Habermas and the Net
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Habermas and the Net

on

  • 1,537 views

Presentation at the International Communication Association (ICA) conference in Singapore, 2010 by Mark Balnaves, Tama Leaver and Michele Willson.

Presentation at the International Communication Association (ICA) conference in Singapore, 2010 by Mark Balnaves, Tama Leaver and Michele Willson.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,537
Views on SlideShare
1,537
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
17
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

CC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike LicenseCC Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Habermas and the Net Habermas and the Net Presentation Transcript

  • Habermas and the Net Mark Balnaves, Tama Leaver, & Michele Willson Department of Internet Studies, Curtin University International Communication Association (ICA) Conference, Singapore, June 2010
    • "I don't think he [Habermas] really gets the Internet."
    • Axel Bruns, 2006
    • (blog post after Habermas's keynote address at the 2006 ICA conference, http://snurb.info/node/621 )
    • "He [Habermas] simply does not understand the Internet”
    • Howard Rheingold, 2007
    • (blog post, http://www.smartmobs.com/2007/11/05/ habermas-blows-off-question-about-the-internet-and-the-public-sphere/ )
  • Communicative spaces are not just neutral technological spaces
    •  
    • Discourse for Habermas
      • Enables people to recognise the intentions of others participating in a discourse;
      • There is no force or coercion in the discourse;
      • There is the opportunity to come to a consensus, even if it is not an perfect consensus, on opinions and facts
  • Habermas embraces the virtual
    • “ If there is to be a realistic application of the idea of the sovereignty of the people to highly complex society, it must be uncoupled from the concrete understanding of its embodiment in physically present, participating, and jointly deciding members of a collectivity.”
    • - Jurgen Habermas, 1992, 462
  • … but aggregation of public opinion on the Internet problematic
    • The data aggregators, like Acxiom, have taken on a proxy role in public opinion formation;
    • The materiality of the Internet, “protocol”, also has indirect effects on public opinion formation
  • Twitter?
    • Twitter
    • Lists?
  • Google … Social Search?
  • Friend or enemy of diversity?
    • The ease of limiting Google to search your social network rather than the entire Internet – achieved essentially with one click – can determine whether the web is explored as an enormous collection of different views, perspectives and information, or whether only a predefined group of friends or connections is searched .
  • And thus we need to consider that…
    • Facilitated by protocol, the Internet is the most highly controlled mass media hitherto known .
    • (Galloway, 2004, 243)
  • Positioning Habermas – public sphere Galloway- protocol Instrumentally Analytical tool Concept-tool ‘ Location’ practiced Outside of market and state (system) Outside of corporate, institutional, govt. power. Historically Early capitalism; changing notions of sovereignty, human/individual rights Network mode of organization; decentralised networks Structurally Horizontal - horizontal Conduit People, opinions, writing Process, code, interoperability Access Bourgeois, Open to all negotiated Public/s Homogeneous originally, later to be multiple publics – universal form/process but heterogeneous content Universal/standardised but with heterogeneity
  • Who or what controls….
    • The key question therefore is never whether control does or does not exist, but rather to ask: What is the quality of this control? Where does it come from? Is it being wielded by governments or deployed at the level of machinic infrastructure?.What is the specific character of information organization? This is the basic question of protocol.
    • ( Galloway interview, 2009)
  • Your thoughts? Mark Balnaves [email_address] Tama Leaver (Twitter: @ tamaleaver ) [email_address] Michele Willson [email_address]