TAGD's TWCA Presentation


Published on

TAGD's Executive Director, Stacey Steinbach, spoke on groundwater management at the Texas Water Conservation Association's Annual Meeting in March 2012.

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

TAGD's TWCA Presentation

  1. 1. Groundwater Management Update Stacey A. Steinbach Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts TWCA Annual Meeting March 7, 2012
  2. 2. Topics for Discussion• SB 660: Amendments to DFC Adoption Process• Recent Rulemakings• DFC Appeals• Drought Update• Looking Ahead
  3. 3. Senate Bill 660
  4. 4. SB 660 – Adoption of DFCs• New DFC process allows for more public involvement and requires additional notice• In proposing DFCs, GCDs must now consider 9 specific factors and a balancing test• “District representatives” must meet at least annually and must establish propose for adoption DFCs at least every 5 years
  5. 5. New DFC Factors • DFC = quantitative description of desired condition of groundwater resources in a GMA at one or more future times; adopted per 36.108 • In establishing the Before voting on the proposed DFCs, GCDs must consider: PrivateAquifer Uses State Water Hydrological Impacts on Propertyor Conditions Plan Conditions Subsidence Rights* Any other Socioeconomic Environmental Feasibility of relevant Impacts* Impacts* achieving DFC* information*
  6. 6. New DFC Balancing Test Conservation, preservation, protection, recharging and prevention of waste of groundwater and control of subsidence Highest practicablelevel of groundwater production
  7. 7. New DFC Adoption Process
  8. 8. New DFC Adoption Process District reps meet & Each GCD must hold a propose new DFCs for Proposed DFCs mailed to public hearing on adoption; 2/3 of all GCDs; 90-day comment relevant DFCs & makedistrict reps must vote to period begins copies available to public approve DFCs [Within 60 days,]* GCD votes on DFCs; GMA meeting(s) to district reps must submit prepares summary of consider GCD hearing DFCs, proof of notice, &comments & suggested summaries & adopt DFCs explanatory report to revisions (2/3 of all reps) TWDB (and GCDs) GCD meeting to adopt GCDs must update DFCs asap after receipt GCDs must amend rules management plans of explanatory report; within 1 year of updating within 2 years of DFC[info to TWDB within 60 management plan adoption at GMA days of adoption]*
  9. 9. Notice of DFC Meetings – GMA Level• 10-day and OMA notice required; must be posted at SOS, COs, and GCDs in GMA and must include: – Date, time, and location – Summary of proposed actions – List of GCDs in GMA and contact information• Failure or refusal of one or more GCDs to post does not invalidate actions• District reps may elect one GCD to be responsible for providing notice of a joint meeting
  10. 10. Notice of DFC Meetings – GCD Level• 10-day notice of hearings on DFCs and meetings to adopt DFCs• Notice must include: – Proposed DFCs and agenda items – Date, time, and location – List of GCDs in GMA and contact information – Information on submitting comments• DFC hearings must also be posted pursuant to GCD rulemaking hearing requirements (includes publication)
  11. 11. Explanatory Report• Adopted DFCs• Policy and technical justifications for each adopted DFC• Documentation showing how DFC factors were considered• List of DFCs considered but not adopted and reasons why• Analysis of public comments received
  12. 12. Using the MAG• Modeled is the new Managed• Defined as the amount of water that may be produced on an average annual basis to achieve a DFC• GCDs, to the extent possible, shall issue permits up to the point that the total volume of exempt and permitted groundwater production will achieve an applicable DFC [permitted equals the MAG, if administratively complete permit applications are submitted…]
  13. 13. Using the MAGIn issuing permits, GCDs must manage total groundwater production ona long-term basis to achieve an applicable DFC and consider: Yearly Exempt Previously Actual Precipitation MAG* Use Authorized Production & Estimates* Withdrawals Estimates Production Patterns
  14. 14. Agency Rulemakings
  15. 15. TWDB Proposed Rules• Dec. 2011: introduction to rulemaking plans for implementing SBs 660, 727, 737• Jan. 2012: Stakeholder meeting; comments accepted through January 31• April 2012: draft rules expected; informal public comment period before formal proposal by Board
  16. 16. TCEQ Proposed Rules• SB 313 (creation of GCDs in PGMAs)• SB 660 (Petitions for Inquiry)• Considered by TCEQ March 7• Comment period March 23 – April 23• Public hearing April 17
  17. 17. RRC Hydraulic Fracturing Rules• Implement HB 3328; wells permitted on or after January 2, 2012• Require disclosure of hydraulic fracturing fluid ingredients and amount of water used; operator must post on FracFocus on/before submission of well completion report• Exceptions: undisclosed, unintentional, and incidental ingredients and ingredients that are eligible for trade secret protection (can be challenged)
  18. 18. Joint Planning• xcv
  19. 19. DFC Appeals
  20. 20. DFC Appeals - Currently • Currently: person with a “legally defined interest in groundwater,” a GCD (in or adjacent to), or a RWPG in the GMA can file petition with TWDB to challenge reasonableness • Appeals filed in 7 of the 16 GMAs • Challenges included: Excessive economic/ Excessive Impacts to Use of best InsufficientGeographic private ecological surface available stakeholder area use property impacts waters science input impacts
  21. 21. DFC Appeals – What’s Next?• Two separate concepts floated last session: – “Affected person” files petition with GCD; SOAH hearing; PFD; GCD final order; appealable to district court in GMA – GCD’s adoption of DFC may be challenged in district court in local venue in same manner as GCD rule (substantial evidence)• What about GCD appeal? Which vehicle is appropriate?• GCDs and TWCA members should consider consensus language
  22. 22. GCDs and the Drought
  23. 23. Effects of the DroughtHas the Drought Affected Your Are the Aquifers in Your District District? Showing Signs of the Drought? No No 13% 24% Yes Yes 87% 76%
  24. 24. Effects of the Drought Increase of "dry" wells in the district 46% Implementation of voluntary restrictions 21% Implementation of mandatory restrictions 15%Less time to focus on district administration 33% Increase in community outreach 52% Increase in well registrations 52% Increase in permit applications 73%
  25. 25. Effects of the Drought• No one-size-fits all solution to groundwater management challenges• Determining full impact of drought may take years• Encourages increased education and better planning
  26. 26. Looking Ahead• House and Senate Interim Charges• EAA v. Day and McDaniel• The Drought• Conservation Strategies & “New” Water Sources
  27. 27. Questions? Stacey A. SteinbachTexas Alliance of Groundwater Districts P.O. Box 152169 Austin, Texas 78715-2169 tagdexec@texasgroundwater.org (512) 809-7785 www.texasgroundwater.org