Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Pete Myers
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
144
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
14
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • The use of agricultural chemicals has public health consequences that are not incorporated into the price we pay on supermarket shelves.
  • Pimental in 2005 estimated public health costs of pesticide use in the US to be $1.2BPeople die.People get cancer.Babies are born with birth defectsChildren grow up with IQ points significantly beneath their genetic potentialFertility is impairedElder lives are diminished with pesticide related diseases like Parkinsons.Families and society are burdened with the financial costs of needed health careWe are scratching the tip of a proverbial icebergWe simply don’t have the data to do a true full cost accountingIt is appalling how ignorant we are.But we have enough to get started.
  • Low doses? Doses that many toxicologists until quite recently dismissed as irrelevant. Parts per billion. Biological responses even down to parts per trillionTools: tests have been done one chemical at a time but we know that there are cocktail effects… mixtures of chemicals add up to strong consequences yet all testing… almost all safety testing… has been done one chemical at a timeAnd the tests used rarely are directly relevant to the range of public health problems that have become epidemic, such as heart disease and type two diabetes, which is where the big health costs are.
  • Transcript

    • 1. Internalizing the externalized public health costs of industrial agriculture Pete Myers, Environmental Health Sciences Environmental Health Sciences
    • 2. What do we know? The costs are real But what we now „know‟ vastly underestimates true costs Only the tiniest fraction of ag chemicals have been studied for health effects by independent scientists Only a small fraction of plausible health endpoints have been assessed Only a handful of studies have tried to connect those health effects with economic costs Environmental Health Sciences
    • 3. What do we know? But there is an even larger elephant in the room A revolution in science has unfolded over the past 20 years indicating health consequences far bigger and more common than traditional estimates even hinted. Environmental Health Sciences
    • 4. Revolution in science Epigenetics and endocrine disruption Environmental Health Sciences
    • 5. The United Nations is serious about it Environmental Health Sciences
    • 6. Revolution in science Low doses matter a lot Events in the womb don‟t stay in the womb The tools we have used to assess safety are profoundly misguided Environmental Health Sciences 2.5 parts per billion of atrazine
    • 7. Environmental Health Sciences
    • 8. Low doses matter 1 part per billion 1000 ppb causes weight loss Newbold et al. 2005, 2007 Same strain of mice Same caloric intake Same activity levels Environmental Health Sciences
    • 9. Low levels matter Not “just” affecting farmworkers Environmental Health Sciences

    ×