Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
SKGF_Advisory_US Design Patents Strengthened by Recent Federal Circuit Ruling-CL_2008
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

SKGF_Advisory_US Design Patents Strengthened by Recent Federal Circuit Ruling-CL_2008

312
views

Published on

Published in: Technology

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
312
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. CLIENT ADVISORY September 25, 2008 U.S. DESIGN PATENTS STRENGTHENED BY RECENT FEDERAL CIRCUIT RULING On September 22, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its much anticipated en banc decision in the case of Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc. et al., significantly strengthening the U.S. design patent system. While the decision affirmed a finding of non- infringement, the Court dramatically redefined the test for design patent infringement. In doing so, the Court threw out the quot;point of noveltyquot; as a separate and distinct part of the test for infringement and returned the focus of the analysis to whether the accused design is quot;substantially the same asquot; or a quot;colorable imitationquot; of the patented design. Background A design patent is granted by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office to protect the ornamental appearance of an article of manufacture. Unlike a utility patent that protects how a product works, a design patent protects how a product looks. Prior to this decision, design patent infringement analysis had devolved into an element-by- element, verbal analysis of the quot;novel featuresquot; of the patented design, often ending in a finding of non-infringement. Rather than interpreting only the drawing which was the original intent of a design patent, District Courts were requiring patent holders to verbally describe the uniqueness of the design. Why is this important? This decision is a welcome development for consumer product companies who struggle to keep knock-offs out of the market, allowing them to assert their patents with greater confidence. In addition to simplifying the test for infringement, the decision shifts the burden of comparing the patented design to the prior art onto the accused infringer. Further, the Fed. Cir. clearly cautioned against a detailed written description of the design patent drawings because it can lead to placing undue emphasis on particular design features, rather than on the design as a whole. This decision should reduce the cost of design patent litigation for the patent holder and could make a finding of design patent infringement on summary judgment more likely. Sterne Kessler is a leader in the procurement and enforcement of design patents. If you would like to know more about the Egyptian Goddess decision or how we can put our knowledge in this area to work for you, please contact Tracy-Gene G. Durkin, Esquire at tdurkin@skgf.com or David K.S. Cornwell, Esquire at davidc@skgf.com. Both can be reached at 202-371-2600. Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. : 1100 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20005 : www.skgf.com