• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Agile india 2012 sonali bhasin
 

Agile india 2012 sonali bhasin

on

  • 1,216 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,216
Views on SlideShare
1,216
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
2
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Agile india 2012 sonali bhasin Agile india 2012 sonali bhasin Presentation Transcript

    • Sonali BhasinNokia Siemens Networks, India 19th Feb, Bangalore 1
    •  Introduction - Background : Claims & realities - Quality Assurance in Agile Motivation to explore quality assurance study in the Agile field Research Gaps Research Objective Methodology Case Study results Future work & recommendations Q&A
    •  In the survey conducted by Ambler (2006), results have reported 66% increased in quality that has adopted one or more agile development techniques. Reduction in defect rates of 15% to 50%, using pair programming (Cockburn et al, 2000) Extreme Programming (XP) effect reported 50% increase in productivity, a 65% improvement in pre-release quality and 35% in post-release quality (Layman et al. 2004). Pre-release defect density , measured as defects per thousand lines of code, decreased between 40% and 90% relative to the projects that did not use TDD. (Chris, 2009) 3
    •  Recent survey conducted by versionone indicates that : There continues to be an increasing % of respondents who do not know the benefits of agile, or have not realized substantial benefits, especially in the areas of managing distributed teams and cost reduction. Agile enthusiasts claim significant increases in the quality of their software while detractor cite instances where rapid development and loose structure lead to decreases in quality. This happens because not all ‘agile’ is created equally. Some agile practices are more likely, when implemented correctly, to impact quality than others. Organizations still struggling to balance between waterfall and agile mindset to utilize the benefits claimed by agile. 4
    • Agile Agile QA adoption Market Market Qualifiers WinnersAgile Quality ServiceMethods Cost Level Lead Time
    • • Deliver the wrong functionality. • Build to fragile design • Hand offs inject defects • Fixing defects is expensive • Increased time to value Traditional• Greater ability to deliver required Analysis Agilefunctionality Design• Active stakeholder participation Code• Greater Discipline Testing &• Shorter work cycle – More Value Verify• Greater quality
    • Agile QA Plan driven /Waterfall QAWho is responsible for All the development The QA team software quality team membersWhen quality related All the time, quality is At the QA/testing stage (e.g.topics are addressed one of the primary milestone declarations) concerns of the development process Quality related Same as other Visibility is low, less frequent activities status activities than other activities Work style Collaboration with all Developers and QA people parties might have conflicting interests
    • Research Gaps Studies done in past have revealed improvement in quality with agile methods but not much dedicated study observed with regard to what are the quality issues/challenges faced within Agile organizations and how to overcome them. Existing studies have revealed individual impact of one or other factor on quality eg. TDD, pair programming, however what is the relative/cumulative effect of these factors/practices on overall quality needs to studied. Lack of quality assurance framework in agile to help organizations for implementing QA within agile to ensure sustainability. Current studies are more based on practitioners report, however research based empirical study needs still to be explored in this area. 8
    • Existing Challenges Different levels of quality with different project agility levels and not significant improvement visible. Non functional requirements were ignored/not tested properly. Pair Programming considered to decrease productivity. Refactoring – How much is enough ? “Better don’t touch the code as it might break existing functionality.” Is it the quality of the code or the quality of the developers? Mindset change between developers and testers impacting the delivery & quality of software. 9
    • Problem question How to ensure sustainability of quality improvement benefits realized from agile practices ? How particular context aspect (e.g. organizational culture, organizational distribution, organizational maturity, or maturity of the client’s organization) affect the potential of agile practices to create value & quality software ? What are product or process measures to evaluate Quality in agile software mainly from customer point of view ? How does different levels of implementing agile practice(s) or agility impacts quality ? 10
    • To expand the existing study identifying the key enablers for sustainingquality in Agile, using empirical analysis.To identify critical links between conditions of success and reasons offailure to achieve high quality Agile software.Study how product quality impacts further cost reduction in terms ofreduction in Cost of poor Quality and improved business value in agileenvironmentPropose Agile quality assurance framework that can guide organizationto establish effective quality assurance practices using Agiledevelopment methodologies. 11
    • Research Methodology Interviewed the stakeholders to identify how they perceive quality in agile & probable factors influencing quality to base the further study. Questionnaire based web survey designed. Interpretive structural modeling (ISM) methodology to be applied to develop contextual relationship among the control variables identified to influence quality. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) can then be used to quantify relationships and weigh the significance of different factors identified to impact quality. Data will be put to statistical analysis using Structural equation modeling (SEM) to derive the conclusions. 12
    •  Most team members did not share the same understanding of the concept of quality : Few mentioned reduced customer defects/defect Improve in customer density is a criterion for satisfaction score measuring or perceiving quality Delivering feature faster as per the requirement specification 13
    • But, If a team delivered defect free software , that is not used/valuedby the customer & delayed , they would not achieve the overalliteration/release goals .  Quality would be perceived as low by customer !! 14
    •  We identified what are the key factors that contribute to defining positive perception of quality . Intrinsic Quality Factors Extrinsic Quality Factors Improved Code Reduced Feature Cycle time Quality Reduced Technical Better Customer Satisfaction Index Debt Green Build Reduced Cost of Poor Quality Increased ability to meet with the Reduced Defects current customer requirements 100 % Requirement Increased flexibility to meet with Coverage changing customer requirements 15
    • Agile Core Characteristics Agile Influence on Quality + + Productivity/- Customer Involvement - Defect Reduction- Test Early and often - Early Defects Detection Cost- Shorter Feedback - Cycle Time Improvement Reduction- Prioritized Requirements - Code Quality +Control Variables Business Value• Scrum Practices• Continuous Integration• Refactoring• Experience of Team Members• Geographical /Team distribution• Done compliance• Condition of Satisfaction• Test Driven Development (TDD)• Acceptance Test Driven Development (ATDD)• Test coverage• Sprint Commitment 17
    • Compliance requirement Low risk Critical, AuditedGeographical distribution Entrenched process, people, and policyCo-located Global Minimal Significant Agile Development QA Organization distribution Application complexity (outsourcing, partnerships) Simple, Complex, single In-house Third party multi-platform platform Team size Degree of Governance Under 10 100’s of Informal Formal developers developers
    • 2. What do agile team members identify as the mainfactors impacting on quality ?(+/-) Development Organization Factors Factors Team H5(+) H1(+) Customer Distribution/ Software Collaboration Co-located Quality H6(+/- Assurance H2(+) Decision Time Management ) In Agile Culture H7(+/- ) H3(-) Team Size Product H8(+) Complexity H4(+) H9(+) H10(-) Planning & Legacy Code Control Base Competence & Developer & Learning Tester Mindset 19
    • 21
    • Agile approaches Old ideas about are changing the testing at the end conversation about of the coding phase software no longer development applicable Agile shifted our Testers need to join attention to small in the conversationsteams incrementally with developers and delivering quality users software
    • Agile Quality Assurance Strategy Goal/Objective: To analyze the Impact of Agile on Product Quality & identify the key Agile Quality Measures Built-in Quality Visible Value Customer Measures Creation Satisfaction Stakeholder Perspective Agile & Lean Principles “What measurable impacts must we achieve to satisfy our stakeholders?”  Fault Reduction Agile  Code Quality Score Card Metrics  Delivered Defect Density  Business Value  Green Build Success %  Cycle Time  Customer Loyalty Index  Outage Reduction  Fault Correction Response Time Definition of Test Early & Daily Build & Fault Enhanced Quality Perspective Done Quality + Often + Integrating often + detection & fixing early = Quality (Hypothesis) Improved Quality (Built-in) “In order to achieve our desired quality, what Agile Practices we must do or enhance?”Internal Process “What are the Quality concerns you have in Agile Mode of Operation? In order to satisfy our customers, what Perspective Quality parameters /processes must we excel at and how?”  Study perception using Questionnaire STRATEGIC Promote Define Recognize THRUST Performance Excellence Performance Measures Performance Achieved
    • • Aims to provide software organizations deeper understanding about what factors are important to sustain the quality benefits realized from in agile.• Evaluating critical links between various success factors inAgile development and their impact on achieving high qualitysoftware ● Quality assurance framework in Agile that will help organizations to drive towards achieving excellence with improved software quality. . What’s Next Data Collection is ongoing to validate the model with large scale projects & study the contextual factors influence on software quality
    • Contact Details :sonalibhasin@gmail.comhttp://sonalibhasin.blogspot.in/Twitter : @sonalibhasin
    • 1. Scott W. Ambler, 2006 IT Project Success Rates SurveyResults,http://www.agilemodeling.com/essays/proof.htm#Figure3 , 2007(accessed Nov 10, 2010)2.M. Fowler, "The New Methodology." , 2005 (accessed Sep 6, 2011)http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/newMethodology.html.3.P. McBreen, “Quality Assurance and Testing in Agile Projects”,McBreen.Consulting, 20034.E. Mnkandla, and B. Dwolatzky, Defining Agile Software Quality Assurance.Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering Advances(ICSEA06)5. Software Quality Assurance Agile Testing Types and Processes,http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/614143/software_quality_assurance_agile_testing.html6. Agile Software Development,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agile_software_development