• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Q7 ethical
 

Q7 ethical

on

  • 283 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
283
Views on SlideShare
283
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Q7 ethical Q7 ethical Presentation Transcript

    • ARE OUTCOMES-BASED PROGRAMS EFFECTIVE AND ETHICAL?Copyright © 2013 ShapeUp, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Proprietary & Confidential shapeup.com
    • Towers Watson/NBGH Cost of Health Care Survey 2012• 68% of companies use incentives to promote participation• 32% plan to expand their incentives in 2013• Outcomes-based incentives are less popular:
    • Aon Hewitt 2012 Health Care Survey• 61% of employers offer incentives or disincentives to motivate sustained healthcare behavior change• Of those who offer incentives, 50% tie them to wellness outcomes• 25% of employers who offer incentives tie them to healthy progress
    • The Case For Rewarding Healthy Progress• People tend to place more weight on the present than the future, thus immediate rewards are more motivating• Frequent, smaller, real-time rewards are more successful than promises of large, future rewards since they provide immediate gratification
    • The Case For Rewarding Health Outcomes “While more than 80% of employers provide an incentive to complete a health questionnaire, less than 10% provide an incentive to address the results of the questionnaire. More than 60% of employers provide an incentive to complete biometric screening, yet again, less than 10% provide an incentive to take any action. Less than 20% of employers provide an incentive to employees who achieve targeted clinical results. This focus on participation and access to information rather than outcomes and results won’t move the needle when it comes to health improvement” – Aon Hewitt 2012 Health Care Survey
    • Are Outcomes-Based Incentives Effective? • “A review of 17 studies by researchers at Oxford University found no difference in outcomes among participants in a smoking cessation program between those who received a financial reward and those who did not. Another group of researchers in the UK reviewed 9 randomized controlled trials of obesity treatment and found no significant effect of the use of financial incentives on weight loss at 12 and 18 months.” • “On the other hand, a series of studies conducted at the University of Pennsylvania showed positive results associated with programs using financial rewards. One study found that financial incentives were effective in producing weight loss, but the results were not fully sustained seven months after the program ended. In another study, financial rewards significantly increased rates of smoking cessation among 878 employees of a large U.S. company.”Source: http://www.healthaffairs.org/healthpolicybriefs/brief.php?brief_id=69 6
    • Incentives: The Employer Argument • “In general, business groups want employers to have maximum flexibility to design programs with rewards or penalties that will encourage employees to not only participate but also to achieve and maintain measurable health status goals, such as quitting tobacco use or reducing body mass index. They argue that individuals should bear responsibility for their health behavior and lifestyle choices and that it is unfair to penalize an employers entire workforce with the medical costs associated with preventable health conditions as well as the costs of reduced productivity.”Source: http://www.healthaffairs.org/healthpolicybriefs/brief.php?brief_id=69
    • Incentives: Consumer Advocate Argument• “Unions, consumer advocates, and voluntary organizations such as the American Heart Association are generally wary of wellness initiatives that provide rewards or penalties based on meeting health status goals. They are concerned that, rather than improving health, such approaches may simply shift heath care costs from the healthy to the sick, undermining health insurance reforms that prohibit consideration of health status factors in determining insurance premium rates.”• “They argue that such incentives are unfair because an individuals health status is a result of a complex set of factors, not all of which are completely under the individuals control. For example, genetic predisposition plays a significant role in determining many health status factors, including such attributes as excess weight, blood pressure, blood sugar, and cholesterol levels. Consumer advocates also caution that poorly designed and implemented wellness initiatives may have unintended consequences, such as coercing an individual with a health condition to participate in an activity without adequate medical supervision.
    • Prepared by: ShapeUp www.shapeup.com @shapeupdotcomCopyright © 2013 ShapeUp, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Proprietary & Confidential shapeup.com