the comparisons

    54% say more than a man months effort, 34% more than 5-6 man months

    29% in less than 9 months, but as big ‘don’t’ know

    Majority in ‘pre-production’ or pilot or proof of concept

    There are many barriers to adoption

    Train, train, train, the University of Delaware ran a pilot and gave 20 hours training to staff, they said it should have been 40

    Current Market leaders

    1 Favorite

    Virtual Worlds Seminar Business Workshop - Presentation Transcript

    1. Virtual Worlds Seminar Business Workshop Terry Thorpe & Neil Riley
    2. Agenda • Thinking about 3D Web • Branding • Current research statistics • The ‘Ecosystem’ around 3D Web • Case studies
    3. Thinking about 3D Web • What are you trying to achieve? • Is it internal or external, private or public • Who are the project team? • Who will be the ‘owner? • “Normal” project disciplines apply
    4. Thinking about 3D Web • Is it for brand or product PR? • Is it for meetings, are they external? • Exhibitions or conferences? • Do you have a budget, does it include staffing and maintenance?
    5. Virtual Worlds Avatar Centric Sports Social Platforms Social Game MMORPG Branded 3D Chat Adult Games Worlds Virtual Worlds Entertainment Business Virtual World City Guides Generators Serious Games Source:FredCavazza.net
    6. Thinking about 3D Web • Needs an executive sponsor • Needs a single ‘owner’ who can be evangelistic • IT team’s ‘buy in’ will be required • Supports the organisations cultural values - what are they (really)?
    7. Organisational Culture Source: Richard Barrett
    8. Branding in 3D Web • Can be expensive to execute and maintain • MTV’s Laguna Beach, Lego Worlds • Who will see it? • Best done as a tie in with other media
    9. Any benefit so far? Source: Thinkbalm
    10. ...and in 2009? Source: Thinkbalm
    11. Was it a success? Source: Thinkbalm
    12. What benefits? Source: Thinkbalm
    13. More or less? Source: Thinkbalm
    14. Used or pilot for what? Source: Thinkbalm
    15. Deployed for what? Source: Thinkbalm
    16. ...And for 2009? Source: Thinkbalm
    17. ... and in the future? Source: Thinkbalm
    18. What other options? Source: Thinkbalm
    19. Telepresence
    20. The Cheap version
    21. ...or worse
    22. A global view
    23. Comparisons Source: Thinkbalm
    24. Comparitive cost Source: Thinkbalm
    25. Effort to roll out? Source: Thinkbalm
    26. Payback time? Source: Thinkbalm
    27. Life cycle? Source: Thinkbalm
    28. The barriers? Source: Thinkbalm
    29. Comments • Early adopters do not usually do ROI • Signs of a maturing situation • Higher success that many expected • Where was ‘branding’?
    30. Comments • Some of the results don’t stack up, e.g. host, build, train, implement • Not all costs being accounted for as innovators use ‘volunteers’ • You need to be realistic or it may fail • There is a great deal of positive
    31. 3D Web Business Ecosystem Middleware and Software Component Providers Authoring Tool Server & Providers Workstations Management Consultant Enterprise Customer 3D Web Engine 3D Web Builder Developers Systems Integrator Enterprise Hardware Integration Comms Provider Manufacturers Tools Revenue Flow Source: Stanford Research Institute
    32. 3D Web Business Ecosystem Meerkat Middleware and Software Component Providers Blender Dell Authoring Tool Server & Providers Workstations Management You Consultant Enterprise Customer 3D Web Engine IBM 3D Web Builder Developers Linden Labs Electric Sheep Systems Integrator Enterprise Hardware Integration Comms Provider Manufacturers Tools Revenue Flow Rivers Run Red Dell BT Source: Stanford Research Institute
    33. 3D Web Business Ecosystem Meerkat Project Management? Middleware and Training? Software Component Providers Cultural Blender Dell Transformation? Authoring Tool Server & Providers Workstations Management You Consultant Enterprise Customer 3D Web Engine IBM 3D Web Builder Developers Linden Labs Electric Sheep Systems Integrator Enterprise Hardware Integration Comms Provider Manufacturers Tools Revenue Flow Rivers Run Red Dell BT Source: Stanford Research Institute
    34. Costs • Branding used to cost £1/4 million • Private Olive projects cost £1m+ • Pilot’s cost about £20k+ • Then consider project by project • Be realistic, build is about 20%
    35. Case studies • BP to save $1-2m per crisis management training event, costs now recovered in 2 years and saved $4m in March 2009 • IBM in a 3 day meeting of it’s ‘Elite’ saved $350k, but ROI not relevant • Kelly Recruitment and Accenture both use SL to recruit at lower cost
    36. Case studies • Branding examples: • American Apparel, came and went • Herman Miller office furniture, ditto • Coca Cola’s investment in Google versus Second Life, 5.6m vs. 27
    37. Common Errors • Non exclusive space, e.g. lack of control, neighbors, closure, etc. • Poor quality build e.g. scale, textures, lighting, aesthetics • Poor design; beach, palm trees, flying rooms, strange and unusual • 3D Web is, and will be, Second Life
    38. what to do?
    39. Persevere
    40. Build pilots
    41. Proof of concept
    42. Training for staff
    43. An open mind
    44. Discussion?

    + KohdSpaceKohdSpace, 2 months ago

    custom

    290 views, 1 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    KohdSpace Business Workshop at the Virtual Worlds S more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 290
      • 290 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 7
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories