www.steps-centre.org

Integrating Impact Planning into
Research Projects: Reflections from the
STEPS Centre
Adrian Ely, De...
The ESRC STEPS Centre ICE Unit

Impact
Communications
Engagement
Framing
• The metaphor and idea of impact
• A wide range of official
definitions, underpinned by procedures and
structures...
Drivers of and responses to the
‘impact agenda’
•
•
•
•
•

Political justification
Value for money
Cynicism in response to...
Impact methods
•
•
•
•

Experimental methods
Theory of change
Network mapping
Participatory methods
PIPA and how we use it

Douthwaite, B. et al. (2007). "Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis: A Practical Application of ...
At or shortly
After workshop

PIPA workshop

Project logic as laid
Out in concept note

STEPS ‘scaled-down’ version of PIP...
PIPA – lessons and reflections
• Team-building and reflexive learning amongst
project teams and stakeholders
• Using PIPA ...
PIPA – future use and developments
• Other projects have also started using the ‘now
network map’ component of PIPA
• How ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Integrating Impact Planning into Research Projects: Reflections from the STEPS Centre

610

Published on

Seminar by Adrian Ely & Nathan Oxley on framings and practices in the societal 'impact' of research, summarising insights from the STEPS Centre working paper on the subject.

http://www.steps-centre.org/impact

Published in: Education
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
610
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
8
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Integrating Impact Planning into Research Projects: Reflections from the STEPS Centre

  1. 1. www.steps-centre.org Integrating Impact Planning into Research Projects: Reflections from the STEPS Centre Adrian Ely, Deputy Director and Head of Impact and Engagement Nathan Oxley, Communications Officer STEPS-CDI Seminar, 20th February 2014
  2. 2. The ESRC STEPS Centre ICE Unit Impact Communications Engagement
  3. 3. Framing • The metaphor and idea of impact • A wide range of official definitions, underpinned by procedures and structures • Freedom of interpretation? Or guessing game?
  4. 4. Drivers of and responses to the ‘impact agenda’ • • • • • Political justification Value for money Cynicism in response to ‘audit culture’ Optimism Reflexive critique
  5. 5. Impact methods • • • • Experimental methods Theory of change Network mapping Participatory methods
  6. 6. PIPA and how we use it Douthwaite, B. et al. (2007). "Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis: A Practical Application of Program Theory in Research-for-Development." Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 22(2): 127-159.
  7. 7. At or shortly After workshop PIPA workshop Project logic as laid Out in concept note STEPS ‘scaled-down’ version of PIPA Problem formulation + identification of change required to overcome it Project outputs – evidence, publications, events etc Project goal – vision for impact ‘Now’ network map – helps to identify actors, narratives, opportunities Strategies for comms and engagement Impact narrative -What the project hopes to achieve, when, how and with whom
  8. 8. PIPA – lessons and reflections • Team-building and reflexive learning amongst project teams and stakeholders • Using PIPA iteratively to support research, enhance impact and inform ex-post evaluation • Aids portfolio-based impact work as in STEPS
  9. 9. PIPA – future use and developments • Other projects have also started using the ‘now network map’ component of PIPA • How would we have done it differently? • Linking participatory theories of change to systematic, robust, proportionate ex-post work • Further resources can be found at http://pipamethodology.pbworks.com
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×