Cio software testing_survey
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Cio software testing_survey

on

  • 544 views

CIO software testing survey

CIO software testing survey

Statistics

Views

Total Views
544
Views on SlideShare
544
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
8
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Cio software testing_survey Document Transcript

  • 1. Software Quality and Testing:A CIO Perspective
  • 2. Is Technology Transforming Your Business? Ba re ly Slightly 2% 16% Profoundly 31%Key PointsOriginal Software conducted a qualitativeopinion survey of senior IT executives andCIOs from organizations with an average Significa ntly 51%annual revenue of $5.8billion and anaverage IT budget of $764 millionThis survey took place at the RichmondEvents 2008 CIO Forum onboard the Are You Taking Advantage of This Potential?Cruise Ship “Norwegian Dawn” out of NewYork City. Not at all 0% Ve ry we ll Not v e ry we ll 23% 23%> There is strong agreement that technology ishaving a profound positive impact on all businessprocesses, however the number of companies in aposition to truly harness this technology for theirown competitive advantage is small.> The three most important managementchallenges facing respondents are cost reduction, Quite we ll 54%budget management and integration/consolidation.> The top three technical issues facing respon-dents are virtualization, application consolidationand server consolidation. Technology: A Business Driver> There is a strong divide as to whether softwarequality processes are deemed important to the Technology is at the heart of processes usedbusiness. across both the public and private sectors. Many organizations are investing in large technology> Undoubtedly software quality issues are gaining projects and so we asked our respondents howmore executive mindshare due to boardroom focus they perceived technology transforming theiron issues such as compliance and the significant business, and were they in a good position to takeinvestment in quality systems. advantage of the possibilities that technology is giving them to improve and gain competitive> High quality applications are sighted as the main advantage?driver for purchasing automation tools but the vastmajority admitted to not being happy with their Although 82% of respondents agreed thatpurchase. technology was having a profoundly positive effect on their industry, 23% of respondents admitted>There is recognition of more options for that they were not utilizing technology as well asresourcing testing with outsourcing of software they might to give them a competitive advantage.quality processes on the agenda for over half ofrespondents.
  • 3. Looking Ahead “A good software quality solution will be able to helpWhen asked what are the top IT management with data migration and ensureconcerns it was perhaps not surprising that the top complete data security, eventwo had a distinctly financial feel. when testing on live data.”Cost reduction and budget management were thetop two concerns highlighted by our respondents,with integration / consolidation and data securityhot on their heels. We also asked our respondents if they foresaw any changes in their budget over the next 12 months. There is divided opinion on what budgets will do over the next 12 months. It certainly isnt all doom and gloom as would perhaps be expected, with 69% of our respondents indicating that budgets will either go up or remain the same. Those increases will not be huge (a maximum of around 30%), but conversely those IT leaders who predict a budget cut are not expected anything more than 10%. On the whole, senior IT leaders can look forward to the next 12 months with some degree of optimism. Do You Predict a Change in Your IT BudgetFrom a technology point of view we asked our Over the Next 12 Months?respondents the very same question. It seemsvirtualization and application consolidation are R e ma i n t he I nc r e a s e s a megoing to give CIOs the biggest headaches over the 48% 21%next 12 months with server consolidation andlegacy migration not far behind. Issuessurrounding data feature heavily in this list(migration, security and storage) and this is wheremany companies can use technology to help them.For example, a good software quality solution willbe able to help with data extraction and migration, Decr easeensure complete data security and integrity even 31%when testing on “live” data, and reduce data tominimise storage costs.
  • 4. The Growing Importance of Software What is the Perceived Importance ofQuality Assurance (SQA) Software Quality Assurance (SQA) in Your Organization?Software quality assurance (SQA) is a means Not De fine d 15% Nice to Ha v eof monitoring the software development Stra te gic Business 25%processes and methods used to ensure quality. Im pe ritav e 15%SQA encompasses the entire softwaredevelopment process, which includes processessuch as design, coding, change management,configuration management and delivery. Cost of DoingWe asked our respondents their opinion on the Busine ss F unda m enta l 16%perceived importance of overall SQA within their Busine ss Proce ss 29%own organizations.There was a stark (and somewhat alarming) Another question we asked our group of respondentsdifference of opinion regarding the perceived was whether they personally get involved inimportance of software quality. On one hand we formulating quality policies. There is a strongsee a healthy 44% of people tell us that SQA is indication that the general issue of SQA is grabbingeither a fundamental business process or of the CIO’s attention with more than 80% directlystrategic importance. Both of these groups exhibit involved in formulating SQA policies. Just under halfa proactive approach to improving software have involvement most of the time, while a furtherquality, understanding the potential effect it has 33% have occasional input. This is further proof thaton application delivery time-to-market, issues around SQA are becoming more strategic incompetitive differentiation and improving overall nature with the increased pressures on CIOs tosoftware quality. reduce costs and balance resources.16% of respondents see SQA as the cost of Responsibilities that have previously been delegateddoing business. This group, although they think to QA Managers and Test Managers now take onsoftware quality is important, are just accepting it added precedence at board level, primarily due to theas a part of their everyday life and are probably costs of many of the systems, plus there is muchnot reaping all the benefits. On the positive side, more awareness at a senior level of the potentialthis indicates that 60% of companies out there business risk (in terms of brand and financial loss)think that software quality is important to their that poor software quality brings.business. When it comes to budgets there is a mixed story. 40%This leaves 40% of respondents who tell us they of our respondents had not invested in software testsee SQA as a nice-to-have or are not interested automation. Only one third of respondents had madein it at all. Such disregard is surprising given the a significant investment (over $100,000), with arecent number of high-profile examples of how further 18% just dabbling in it.costly software failures can be to an organization. Software test automation tools can have a significantDisaster cases this year include Heathrow T5 in impact on software quality, corporate compliance andthe UK and the failed IBM ERP installation into application delivery times. It is somewhat surprisingAmerican LaFrance that has caused the fire therefore that only a third of companies questionedengine company to go into bankruptcy. had significantly invested in such tools, although there may be a number of reasons why this is:To read more stories like these, visitwww.origsoft.com/nightmares.htm Firstly these tools can be expensive, with outlays of $250,000 not uncommon. Secondly, there is a significant amount of negativity surrounding software test automation, the dominant players are famous for“Such disregard is surprising producing overcomplicated products that are very difficult to maintain over any length of time and onlygiven the recent number of ever result in a small automation gain. Many CIOshigh-profile examples of how may be in the position of “once bitten twice shy” if they have had experience of these tools in previouscostly software failures can roles.be to an organization.”
  • 5. Outsourcing Finally, we asked our respondents about their outsourcing strategy. The indicators are that the outsourcing of software testing is on the up. 25% of people asked admitted to already outsourcing all or part of their software quality processes, with another 28% admitting they are considering it in the future. Outsourcing software quality can provide major cost benefits, especially if coupled with offsite development, however a lack of control over the quality of application is a major reason why so many companies tend to keep their software testing in-house. Data Security The growing trend in outsourcing goes hand-in- hand with an increase in data security risk. Outsourcing y our softwa re quality proce sse s Production data as a source of background data is valuable and desirable for testing and allows the35% test environment to represent the live system as30% closely as possible. Clearly however, testing on live data is risky but many companies are sharing such25% data with outsource partners, with no way of20% knowing if it is ever compromised.15% Including a data scrambling element to the testing10% process, ideally with some kind of roll back function5% to be able to reset the data to its original state, will ensure that the test data is not exposed.0% We’v e nev er We hav e We hav e We ar e alr eady We ar e alr eady c onsider ed it c onsider ed it - c onsider ed it - out sour c ing out sour c ing all we will not it may happen par t of t he of t he sof t war e out sour c e in t he f ut ur e sof t war e qualit y qualit y pr oc esses pr oc esses
  • 6. Software Test Automation requirements are fully satisfied - we have just spent $1m on a large amount of tools to do this.”When the questions turned specifically to After a small amount of persistence, we were ablesoftware test automation tools, we asked our to understand a little bit more of the detail about thegroup of respondents what the main objectives very impressive sounding “complete solution” theywere for implementing automation. By far the had just purchased.biggest driver was to produce higher qualityapplications (63%). To increase time-to-market > The “solution” was purchased almost 2for those applications only ranked at 24%, years previously and had taken a team ofIndicating that quality wins out over quantity in 6 people that long to prepare for their firstthe current market. automation.Improving resource efficiency (28%), mitigating > The automation could only work on acorporate risk (24%) and regulatory compliance small stable area of the application.(28%) all ranked quite high. > Only 5% of their testing was covered by this $1m solution because it was too slow and complex to use it on any area of their applications that changed frequently. So after a $1m investment, and two years of imple- mentation they had a software solution that was able to automate just 5% of their total testing, and this was the 5% that was stable and relatively risk free. The rest still needed to be tested manually. Probably not the ROI they were looking for! “Only having 6% of the survey completely satisfied with their software test automation tools is a sad indictment for thoseTo what extent were these objectives achieved? vendors involved, althoughOnly 6% of respondents were completely happy not completely surprising.”with the outcome of their projects, with 39% beinghappy and almost half (43%) gaining only minimalor slight benefits from their investment.Only having 6% of the survey participants The antidote? Next generation software testingcompletely satisfied with their software test solutions from Original Software are designed veryautomation tools is a sad indictment for those differently to the old traditional style tools from thevendors involved, although not completely rest of the industry. Therefore three big issues (longsurprising. set up times, specialist workforce needed and minimal coverage) are nullified. Original SoftwareWhy is this the case? How come the leading lights customers start saving within days and weeks, notof the software test automation industry have got it months, and with our unique self healingso spectacularly wrong? Let us consider a true technology, your testing assets become re-usable,example: meaning a much wider automation coverage. Couple this with an easy interface that enables allOriginal Software recently spoke to a large USA employees to get involved in test automation, andfinancial company (who shall remain nameless) suddenly the benefits promised by automation canabout their software testing requirements. Back be realized.came the reply; “Our automated software testing *For more information on such issues, read “The Great Software Testing Swindle” Whitepaper www.origsoft.com/swindle.htm
  • 7. Automation Can Work!Here are just a few examples of how OriginalSoftware’s next generation software test automationhas helped leading companies around the world.Capital One saved 75% of “business as usual” About Original Softwaretesting of web site.Cargill save over $270k yearly, testing JDE. Original Software offers next generation automatedHSBC save 50% of time in unit testing Coda software testing and quality assurance solutions thatchanges. deliver tangible benefits across a wide range of IT and application environments. As a recognizedBP/Castrol save 90% of time in unit testing batch innovator, Original Software’s goal is to reduceprocesses. business risk and improve application time-to-Summit Holdings (Insurance) saved 75% of testing market for IT departments through the developmentresource. of class leading automated solutions.Skandia Group saved 90% of effort in regression Over the last 10 years, more than 400 organizationstesting. operating in 25 countries have come to depend on Original Software for their software testing solutions.NJ Natural Gas built test environments in 4 daysrather than 4 weeks. Current users range from small software development shops to major multinationals,Royal Bank of Scotland reduced their UAT from 6 including: NYSE, Cargill Global Financial Solutions,weeks to 1 week. Circuit City Stores, Pfizer, BP, DHL, Coca-Cola, Skandia and hundreds of others. Original Software operates central offices near Chicago, and London. Our solutions can be About Richmond Events obtained through these offices or through a network of qualified and knowledgeable business partners throughout Europe, the Middle East, Australasia andRichmond Events organizes and executes strategic the Americas.business forums throughout the US, UK and Europe.These Forums utilize Richmond’s proprietarymatching systems, RichMatch™, to efficiently bringindustry decision makers together to interact withtheir peers, learn from experts and meet withvendors. www.richmondevents.com www.origsoft.com solutions@origsoft.comCopyright Original Software 2008. All rights reserved. All descriptions, and specifications areintended for general information only and are subject to change without notice.OSG—CIOS-08/08