International Commons Conference
Berlin, 2010-11-02
Heinrich Böll Foundation & Commons Strategies Group
Keynote
Stefan Mer...
Commons Beyond State and Market
„What one can observe in the world, ... is that
neither the state nor the market is unifor...
Society, Production, and Commons
● Humans do not »find« their livelihoods, they
produce them societally using resources
● ...
Capitalism from Commons Perspective
● Capitalism is an anomaly: it is doing basically the
same as Commons do, but in an al...
Commons and Commodities
Two Types of Value
● Need-based value: subjective meaning of things,
knowledge, sociality, that is...
Why »Incompatible Logics«?
Commons:
● Needs are negociated
prior to production
● Conflict of aims are
handled internally
●...
Commons Buildung Blocks
= COMMONS
Commons in a Dangerous Environment

Commons-Mesh Crowds Market Out
Designing Interfaces
Keeping commons alive requires to separate their
generative logic from exploitive logic of markets
Ho...
What about the state?
Again, the state has its own logic being alien for the
commons (can not go into detail here due to t...
Read more about the commons:
www.keimform.de/category/english
Finally...
Thank you :-)
Cartoon by great Nina Paley under C...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

ICC Berlin: Stefan Meretz Keynote

1,787
-1

Published on

Keynote speech of at International Commons Conference Berlin, Oct 31 - Nov 2, 2010.

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,787
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
4
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

ICC Berlin: Stefan Meretz Keynote

  1. 1. International Commons Conference Berlin, 2010-11-02 Heinrich Böll Foundation & Commons Strategies Group Keynote Stefan Meretz, keimform.de The Generative Logic of the Commons No rights reserved. Do what you want.
  2. 2. Commons Beyond State and Market „What one can observe in the world, ... is that neither the state nor the market is uniformly successful in enabling individuals to sustain longterm, productive use of natural resource systems. Further, communities of individuals have relied on institutions resembling neither the state nor the market to govern some resource systems with reasonable degrees of success over long periods of time“ Elinor Ostrom (1990), Governing the Commons, p.1 (German title, re-translated: The Constitution of the Commons – Beyond State and Market)
  3. 3. Society, Production, and Commons ● Humans do not »find« their livelihoods, they produce them societally using resources ● Production does not only include creating things, but also creating knowledge and social relationships when creating things ► All is produced: things, knowledge, sociality ● Commons is a quite »natural« way to do this ● Commons produce things, knowledge, and social relationships we value ► Commons is producing livelihoods according to our needs
  4. 4. Capitalism from Commons Perspective ● Capitalism is an anomaly: it is doing basically the same as Commons do, but in an alien way: – Separation of producers from each other – Separation of producers from consumers – Separation of different needs from each other – Mediation via an unidimentional, blind entity: money – Scarcity rules over abundance – Waste rules over sustainability – Competition rules over cooperation – Commodity rules over sociality – Stuff does only count by its economic value to gain profit ► Polanyi: Dis-embedding of economy from society
  5. 5. Commons and Commodities Two Types of Value ● Need-based value: subjective meaning of things, knowledge, sociality, that is sth. worth for us, e.g. – Sharing software to help the neighbor (»freedom 2«) – Spending time with children or older people – Living in a healthy enviroment ● Economic value: objective meaning of things, knowledge, sociality, that can be sold on markets – Proprietary software – Private kindergarten or retirement home – Spa ● The latter needs the first, but not vice versa ● The value types represent incompatible logics
  6. 6. Why »Incompatible Logics«? Commons: ● Needs are negociated prior to production ● Conflict of aims are handled internally ● Values are a multi- dimensional plurality ● Time spending is a quality of life ● Defending against ongoing enclosures ► Logics of inclusion Commodity: ● Needs are confirmed after production (or not) ● Conflict of aims are externalized ● Value is a uni- dimensional „number“ ● Time saving is an unavoidable coercion ● Executing continuous enclosures ► Logics of exclusion
  7. 7. Commons Buildung Blocks = COMMONS
  8. 8. Commons in a Dangerous Environment 
  9. 9. Commons-Mesh Crowds Market Out
  10. 10. Designing Interfaces Keeping commons alive requires to separate their generative logic from exploitive logic of markets However, interfaces between commons and market do exist – they have to be designed carefully Some design proposals ● Separate commons survival from market activity ● Do not sell your commons products on market ● Replace market functions by your commons to save money ● Distribute your commons results internally according to needs or by stakeholding
  11. 11. What about the state? Again, the state has its own logic being alien for the commons (can not go into detail here due to time) Recommendation: Keep distance to state and market However: ● State can be partially influenced by politics ● State can act as an enabler for the commons ● Key question: Handing-over of resources ● State can act as trustee where commons yet can not (e.g. global commons) ► Use the state, but don‘t trust in the state ► Trust in the commons!
  12. 12. Read more about the commons: www.keimform.de/category/english Finally... Thank you :-) Cartoon by great Nina Paley under CC-by-sa license http://ninapaley.com/mimiandeunice/2010/10/27/viral-patent
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×