Manifesto: Brian Wynne - The GMO controversy as 'public engagement with science'

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Manifesto: Brian Wynne - The GMO controversy as 'public engagement with science' - Presentation Transcript

    1. The GMO Controversy as “Public Engagement with Science”
      It was not a ‘scientific issue’ – it was a public issue involving science
      ‘Public engagement with science’ occurred well before it was invited (BBSRC, 1994: GM Nation, 2003). It was uninvited, and multifarious
      It had an impact on science – eg BBSRC, 2004 Crop Science Rev, +
      That impact was very different from the apocalyptic scenarios of some leading scientists
      It was ‘upstream’, even if also (in timing) ‘downstream’
      The influence on the science – moving away from concentration and ‘monopoly vision’ - could not have occurred without reflective scientific response to (powerful) public signals
      The public could not have offered those new technical directions
      It would have been stupid to expect them to do so – but not stupid to listen, understand and respond to those public concerns
      Diversity isenhanced in scientific (& agricultural?) trajectories
    2. UK BBSRC April 2004 Crop Science Review
      “proposes a stronger national focus on research underpinning ‘public good’ plant breeding”
      “Public-good plant breeding:The response to the consultation exercise identified a widely perceived need for public-good plant breeding, in order to address crops and traits not emphasised by multinational interests and to restore public confidence in plant breeding…The initiative should aim to provide improved germplasm and technology for the development of new varieties, thereby complementing and supporting, not competing with commercial companies”
      “BBSRC should seek to increase publicity for public-good plant breeding and to emphasise the role of genomically-informed but non-transgenic approaches to crop science research”
      Now being funded, Crop Science Initiative ( ~£15m 2009)
    3. “We highlight two further issues concerning technological priorities. First is the need to identify and generate new sources of variation for important traits and to strengthen the science underpinning the development of non-GM approaches to crop improvement such as the identification of allelic variants associated with improved function, introgression of chromosomal elements (or individual genes) from related species and resynthesis of polyploid crops. Transgenic plants involving gene transfer between species are not a prerequisite for exploiting genomics but do provide a useful tool in understanding gene function”
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + STEPS  CentreSTEPS Centre Nominate

    custom

    214 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    The STEPS Centre Symposium, 26 September 2009, focu more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 214
      • 214 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 1
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories