Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Governance for Software
Governance for Software
Governance for Software
Governance for Software
Governance for Software
Governance for Software
Governance for Software
Governance for Software
Governance for Software
Governance for Software
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Governance for Software

268

Published on

Draft introduction to the topic of governance models and related issues for research software

Draft introduction to the topic of governance models and related issues for research software

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
268
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  1. P roject Governance <ul><li>Decision making </li></ul><ul><ul><li>W ho controls the destiny of your software </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Ownership </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Who has rights on your software </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Exploitation </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Who can take your software forward </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Funding </li></ul><ul><ul><li>How can you take your software forward </li></ul></ul><ul><li>OSS-Watch </li></ul>
  2. Governance Models <ul><li>The basis of decision making </li></ul><ul><ul><li>F rom benign dictator to fully meritocratic </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Essential once you consider contributors from outside your group </li></ul></ul><ul><li>How much control do you wish to retain as originator vs how much do you seek to expand? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>H ow much can be enforced through licensing/trademark/patent </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Similar to decision between partnership / private company / public company </li></ul></ul>
  3. Ownership <ul><li>Generally copyright exists with the creator </li></ul><ul><ul><li>G ets complicated when many people modify a piece of code </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Ownership need to be explicit </li></ul><ul><ul><li>T o allow future relicensing </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>To define legal accountability </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Contribution agreements should be used </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Useful to have a single “custodian” </li></ul></ul>
  4. Exploitation <ul><li>Who and what are the right ways to take your software forward? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Commercial vs Open Source </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Targets </li></ul><ul><ul><li>K nown users </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Potential users in current market </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Potential users in new market </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Integrators and bundlers </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Partners </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Take forward yourself </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>In collaboration with others </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>By licensing code to others </li></ul></ul>
  5. Funding Models <ul><li>Grant Mosaic </li></ul><ul><li>Institutional support </li></ul><ul><li>Fully Costed Service </li></ul><ul><li>External Enterprise / Consultancy </li></ul><ul><li>Royalties and Fees </li></ul><ul><li>Donations </li></ul><ul><li>Advertising </li></ul><ul><li>T-shirt (spinoff merchandising) </li></ul>
  6. Funding Vehicles <ul><ul><li>University based </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Spin out company </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Consultancy and Customisation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Industrial knowledge transfer </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Contracts </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Licensing </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Certification </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Support services / training </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Software as a Service </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Software Foundation </li></ul></ul>
  7. <ul><li>Not enough projects go from JISC to over funding sources </li></ul><ul><li>Tech transfer focus on patents </li></ul><ul><li>Not enough understanding of changing teams </li></ul><ul><li>Exploitation of experience from projects </li></ul>
  8. <ul><li>The “so what” question? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Why are you doing this? </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Who are you doing it for? </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Real IPR issues </li></ul><ul><li>Software sustainability </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Required because of disaster </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Required because of policy </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Keep software with researchers </li></ul><ul><ul><li>But don’t keep researcher teams static </li></ul></ul>
  9. <ul><li>Sustainability stakeholders </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Researcher / developer </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Interested in understanding new techniques </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Funder </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Interested in potential capacity/network effects </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>User </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Interested in getting a better way of doing something </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><li>How often do their desires conflict? </li></ul>
  10. <ul><li>Does JISC funding plus university mindset stifle Darwinian natural selection? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Is that healthier than in the commercial environment? </li></ul></ul>

×