Sharon4AttorneyProSe_DemandsECF

  • 1,054 views
Uploaded on

Sharon4Anderson,Attorney Pro Se,Exposes the entire MN. Court System, Denying Due Process, Electronic Filings,Forensic Records, of Property Taxes/Elections, Heinous Violations of Civil,Constutional …

Sharon4Anderson,Attorney Pro Se,Exposes the entire MN. Court System, Denying Due Process, Electronic Filings,Forensic Records, of Property Taxes/Elections, Heinous Violations of Civil,Constutional Rights, MN Const.Art.X, Taxes levied Equitable, has been abridged by Corrupt Judiciary,A09-2031, Taxpayers Right to Access to Judiciary by Electronic Filings, has been DENIED, E-mail Blocked., The Courts Cannot tax by Theft of Cars, Trespass on Private Property, Treason to deny State and Federal Laws, Denial of Long Formal Complaints to effect Judgments based on Fraud, must not Stand, REpublican Candidate of State AG www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com

More in: News & Politics
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
1,054
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Page 1 of 40 Subj: Fwd: SharonScarrellaAnderson62cv09-1163(Vandenorth)A09-2031(Toussaint)Complia... Date: 12/21/2009 2:02:23 A.M. Central Standard Time From: Sharon4Anderson To: Sharon4Anderson SHARON4ANDERSON_SUBMITTED GOOD FAITH From: Sharon4Anderson To: edward.toussaint@courts.state.mn.us, sue.dosal@courts.state.mn.us, fred.grittner@courts.state.mn.us, askdoj@usdoj.gov, tim.pawlenty@state.mn.us, attorney.general@state.mn.us, rca@co.ramsey.mn.us CC: harriet.lansing@courts.state.mn.us, thomas.kalitowski@courts.state.mn.us, roger.klaphake@courts.state.mn.us, randolph peterson@courts.state.mn.us, gordon.schumaker@courts.state.mn.us, jill.flaskamp.halbrooks@courts.state.mn.us, terri.j.stoneburner@courts.state.mn.us, david.minge@courts.state.mn.us, natalie.hudson@courts.state.mn.us, wilhelmina.m.wright@courts.state.mn.us, renee.worke@courts.state.mn.us, @courts.state.mn.us, heidi.schellhas@courts.state.mn.us, francis.connolly@courts.state.mn.us, matthew.johnson@courts.state.mn.us, michelle.larkin@courts.state.mn.us, lawrence.stauber@courts.state.mn.us, louise.dovre.bjorkman@courts.state.mn.us Sent: 12/21/2009 1:56:21 A.M. Central Standard Time Subj: SharonScarrellaAnderson62cv09-1163(Vandenorth)A09-2031(Toussaint) ComplianceECF 21DEC09 AFFIDAVIT OF ESERVICE:BY SHARONSCARRELLAANDERSON, ATTORNEY PRO SE,QUITAM WHISTLEBLOWER,TO BLOW THE WHISTLE ON THE CORRUPTION IN RAMSEY COUNTY, ATTORNEY, SUSAN GAERTNER, JUDGE JOHN VADENORTH,AUDITOR MARK OSWALD TO ISSUE FRAUDULENT, ORDERS, TRIGGERING BANK FRAUD, WIRE FRAUD, MN Judges violation of Citizenery Civil,Constitutional Rights - Google Search Click here: Minnesota Judicial Branch www.mncourts.gov Sat.19Dec09 YouTube - Sharon4Anderson's Channel#p/a/u/1/m0ye1YleOik HAPPY HOLIDAYS Merry Christmas Happy New Year 1959 to YES AFFIANT HAS RECORDS FROM 50 YEARS AGO. Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 2. Page 2 of 40 Sharon4Judge Blogger: Dashboard TO: The Above named :Sue Dosal,Staff,Court Employees in their Official Capacities, Severally, Individually, John Doe and Mary Roe. State Court Administrator's Office Issues: Affiant Sharon4Anderson demands Equal Treatment, Due Process re: MN Electronic Filings Hennepin Co - Google Search, must also be implemented in www.co.ramsey.mn.us Verily believes Full Compliance has been obtained and the Matter must move forward. as alleged Deficancy's are Published with Good Faith and as Whistleblower Relator. If in Fact the Lower Ramsey Co. Dist. Court has wilfully failed to file documents, acting complicit with DFL County Attorney Susan Gaertner to coverup the Fact Taxes were paid, Constitutional Challenge of Illegal Fees/Assessments "taken" by Theft,Trespass,Treason. 91Chrysler,Trailer,Camping Equipment even porta potty is BIZZARE. Any All IFP Documents are to be served by Sheriff Bob Fletcher, All 89 Doc at www.slideshare.com/sharon4anderson www.scribd.com/sharon4anderson www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com and www.sharon4anderson.org + Blogs Affiant assumes: Published APL= Appellant NOA=Notice of Appeal SharonsAppeal 62cv09-1163(VAndenorth) 28 pgs SCA= Statement of Case Sa Statement MNAppeal62cv09-1163 11 pgs. IFP= Informa Pauperous SharonsIFP_62cv09-1163_Appeal 24 pgs. 7 copies APB must be served electronically LEGAL NOTICE TO JOIN WITH Citation no. 905191492 Affiant making a R. Hand Turn from a R.Hand Lane as Retired Judge Larry Cohen complicit with his Court Clerk, City Attorney Judy Hanson wilfully failed to issue Order Taking Shar DL 2005 Criminal/Traffic/Petty Case Records Search Results Logout Search Menu New Search Location : All MNCIS Sites - Help Criminal/Traffic/Petty Search Criteria: 905191492 Case Search Filed/Location/Judicial Case Number Citation Number Defendant Info Type/Status Charge(s) Officer 62-T0-05-011101 905191492 ANDERSON, SHARON LEA 04/13/2005 Moving - Petty Misd PASSI ON RT [115] ILL 01/27/1939 Ramsey Criminal/Traffic/Petty Closed Converted Downtown TICE: TO JOIN WITH Citation 905191492 2005 Sue Dosal serves as the State Court Administrator of the Minnesota Judicial State Court Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 3. Page 3 of 40 Administrator's Office Branch. She was appointed to this position on July 16, 1982. Prior to her appointment she served as Senior Staff Attorney for the National Center for State Courts, Deputy State Court Administrator for the state of Florida, Staff Director of the Florida Legislature’s Joint Select Committee on Judicial Personnel, and staff asso State Court Administrator's Office (651) 296-2474 (phone) (651) 297-5636 (fax) Sue Dosal, Send an email via our contact form State Court Administrator Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 135 25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St. Paul, MN 5515 CC: bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us Sent: 8/12/2009 1:34:10 P.M. Central Daylight Time FAX TRANSMITTAL Resubmit Sat.19Dec09 Wed 12Aug09 Ramsey Dist.Crt.File 62cv09-1163 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY E-COMMERCE AND FAX: TO: Ramsey Co. Clerk of Court, Lynae.Olson@courts.state.mn.us tel:651- 266-8255 F 266-8263 mary.jurek@courts.state.mn.us 2nd Jud.Court Admin. Larry.Dease@courts.state.mn.us 651- 266-8266 F 266-8278 Sheriff: bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us 651-266- 9333 F 266-9301 Elections@co.ramsey.mn.us mark.oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us 651- 266-2171 F 266-2177 Susan Gaertner rca@co.ramsey.mn.us jean.stepan@co.ramsey.mn.us 266-3222 F 266-3010 Lori Swanson MN_AG attorney.general@state.mn.us 651- 296-3353 F 282-2155 St.Paul City Clerk shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us 651- 266-8688 F 266-8574 and all others as their interest appear. FROM: Sharon4Mayor@aol.com http://taxthemax.blogspot.com 651- 776-5835 FAX VIA OUTGOING: SHARON CANNOT RECEIVE FAXES PGS.20 Mon.10Aug09 RESubmitt Sat 19Dec09 CANDIDATE AttorneyGeneral www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com SHARON ANDERSON CHARGES MARK OSWALD and others WITH TITLE 18S1030 RE: Taxes/Elections US CODE: Title 18,1030. Fraud and related activity in connection with computers 42 USC 3631 MS 2.724 Disclaimer: Sharon has been reduced to Poverty, QuiTam Whistleblower Today Sat.19Dec09 it has been brought toAffiants Attention that an "Order" was Issued 7Dec09 Never received by Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 4. Page 4 of 40 Affiant_Appellant_VA Widow Whistleblower to Remedy Deficiency's Help Case View Case Information ORCA Info Case A092031 Filing Date: 11/06/2009 Number: Jurisdiction: Court of Appeals Status: Pre-Briefing Civil Division Ramsey Hearing ORCA: Nonoral County District Court Type: Classification: Standard - Civil - Other Short Title: In the Matter of Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Real Property Described, to wit: Lyman Dayton Addition to St. Paul, Lot 5, Blk 46, a/k/a 697 Surrey Avenue, PIN: 32.29.22.41.0053, Sharon Lee Anderson a/k/a Sharon Scarrella Anderson, record owner Full Title: In the Matter of Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Real Property Described, to wit: Lyman Dayton Addition to St. Paul, Lot 5, Blk 46, a/k/a 697 Surrey Avenue, PIN: 32.29.22.41.0053, Sharon Lee Anderson a/k/a Sharon Scarrella Anderson, record owner Summary: Citation: + Display Party Information Docketing Filter View Display: Chronological 6 Go! Docket Information Docket Document Filing Jurisdiction Entry Filing Type Status Description Date Type Order - Remedy Deficiencies; requirement for APL to Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 5. Page 5 of 40 file cc of 9/10/09 judgment is waived. By 12/21 APL to file a NOA and SCA containing original signatures; aff/serv for Court of Remedy NOA & 12/07/2009 Order Final Appeals Deficiencies SCA; copy of district court's 9/18/09 IFP Order; 7 copies of APB with aff/serv (one must contain orig. signature) Transcript - Delivery Court of Delivery Certificate - 11/19/2009 Transcript Final Appeals Certificate Patricia Martinez Notice - Court of 11/12/2009 Notice Case Filing Final Case Filing Appeals Statement - Court of Case - Case - 11/06/2009 Statement Final Appeals Appellant Appellant Notice - Court of Appeal - Appeal - 11/06/2009 Notice Final Appeals Case Filed Case Filed Transcript - Initial Court of Initial Certificate - 10/15/2009 Transcript Final Appeals Certificate Patricia Martinez CC: Sharon4Mayor, DOR.taxpayeradvocate@state.mn.us, dorrick@pioneerpress.com, ron.guilfoile@ci.stpaul.mn.us, minneapolis@fbi.gov, info@judicialwatch.org, JURIST@law.pitt.edu Sent: 8/5/2009 1:33:31 P.M. Central Daylight Time Subj: 1058 Warrant 34_LEGAL NOTICE TO PDF RamseyDist.Crt.62cv09-1163 A09-2031 Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 6. Page 6 of 40 Click here: 1058 Warrant 34 Wed.5Aug09 Larry.Dease@courts.state.mn.us John.Vandenorth@courts.state.mn.us fred.grittner@courts.state.mn.us eric.magnuson@courts.state.mn.us In the Serious Matter of Judicial Administration re: Ramsey District Co. File 62cv09-1163 Prosecutorial Misconduct Legal Notice to the State of MN, Revenue,All Agencies, County of Ramsey,Mark.Oswald,Risk Management,Land Acquistion et al,City St.Paul,Mayor Coleman,DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling,Risk Management Ron.Guilfoile,HRA,Kathy Lantry,City Council enbanc,Shari.Moore Clerk,Marcia Moermond et al Candidates Plea to implement pdf ECF Filings in the 3 thousand propertys published 697 Surrey is on pg 53 and other Files for the past 20 years. Candidate 4 St.Paul Mayor Affiant_ Relator_VA Widow_Whistleblower_Victim Sharon Anderson Attorney Pro Se-InFact_PrivateAG cannot interpose proper Answers without ID Court Records in the File. East Side Review News alleged to be Tax Delinquent. 62cv09-1163 go to www.mncourts.gov top access to court records Access Case Records scrool to bottom click on I accept click civil records type in 62cv09-1163 click on upper left link Logout Search Menu New Civil Search BackLocation : All MNCIS Sites - Case SearchHelp Register of Actions Case No. 62-CV-09-1163 Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 7. Page 7 of 40 SECOND JUDICIA CASE TITLE Civil,Criminal,General Em To: All Persons with legal interest in the Parcels of Real Property d Following Delinquent Tax List, Filed with District Court Administrator Lyn published 18Mar09 MapleWood Review www.review and all Candidates for Political Offices www.sharon4mayor2010.b ************************************************************** STATE OF MINNESOTA,Ward Einess, Revenue, Michael Campion DPS Agencies,County of Ramsey,All Agencies, City of St.Paul,MN,All Agencies, DSI,HS,HR, AUDITOR MARK OSWALD, Elections/Taxes Supervisor, Can State of Minnesota, Rule 24.04 by and thro State Attorney Gen Swanson www.ag.state.mn.us, Michael Campion, Public Safety,Larry Dease,Co Mayor Chris B. Coleman,City Clerk Shari Moore,Council President K www.ci.stpaul.mn.us, Janice Rettman res: No 2009-012,Toni Carter and County Commissioners, www.co.ramsey.mn.us DSI Bob Kessl John Harrington Chief Police,his agents , Kathy Wuorinen,Don Luna,Tanya Hu Impound Lot, Rapid Towing et al in their Official Capacity‘s, Ind ividually,Severally, acting in concort and Mary Roe. SCAP,Judges Kathleen Gearin,Joanne Smith Johnson,Salvador Rosas,Larry Cohen et al, unk at this time 1988 Files 495 Million Dollars. In re Scarrella4 Assoc. Justice 221NWS2 Plaintiffs V. 697 SURREY AVE 32.29.22.41.0053$2,499.43 St.Paul,MN.55106 ,Intestate Decedant www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com ,VA Widow,Senior,Disabled Po Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Chergosky_Scarrella www.sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.bl http://sharon4privateattorneygeneral.blogspot.com www.sharonanderson.org , et al as their interest appear , Defen 3rd Party Plaintiffs,Intestate Decedants Tenant in Common Wm.O A.Peterson. http://crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.co Title to Sharons Cars,Trailers,Peterbilt,Realestate in Fee Simple Absolute Chrysler V-1C4GY54R5MX597169 Defendants: 3rd Party Plaintiffs Cop- Corruption-Minnesota: Theft Trespass Larceny RI ********************** NOTICE OF APPEAL TO COURT OF APPEA TRIAL COURT CASE NUMBER: 62cv09 DATE OF ORDER: 8Sept.09 OR http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/62cv091163vandenorth DATE JUDGMENT ENTERED:10Sept09 § TO: Clerk of the Appellate Courts Fred Grittner et a Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 8. Page 8 of 40 Minnesota Judicial Center St. Paul, MN 55155 Please take notice that the above-named defendant's 3rd party plaintiff's appeal the State of Minnesota from an order (judgment) of the court filed (10Sept09 denying defendant's_ QuiTam Relator motion's Jury trial Evidentiary Hearing, Affidavit of Prejudice and for Public Policy pdf Formats found at www.sharon Affidavit of Prejudice AffidavitPrejudice Kathleen Gearin Judge 08/12/2009 Notice of Motion and MotionSharons FactF Taxes/Elections 08/13/2009 Other DocumentMotion to Continue 62cv0 Vandenorth 08/17/2009 Motion 08/19/2009 http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson 20aug09 Document SharonsSanction Attorneys_Fraud on Court pg26Sharons Letter NAME,ADDRESS AND NUMBER OF ATTORNEY(S) FOR PL Ramsey Co. Attorney Susan Gaertner aka Mrs. John Wodele, M.Jean Stepan ak Osceola St.Paul, (105120) MN Student John Edison addres Sicko-City StPaul: FindLaw InterrogatoriesJean Tancabel aka Jean Ste § Phone:Tel: 651-266-3222 Fax: 651-266-3010 Email: RCA@co.ra Ramsey County Attorney NAME, ADDRESS, ZIP CODE, TELEPHONE NUMBER, AND REGISTRATION LICENSE NUMBER OF ATTORNEY(S) FOR D /s/ VA Widow_Whistleblower QuiTam Relator, Attorney Pro Se,Private AG, InF Peterson-Chergosky-Scarrella Tel: 651- Legal Domicile: 1058 Summit/PO Box 4384 and 697 Surrey Ave St.Paul,MN 55104 ECF :P165913_sa1299___sharon4anderson@aol.com _E Democracy Files _____ http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006 SIGNATURE (The trial court caption is used on the notice of appeal. Subsequent docume appropriate appellate court caption. {HYPERLINK "RCAP.htm" l "a10301 the contents of the notice of appeal and filings required to perfect an appeal, {HYPERLINK "RCAP.htm" l "a10303"} sets forth judgments and orders w to the Court of Appeals. {HYPERLINK "RCAP.htm" l "a10401"} specif filing and service of the notice of appeal. {HYPERLINK "RCAP.htm" l "a bond or deposit for costs. {HYPERLINK "RCAP.htm" l "a10801"} provide FORM 133. STATEMENT OF THE CASE STATE OF MINNESOTA (IN COURT OF APPEALS) CASE TITLE: General,Civil,Criminal Eminent Domain,Taxes,Forfeiture,C Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 9. Page 9 of 40 429.061 Fees/Assess/ROW STATEMENT OF THE CASE OF (RESPONDENT) TRIAL COURT CASE NUMBER:62cv09-1163 (Vandenorth)Reporte vs. APPELLATE COURT CASE NUMBER: UNK Respondent. 1. Court or agency of case origination and name of presiding judge officer.Answer/Cross/1/2MillionClaim v.CitySt.Paul St.Paul City Cou thurs,5Jul2007,Res Assess 07-601pub.hearing 15Aug07,(GS3041156) Notice t Res.Ratifying Assessments 07-609 from 12Apr to 27Apr07 (J0707A J0708A: As ID 32-29-22-41-0053, Referred to Risk Management Ron Guilfoile, See Venue 62cv09-1163 Judge Edward Cleary, Recused, Judge Gregg Johnson Recu Vandenorth. 2. Jurisdictional statement Study in Appellate Advocacy: Guide To Appellate Briefs The Appellate Brief : SparkCha Minnesota Court of Appeals - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Tax and Property Look Up Information - Quick Info 697 Surrey http://www.mncourts.gov/opinions/sc/current/OPA090064-0306.pdf re Mark Osw QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Court criminally abused its discretion by Acting a WAR with MN Cons appellants’ constitutional challenge , Bizzare Method of City St.Paul Fees/Assessment Treason.? Usury Interest on Property Tax Statement without WritProA06 Complaints,Warrants,Tickets to Defend § 2. Auditor Mark Oswald in perjury as www.usbank.com Tax Receipts Mark Oswald Auditor/Elections re: 2008 US Senate Mark Oswald Canvass Board US Senate 2008 MN Auditor's False Statements have put at risk 3 thousand Propertys + Qu MN 62cv09-1163 « Sharon4anderson’s Weblog . Sections 212, 214(b), 214(c), 304, 319, and 403(b) of the Bipartisan Campaign Re No. 107-155, 116 Stat. 81, because those challenges are plainly nonjusticiable or insu bipartisan campaign re-form act 2002 - Google Search 3. Whether, in other respects, the Court should note probable jurisdiction over appella to BCRA, Relators Medicare, Federal Jurisdiction and set the appeals on those issues f Intellectual Property in Cyberspace Minnesota's Longest Arm: Jurisdiction Over the Internet - Law Firm Mans P.A. Attorneys Minneapolis, M.. PROOF OF SERVICE 62cv09-1163 BY PDF FORMAT SHARONSCARRELLA ANDERSON AKA PE AKA CHERGOSKY_VA Widow_Whistleblower_Candidate State AG,Atto AG AFFIANT; SET'S FORTH THIS CLAIM OF INJURY CAUS BY EMPLOYEES OF THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF OF RAMSEY, POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF MINNES TRUSTEE'S UNDER THE NAME Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 10. Page 10 of 40 OF THE UNITED STATES /GOVERNMENT/CORPORATION 42 USC 363 INJURY VIOLATIONS OF TITLE 18 USCs: 241,242,245, Civil Rights Division Home Page HATE CRIMES, R.I.C.O. 18 USCs 1584,Servitude HONEST SERVICE FRAUD & VIOLATION OF THE US and State o Constitution's & STATUTES of wrong doings, "Bad Behavior 609 - CRIMINAL CODE, 2009 Minnesota Statutes Title 42 USC sec.1983 - Google Search Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia. 1 . Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983, Wood v. Breier, 54 F.R.D. 7, 10 Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, 59 F.R.D. 339 (E.D. Pa. 1973 § Title 42 USC sec.1983 Wood v. Breier, Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, Priva Search “Each citizen acts as a private attorney general who ‘takes on the mantel of sovereign 2. Minnesota is a “Right to Work” State! Affiant 1973 Started the Churc legally incorporated at 1058 Summit Ave. St. Paul, re: Scarrella v. M Google Search 536F.2d.1207 Its OK to practice God`s law with out a license, Luke 11:52, Sharon in Good Faith re: God`s Law was here firs loyalty than the Office of Justice of the MN Supreme Court. Justice MN Sup Crt. - Google Search loyalty to this country, loyalty to God” U.S. v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163, 172, 85 S. Ct. 85 (1965) US v. Seeger - Google Search 3. “The practice of law can not be licensed by any state/State. Schw Examiners, United States Reports 353 U.S. pgs. 238, 239. Schware v. Board Ex Search In Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925) Sims v Aherns - Google Search Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 11. Page 11 of 40 “The practice of law is an occupation of common right.” A bar card is dues card and/or membership card. A bar association is that what it is, a club, A license, it has a certificate though the State, the two are not the sam RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED BY Relief can be granted in the following ways in dollar amount Option ( $60,000,000.00 million tax free dollars (Sixty-Six Million Dollars) inclu Costs, Research and Time or tax free; PLUS THE RIGHTS TO RECOVERY.All 13 Propertys, 91 Chrysler,Trail triggering Long Formal Complaints, Warrants, List of Witness, Evident the Murder of Cpl.Jim Anderson, 21Sept2000 Sharons 2nd H , Intestate Decedants Tenants in Common , William O and Bernice A. P Parents, Murder of Steven Monroe Quale Sr. and the "takings" of Sharons Da 40 yrs ago by Corrupt Officials, Cold Case Murders murders.blogspot.com Barb Winn aks Aaron Foster Manager of Police stole sharons car", Greenly and 10 month Baby Boy Henry Gooselaw Remove the City Attorney John Choi,Ramsey County Attorney Susan Stepan, Student John Edison and State Attorney General Lori Swans BAR Association and place all lawyer's under the state or § licensing program to work in this country under the Constitutional M originally required. Remove all Lawyers and Attorneys as Staff employment f Minnesota and Congress. Have the State of Minnesota and C restate the state militia under the intent of HR11654 better known as th Dick Act 1902 - Google Search and allow the state militia to enforce and bring claims of injury to the Mi Legislature and floor of Congress to have these issue address and deal with in 72 hour of such complaint or befor hearing board. or Convene Grand Jurys. Option (B), Bring in the military to help set up a new governmen place and remove all federal and state officials who are g of Malfeasance,Nonfeasance,Misfeasance from office and brought th charges as was done in Germany 1945 for crime against humanity. Tha granted. The debt cause in this action comes under the 14th amendme section 4 tell how to collect this debt..as the "takings" of our Homesteads via C Acts of Theft,Trespass,Treason placed on Property Taxes without Publ cause Eminent Domain must not stand. Disclaimer: City of St.Paul cannot and must not tax,Fees/Assessmen Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 12. Page 12 of 40 § Criminal RICO Acts of Theft of Cars,Trailers,Personal Property, Water, T Property ie 3 Thousand Cases, Affiant is the only one to Answer, and Tr at War with STate and Federal Laws, Constitutional Guarantees on Cand Anderson aka Sharon4Anderson,Scarrella,Peterson-Chergosky_Beckle Woman,Senior,Disabled, in a Protected Class. REFERANCE COURT CASES 1. Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 151 Fed. 2nd 240; Pucket v. Cox 456 2 Picking v. Pennsylvania - Google Search Pro se pleadings are to be considered without regard to technicality; pro se lit not to be held to the same high standards of perfection as lawyers. Platsky v. C.I.A. 953 F. Platsky v CIA - Google Search Additionally, pro se litigants are to be given reasonable opportunity to remedy the defects in th Reynoldson v Reynoldson v Shillinger - Google Search Shillinger 907F .2d 124, 126 ( also Jaxon v Circle K. Corp. 773 F.2d 1138, 1140 (10th Cir. 1985) (1) Jaxon v. Circle K. Corp - Google Search 2. Haines v. Kerner (92 S. Ct. 594). The respondent in this action is a n and is moving forward in Haines v. Kerner - Google Search Private Attorney General and Attorney Pro Se, IFP 3. NAACP v. Button (371 U.S. 415); United Mineworkers of America v. G NAACP v. Button - Google Search and Johnson v. Avery 89 S. Ct. 747 (1969). Members of groups who ar lawyers Johnson v. Avery - Google Search can assist other members of the g goals of the group in court without being charged with “Unauthorized practice of law. Unauthorized Practice of Law Rev. Dick Bullock MN 4. Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar (377 U. of Trainmen v. Virginia Bar - Google Search Gideon v.Wainwright 372 U.S. 335; gideon v. wainwright case brief - Google Search Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425. Litigants ma assisted by unlicensed layman during judicial proceedin Argersinger v. Hamlin - Google Search 5. Howlett v. Rose, 496 U.S. 356 (1990) Federal Law and Supreme Cou State Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 13. Page 13 of 40 Howlett v. Rose - Google Search Court Cases 6. Federal Rules Civil Proc., Rule 17, 28 U.S.C.A. “Next Friend who represents Fed Rules 17, 28 USCA Next Friend - Google Search someone who is unable to tend to his or her own intere 7. Minnesota Court Rules and Procedures, Minnesota Court Rules - Google Search Title 12, sec. 2017 (C) person does not have a duly appointed representative he may sue by his next friend or by a guardian ad litem. 8. Mandonado-Denis v. Castillo-Rodriguez, 23 F3d 576 (1st Cir. 1994) Ina subordinates may be basis for 1983 claim. Mandonado-Denis v. Castillo-Rodriguez - Google Sear 9. Warnock v. Pecos County, Tex., 88 F3d 341 (5th Cir. 1996) Eleventh not Warnock v. Pecos County Tex - Google Search protect state officials from claims for prospective relief when it is a officials acted in violation of federal law. government offices, State, local political subdivision, judicial etc comes Foreign State. The question will arise to the issue of 12(b)(6) failure to state a claim t be grant. How does put a price on such crimes against humanity. Th were the 12(b)(6) for the People or 12(b)(1)(2) rule 17 where was the p If they were as censured about the people 12 (b) s and immunity and People would not be in this Court now. NOTICE: We, the people, reserve the right to amend this Appeal at an Process of this action at bar as www.usbank.com is the holding comp Paul and County of Ramsey Taxes, and that 20+ years ago Lesbian Jud kicked us out of our Paid for Home, triggering the Heinous, Repugnan Anderson's both Disabled, Jim Silver Star, Purple Heart Marine (Kore apparantly embellzed over $110,000.00 "taking" our Homestead in a "Patterened Enterprise for over currently the County Auditor Mark Oswald is in Perjury or Sharon4anderson’s Weblog he has also Embellzed the Property Ta 449.92, > The Payment of $449.93 was returned and run thr even tho Affiant called and thro another account proces Totalling $893.xx Paid May 15,16th 2008. Affiant charges Mark Oswald as he has been notified by Phone,E Statements. Oswald has tried to circumvent Affiants online Banking for Federal Reserve Banks, mn const. art.x taxes - Google Search Examining the organization and function of the Federal Reserve Ban Judicial relevant factors, we conclude that the Reserve Banks are not federal inst Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 14. Page 14 of 40 Officer: of the FTCA, but are independent, privately owned and locally contr Each Federal Reserve Bank is a separate corporation owned by comme The stockholding commercial banks elect two thirds of each Bank's n directors. The remaining three directors are appointed by the Federal Re Reserve Board regulates the Reserve Banks, but direct supervision and exercised by its board of directors. 12 U.S.C. § 301. The directors enact 12 USC 301 - Google Search manner of conducting general Bank business, 12 U.S.C. § 341, and a implement 12 USC 341 - Google Search and supervise daily Bank activities. These activities include collecting a making advances to private and commercial entities, holding reserves discounting the notes of member banks, and buying and selling secu market. See 12 U.S.C. §§ 341 361. 12 USC 341-361 - Google Search The fact that the Federal Reserve Board regulates the Reserve Banks d federal agencies under the Act. In United States v. Orleans, 425 U.S. 807, 96 S 2d US v. Orleans - Google Search 390 (1976), the Supreme Court held that a community action agency agency or instrumentality for purposes of the Act, even though the agency was federal regulations and heavily funded by the federal government. Because th day operation was not supervised by the federal government, but by local refused to extend federal tort liability for the negligence of the agency's emplo Federal Reserve Banks, though heavily regulated, are locally controlle banks. Unlike typical federal agencies, each bank is empowered to hire and fir Bank employees do not participate in the Civil Service Retirement System. T worker's compensation insurance, purchased by the Bank, rather t Employees room. When the Department Of Justice fails to prevent these actions and conceal the truth this now show collusion between all three government. One branch of our government such had integrity to sta right. Their failure to do so comes under the term of high crimes a crimes, human rights violations, R.I.C.O., and etc. This Appel of the State of Minnesota www.mncourts.gov is being placed on Notice State Court outside of the Ten square miles area and the Federal Court insid square miles, area have made it impossible, through its own corruption Sharon Scarrella Anderson for over 30 years Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 15. Page 15 of 40 lacked enforcement and has been denied the ability to defend hers Nazis Germany under Hitler. Those who set in the same position in time as member of their Government and Military stood before our M the World Court and were tried for war crimes and crime against hum they are still being rounded up and charged. There is no statute of li types of crimes. This Superior Court of the STate of Minnesota has some type of humanity to give to the People of this nations or pursui action, knowing that such action is a crime and some day run the r another world court. This Superior Court of the State of Minnesota is fully aware that can not bring charges against a living being. The High Court has ru Supreme Court PENHALLOW v. DOANE'S ADM'RS, 3 U.S. 54 (1795 requires a interest party a living body. Penhallow v. Doanes Admr Case law Title 28, USC 1601-1611 FSIA Title 28 USC 1601 FSIA - Google Search protects the people under the 11th amendment as a 11th amendment commerce clause - Google Search public welfare. But because Congress' control over the Civil Air Patro corporation is not designated as a wholly owned or mixed ownersh corporation under 31 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 856, the court concluded that the cor nongovernmental, 31USC 846 - Google Search independent entity, not covered under the Act. Finally, the Banks are empowered to sue and be sued in their own nam 31USC 846 - Google Search Conclusion The issue being place before this Superior Court of the State of M history of the abuse being allowed by the Federal and State Courts square miles and by the Federal Courts inside the State of Minnes American Nationals. This is in direct violation of our federal constitu and title 50 and the 15 Statutes at Large, Chapter 249 (section 1), e 1868 Chap. CCXLIX. ---An Act concerning the Rights of American Ci Title 50 - Google Search States and of the above. The American peopl their citizenship to their country, but by the misuse of legislation, created by the Bar Associ fraudulently expatriated the public officials from our Country the u America and their citizenship to a foreign state standing outside of th Suspended the Federal and all State Constitutions without the peop consent. By the Courts continuing these actions in the courtrooms th co-conspirator in acts of mutiny and the overthrow of a constitu government. Legislators are hiding behind the separation of po knowing full well of these injuries, being done to the people. When Congress could be created to prevent this injury, and their willful failu them as guilty as those Court officials who deny the supreme of the bears the risks, and the Maritime law compelling specific performan interest, or Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 16. Page 16 of 40 premiums are the same. Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, fr Allodial Title - Google Search liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913) "Hypothecated the Federal Reserve Act (1913) - Google Search federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Rese Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) wa "beneficiary" of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the fede hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor the 14th amendment us constitution - Google Search 14th Amendment U Federal Reserve System. In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federa corporation all the credit "money substitute" it needed. Like any other debtor, the fed government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as loan. Since the federal United States didn't have any assets, they assigned t of their "economic slaves", the U.S. citizens as collateral against the un They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national pa certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as collateral against the fed already been transferred as payment to the international banke The Banks are listed neither as "wholly owned" government corporatio § 31 USC - Google Search 846 nor as "mixed ownership" corporations under 31 U.S.C. § 856, a fac 31 USC 846,856 - Google Search Wilful failure to address the Affidavit of Prejudice against Ramsey C Kathleen Gearin www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.co Ex. Disclosure Statement http://www.povertylaw.org/poverty-law-library/case/55500/55504 Pearlv. United States, 230 F.2d 243 (10th Cir. 1956), which held that the Civil Air Patrol is not a Pearl v. US,230 F. 2d 243 - Google Search federal agency under the Act. the status [*1242] of the Federal Reserve Bank, the Civil Air Patrol is a non-profit, federally chartered corporation the from sources within or outside the United States. United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33, p US Congressional Record Mar 17,1993 Vol 33 - Google S Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 17. Page 17 of 40 It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1,Public Law 89 President Emergency Banking Ace Mar 9 1933 - Google Search Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m s - Emergency Banking Act June 5th 1933 - Google Sear Joint Resolution to Suspend the Gold Standard and Abrogate the Gold the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities o Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further eviden States supply of a money substitute in the economy without a correspon in the gold and silver backing, inflation occurs. The Federal Reserve System is based on the Canon law and the princi protected in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In fact, the internati "Canon Law Trust" as their model, adding stock and naming it a "Join U.S. Congress had passed a law making it illegal for any legal "person" to Stock Trust" in 1873. The Federal Reserve Act was legislated post 3. 1935 U.S. v. Constantine, 296 U.S. 287 The INTERNAL REVENUE US v. Constantine 296 - Google Search unconstitutional since prohibition has been repealed. No legislative ac established the IRS as a Department of the United States Tr 4. 1818: U. S. v. Beavans, 16 U.S. 336. Established two separate jurisd US v. Beavans - Google Search United States Of America: 1. The “federal zone” and 2. “the 50 Sta (INTERNAL REVENUE CODE) only has jurisdiction within the 5. Fraud by Trickery: Zone Improvement Plan (Zip Code) Congress divid (50 ) into 10 Federal Zones in violation of Constitution and Color o Postal Code. There are to type of action to which any Court can operate one is civ Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 2 or under Criminal Which is fou Chapter 3 Section 23 Jurisdiction of United States courts and judges; upon com alien enemy resident and at large within such jurisdiction or district, t public peace. The department of the IRS is misusing this section as defined b "http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sup_01_26.h INTERNAL REVENUE CODE"} > {HYPERLINK "http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sup_01_26_10_ A- Income Taxes"} > {HYPERLINK "http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sup_01_26_10_ 18, U.S.C., SECTION 245 The portion of Section 245 of Title 18 which is primarily enforced by th Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 18. Page 18 of 40 makes it unlawful to willfully injure, intimidate or interfere with any pers do so, by force or threat of force, because of that other person's race, c national origin and because of his/her activity as one of the following: (b) a p benefit, service, privilege, program, facility or activity provided or administe States. (e) a participant in any program or activity receiving federal financial assis is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death p upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, {HYPERLINK "http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/usc_sup_01_26.h INTERNAL REVENUE CODE"} > {HYPERLINK "http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/usc_sup_01_26_10_ o "Subtitle F - Procedure and Administration"} > {HYPER "http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/usc_sup_01_26_10_F_20_64.htm - COLLECTION"} > {HYPERLINK "http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/usc_sup_01_26_10_F_20_6 "Subchapter D - Seizure of Property for Collection of Taxes"} > {HYPERL "http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/usc_sup_01_26_10_F_20_64_3 "PART II - LEVY"} > § 6331. Levy and Distraint (a) Authority of Secretary If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same notice and demand, it shall be lawful for the Secretary to collect such tax (an as shall be sufficient to cover the expenses of the levy) by levy upon all prop property (except such property as is exempt under section {HYPER "http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode26/usc_sec_26_0000633 belonging to such person or on which there is a lien provided in this chapter for th tax. Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employe of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumen States or the District of Columbia, by serving a notice of levy on the employ section 3401(d)) of such officer, employee, or elected official. If the Secretary m the collection of such tax is in jeopardy, notice and demand for immediate may be made by the Secretary and, upon failure or refusal to pay such tax, c Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 19. Page 19 of 40 levy shall be lawful without regard to the 10-day period provided in t United States Supreme case decision on taxes just to name a few. Taxe those under 26 USC 6331 and not the people of the several fifty states. laws. 1. 1895 Pollock v. Farmers Loan and Trust Co. 157 U. S. 429, 158 U.S. Court ruled “income tax” unconstitutional. Pollock v. Farmers Loan - Google Search 2. 1920 Eisner v. Mcomber, 252 U.S. 189, 206 Eisner v. Macomber - Google Search Congress cannot by any definition it may adopt conclude what income is, since it cannot by legislat Constitution, from which alone it derives its power to legislate an limitations alone that power Can be lawfully exercise long been a part of human history. It is only recently, however, that our a name and decided to monitor it, study it and legislate again The FBI defines a hate crime (a.k.a. bias crime) to be: "a criminal offens a person, property or society which is motivated, in whole or in part, by against a race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or ethnicity/national o Nationals) Public Law #103-322A, a 1994 federal law, defines a hate crime as: "a Hate Crime Public Law #103-322A - Google Search defendant intentiona or in the case of a property crime, the property that is object of the crime, because of the actual or perceived race, color, relig ethnicity, gender, disability, or sexual orientation of any pe Official definitions of hate crimes: Typical hate crime laws criminalize the use of force, or the threat of Person because they are a member of a specific, protected group. F the term "hate crime" are: Hate Crimes Statistics Act (1990): "... crimes that manifest evidence of race, religion, sexual orientation, or ethnicity, including where approp murder, nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, aggravated assault, simple a arson, and destruction, damage or vandalism of property." (Public La Bureau of Justice Administration (BJA; 1997): "Hate crimes--or bias defined as offenses motivated by hatred against a victim based on his o sexual orientation, ethnicity, or national origin." Anti-Defamation League (ADL): A hate crime is "any crime committe victim's actual or perceived race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disa or female] or sexual orientation." National Education Association (NEA): "Hate crimes and violent act Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 20. Page 20 of 40 offenses motivated by hatred against a victim based on his or her beliefs or m characteristics, including race, ethnicity, and sexual orien Traditional hate crime legislation protects persons because of "his rac national origin , " as in the case of the 1969 federal hate crimes law. (18 Most state laws now include additional protected groups. Some laws Only protect a member of a group if she/he is involved in specific example, the 1969 federal law only applies if the crime happens wh attending a public school or is at work or participating in one of fou protected activities." persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives. TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 113B > § 2331 § 2331. Definitions (5) the term “domestic terrorism” means activities tha (A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the cr United States or of any State; (B) appear to be intended— (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; HR 3162 RDS SEC. 802. DEFINITION OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM. `(5) the term `domestic terrorism' means activities tha `(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the cr United States or of any State; `(B) appear to be intended-- `(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population HATE CRIMES When the Federal Government; Legislative, Executive and Judicial such action they are now aiding & abating in Hate crimes as defined following issue. When these Government offices have had complaint the people has had appointment to cover these issues in person with and they refuse to address the complaint. By hiding behind the sep clause. These are the same official who created, enforce and ministe can be created to injury, be enforced and minister to injury the people made to reversed such injuries by the same means. The FBI's hate-crime report for 2002 quotes a statement about hate American Psychological Association: "...not only is it an attack on one's physical self, but is also an attac identity."Attacks upon individuals because of a difference in how they l have (B) Cruel or inhuman treatment.— The act of a person who commits attempts to commit, an act intended to inflict severe or serious physical or menta (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions), including seriou upon another within his custody or control. (C) Performing biological experiments.— The act of a person who subje Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 21. Page 21 of 40 attempts to subject, one or more persons within his custody or phy biological experiments without a legitimate medical or dental purpose and in so d body or health of such person or persons. (D) Murder.— The act of a person who intentionally kills, or conspires o kills whether intentionally or unintentionally in the course of committin under this subsection, one or more persons taking no active part in the hos those placed out of combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any o (I) Taking hostages.— The act of a person who, having knowingly seize more persons, threatens to kill, injure, or continue to detain such pers the intent of compelling any nation, person other than the hostage, or grou or refrain from acting as an explicit or implicit condition for the safety o person or persons. (2) Definitions.— In the case of an offense under subsection (a) by reas (3)— (A) the term “severe mental pain or suffering” shall be applied for purp (1)(A) and (1)(B) in accordance with the meaning given that term in s this title; TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 113C > § 2340 § 2340. Definitions Title 18 2340 - Google Search (2) “severe mental pain or suffering” means the prolonged mental ha resulting from (C) the threat of imminent death; or (D) the threat that another person will imminently be subjected to deat pain or suffering, or the administration or application of mind-altering subs procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses or personalit (3) “United States” means the several States of the United States, the D and the commonwealths, territories, and possessions of the Unite DOMESTIC TERRORISM There is no single, universally accepted definition of terrorism. Terro the Code of Federal Regulations as “...the unlawful use of force and pretender and or agents who has expatriated themselves from the con government to a foreign state standing then to allow the misuse or constitutional position in order to collect federal funds and to bond th in a insurance account under ticket numbers, case number or use of in a time that a State Emergency has been declared. This misuse of and in a state of emergency a war crime and also is defined as a hate is being singled out (American National) and also falls under the term o > Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 22. Page 22 of 40 PART I > CHAPTER 96 > § 1961) § 1961. Definitions Title 18 s 1961 - Google Search (1) “racketeering activity” means (A) any act or threat involving mur gambling, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion, dealing in obscene matter, or deali substance or listed chemical. (2) “State” means any State of the United States, the District of C Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, any territory or possession of the United States, any polit any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof; (4) “Enterprise” includes any individual, partnership, corporation, ass legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact althoug (5) “pattern of racketeering activity” requires at least two acts of racke of which occurred after the effective date of this chapter and the last of wh ten years (excluding any period of imprisonment) after the commission racketeering activity; Definition of a war crime comes under. TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 118 > § 2441 § 2441. War crimes Title 18 s 2441 - Google Search (d) Common Article 3 Violations.— (1) Prohibited conduct.— In subsection (c)(3), the term “grave breach o means any conduct (such conduct constituting a grave breach of com international conventions done at Geneva August 12, 1949), a (A) Torture.— The act of a person who commits, or conspires or attemp specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or sufferi or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions) upon another person within physical control for the purpose of obtaining information or a confession, punis coercion, or any reason based on discrimination of any TITLE 50, APPENDIX App. > TRADING > ACT > § 2 Title 50 Trading Act s2 - Google Search § 4. Licenses to enemy or ally of enemy insurance or reinsurance com name; doing business in United States. Required SR 22 bond Laws vary from state to state on the legal requirements one must me licensed driver. In most states, one must carry proof of insurance in order to d without proof of insurance carries a stiff penalty. An SR22 is a financial respo Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 23. Page 23 of 40 that informs the state that a driver has met his or her insurance req Function While all states require drivers to be insured in order to legally drive, require that the state has documentation of said insurance unless the driver otherwise attracts the attention of the Department of Motor Vehicles. In certain driver will need to register his or her insurance with the state, and that is whe in. The SR22 is generally filed by the insurance provider and tells the state th have the insurance required to be on the road. In the event that the insurance po provider is likewise required to inform the state that the driver does no coverage. State-to-State Differences Some states (Pennsylvania, Delaware, Minnesota, Kentucky, New Mex never require an SR22, but if a driver required one in his or her previous state to remain on file with that state; moving from Ohio to Oklahoma will not a her responsibilities towards Ohio. Additionally, if the requirements for insu the driver must meet the requirements for both states in order to drive le York nor North Carolina, however, require out-of-state SR22 filin so returning by circumstances beyond his control. By the Federal and State Courts allowing such act by the Feder v. Bevans, 16 U.S. 3 Wheat. 336 336 (1818) these case law that there are three different and distinct forms of the United State The Federal and State Courts and the Federal and State pretend agents have misused the meaning of these Supreme Court cases alo the USC and have knowingly defrauded the America people by expat their own country in the courtrooms and silenced them making the pe the state under this USC title 50. By and thru mandatory licensing transactions in foreign exchange of gold or silver to FEDERAL RES property transfers by placing all property under the name of the Stat ,vehicles, children, animals, firearms and etc. The Federal and State agents have made a willful presumption of expatriation on the par therefore denying the People their rights to their lawful standing as an The court has willfully and knowing concealed this from the people Congressional Statute at large has given the People protection from f the federal constitutional 11th amendment not subject to fore 15 Statutes at Large, Chapter 249 (section 1), enacted July 2 American citizens, with their descendants, are subjects of foreign state to the government thereof; and whereas it is necessary to the maintenance o Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 24. Page 24 of 40 this claim of foreign allegiance should be promptly and finally disavow Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the American in Congress assembled, That any declaration, instruction, decision, of any officers of a government which denies., restricts , impairs or que expatriation , is hereby declared inconsistent with the fundamental government. (B) the court having jurisdiction over the defendant in the (ii) shall be an officer of the court, and the powers of the Federal Receiv powers set out in section 754 of title 28, United States Cod (iii) shall have standing equivalent to that of a Federal prosecutor fo submitting Title 28 - Google Search requests to obtain information regarding the assets of the de (I) from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the Department (II) from a foreign country pursuant to a mutual legal assistance tre agreement, or other arrangement for international law enforcement assis provided that such requests are in accordance with the policies and Attorney General. (c) As used in this section - The term United States has been defined in Title 28, USC under § 3002 Title 28 USC 3002 - Google Search Corporation CJS Vol 20 § 1785 a Foreign Corporation and substantiated case laws. BLACKS LAWS FIFTH EDTION FOREIGN STATE; A “foreign state” within statues providing for expat Blacks Law 5th ed - Google Search citizens who are naturalized under laws of a foreign state in a countr United States, or its possession or colony, an alien country, other than the Dulles, Kletter v. Dulles - Google Search D.C.D.C.111F.SUPP.593, 598. TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 1101 (14) The term “foreign state” includes outlying possessions of a fore governing dominions or territories under mandate or trusteeship shall be rega foreign states. At no time have the People expatriated his/her self from his cou through the passing of Title 50, USC TWEA all public officials knowing have declared themselves to be foreign and did expatriate from the States of America to become a citizen of the UNITED STATES located Columbia as defined by the United States Supreme Court in the follo “The high Court confirmed that the term "United States" can and d Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 25. Page 25 of 40 completely different things, depending on the context:” Hooven & All hooven & allison co. v. evatt - Google Search 324 U.S. 652 (1945) & United States v. Cruiksha 542 (1876) & United States US v. Cruikshank - Google Search SECTION TITLE 50 > CHAPTER 3 > § 23 Title 50 chapter 3 - Google Search § 23. Jurisdiction of United States Courts and Judges; “After any such been made, the several courts of the United States, having criminal jurisdict against the people fall under criminal.This is why the Courts refus challenges of jurisdiction. Under the TWEA this is but one jurisdiction and that juris Second; TITLE 50 > CHAPTER 3 > § 21 § 21. Restraint, regulation, and removal. TITLE 50 APPENDIXES DEFENSE Sec. 16. Offenses; punishment; forfeitures of property(a) Wh violate any of the provisions of this Act or of any license, rule, or regu under, and whoever shall willfully violate, neglect, or refuse to comply w AND Third; TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PART CHAPTER 95 - RACKETEERING Title 18 RICO - Google Search (2) Jurisdiction over foreign persons. - For purposes of adjudicating enforcing a penalty ordered under this section, the district courts shall have juri foreign person, including any financial institution authorized under the laws o against whom the action is brought, if service of process upon the foreign per the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the laws of the country in which the foreign person is found, and (A) the foreign person commits an offense under subsec (a) involving a financial transaction that occurs in whole or in part in (B) the foreign person converts, to his or her own use, property in whic has an ownership interest by virtue of the entry of an order of forfeiture by a States; or (C) the foreign person is a financial institution that maintains a bank ac institution in the United States. (3) Court authority over assets. - A court described in paragraph (2) m restraining order or take any other action necessary to ensure that an other property held by the defendant in the United States is available to satis this Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 26. Page 26 of 40 section. (4) Federal receiver. - (A) In general. - A court described in paragraph (2) may appoint a Fe accordance with subparagraph (B) of this paragraph, to collect, marsha control, and possession of all assets of the defendant, wherever locate judgment under this subsection, a forfeiture judgment under section criminal sentence under section 1957 or subsection (a) of this section, inclu restitution to any victim of a specified unlawful activity. Section 3); and (Article I section 10 clause 1)The Federal CEO Corpora as well as of today along with all Federal and State government. Federal Corporation/Foreign Corporation or “doing business as “under any o become a "domestic enemy" by implementing & reimplementing the Bankruptc "War and Emergency Powers" (March 9, 1933 and subsequently) and "Intern and War Powers" (1977) in contradiction to Article 4 Section 4; "The Un guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and sh them against Invasion (from all enemies foreign and domestic); and on A Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against By and thru the passing of The Amendatory Act of March 9, 1933 Trading with the Enemy Act Public Law No. 65-91 (40 Stat. L. 411) O The original Trading with the Enemy Act excluded citizens of the Un being treated as the enemy when involved in transactions wholly w States. The Amendatory Act of March 9, 1933, however, included th United States as the enemy by inserting the following “citizens wi States”. The issue of abuse upon the American national(s) comes fro Title 50 of the U.S.C. TWEA. JUDICIAL NOTICE TO THIS COURT That, We, the people of the States in America has overly provided Co Senate Judiciary Committees with Evidence and/or Exhibits with NO "Due Process "Violation of/in the Courts, Judges, Prosecutors, Lawy al., ect... Evidence of Summies and Documentation will be provided i Scheduling Order Issued. The Doctrine of Contra Non Valentem The rule that a limitation or prescriptive period does not begin to run who is unable to act usually. Because of the defendants culpable act, s material information that would give rise to the plaintiffs claim- Often shorten Valentem( Case limitation of action key 43,95,CJS Employer- 87; Limitation of action sec. 81-84,87,131,138,142,164-165,170 Physicians, surgeons, and other health-care providers sec. 108, COMPLAINT Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 27. Page 27 of 40 Now Comes, David Lee; Buess & Rodney Dale; Class a naturalist citi States of America whomever rescinded his/her Citizenship to his/h document comes in a form of a complaint in the name of David Lee; Buess & Rodn FORTH THIS CLAIM OF INJURY CAUSED BY EMPLOYEES OF THE AND THEIR TRUSTEE UNDER THE NAME OF THE UNITED /GOVERNMENT/CORPORATION TITLE 28 SEC.3002 SEC.15(a) GROU VIOLATIONS OF TITLE 50 TWEA WAR CRIMES, HATE CRIMES, R. SERVICE FRAUD & VIOLATION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA C THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATUTES That the actions of the feder State Government, the federal President and State Governor, the fede State legislators and the federal Judiciary and State Judicial branch acting Treasury, DOJ and FRB constitute an unlawful usurpation of the Constitution for America, for the purpose(s) of implementing exclusive Legislation, in a (Statutory Jurisdiction) over the People, to the detriment of lawful mon States of America and for Treason, high Crimes and Misdemeanors (Article II S III 2. The STATE OF OHIO Law Firm represents REGINALD J. ROUTSON fraudulent taxes under the heading STATE OF OHIO dba Corporatio States Corporation in the name of the Department of IR 3. The STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA Law Firm represents Gasto Department which collected fraudulent taxes for the United States Co Department of IRS under the Treasury Department, which collect for th Bank which is also a private Corporation. 4. The complaint below goes into detail on how the fraud came about dealing with the departments/ corporations of the United States under judicial procedure manual under Title 28 USC. 3002 15(a) and under the United States 14th amendment section 3 which was created by the rec 1868. Placing all of the State offices under the jurisdiction of the Federa as the District of Columbia / The United States. The doctrine of Uberrima Fides; Hold the four rules of fiduciary 1. Must not benefit from their position(s) 2. Must provide full disclosure of all activities 3. May not compromise the beneficiary’s interests 4. May not delegate absolute responsibility over their beneficia outside of the ten square miles have become co-conspirer in aiding crimes and hate crimes against a united States national(s) with the and/or commit human trafficking on such united States nation Superior Court of the District of Columbia is an aware that there i limitation on fraud, war crimes, hate crimes, human trafficking constitutional violation. The United States Bill of Right as found in Columbia Constitution and in the United Nations charter defines this against humanity. PARTIES OF THE CASE Respondant-Appellant_QuiTam Private AG Whistleblower Sharon Scar Peterson-Chergosky for Realestate,Car Title Search's are the Relato Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 28. Page 28 of 40 Minnesota Appellate Action setting forth claim of injuries Appelle's_ United States dba Corporation, Department of the Minnesot dba Corporation, STATE OF Minnesota dba Corporation Law firm State Attorney General Lori S Employee of Corporation . All of the Parties involved: come under Title 28 USC 3002 15 (a) as department under the Corporation definition title 28 usc 3002 - Google Search FOUNDATION & BASES FOR THE COMPLAINT The MN Government Officials ie: DSI Employee Joel Essling and Cop committed tax fraud upon the Affiant Sharon Scarrella Anderson by stea Disabled License Plates. By and thru the differen departments of the United States Corporation as listed under 28 USC 3 States Corporation created Title 26 of THE UNITED STATES CODES OF FEDERAL REGULATION on how they are to tax it own Federal & S and corporations as found under 26 USC 6331(a) and the CFR 1. The United States dba Corporation is the Law Firm for the De Corporation under the Treasury Department, which collect for the Fe which is also a private Corporation. These are the Corporate laws being missed use by the Corporate Delaware Code Title 8 under Corporate Law is Chapter 6 CHAPTER Delaware Code Title 8 - Google Search SERVICE CORPORATIONS section 617 Corporate names The corporate organized under this chapter shall contain either a word or words descri service to be rendered by the corporation or shall contain the last n Administrative Code under Corporation Chapter 79 CORPORATIONS NAMES section 79.31. The amendments to §79.31, which relates to th acceptable in a proposed entity name, are required to more specifically and limitations in the entry of entity names into the present computer sy Secretary of State even the Style Manual created by the Corporation for Corporate usage. . NOTICE Notice is being placed into this Superior Court of the State of Minnesota record of fraud commit by the Corporate employees un name of the UNITED STATES aka, Federal Corporation, Foreign C business as” the UNITED STATES /GOVERNMENT/CORPORA STATES OF AMERICA. The Superior Court of the State of Minne placed on Notice that the State and Federal ie: Ramsey Co. Aud appointed by the 2nd Judicial Judges , apparantly has committed Bank Taxes/Elections of Ramsey County with selective False Statements on Scarrella Anderson et al and fraudulently took public oath with the in herself with the intent to created injury and allow fraudulent claim against Sharon Scar united States national/s under Title 50, USC Trading With Enemy Act (TWEA). Sharon et al are c Superior Court of State of Minnesota for Domestic Terrorism crimes ag Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 29. Page 29 of 40 who hold these federal public offices. As of date all Federal an All offices attached to the seat of government shall be exercised not otherwise expressly provided by law. TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 21 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 19 § 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights (3) Depriving persons Delaware Legislation passed a Act called “An Act to Provide Ge Law” This act created a corporation into a Person with all the same person to buy, sell, mortgage, receive licenses. Pledges, etc but no a natural person /being. The High Court has rule in three case law can be sued as a Person. SANTA CLARA COUNTY v. SOUTHERN U.S. 394(1886), New York Central R. Co. v. United States, 212 U United States v. Dotterweich, 320 U.S. 277 (1943 Superior Court of the District of Columbia has jurisdiction over this State and not represented in Congress and is not part of this countr position as all parties having a claim against them hold residents a District of Columbia area and are federal citizens of that District. A planing to injury the people of this nation were within the federal d Columbia as made subject by the Constitution and not outside of D All injury originated within this ten square mile area. As no State Cou hear such an action. No Federal Court outside of the D.C. or ins jurisdiction to hear this case as they are a party to this action. The Constitution and it federal statutes have been violated by all parti constitutional standing in Article I, II, III of the D.C. Constitution a amendment section 3. This gives the Superior Court of the Dist jurisdiction over subject matter jurisdiction and personal jurisdictio providing for the protection of civil rights, including the rig (b) For purposes of this section (1) the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a and (2) any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columb be a statute of the District of Columbia. Sec. 1443. Civil rights cases -STATUTE Any of the following civil actions or criminal prosecu commenced in a State court may be removed by the defen District Court of the United States for the district and division embracin pending : (1) Against any person who is denied or cannot enforc courts of such State a right under any law providing f equal civil rights of citizens of the United States, or persons within the jurisdiction thereof; (2) For any act under color of authority derived from a providing for equal rights, or for refusing to do any act ground that it would be inconsistent with such la {HYPERLINK "http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/usc_sup_01_28 JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE"} > {HYPERLINK "http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/usc_sup_01_28_10_VI.html PROCEEDINGS"} > {HYPERLINK Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 30. Page 30 of 40 "http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/usc_sup_01_28_10_VI_20_171.h TORT CLAIMS PROCEDURE"} >§ 2671. Definitions As used in this chapter and sections {HYPERLIN "http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00001346 "http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00001346 {HYPERLINK "http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode28/usc_sec_28 {HYPERLINK "http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode28/usc_sec_28_ "b"} of this title, the term “Federal agency” includes the executive departm legislative branches, the military departments, independent establishme and corporations primarily acting as instrumentalities or agencies of the not include any contractor with the United States {HYPERLINK "http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode04/usc_su - FLAG AND SEAL, SEAT OF GOVERNMENT, AND THE STATES" "http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode04/usc_sup_01_4_10_ SEAT OF THE GOVERNMENT"} > § 72. Public offices; at seat of G jurisdiction" as used in reference to subject matter jurisdiction.) Pu 29 1979. “AN ACT” To permit civil suit under section 1979 of the R USC1983) against any person acting under color of any law or cust Columbia who subject any person within the jurisdiction of the Dis the deprivation rights, privilege, or immunity secured by the Cons including & 24 Am Jur 2d District of Columbia ß 21 ß 21 Superior Co Columbia and divisions thereof The District of Columbia Court of Gener Court of the District of Columbia, and the District of Columbia Tax Cour single court known as the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. (T the end thereof the following new sentence;“ for the purposes of this Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be con the District of Columbia. Sec.2 Section 1343 of title 28 UNITED STATE (1) by inserting”(a)“ before : The district court”. Sec. 1343. Civil rights a -STATUTE- (a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action commenced by any person: (1) To recover damages for injury to his person or property, or because right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, by any act done in conspiracy mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42 (2) To recover damages from any person who fails to prevent or to aid in mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42 which he had knowledge were abo prevent; (3) To redress the deprivation, under color of any State law, statute, o custom or usage, of any right, privilege or immunity secured by the Co States or by any Act of Congress providing for equal rights of citizens the jurisdiction of the United States; (4) To recover damages or to secure equitable or other relief under SET FORTH THIS CLAIM OF INJURY CAUSED BYEMPLOYEES OF THE CORPORATION AND THEIR T THE NAME OF THE UNITED STATES /GOVERNMENT/CORPOR Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 31. Page 31 of 40 SEC.3002 SEC.15(a) GROUNDS FOR INJURY VIOLATIONS OF WAR CRIMES, HATE CRIMES, R.I.C.O. HONEST SERVICE FRAU OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CONSTITUTION & THE DISTRIC STATUTES NOTICE TO THE PRINCIPLE IS NOTICE TO THE AGE NOTICE TO THE AGENTS IS NOTICE TO THE PRINC R.I.C.O. FRAUD, BANK FRAUD, POSTAL FRAUD CONSPIRACY/OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE TAX FRAUD, MONEY LAUNDERING, WIRE FRAUD, PE PETITION IN THE NATURE OF A SUIT FOR DEPRIVA OF FEDERALLY PROTECTED RIGHTS TITLE 28, 42 USC 1983, 1 TITLE18 USC 241, 242, 1512, 1968, 1964, 1918 AND 18 USC SE INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF AND OTHER DAMAGES AS THE COURT SHALL DETERMINE REASON AND JUST JURISDICTION Private Attorney General VA Widow Sharon Scarrella Anderson Petitioners-Relator QuiTam Vs ___________________State of Minnesota, All Agencies, Ward Michael Campion DPS, Mark Oswald Ramsey Co. Auditor,City St. Essling, Cop Tanya Hunter John Doe and Mary Roe, Individually,severally, Delinquent /s//s/ Ramsey Co. Attorney Susan Gaertner, aka Mrs. John Wodele, M.J Tancibel (sp) (105120) Student John Edison UNK. 560 RCGC W. 50 Kellog tel 651-266-3110 UNITED STATES dba CORPORATION LAW FIRM ERIC HOLDER 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 2053 Department of IRS dba Corporation DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC 20224 (A) Appeal from Ramsey district court, 62cv09-1163 (John Vandenorth, Court R Statute, rule or other authority authorizing appeal: MN Const. Art. X, MS429.06 of Bank Fraud,Wire Fraud by Auditor Mark Oswald False St Date of entry of judgment or date of service of notice of filing of order fr taken:8Sept09 Authority fixing time limit for filing notice of appeal (specify applicable ru Date of filing any motion that tolls appeal time:10Sept0 Date of filing of order deciding tolling motion and date of service of notic (B) Certiorari appeal. Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 32. Page 32 of 40 Statute, rule or other authority authorizing certiorari app Authority fixing time limit for obtaining certiorari review (cite statutory event triggering appeal time, e.g., mailing of decision, receipt of decision notice): (C) Other appellate proceedings. Statute, rule or other authority authorizing appellate proce Authority fixing time limit for appellate review (cite statutory section triggering appeal time, e.g., mailing of decision, receipt of decision, or notice): (D)Finality of order or judgment. Does the judgment or order to be reviewed dispose of all claims by and including attorney fees? Yes ( ) No ( X) If no: Did the district court order entry of a final partial judgment for immediat MINN. R. CIV. APP. P. 104.01? Yes ( ) No (X ) or If yes, provide date of order: If no, is the order or judgment appealed from reviewable under any exce rule? Yes (x ) No ( ) If yes, cite rule, statute, or other authority authorizing ap (E) Criminal only:RICO MS 609 MS609.43, Theft,Trespass, Has a sentence been imposed or imposition of sentence stayed? Y If no, cite statute or rule authorizing interlocutory appe 3. State type of litigation and designate any statutes at issue. Constitutionality 42 Domain,Taxes/Election 4. Brief description of claims, defenses, issues litigated and result below. specify whether conviction was for a misdemeanor, gross misdemeanor 5. List specific issues proposed to be raised on appeal 6. Related appeals. www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com MN 62cv09-1163 « Sharon4anderson’s Weblog List all prior or pending appeals ar appeal. If none, so Google Lawmen Cases MN 62cv09-1163 September 23, 2009 by sharon4anderson Lawmen | Google Groups http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/quowar ApplBlog5Apr07_71 SharonvCitySt.Paul, Car,Insurance,TitledTheft Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 33. Page 33 of 40 Car,Insurance,TitledTheft http://www.rockyou.com/show_my_gallery2.php?instanceid=133464503 MN Courts www.mncourts.gov Re: Ramsey Dist.Crt. 62cv09-1163 2008 697 Sur re SharonScarrellaAnderson Attorney Pro Se Appeals based on Fraud,Abuse of Disg Financial Institution Recovery Reform Enforcement Act – Google Financial Inst Act – Google Regulation Z – Google SearchSearchSearchhttp://taxthemax.blogspo www.slideshare.net/sharon4anderson and www.scribd.com/sharon4anderson Cars etc. Trilogy Impeach1992 35 Copaitkbgs Location : All MNCIS Sites – Case SearchHelp Logout Search Menu New Civil Search Back Register of Actions www.mncourts.gov Sharons_Medicare_Ramsey Co.#670295 Lantry Stalking19 Apr07 Case No. 62-CV-09-1163 Related Case: WritProA06-1150 30Jun06 v.CitySt.Paul Delinquent Real Property Taxes for 2008 EastSideRevies § DelTaxesI_73pgs pg.53Forfeiture Cars etc.42 USC 3631 § MS555DeclaratoryJudgmentAct § § § § john.vandenorth@cou Party Information LeadAttorneys jean.@stepan@co.ramsey.mn.us john.edison@ Topic Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Legal Notice TaxLetter 62cv09 2008 EastSideReviewnews 2008TaxDelpg53 Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 34. Page 34 of 40 Events & Orders of the Court Sa 62cv09 1163 1 Apr09 DISPOSITIONS 02/12/2009 Closed administratively 09/10/2009 Judgment (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr.) http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/62cv091163vandenorthsumju Sa 62cv09 1163 1 Apr09 OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS 02/12/2009 Notice-Other http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sa-tax $449.93 and $449.13 03/31/2009 Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 03/31/2009 Order-Other (Judicial Officer: Lindman, Dale B. ) 03/31/2009 Affidavit-Other http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sa 04/02/2009 Other Document Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84 04/06/2009 Affidavit of Service 04/06/2009 Correspondence Sa 62cv09 1163 1 Apr09 04/06/2009 Other Document Sa Affid Hud Hra Fair Ho45pdf 04/06/2009 Other Document 435 – PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, OTHER PROCEED 04/06/2009 Other DocumentTamar N. GronvallMNAG_DenyService did not serve al Constitutionality of Fees/Assessments 04/07/2009 Order to Remove (Judicial Officer: Johnson, Gregg E. )Dm 1399 23 04/09/2009 Notice of Case Reassignment Edward Cleary 04/10/2009 Correspondence 06/26/2009 Affidavit of PublicationTamar N. GronvallMNAG_DenyService 06/26/2009 Other Document 07/06/2009 Publicly Viewable Note to File 07/15/2009 Motion Sa62cv09 1163 Stephan Ans 15 07/15/2009 Memorandum 07/15/2009 Affidavit-Other Auditor Mark Oswald Affidavit 62cv09-1163 07/15/2009 Affidavit-OtherSa 62cv09 1163 Aff Lynn Moser Dtd.8 Jul09 13 07/15/2009 Affidavit of Service 08/10/2009 Affidavit of Prejudice AffidavitPrejudice Kathleen Gearin Judge 08/12/2009 Notice of Motion and MotionSharons FactFinding 62cv09-1163 Taxes/El 08/13/2009 Other DocumentMotion to Continue 62cv09-1163Judge John Vandenorth 08/17/2009 Motion http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sharon4andersonwebn 08/19/2009 Other Document SharonsSanction Attorneys_Fraud on Court pg26 08/20/2009 Motion Summary Judgment (10:30 AM) (Judicial Officer VanDeNorth, Result: Held 09/09/2009 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order (Judicial Officer: VanD 09/10/2009 Judgment 09/10/2009 Notice of Entry of Judgment http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/62cv091163vandenorthsumju 09/11/2009 Other Document 09/11/2009 Other Document 09/14/2009 Notice of Appeal 09/14/2009 Other Document 09/14/2009 Supplemental Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis 09/15/2009 Supplemental Affidavit for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis 15 Sept09 I Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 35. Page 35 of 40 http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sharonsifp62cv091163appeal 09/18/2009 Supplemental Order for Proceeding In Forma Pauperis (Judicial Office 09/18/2009 Correspondence http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sharonsifp6 09/21/2009 Affidavit of Service LetterMotionRequestCourtReporter ECF RElated Briefs:aff6apr07inditcoleman_20 1058 Warrant 34 St.Paul,MN MarkOswald Handbook for Electronic Filers VA-1345 Declaration for Electro 8453 sharon4anderson v. judge john vandenorth mn – Google Search APPENDIX OF FORMS File4[1]Shar Thune 22 Trilogy Impeach1992 35 Jrsa 88 Homeless 17 Sharons-DL-07 10 1058 Warrant 34 Trilogy Impeach1992 35 Posted in Blogroll | Tagged 62cv09-1163, Appeals, CaseFixing, CitySt.Paul Felony, Forms, Fred Grittner, Google, Judge John Vandenorth, lawmen state. List any known pending appeals in separate actions raising similar issu none are known, so state. 7. Contents of record. Is a transcript necessary to review the issues on appeal? Yes ( If yes, full (X ) or partial ( ) transcript? Has the transcript already been delivered to the parties and filed wit administrator? Yes ( ) No (X ) If not, has it been ordered from the court reporter? Yes (X If a transcript is unavailable, is a statement of the proceedings under Ru Yes ( X) No( ) In lieu of the record as defined in Rule 110.01, have the parties agreed to of the record pursuant to Rule 110.04? Yes ( ) No (X 8. Is oral argument requested? Yes ( X) No ( ) If so, is argument requested at a location other than that provided in Ru Yes ( ) No ( X) If yes, state where argument is requested: 9. Identify the type of brief to be filed. Formal brief under Rule 128.02. ( ) Informal brief under Rule 128.01, subd. 1 (must be accompanied by mot submitted by claimant for reemployment benefits). (X ) Online Trial memoranda, supplemented by a short letter argument, under Rule 10. Names, addresses, zip codes and telephone numbers of attorney for app NAME, ADDRESS, ZIP CODE, TELEPHONE NUMBER, AND Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 36. Page 36 of 40 REGISTRATION LICENSE NUMBER OF ATTORNEY(S) FOR ( (RESPONDENT) __/s/ Sharon Anderson Attorney Pro Se_Privat AG Legal Domicile 1058 Summ 4384 _55104-0384 tel 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com www.sharon4 www.sharonanderson.org ECF P165913-sa1299_________________________ SIGNATURE OR, IF NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL: NAME, ADDRESS, ZIP CODE AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF (RESPONDENT) _______________________________________________ SIGNATURE (OF APPELLANT) (OF RESPONDENT Dated: Mon. 26Oct09 (The Statement of Case is not a jurisdictional document, but it is importa efficient processing of the appeal by the appellate courts. The "jurisdiction is intended to provide sufficient information for the appellate court to easi the order or judgment is appealable and if the appeal is timely. The natur below and the notice of appeal determine the jurisdiction of the appellate requesting information about the issues litigated in the lower court or trib proposed to be raised on appeal are for the court's information, and do no issues that might be addressed on appeal. Likewise, the section asking co prior or pending appeals from the same case, and any separate appeals tha intended to provide more information about the procedural history of the c the court has early notice of other pending related matters in case consoli FORM 105. PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS CASE TITLE: PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIE Petitioner, Sharon Scarrella Anderson vs. TRIAL COURT CASE NUMBER: 62cv09 Respondent. DATE OF FILING ORDER: 10Sept09 TO: The Court of Appeals of the State of Minnesota: The petitioner (SharonScarrella Anderson ) requests discretionary review of t the Ramsey Co. Second Judicial Court. John VandeNorth 1. Statement of facts necessary to an understanding of the issues p 2. Statement of the issues. See Above 3. Statement why immediate review of interlocutory or otherwise nonap necessary. See Above WHEREFORE, the petitioner requests an order of the court granting t discretionary review. DATED: NAME, ADDRESS, ZIP CODE, TELEPHONE NUMBER, AND AT REGISTRATION LICENSE NUMBER OF ATTORNEY(S) FOR PE _/s/ Sharon Anderson __ECF P165913 sa:1299_____http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/2006water/PDF ___________________ SIGNATURE (The content requirements of the petition for discretionary review are foun Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 37. Page 37 of 40 memorandum of law and pertinent lower court documents should be attach The submission and the requirements for filing, form and the number of cop RCAP 105.02.State of Minnesota District Court County Judicial District: Court File Number: Case Type: Plaintiff/Petitioner Affidavit for Proceeding vs / and In Forma Pauperis (Minn. Stat. § 563.01) Defendant/Respondent 1. I am a party in this action. I am a natural person (not a corporation, partner In good faith, I request a court order waiving court fees and costs. I cannot and myself and also pay or give security for costs. 2. I believe that I have valid reasons for pursuing this action. My pleadin http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sharonsifp62cv091163appea Sharon4anderson’s Weblog l Complaint, Answer, Appeal or other pleadin 3. a. I am receiving public assistance under one or more of the following mea MSA (Minnesota Supplemental Assistance Programs); MFIP (Minnesota Family Investment Program); Food Stamps; General Assistance or Discretionary Work Program; MinnesotaCare, Medical Assistance, or General Assistance Medical Energy Assistance; b. I am receiving public assistance under some other means-tested program: ( I have attached proof that I receive public assistance (such as MFIP card o from agency) or I will provide proof if requested. XXXc. I receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI) as a resource for mee If you checked #3a or 3c and receive help under one of the listed programs, ski on page 2. If you checked #3b and receive some "Other" means-tested assistan 4. I am represented by attorney pro se on behalf of Self, a civil legal services program or volunteer attorney program, based on indigency. If you checked #4, skip to the signature l 5. My family size is ______1_____. (Include yourself, your spouse, your minor dependents in your household.) For my family size, I counted myself and Name Age Relationship to you 6. My gross annual family income (before taxes and deductions) is $ 11 is less than 125% of the Federal Poverty Line for my family size of _ Sharons_Medicare_Ramsey Co.#670295 members. I have attached proof of my family income or I will provide proof if requested. If you Affidavits IFP to the signature line on page 2. Print Form CONFIDENTIAL IFP102 State ENG Rev 9/09 www.mncourts.gov/forms State of Minnesota District Court County Judicial District: Court File Number: Case Type: Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 38. Page 38 of 40 Plaintiff/Petitioner Affidavit for Proceeding vs / and In Forma Pauperis (Minn. Stat. § 563.01) Defendant/Respondent 1. I am a party in this action. I am a natural person (not a corporation, p entity). In good faith, I request a court order waiving court fees and costs. I c family and myself and also pay or give security for costs. 2. I believe that I have valid reasons for pursuing this action. My plead Complaint, Answer, Appeal or other pleading) are attac 3. a. I am receiving public assistance under one or more of the follow programs: MSA (Minnesota Supplemental Assistance Programs MFIP (Minnesota Family Investment Program); Food Stamps; General Assistance or Discretionary Work Program MinnesotaCare, Medical Assistance, or General Assistance Medic Energy Assistance; b. I am receiving public assistance under some other means program) I have attached proof that I receive public assistance (such as MFIP check from agency) or I will provide proof if requested. c. I receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI) as a resource for mee If you checked #3a or 3c and receive help under one of the listed pro signature line on page 2. If you checked #3b and receive some "Other" means Question 4. 4. I am represented by attorney on behalf of a civil legal services program or volunteer attorney program, based on indigency. If you checked #4, skip to the signatu 5. My family size is ___________. (Include yourself, your spouse, your other dependents in your household.) For my family size, I counted myself a Name Age Relationship to you 6. My gross annual family income (before taxes and deductions is less than 125% of the Federal Poverty Line for my family size of ___ have attached proof of my family income or I will provide proof if requested skip to the signature line on page 2. Print Form CONFIDENTIAL IFP102 State ENG Rev 9/09 www.mncourts.gov/forms appropriate appellate court caption. Minnesota Statutes, Section 632.14 pro from a final judgment of conviction of the crime of murder in the first degre to the Supreme Court. Rule 29, subdivision 1 of the Rules of Criminal Proc Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 39. Page 39 of 40 procedure for service and filing of the notice of appeal; subdivision 2 itemize notice of appeal; subdivision 3 defines the time for taking an appeal; and s other relevant procedures in first-degree murder appeals. LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa 5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower - Google Profile Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.c Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo! Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058's Buzz A Buzz Activity - Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Home | FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of wh been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making suc in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection is SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Ema kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court 3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MA 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints copywrite.blogspot.comknowledge gained as financial jour http://taxthemax.blogspot.com securities they recommend to readers, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office do forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal Party Information Lead Attorneys Topic Delinquent Real STEPAN, JEAN Property Taxes for 2008 Retained Events & Orders of the Court SHARON ANDERSON AKA PETERSON-SCARRELLA http://sharon4mayor2010.blogspot.com http://sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com PS. The City Council Agenda's are in pdf and Video format4forensic evidence City of St. Paul, MN - Official Website - Council http://stpaul.granicus.com/AgendaViewer.php?view_id=37&event_id=40 Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  • 40. Page 40 of 40 Ramsey County CB-CC LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson - Google Profile Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo! iGoogle Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058's Buzz Activity Page - My Buzz Activity - Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home | FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06- 2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.comknowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4And Monday, December 21, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson