The Political Economy of HPAI in Thailand by Rachel M. Safman

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    The Political Economy of HPAI in Thailand by Rachel M. Safman - Presentation Transcript

    1. The Political Economy of HPAI in Thailand Rachel M. Safman, Ph.D.
    2. Key Characteristics
      • Thailand in recovery from Asian Economy crisis at time HPAI hit
      • Thai political system in transition – era of populist & pro-business politics under leadership of Thaksin Shinawatra
      • Thai poultry industry is large, profitable and sophisticated (4 th largest poultry exporter @ time HPAI hit)
    3. Overview of the Crisis
      • ~33 million birds destroyed (2,000 flocks infected)
      • $130 M (USD) in losses in first wave of infections alone
      • Human infections: 25 cases, 17 deaths
      • 4 waves of disease (in poultry) with shift from epidemic to endemic pattern of infection
    4. Chronology of HPAI in Thailand I II III IV
    5. Timeline of Major Events
      • 1 st appearance of disease – Nov ’03
      • Government initially denied HPAI’s presences – treat as point-outbreak
      • Admitted to outbreak in Jan 2004
      • 2 human cases (deaths)
      • 1 st wave: 32/76 provinces affected, 30 M birds culled
      Jan 2004 Jun 2004 Jan 2005 Jun 2005 Jan 2006
    6. Timeline of Major Events
      • Response to 1 st wave adhered closely to international guidelines
      • 5 km cull radius, movement controls
      • Compensation of farmers @ 75% of market value resulted in high levels of compliance – but logistical complications in implementing culls
      • Export ban (90 days)
      Jan 2004 Jun 2004 Jan 2005 Jun 2005 Jan 2006
    7. Timeline of Major Events
      • Virus waned May ’04, re-appeared in July ’04
      • Attempt to deny re-emergence
      • 2 nd wave more widespread and intense than 1 st (264 districts, ~1500 flocks)
      • More targeted culling reduced economic losses (3 M birds culled)
      Jan 2004 Jun 2004 Jan 2005 Jun 2005 Jan 2006
    8. Timeline of Major Events
      • X-ray surveillance introduced Oct 04
      • Nationwide active case-finding based on house-to-house survey
      • Integrated effort of public health and animal health control authorities
      • Dramatic increase in case detection initially, but ultimately effective in bringing epidemic under control
      Jan 2004 Jun 2004 Jan 2005 Jun 2005 Jan 2006
    9. Surveillance Rapid Response System
    10. Timeline of Major Events
      • 3 rd “wave” appeared June ’05, following long disease-free hiatus
      • 2 days before TH was to be declared “bird flu free”
      • Limited duration and extent but major psychological blow
      • Infection pattern closer to seasonal recurrence of endemic infection
      Jan 2004 Jun 2004 Jan 2005 Jun 2005 Jan 2006
    11. Timeline of Major Events
      • Data collected via ongoing X-ray surveillance allowed for more targeted intervention
      • Focus on role of ducks as hosts/ vectors of transmission
      • Small poultry producers also targeted
      • National Strategic Plan adopted
      Jan 2004 Jun 2004 Jan 2005 Jun 2005 Jan 2006
    12. National Strategic Plan
      • Enhanced bio-security at production points
      • Ongoing disease monitoring w/periodic active surveillance (X-ray campaigns)
      • Public education to promote safe handling and quick response to human disease
      • Capacity building within public health system
      • Integrated response management
    13. Timeline of Major Events
      • Since 2006 TH has experienced semi-annual outbreaks of low intensity, typically v.localized
      • No human cases since early 2006
      • Response has now shifted (quietly) to more endemic-style of control, though with readiness for large-scale outbreak
      Jan 2004 Jun 2004 Jan 2005 Jun 2005 Jan 2006
    14. Major Policy Positions
      • Preventative culling of all susceptible animals within 1-10 km radius of cases
      • Movement controls w.i./10 km – permit needed to move animals from/through
      • Census & registration of livestock
      • Upgrading of livestock facilities
      • No preventative vaccination of animals
      • Readying of public health facilities & staff
    15. Key Stakeholder Groups
      • Industrial producers
      • Cock-fighting enthusiasts
      • Duck farmers
      • Public Health community
    16. Industrial Producers
      • Well organized, politically sophisticated
      • Major drivers of government policy
      • Primarily concerned with maintaining (restoring) access to foreign markets
      • Militantly opposed to the use of vaccination (in any subsector)
      • Very closely linked to policy-makers through personal and business connections
    17. Poultry Population of Thailand Composition by # of birds Composition by # of flocks
    18. Growth of the Thai Poultry Sector
    19. Cock-Fighters
      • Actual number of fighting cocks low (6-10 million birds) but supported politically by larger community of enthusiasts
      • Became proxies for small-holders and rural residents more generally, therefore important constituency for Thaksin
      • Represented through lobbying groups with excellent media access
      • History of defying government policy
    20. Cock-fighters (cont.)
      • Strong proponents of vaccination
      • Cock-fighters badly impacted by movement controls – also poorly served by other gov. policies
      • Used strategies of popular resistance to pressure administration to loosen vaccine and movement controls
      • Widespread subversion of policy – illegal vaccine use & illicit movement of birds
    21. Fighting Cock Passports
    22. Duck Farmers
      • Industry rose in prominence/importance in wake of economic crisis
      • Formerly sideline enterprise but now main source of income for duck herders
      • Production largely decentralized but funded by locally influential backers
      • Current production techniques: low-cost, high yield (from farmers’ perspective)
    23. Duck Farmers (cont.)
      • Duck farmers targeted for control after research identified ducks as important reservoir for disease & transmission vector
      • Attempts to shift production to closed-farm systems and prevent trans-provincial movement – strongly opposed by farmers
      • Poor enforcement of legislation – few mechanisms for outreach, enforcement
    24. Public Health Community
      • Human health has long been held up as the central goal of HPAI prevention efforts
      • Public health community in TH is organized, technologically sophisticated and well networked internationally
      • Saw HPAI response as a continuation of earlier outbreaks (HIV, SARS, etc.)
      • Used HPAI as opportunity for capacity building & to raise int’l prestige
    25. Concluding Comments
      • Thai response gave disproportionate advantage to large producers & nearly wiped out small commercial producers
      • Timing of epidemic emphasized commercial interests over social impact
      • Close alliances between government and industry shifted policy-making out of realm of popular participation
    26. Concluding comments (cont.)
      • “ Effective” information management preserved image of Thailand internationally while diminishing internal effectiveness of control efforts
      • Public health-veterinary health alliances (SRRT) developed as part of HPAI response may offer effective model for future emergent infectious disease response

    + STEPS  CentreSTEPS Centre, 8 months ago

    custom

    762 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    In February 2009, an expert meeting co-hosted by th more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 762
      • 762 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 15
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories