Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Page 1 of 4




Subj:         Fwd: Sharon Scarrella Anderson Answers/Cross Ramsey Dist.Crt 62cv09-1163
Date:         3/30/...
Page 2 of 4



A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!

-----------------
Forwarded Message:
...
Page 3 of 4



              of due process as Realestate taxes 2008 paid.
 State of Minnesota, County of Ramsey ,Auditor
...
Page 4 of 4



the 1st,4th,5th Amendments of the US and Art. 3 MN Constitution.



Submitted in Good Faith
/s/ Sharon4Ande...
Page 1 of 5




Subj:   SharonScarrellaAndersonsObjections to RealEstate Tax CasesMN 62cv09-1163
Date:   3/30/2009 3:48:32...
Page 2 of 5




rep.augustine.dominguez@house.mn, rep.nora.slawik@house.mn, rep.phyllis.kahn@house.mn,
rep.joe.atkins@hous...
Page 3 of 5




           Julie.Kleinschmidt@co.ramsey.mn.us, elections.dept@state.mn.us, secretary.state@state.mn.us,
  ...
Page 4 of 5



Delq Util 01008416 $78.92 Recycle 01009996 $27.04, was told they were city issues.
Sha Answer/Cross 5Apr07
...
Page 5 of 5



LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,...
Message                                                                                           Page 1 of 1




 Subj:  ...
Page 1 of 5




Subj:   SharonScarrellaAndersonsObjections to RealEstate Tax CasesMN 62cv09-1163
Date:   3/30/2009 3:48:32...
Page 2 of 5




rep.augustine.dominguez@house.mn, rep.nora.slawik@house.mn, rep.phyllis.kahn@house.mn,
rep.joe.atkins@hous...
Page 3 of 5




           Julie.Kleinschmidt@co.ramsey.mn.us, elections.dept@state.mn.us, secretary.state@state.mn.us,
  ...
Page 4 of 5



Delq Util 01008416 $78.92 Recycle 01009996 $27.04, was told they were city issues.
Sha Answer/Cross 5Apr07
...
Page 5 of 5



LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,...
STATE OF MINNESOTA                                   DISTRICT COURT
                                                    2N...
Beale v. McClure



LORI SWANSON,STATE CAPITOL,SUSAN GAERTNER,JOHN CHOI,AT
THEIR RESPECTIVE OFFICES .

       Defendants, ...
Beale v. McClure



        Between April 2006 up to and including the present The Stalking of Sharon
by shutting off Wate...
Beale v. McClure



       STATE OF MINNESOTA ET AL               V. 697 SURREY ET AL

       NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION ...
Beale v. McClure




                     In the Saint Paul City Council Agenda
                                    thurs,...
Beale v. McClure



branch in their personal,official capacities, sued individually, severally, John Doe

       and Mary ...
Beale v. McClure



standards than bar licensed attorneys. Regardless of the deficiencies in their
pleadings, pro se litig...
Beale v. McClure



and Seizure 4th Amend,it is possible on any evidence which might be produced,
consistent with the plea...
Beale v. McClure



Minnesota’s regulations are the Federal regulations for the state income tax. There
are no other Minne...
Beale v. McClure



531 F.2d 1397, 1401 (1976); U.S. v. Omega Chemical Corp., 156 F.3d 994 (9th Cir.
1998); U.S. v. Corona...
Beale v. McClure



Sharons Trailer.

         The cop corruption involves Aaron Foster, Murder of Barb Winn, as the city
...
Beale v. McClure



The claims are demonstrably false, since Sharon Anderson has submitted affidavits
that she has been ha...
Beale v. McClure



individuals or to easily ascertainable members of a group in such a way as to inflict
punishment on th...
Beale v. McClure



1965, 353 F.2d 396, 398-399, that: In the absence of any better test, we give effect to
the generally ...
Beale v. McClure



USTC P 12494, 20 AFTR 2d 6008.


        7(f) Radinsky v. United States of America, 622 F.Supp. 412 (U...
Beale v. McClure



        8(b) Mesenbourg v. Jerome, 1995.MN.20775, 538 N.W.2d 489, Although the
language of the statute...
Beale v. McClure



individual, or b) granted by the District Court. Also, a void administrative
judgment cannot be time b...
Beale v. McClure



Andersons constitutional rights by denying her due process of law.

        12(c) Fuentes v. Shevin, 4...
Beale v. McClure



probable cause of criminal activity is pure criminal behavior characteristic of a
totalitarian governm...
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84

1,310

Published on

Forensic Evidence of Property Taxes Paid, Illegal Fees,Assessments "taken" by Theft of Affiants Car,Trailer, Trespass,at 697 Surrey, St.Paul, without Tickets,Warrants,due process, triggering Court File 62cv09-1163, taking Homestead, Constitutionality of State Law, ADA,42USC3631, Affiant is AttorneyProSe,Private AG, with IFP signed by Judge Dale B. Lindman, madating Sheriff Bob Fletcher serve all Papers.

Published in: Real Estate, Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,310
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 84"

  1. 1. Page 1 of 4 Subj: Fwd: Sharon Scarrella Anderson Answers/Cross Ramsey Dist.Crt 62cv09-1163 Date: 3/30/2009 12:37:22 P.M. Central Daylight Time From: Sharon4Anderson To: Sharon4Anderson A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! ----------------- Forwarded Message: Subj: Fwd: Sharon Scarrella Anderson Answers/Cross Ramsey Dist.Crt 62cv09-1163 Date: 3/30/2009 12:25:30 P.M. Central Daylight Time From: Sharon4Anderson To: larry.dease@courts.state.mn.us, lynae.olson@courts.state.mn.us, DOR.taxpayeradvocate@state.mn.us, dorweb.comm@state.mn.us, ward.einess@state.mn.us CC: fred.grittner@courts.state.mn.us, eric.wood@spps.org, eric.magnuson@courts.state.mn.us Fax Transmittal_ Affidavit of E Service/Answers/Cross Ramsey Dist. Court 62cv09-1163 www.co.ramsey.mn.us mn revenue department - Google Search Property Tax Taxpayer rights advocate Ward EinessCabinet Pursuant to my call today Mon 30Mar09 to larry.dease@courts.state.mn.us Court Administrator tel.651- 266-8266 Fax: 651-266-8266 and lynae.olson@courts.state.mn.us tel.651-266-8255 Fax: 651-266-8263 Sample Brief encompassed 1984+Tax+Court.jpg (image) GrittnerJud89.jpg (image) CrimComplaint v Judges 05_41 FTC v. Debt Assets04_73.pdf CityStP_Conflicts_Ethics Sharon TrustTrilogy_21 Aitkin Ans/Cross20Aug01 SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 (FIAFEA&FIRREA)Dahn Files are exensive, We the People must make government accountable. LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower,Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson AllMN | Sharon Anderson's Blog neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home | FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Managment v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.comknowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4Anderson St.Paul City Council Ward2 SA-Blogs2007 Blogger: Dashboard http://sharons- copywrite.blogspot.co Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  2. 2. Page 2 of 4 A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! ----------------- Forwarded Message: Subj: Fwd: Sharon Scarrella Anderson Answers/Cross Ramsey Dist.Crt 62cv09-1163 Date: 3/30/2009 11:30:03 A.M. Central Daylight Time From: Sharon4Anderson To: lynae k.e.olson@courts.state.mn.us CC: Sharon4Anderson Sorry for e-error A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! ----------------- Forwarded Message: Subj: Fwd: Sharon Scarrella Anderson Answers/Cross Ramsey Dist.Crt 62cv09-1163 Date: 3/30/2009 10:58:50 A.M. Central Daylight Time From: Sharon4Anderson To: Sharon4Anderson CC: a_democracy@yahoo.com, BillDahn4 Will transpose to http://taxthemax.blogspot.com My Presentations on SlideShare A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! ----------------- Forwarded Message: Subj: Sharon Scarrella Anderson Answers/Cross Ramsey Dist.Crt 62cv09-1163 Date: 3/30/2009 10:55:21 A.M. Central Daylight Time From: Sharon4Anderson To: lynae k.e.olson@courts.state.mn.us, mark.oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us, deb.haselman@co.ramsey.mn.us CC: askdoj@usdoj.gov, tim.pawlenty@state.mn.us, michael.campion@state.mn.us, attorney.general@state.mn.us, rca@co.ramsey.mn.us, john.harrington@ci.stpaul.mn.us, bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us, a_democracy@yahoo.com DTD: Mon 30Mar09 AFFIDAVIT OF SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON 697 Surrey 32.29.2.41.0053 2008_$2,499.43 pg 53 www.review-news.com ie: Janice Rettman Res: 2009-012 279 - DELINQUENT REAL ESTATE TAXES, 2008 Minnesota Statutes 697 Surrey_09 697 Surrey Illegal Assessments_09 TO THE ABOVE NAMED www.co.ramsey.mn.us www.ci.stpaul.mn.us STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF RAMSEY 62cv09-1163 2ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT To: All Persons with Legal Interest in the Parcels of Real Property Described in the Folowing Delinquent Tax List, Filed with District Court Administrator Lynae.K.E.Olson 651-266-2002 , published 18Mar09, sent to Affiant by US Mails Fri.20thMar09, received Sat. 21Mar09, Auditor Mark Oswald, acting in concort with Larry Dease Court Administrator without a FEE, Proper Service, S&C. Heinous denial Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  3. 3. Page 3 of 4 of due process as Realestate taxes 2008 paid. State of Minnesota, County of Ramsey ,Auditor Mark Oswald,PS Michael Campion,Agents,Assigns,Official Capacity, Individually,severally, John Doe,Mary Roe Plaintiffs 279 - DELINQUENT REAL ESTATE TAXES, 2008 Minnesota Statutes vs. 697 Surrey, Intestate Decedant CplJimAnderson,VA Widow Sharon Anderson, heirs,assigns, all others as their interest appear Defendants Memorandumn of law,Dismissal 554 - FREE SPEECH; PARTICIPATION IN GOVERNMENT, 2008 Minnesota Statutes 3rd Party Pltf,vs. US&State of MN et al File No.62cv09-1163 INTRODUCTION COUNT 1 Title 18 At all times material, when notified Sharon has answered, techinaly the city of st.paul has created False Statements, False Assessments, False Ratification of Asessments, then signed off by the Mayor Chris Coleman WaterA06-1150f/_26 in a RICO Patterened DL/803-2007-02-27T0343 Enterprise against Seniors, Protected Class to Steal Cars, Suspend Drivers License, Shut off Water www.sharonanderson.org without Long Form Complaints, specifically DSI Employee Joel Essling, Sharon Anderson v. Joel Essling MN - Google Search unabated by Public Offici als. COUNT II 42 USC 3631 COUNT IIIMS 609.51SimulatingLegProcess To simulate legal process without decending to particulars , said file/complaint of delinquent taxes contains NO accusations or charging language, distinct from the published 18Mar09 Maple Wood Review www.review-news.com . COUNT IV MS555DeclaratoryJudgmentAct Affiant challenges Authority/Jurisdiction as no long formal complaints, Car fully insured until Dec.08, DL never returned http://sharonvaitkin.blogspot.com Property taxes were paid Please take legal notice: that E Commerce Brief is under construction, Affidavits of Prejudice against Kathleen Gearin and Gregg Johnson for Criminal Cause My Presentations on SlideShare Sa Tax Del62cv09 1163 18 1 hour ago Pursuant to Law Brief due 20 days from 18Mar09 = exclusive of weekends 7Apr to 17th Apr09 and or place in File 62cv09-1163 this E-Commerce Notification. to challenge the quot;takingquot; of Homestead Credit, The Bizzare Assessments with 12% interest is Bizzare, Reppugnant to Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  4. 4. Page 4 of 4 the 1st,4th,5th Amendments of the US and Art. 3 MN Constitution. Submitted in Good Faith /s/ Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913_sa1299 Attorney Pro Se_InFact,Private Attorney General,Candidate 2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Homestead Act of 1862 Sharon Scarrella Anderson's Page - We The People USA http://sharon4privateattorneygeneral.blogspot.com political ?(Sharon4Anderson?) Alliance for a Better Minnesota | Sharon Anderson's Blog Click here: Sharon4Council file4[1]Shar_thune_22.pdf - Google Docs Disclaimer on Site'sThe Electronic Communications Privacy Act MY FindLaw (ECPA) sets out the provisions for access, use, disclosure, interception and privacy protections of electronic communications. Sharon4Anderson | Scribd pdf files. The law was enacted in 1986 and covers various forms of wire and electronic communications. According to the U.S. Code, electronic communications quot;means any transfer of signs, signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photo electronic or photo optical system that affects interstate or foreign commerce.quot; ECPA prohibits unlawful access and certain disclosures of communication contents. Additionally, the law prevents government entities from requiring disclosure of electronic communications from a provider without proper procedure. The Legal Institute provides Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which encompasses ECPA. Blogger: Dashboard NOTICE: This communication is not encrypted. This e-mail (including any attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and Electronic Communications Privacy Act The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  5. 5. Page 1 of 5 Subj: SharonScarrellaAndersonsObjections to RealEstate Tax CasesMN 62cv09-1163 Date: 3/30/2009 3:48:32 P.M. Central Daylight Time From: Sharon4Anderson To: mark.oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us, larry.dease@courts.state.mn.us, dorrick@pioneerpress.com, ward.einess@state.mn.us, karen.norgaard@co.ramsey.mn.us, bonnie.andrews@co.ramsey.mn.us, aitkinpz@co.aitkin.mn.us, achhs@co.aitkin.mn.us, acac@mlecmn.net, age@aitkinage.com, acld@co.aitkin.mn.us, lgrams@co.aitkin.mn.us, janice.bare@courts.state.mn.us, ltibbetts@co.aitkin.mn.us, dale.lueck@co.aitkin.mn.us, irwi0009@umn.edu, central.services@co.aitkin.mn.us, sbennett@co.aitkin.mn.us, auditor@co.aitkin.mn.us, marta.swanson@courts.state.mn.us, license@co.aitkin.mn.us, kladd@co.aitkin.mn.us, sheriff2@co.aitkin.mn.us, chills@co.aitkin.mn.us, dselander@co.aitkin.mn.us, jratz@co.aitkin.mn.us, brian.napstad@co.aitkin.mn.us, diane.lafferty@co.aitkin.mn.us, assessor@co.aitkin.mn.us, reid.amborn@co.aitkin.mn.us, dboyer@co.aitkin.mn.us, ruth.bender@courts.state.mn.us, treas@co.aitkin.mn.us, dniemi@co.aitkin.mn.us, mark.wedel@co.aitkin.mn.us, janze003@umn.edu, tburke@co.aitkin.mn.us, mis@co.aitkin.mn.us, kpeysar@co.aitkin.mn.us, bonnie.lecocq@courts.state.mn.us, plandg@co.aitkin.mn.us, jhicks@co.aitkin.mn.us, russ.wagner@co.aitkin.mn.us, nancy.lebland@courts.state.mn.us, mbos@co.aitkin.mn.us, tsanbeck@co.aitkin.mn.us, paul.bailey@co.aitkin.mn.us, tveenker@co.aitkin.mn.us, bill.thompson@co.aitkin.mn.us, csutch@co.aitkin.mn.us, jblomberg@co.aitkin.mn.us, michelle.cosgriff@courts.state.mn.us, lori.grams@co.aitkin.mn.us, dmoore@co.aitkin.mn.us, mnext- aitkin@umn.edu, tgustin@co.aitkin.mn.us, rmnelson@co.aitkin.mn.us, coatty@co.aitkin.mn.us, galen.tveit@co.aitkin.mn.us, llcc@mlecmn.net, tburman@co.aitkin.mn.us, baverill@mndaily.com, eeskola@cbs.com, ddavis@forumcomm.com, hopfen@startribune.com, rstassen- berger@pioneerpress.com, ochsnews@yahoo.com, bbowring@tpt.org, charley.shaw@legal- ledger.com, mlohn@ap.org, jragsdale@pioneerpress.com, ahart@kare11.com, swente@republican- eagle.com, mfischenich@mankatofreepress.com, EEskola, tim.budig@ecm-inc.com, ndraper@startribune.com, lmccallum@mpr.org, bsalisbury@pioneerpress.com, lschumacher@stcloudtimes.com, pcondon@ap.org, mbrunswick@startribune.com, ntibbetts@mndaily.com, pjkessler@wcco.cbs.com, jcroman@kare11.com, plopez@startribune.com, tscheck@mpr.org, thauser@kstp.com, mlahammer@tpt.org, pdoyle@startribune.com, rrosario@pioneerpress.com, klksnews@yahoo.com, lsturdevant@startribune.com, jayjohnson@postbulletin.com, bbakst@ap.org, dbrewster@startribune.com, glenn.wilson@state.mn.us, market.assurance@state.mn.us, licensing.commerce@state.mn.us, education.comerce@state.mn.us, unclaimed.property@state.mn.us, energy.info@state.mn.us, general.commerce@state.mn.us, insdatareports.commnerce@state.mn.us, financial.commerce@state.mn.us, insurance.commerce@state.mn.us, securities.commerce@state.mn.us, petrofund.commerce@state.mn.us, telecom.commerce@state.mn.us, weights.measures@state.mn.us, MNLabContact@commerce.state.mn.us, mn.relay@state.mn.us, commerce.commissioner@state.mn.us, commerce.webmaster@state.mn.us, marcia.moermond@ci.stpaul.mn.us, kenneth.smith@ci.stpaul.mn.us, margaret.egan@ci.stpaul.mn.us, elizabeth.davis@ci.stpaul.mn.us, trudy.moloney@ci.stpaul.mn.us, thomas.davenport@ci.stpaul.mn.us, mwandersee@eldercarerights.org, jaasve@eldercarerights.org, hkaur@eldercarerights.org, justice@eldercarerights.org, mthurin@eldercarerights.org, jmcquillan@eldercarerights.org, jabrams@eldercarerights.org, tpeplinski@eldercarerights.org, tim.pawlenty@state.mn.us, velma.korbel@state.mn.us, carol.molnau@state.mn.us, brian.mcclung@state.mn.us, dli.commissioner@state.mn.us, cal.ludeman@state.mn.us, admin.info@state.mn.us, alice.seagren@state.mn.us, dan.salomone@state.mn.us, mhfa@state.mn.us, michael.pugliese@state.mn.us, michael.campion@state.mn.us, info@IronRangeResources.org, webinfo@mda.state.mn.us, mde.webmaster@state.mn.us, webmaster@doc.state.mn.us, deed.customerservice@state.mn.us, oet.web@state.mn.us, webmaster.finance@state.mn.us, sanne.magnan@state.mn.us, dhs.info@state.mn.us, steve.sviggum@state.mn.us, bms@state.mn.us, data.center@metc.state.mn.us, peter.bell@metc.state.mn.us, webmaster@mn-arng.ngb.army.mil, susan.heegard@state.mn.us, info@dnr.state.mn.us, webmaster@pca.state.mn.us, Dps.webmaster@state.mn.us, dorweb.comm@state.mn.us, tom.sorel@state.mn.us, info@dot.state.mn.us, clark.dyrud@state.mn.us, mdva.webmaster@mdva.state.mn.us, rep.tim.faust@house.mn, rep.morrie.lanning@house.mn, rep.sandra.peterson@house.mn, rep.kathy.brynaert@house.mn, rep.bud.heidgerken@house.mn, rep.carol.mcfarlane@house.mn, Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  6. 6. Page 2 of 5 rep.augustine.dominguez@house.mn, rep.nora.slawik@house.mn, rep.phyllis.kahn@house.mn, rep.joe.atkins@house.mn, rep.maryellen.otremba@house.mn, rep.steve.gottwalt@house.mn, rep.john.ward@house.mn, rep.leon.lillie@house.mn, rep.tony.cornish@house.mn, rep.brita.sailer@house.mn, rep.frank.hornstein@house.mn, rep.joe.mullery@house.mn, rep.tom.emmer@house.mn, rep.cy.thao@house.mn, rep.paul.kohls@house.mn, rep.david.bly@house.mn, rep.joyce.peppin@house.mn, rep.sandy.wollschlager@house.mn, rep.rick.hansen@house.mn, rep.carlos.mariani@house.mn, rep.ron.shimanski@house.mn, rep.bob.dettmer@house.mn, rep.mike.jaros@house.mn, rep.kim.norton@house.mn, rep.bruce.anderson@house.mn, rep.patti.fritz@house.mn, rep.dean.urdahl@house.mn, rep.john.lesch@house.mn, rep.julie.bunn@house.mn, rep.tom.rukavina@house.mn, rep.bill.hilty@house.mn, rep.frank.moe@house.mn, rep.steve.drazkowski@house.mn, rep.steve.smith@house.mn, rep.margaret.kelliher@house.mn, rep.john.benson@house.mn, rep.erik.paulsen@house.mn, rep.bob.gunther@house.mn, rep.andy.welti@house.mn, rep.shelley.madore@house.mn, rep.matt.dean@house.mn, rep.marty.seifert@house.mn, rep.larry.hosch@house.mn, rep.mary.murphy@house.mn, rep.tom.tillberry@house.mn, rep.sondra.erickson@house.mn, rep.carolyn.laine@house.mn, rep.neil.peterson@house.mn, rep.robin.brown@house.mn, rep.larry.haws@house.mn, rep.sandra.masin@house.mn, rep.dean.simpson@house.mn, rep.denise.dittrich@house.mn, rep.al.juhnke@house.mn, rep.tom.anzelc@house.mn, rep.mark.olson@house.mn, rep.pat.garofalo@house.mn, rep.neva.walker@house.mn, rep.bernie.lieder@house.mn, rep.karen.clark@house.mn, rep.maria.ruud@house.mn, rep.joe.hoppe@house.mn, rep.terry.morrow@house.mn, rep.kent.eken@house.mn, rep.marsha.swails@house.mn, rep.lyle.koenen@house.mn, rep.karla.bigham@house.mn, rep.gene.pelowski@house.mn, rep.rod.hamilton@house.mn, rep.ryan.winkler@house.mn, rep.tim.mahoney@house.mn, rep.dan.severson@house.mn, rep.randy.demmer@house.mn, rep.thomas.huntley@house.mn, rep.bud.nornes@house.mn, rep.jim.abeler@house.mn, rep.ken.tschumper@house.mn, rep.brad.finstad@house.mn, rep.ann.lenczewski@house.mn, rep.jeanne.poppe@house.mn, rep.mark.buesgens@house.mn, rep.debra.hilstrom@house.mn, rep.denny.mcnamara@house.mn, rep.al.doty@house.mn, rep.linda.slocum@house.mn, rep.jeremy.kalin@house.mn, rep.mike.beard@house.mn, rep.dennis.ozment@house.mn, rep.mindy.greiling@house.mn, rep.lynn.wardlow@house.mn, rep.diane.loeffler@house.mn, rep.jim.davnie@house.mn, rep.bev.scalze@house.mn, rep.melissa.hortman@house.mn, rep.erin.murphy@house.mn, rep.ron.erhardt@house.mn, rep.paul.thissen@house.mn, rep.scott.kranz@house.mn, rep.laura.brod@house.mn, rep.aaron.peterson@house.mn, rep.kurt.zellers@house.mn, rep.alice.hausman@house.mn, rep.paul.marquart@house.mn, rep.steve.simon@house.mn, rep.david.dill@house.mn, rep.sheldon.johnson@house.mn, rep.dave.olin@house.mn, rep.sarah.anderson@house.mn, rep.paul.gardner@house.mn, rep.jean.wagenius@house.mn, rep.tina.liebling@house.mn, rep.lyndon.carlson@house.mn, rep.connie.ruth@house.mn, rep.maryliz.holberg@house.mn, rep.will.morgan@house.mn, rep.rob.eastlund@house.mn, rep.loren.solberg@house.mn, rep.kate.knuth@house.mn, rep.john.berns@house.mn, rep.michael.paymar@house.mn, rep.tom.hackbarth@house.mn, rep.torrey.westrom@house.mn, rep.doug.magnus@house.mn, rep.tony.sertich@house.mn, rep.larry.howes@house.mn, rep.michael.nelson@house.mn, bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us, matt.bostrom@ci.stpaul.mn.us, neil.melton@state.mn.us, john.harrington@ci.stpaul.mn.us, mary.bjornberg@state.mn.us, kwilkening@co.nobles.mn.us, terry.sandbeck@state.mn.us, johnp@alx.tec.mn.us, mitch.lee@state.mn.us, mylan.masson@minneapolis.edu, paul.monteen@state.mn.us, tracey.a.martin@co.hennepin.mn.us, mark.letexier@co.polk.mn.us, john.bolduc@co.crow-wing.mn.us, dan.glass@state.mn.us, brent.richter@state.mn.us, debra.soderbeck@state.mn.us, mdohman@ci.maple-grove.mn.us, sheryl.waddick@state.mn.us, junstad@yahoo.com, carol.j.hall@state.mn.us, mike.ardolf@state.mn.us, bill.martinez@ci.stpaul.mn.us, michael.young@ci.minneapolis.mn.us, peggy.strand@state.mn.us, timbildsoe@visi.com, starr.suggs@state.mn.us, harr@csp.edu, diverson@pioneerpress.com, dbeal@pioneerpress.com, mhopp@pioneerpress.com, rhubbard@pioneerpress.com, twebb@pioneerpress.com, jforster@pioneerpress.com, jkrocheski@pioneerpress.com, jbjorhus@pioneerpress.com, khubbard@pioneerpress.com, aharrington@pioneerpress.com, lsuzukamo@pioneerpress.com, dfondler@pioneerpress.com, janice.rettman@co.ramsey.mn.us, chiefclerk@co.ramsey.mn.us, tony.bennett@co.ramsey.mn.us, jim.mcdonough@co.ramsey.mn.us, rafael.e.ortega@co.ramsey.mn.us, jan.parker@co.ramsey.mn.us, toni.carter@co.ramsey.mn.us, victoria.reinhardt@co.ramsey.mn.us, rob.fulton@co.ramsey.mn.us, bonnie.jackelen@co.ramsey.mn.us, Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  7. 7. Page 3 of 5 Julie.Kleinschmidt@co.ramsey.mn.us, elections.dept@state.mn.us, secretary.state@state.mn.us, public.information@state.mn.us, direct.access@state.mn.us, authentication.inquiries@state.mn.us, ucc.dept@state.mn.us, sen.patricia.torres.ray@senate.mn, sen.tarryl.clark@senate.mn, sen.mary.olson@senate.mn, sen.linda.higgins@senate.mn, sen.david.senjem@senate.mn, sen.john.marty@senate.mn, sen.john.doll@senate.mn, sen.yvonne.prettner.solon@senate.mn, sen.paul.koering@senate.mn, sen.daniel.sparks@senate.mn, sen.terri.bonoff@senate.mn, sen.chris.gerlach@senate.mn, sen.kathy.saltzman@senate.mn, sen.warren.limmer@senate.mn, sen.jim.vickerman@senate.mn, sen.dick.day@senate.mn, sen.sandra.pappas@senate.mn, sen.debbie.johnson@senate.mn, sen.katie.sieben@senate.mn, sen.thomas.bakk@senate.mn, sen.geoff.michel@senate.mn, sen.sharon.erickson.ropes@senate.mn, sen.claire.robling@senate.mn, sen.keith.langseth@senate.mn, sen.david.tomassoni@senate.mn, sen.satveer.chaudhary@senate.mn, sen.gen.olson@senate.mn, sen.david.hann@senate.mn, sen.linda.scheid@senate.mn, sen.ann.lynch@senate.mn, sen.chuck.wiger@senate.mn, sen.steve.dille@senate.mn, sen.lawrence.pogemiller@senate.mn, sen.amy.koch@senate.mn, sen.dan.skogen@senate.mn, sen.don.betzold@senate.mn, sen.steve.murphy@senate.mn, sen.dennis.frederickson@senate.mn, sen.sandy.rummel@senate.mn, sen.ron.latz@senate.mn, sen.ray.vandeveer@senate.mn, sen.richard.cohen@senate.mn, sen.julianne.ortman@senate.mn, sen.bill.ingebrigtsen@senate.mn, sen.kathy.sheran@senate.mn, sen.ellen.anderson@senate.mn, sen.jim.metzen@senate.mn, sen.michelle.fischbach@senate.mn, sen.ann.rest@senate.mn, sen.gary.kubly@senate.mn, sen.leroy.stumpf@senate.mn, sen.jim.carlson@senate.mn, sen.rick.olseen@senate.mn, sen.joe.gimse@senate.mn, sen.tom.saxhaug@senate.mn, sen.tony.lourey@senate.mn, sen.betsy.wergin@senate.mn, sen.scott.dibble@senate.mn, sen.pat.pariseau@senate.mn, sen.mike.jungbauer@senate.mn, sen.rod.skoe@senate.mn, sen.linda.berglin@senate.mn, sen.mee.moua@senate.mn, sen.leo.foley@senate.mn, sen.julie.rosen@senate.mn, sen.dan.larson@senate.mn, john.choi@ci.stpaul.mn.us, john.lesch@ci.stpaul.mn.us, lisa.veith@ci.stpaul.mn.us, john.kelly@ci.stpaul.mn.us, jerry.hendrickson@ci.stpaul.mn.us, dave.thune@ci.stpaul.mn.us, pat.harris@ci.stpaul.mn.us, kathy.lantry@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Lee.Helgen@ci.stpaul.mn.us, dan.bostrom@ci.stpaul.mn.us, russ.stark@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Melvin.Carter@ci.stpaul.mn.us, mranfang@hotmail.com, jerry.ludden@ci.stpaul.mn.us, nathan.stublaski@ci.stpaul.mn.us, steve.schneider@ci.stpaul.mn.us, john.zanmiller@ci.west-saint-paul.mn.us, will.rossbach@ci.maplewood.mn.us, waterinquiries@ci.stpaul.mn.us, jim.graupmann@ci.stpaul.mn.us, dave.schuler@ci.stpaul.mn.us, steve.gleason@ci.stpaul.mn.us, dave.wagner@ci.stpaul.mn.us CC: nancylazaryan@gmail.com, a_democracy@yahoo.com, BillDahn4, Sharon4Anderson, attorney.general@state.mn.us, rca@co.ramsey.mn.us Click here: Objections to RealEstate Tax Cases MN - Google Search Mon.30Mar09 NIOTICE OF APPEARANCE BY E-COMMERCE/FAX RE: CLASSIFICATION 697 SURREY AVE 32.29.22.41.0053 published 18Mar09 www.review-news.com Tues for 1Apr09 Related Court File Ramsey Dist.Crt. 62cv09-1163 Further to reopen the Grand Jury Proceedings against Lou McKenna former Auditor. 697 Surrey 08 Assess/TaxValueStmt.asp?pin=32292 To Mark.Oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us Auditor/Taxes/Elections,his Agents,Assigns,Employees,et al. Ramsey County PRR If you have questions regarding your Notice of Valuation and Classification for Taxes Payable in 2010, you may call the Assessor’s Office at 651-266-2000, prior to March 27, 2009, to discuss your concerns with an appraiser over the phone. Please be aware that you will: Pursuant to Affiants call today to karen.norgaard@co.ramsey.mn.us, re: Supervisor bonnie.andrews@co.ramsey.mn.us to Challenge the quot;takingquot; of Homestead credit at 697 Surrey Ave. St. Paul, MN.55106, Continuous Homestead from 1992 up to and including the present, apparantly quot;takenquot; 2008 for taxes payable 2009, again 2009 payable 2010., without change in ownership and or Sale. Affiant is not objecting to the Valuation, as the single little cottage is insured for over $100,000.00. Questioned What is Row Maintance 01000032 $112.68 Water Drain 01000080 $67.84 Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  8. 8. Page 4 of 5 Delq Util 01008416 $78.92 Recycle 01009996 $27.04, was told they were city issues. Sha Answer/Cross 5Apr07 THEREFORE: http://taxthemax.blogspot.com working a a pdf legal brief to challenge the City of St.Paul, Fraudulent Theft,Trespass,Treason to have Joel Essling of DSI 42USC1988 - Google Search and Tanya Hunter cop packing a gun steal my car,traileCode-Corruption 19Apr07 Lantry r,personal property SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 Sharon TrustTrilogy_21 Michael Campion v. Mpls,Rybak Sa Beale Answ 07 278 - REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX; OBJECTION, DEFENSE, 2008 Minnesota Statutes 278.14 REFUNDS OF MISTAKENLY BILLED TAXES. Subdivision 1.Applicability. 697 Surrey Illegal Assessments_09 A county must pay a refund of a mistakenly billed tax as provided in this section. As used in this section, quot;mistakenly billed taxquot; means an amount of property tax that was billed, to the extent the amount billed exceeds the accurate tax amount due to a misclassification of the owner's property under section 273.13 or a mathematical error in the calculation of the tax on the owner's property, together with any penalty or interest paid on that amount. This section applies only to taxes payable in the current year and the two prior years. As used in this section, quot;mathematical errorquot; is limited to an error in: (1) converting the market value of a property to tax capacity or to a referendum market value; (2) application of the tax rate as computed by the auditor under sections 275.08, subdivisions 1b, 1c, and 1d; 276A.06, subdivisions 4 and 5; and 473F.07, subdivisions 4 and 5, to the property's tax capacity or referendum market value; or (3) calculation of or eligibility for a credit. The remedy provided under this section does not apply to a misclassification under section 273.13 that is due to the failure of the property owner to apply for the correct classification as required by law. Subd. 2.Procedure. A refund of mistakenly billed tax must be paid upon verification of a claim made in a written application by the owner of the property or upon discovery of the mistakenly billed tax by the county. Refunds of overpayments will be made as provided in section 278.12. Subd. 3.Appeals. If the county rejects a claim by a property owner under subdivision 2, it must notify the property owner of that decision within 90 days of receipt of the claim. The property owner may appeal that decision to the Tax Court within 60 days after receipt of a notice from the county of the decision. Relief granted by the Tax Court is limited to current year taxes, and taxes in the two prior years AFFIANT'S DEMAND'S OF TAKING FOR THE PAST 21 YEARS MANDATES 21 MILLION RE: RICO ACTS. Cop- Corruption-Minnesota: Notice: Ins.Claim Stolen 91 Chrysler V-1C4GY54R5MX5 Not his car, but still his tickets? It's man versus state database - TwinCities.com Sharon's Quitam Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  9. 9. Page 5 of 5 LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower,Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson AllMN | Sharon Anderson's Blog neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home | FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.comknowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4Anderson St.Paul City Council Ward2 SA-Blogs2007 Blogger: Dashboard http://sharons- copywrite.blogspot.co A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  10. 10. Message Page 1 of 1 Subj: RE: SharonAnderson,BillDahn Constitutional Challenge Agenda 1Apr091thro15_33,37,50 Date: 4/1/2009 1:16:52 P.M. Central Daylight Time From: ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov To: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com Thank you for contacting the Department of Justice. This is an automatic acknowledgement that your e-mail was received. It will be reviewed in the order it was received. Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  11. 11. Page 1 of 5 Subj: SharonScarrellaAndersonsObjections to RealEstate Tax CasesMN 62cv09-1163 Date: 3/30/2009 3:48:32 P.M. Central Daylight Time From: Sharon4Anderson To: mark.oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us, larry.dease@courts.state.mn.us, dorrick@pioneerpress.com, ward.einess@state.mn.us, karen.norgaard@co.ramsey.mn.us, bonnie.andrews@co.ramsey.mn.us, aitkinpz@co.aitkin.mn.us, achhs@co.aitkin.mn.us, acac@mlecmn.net, age@aitkinage.com, acld@co.aitkin.mn.us, lgrams@co.aitkin.mn.us, janice.bare@courts.state.mn.us, ltibbetts@co.aitkin.mn.us, dale.lueck@co.aitkin.mn.us, irwi0009@umn.edu, central.services@co.aitkin.mn.us, sbennett@co.aitkin.mn.us, auditor@co.aitkin.mn.us, marta.swanson@courts.state.mn.us, license@co.aitkin.mn.us, kladd@co.aitkin.mn.us, sheriff2@co.aitkin.mn.us, chills@co.aitkin.mn.us, dselander@co.aitkin.mn.us, jratz@co.aitkin.mn.us, brian.napstad@co.aitkin.mn.us, diane.lafferty@co.aitkin.mn.us, assessor@co.aitkin.mn.us, reid.amborn@co.aitkin.mn.us, dboyer@co.aitkin.mn.us, ruth.bender@courts.state.mn.us, treas@co.aitkin.mn.us, dniemi@co.aitkin.mn.us, mark.wedel@co.aitkin.mn.us, janze003@umn.edu, tburke@co.aitkin.mn.us, mis@co.aitkin.mn.us, kpeysar@co.aitkin.mn.us, bonnie.lecocq@courts.state.mn.us, plandg@co.aitkin.mn.us, jhicks@co.aitkin.mn.us, russ.wagner@co.aitkin.mn.us, nancy.lebland@courts.state.mn.us, mbos@co.aitkin.mn.us, tsanbeck@co.aitkin.mn.us, paul.bailey@co.aitkin.mn.us, tveenker@co.aitkin.mn.us, bill.thompson@co.aitkin.mn.us, csutch@co.aitkin.mn.us, jblomberg@co.aitkin.mn.us, michelle.cosgriff@courts.state.mn.us, lori.grams@co.aitkin.mn.us, dmoore@co.aitkin.mn.us, mnext- aitkin@umn.edu, tgustin@co.aitkin.mn.us, rmnelson@co.aitkin.mn.us, coatty@co.aitkin.mn.us, galen.tveit@co.aitkin.mn.us, llcc@mlecmn.net, tburman@co.aitkin.mn.us, baverill@mndaily.com, eeskola@cbs.com, ddavis@forumcomm.com, hopfen@startribune.com, rstassen- berger@pioneerpress.com, ochsnews@yahoo.com, bbowring@tpt.org, charley.shaw@legal- ledger.com, mlohn@ap.org, jragsdale@pioneerpress.com, ahart@kare11.com, swente@republican- eagle.com, mfischenich@mankatofreepress.com, EEskola, tim.budig@ecm-inc.com, ndraper@startribune.com, lmccallum@mpr.org, bsalisbury@pioneerpress.com, lschumacher@stcloudtimes.com, pcondon@ap.org, mbrunswick@startribune.com, ntibbetts@mndaily.com, pjkessler@wcco.cbs.com, jcroman@kare11.com, plopez@startribune.com, tscheck@mpr.org, thauser@kstp.com, mlahammer@tpt.org, pdoyle@startribune.com, rrosario@pioneerpress.com, klksnews@yahoo.com, lsturdevant@startribune.com, jayjohnson@postbulletin.com, bbakst@ap.org, dbrewster@startribune.com, glenn.wilson@state.mn.us, market.assurance@state.mn.us, licensing.commerce@state.mn.us, education.comerce@state.mn.us, unclaimed.property@state.mn.us, energy.info@state.mn.us, general.commerce@state.mn.us, insdatareports.commnerce@state.mn.us, financial.commerce@state.mn.us, insurance.commerce@state.mn.us, securities.commerce@state.mn.us, petrofund.commerce@state.mn.us, telecom.commerce@state.mn.us, weights.measures@state.mn.us, MNLabContact@commerce.state.mn.us, mn.relay@state.mn.us, commerce.commissioner@state.mn.us, commerce.webmaster@state.mn.us, marcia.moermond@ci.stpaul.mn.us, kenneth.smith@ci.stpaul.mn.us, margaret.egan@ci.stpaul.mn.us, elizabeth.davis@ci.stpaul.mn.us, trudy.moloney@ci.stpaul.mn.us, thomas.davenport@ci.stpaul.mn.us, mwandersee@eldercarerights.org, jaasve@eldercarerights.org, hkaur@eldercarerights.org, justice@eldercarerights.org, mthurin@eldercarerights.org, jmcquillan@eldercarerights.org, jabrams@eldercarerights.org, tpeplinski@eldercarerights.org, tim.pawlenty@state.mn.us, velma.korbel@state.mn.us, carol.molnau@state.mn.us, brian.mcclung@state.mn.us, dli.commissioner@state.mn.us, cal.ludeman@state.mn.us, admin.info@state.mn.us, alice.seagren@state.mn.us, dan.salomone@state.mn.us, mhfa@state.mn.us, michael.pugliese@state.mn.us, michael.campion@state.mn.us, info@IronRangeResources.org, webinfo@mda.state.mn.us, mde.webmaster@state.mn.us, webmaster@doc.state.mn.us, deed.customerservice@state.mn.us, oet.web@state.mn.us, webmaster.finance@state.mn.us, sanne.magnan@state.mn.us, dhs.info@state.mn.us, steve.sviggum@state.mn.us, bms@state.mn.us, data.center@metc.state.mn.us, peter.bell@metc.state.mn.us, webmaster@mn-arng.ngb.army.mil, susan.heegard@state.mn.us, info@dnr.state.mn.us, webmaster@pca.state.mn.us, Dps.webmaster@state.mn.us, dorweb.comm@state.mn.us, tom.sorel@state.mn.us, info@dot.state.mn.us, clark.dyrud@state.mn.us, mdva.webmaster@mdva.state.mn.us, rep.tim.faust@house.mn, rep.morrie.lanning@house.mn, rep.sandra.peterson@house.mn, rep.kathy.brynaert@house.mn, rep.bud.heidgerken@house.mn, rep.carol.mcfarlane@house.mn, Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  12. 12. Page 2 of 5 rep.augustine.dominguez@house.mn, rep.nora.slawik@house.mn, rep.phyllis.kahn@house.mn, rep.joe.atkins@house.mn, rep.maryellen.otremba@house.mn, rep.steve.gottwalt@house.mn, rep.john.ward@house.mn, rep.leon.lillie@house.mn, rep.tony.cornish@house.mn, rep.brita.sailer@house.mn, rep.frank.hornstein@house.mn, rep.joe.mullery@house.mn, rep.tom.emmer@house.mn, rep.cy.thao@house.mn, rep.paul.kohls@house.mn, rep.david.bly@house.mn, rep.joyce.peppin@house.mn, rep.sandy.wollschlager@house.mn, rep.rick.hansen@house.mn, rep.carlos.mariani@house.mn, rep.ron.shimanski@house.mn, rep.bob.dettmer@house.mn, rep.mike.jaros@house.mn, rep.kim.norton@house.mn, rep.bruce.anderson@house.mn, rep.patti.fritz@house.mn, rep.dean.urdahl@house.mn, rep.john.lesch@house.mn, rep.julie.bunn@house.mn, rep.tom.rukavina@house.mn, rep.bill.hilty@house.mn, rep.frank.moe@house.mn, rep.steve.drazkowski@house.mn, rep.steve.smith@house.mn, rep.margaret.kelliher@house.mn, rep.john.benson@house.mn, rep.erik.paulsen@house.mn, rep.bob.gunther@house.mn, rep.andy.welti@house.mn, rep.shelley.madore@house.mn, rep.matt.dean@house.mn, rep.marty.seifert@house.mn, rep.larry.hosch@house.mn, rep.mary.murphy@house.mn, rep.tom.tillberry@house.mn, rep.sondra.erickson@house.mn, rep.carolyn.laine@house.mn, rep.neil.peterson@house.mn, rep.robin.brown@house.mn, rep.larry.haws@house.mn, rep.sandra.masin@house.mn, rep.dean.simpson@house.mn, rep.denise.dittrich@house.mn, rep.al.juhnke@house.mn, rep.tom.anzelc@house.mn, rep.mark.olson@house.mn, rep.pat.garofalo@house.mn, rep.neva.walker@house.mn, rep.bernie.lieder@house.mn, rep.karen.clark@house.mn, rep.maria.ruud@house.mn, rep.joe.hoppe@house.mn, rep.terry.morrow@house.mn, rep.kent.eken@house.mn, rep.marsha.swails@house.mn, rep.lyle.koenen@house.mn, rep.karla.bigham@house.mn, rep.gene.pelowski@house.mn, rep.rod.hamilton@house.mn, rep.ryan.winkler@house.mn, rep.tim.mahoney@house.mn, rep.dan.severson@house.mn, rep.randy.demmer@house.mn, rep.thomas.huntley@house.mn, rep.bud.nornes@house.mn, rep.jim.abeler@house.mn, rep.ken.tschumper@house.mn, rep.brad.finstad@house.mn, rep.ann.lenczewski@house.mn, rep.jeanne.poppe@house.mn, rep.mark.buesgens@house.mn, rep.debra.hilstrom@house.mn, rep.denny.mcnamara@house.mn, rep.al.doty@house.mn, rep.linda.slocum@house.mn, rep.jeremy.kalin@house.mn, rep.mike.beard@house.mn, rep.dennis.ozment@house.mn, rep.mindy.greiling@house.mn, rep.lynn.wardlow@house.mn, rep.diane.loeffler@house.mn, rep.jim.davnie@house.mn, rep.bev.scalze@house.mn, rep.melissa.hortman@house.mn, rep.erin.murphy@house.mn, rep.ron.erhardt@house.mn, rep.paul.thissen@house.mn, rep.scott.kranz@house.mn, rep.laura.brod@house.mn, rep.aaron.peterson@house.mn, rep.kurt.zellers@house.mn, rep.alice.hausman@house.mn, rep.paul.marquart@house.mn, rep.steve.simon@house.mn, rep.david.dill@house.mn, rep.sheldon.johnson@house.mn, rep.dave.olin@house.mn, rep.sarah.anderson@house.mn, rep.paul.gardner@house.mn, rep.jean.wagenius@house.mn, rep.tina.liebling@house.mn, rep.lyndon.carlson@house.mn, rep.connie.ruth@house.mn, rep.maryliz.holberg@house.mn, rep.will.morgan@house.mn, rep.rob.eastlund@house.mn, rep.loren.solberg@house.mn, rep.kate.knuth@house.mn, rep.john.berns@house.mn, rep.michael.paymar@house.mn, rep.tom.hackbarth@house.mn, rep.torrey.westrom@house.mn, rep.doug.magnus@house.mn, rep.tony.sertich@house.mn, rep.larry.howes@house.mn, rep.michael.nelson@house.mn, bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us, matt.bostrom@ci.stpaul.mn.us, neil.melton@state.mn.us, john.harrington@ci.stpaul.mn.us, mary.bjornberg@state.mn.us, kwilkening@co.nobles.mn.us, terry.sandbeck@state.mn.us, johnp@alx.tec.mn.us, mitch.lee@state.mn.us, mylan.masson@minneapolis.edu, paul.monteen@state.mn.us, tracey.a.martin@co.hennepin.mn.us, mark.letexier@co.polk.mn.us, john.bolduc@co.crow-wing.mn.us, dan.glass@state.mn.us, brent.richter@state.mn.us, debra.soderbeck@state.mn.us, mdohman@ci.maple-grove.mn.us, sheryl.waddick@state.mn.us, junstad@yahoo.com, carol.j.hall@state.mn.us, mike.ardolf@state.mn.us, bill.martinez@ci.stpaul.mn.us, michael.young@ci.minneapolis.mn.us, peggy.strand@state.mn.us, timbildsoe@visi.com, starr.suggs@state.mn.us, harr@csp.edu, diverson@pioneerpress.com, dbeal@pioneerpress.com, mhopp@pioneerpress.com, rhubbard@pioneerpress.com, twebb@pioneerpress.com, jforster@pioneerpress.com, jkrocheski@pioneerpress.com, jbjorhus@pioneerpress.com, khubbard@pioneerpress.com, aharrington@pioneerpress.com, lsuzukamo@pioneerpress.com, dfondler@pioneerpress.com, janice.rettman@co.ramsey.mn.us, chiefclerk@co.ramsey.mn.us, tony.bennett@co.ramsey.mn.us, jim.mcdonough@co.ramsey.mn.us, rafael.e.ortega@co.ramsey.mn.us, jan.parker@co.ramsey.mn.us, toni.carter@co.ramsey.mn.us, victoria.reinhardt@co.ramsey.mn.us, rob.fulton@co.ramsey.mn.us, bonnie.jackelen@co.ramsey.mn.us, Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  13. 13. Page 3 of 5 Julie.Kleinschmidt@co.ramsey.mn.us, elections.dept@state.mn.us, secretary.state@state.mn.us, public.information@state.mn.us, direct.access@state.mn.us, authentication.inquiries@state.mn.us, ucc.dept@state.mn.us, sen.patricia.torres.ray@senate.mn, sen.tarryl.clark@senate.mn, sen.mary.olson@senate.mn, sen.linda.higgins@senate.mn, sen.david.senjem@senate.mn, sen.john.marty@senate.mn, sen.john.doll@senate.mn, sen.yvonne.prettner.solon@senate.mn, sen.paul.koering@senate.mn, sen.daniel.sparks@senate.mn, sen.terri.bonoff@senate.mn, sen.chris.gerlach@senate.mn, sen.kathy.saltzman@senate.mn, sen.warren.limmer@senate.mn, sen.jim.vickerman@senate.mn, sen.dick.day@senate.mn, sen.sandra.pappas@senate.mn, sen.debbie.johnson@senate.mn, sen.katie.sieben@senate.mn, sen.thomas.bakk@senate.mn, sen.geoff.michel@senate.mn, sen.sharon.erickson.ropes@senate.mn, sen.claire.robling@senate.mn, sen.keith.langseth@senate.mn, sen.david.tomassoni@senate.mn, sen.satveer.chaudhary@senate.mn, sen.gen.olson@senate.mn, sen.david.hann@senate.mn, sen.linda.scheid@senate.mn, sen.ann.lynch@senate.mn, sen.chuck.wiger@senate.mn, sen.steve.dille@senate.mn, sen.lawrence.pogemiller@senate.mn, sen.amy.koch@senate.mn, sen.dan.skogen@senate.mn, sen.don.betzold@senate.mn, sen.steve.murphy@senate.mn, sen.dennis.frederickson@senate.mn, sen.sandy.rummel@senate.mn, sen.ron.latz@senate.mn, sen.ray.vandeveer@senate.mn, sen.richard.cohen@senate.mn, sen.julianne.ortman@senate.mn, sen.bill.ingebrigtsen@senate.mn, sen.kathy.sheran@senate.mn, sen.ellen.anderson@senate.mn, sen.jim.metzen@senate.mn, sen.michelle.fischbach@senate.mn, sen.ann.rest@senate.mn, sen.gary.kubly@senate.mn, sen.leroy.stumpf@senate.mn, sen.jim.carlson@senate.mn, sen.rick.olseen@senate.mn, sen.joe.gimse@senate.mn, sen.tom.saxhaug@senate.mn, sen.tony.lourey@senate.mn, sen.betsy.wergin@senate.mn, sen.scott.dibble@senate.mn, sen.pat.pariseau@senate.mn, sen.mike.jungbauer@senate.mn, sen.rod.skoe@senate.mn, sen.linda.berglin@senate.mn, sen.mee.moua@senate.mn, sen.leo.foley@senate.mn, sen.julie.rosen@senate.mn, sen.dan.larson@senate.mn, john.choi@ci.stpaul.mn.us, john.lesch@ci.stpaul.mn.us, lisa.veith@ci.stpaul.mn.us, john.kelly@ci.stpaul.mn.us, jerry.hendrickson@ci.stpaul.mn.us, dave.thune@ci.stpaul.mn.us, pat.harris@ci.stpaul.mn.us, kathy.lantry@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Lee.Helgen@ci.stpaul.mn.us, dan.bostrom@ci.stpaul.mn.us, russ.stark@ci.stpaul.mn.us, Melvin.Carter@ci.stpaul.mn.us, mranfang@hotmail.com, jerry.ludden@ci.stpaul.mn.us, nathan.stublaski@ci.stpaul.mn.us, steve.schneider@ci.stpaul.mn.us, john.zanmiller@ci.west-saint-paul.mn.us, will.rossbach@ci.maplewood.mn.us, waterinquiries@ci.stpaul.mn.us, jim.graupmann@ci.stpaul.mn.us, dave.schuler@ci.stpaul.mn.us, steve.gleason@ci.stpaul.mn.us, dave.wagner@ci.stpaul.mn.us CC: nancylazaryan@gmail.com, a_democracy@yahoo.com, BillDahn4, Sharon4Anderson, attorney.general@state.mn.us, rca@co.ramsey.mn.us Click here: Objections to RealEstate Tax Cases MN - Google Search Mon.30Mar09 NIOTICE OF APPEARANCE BY E-COMMERCE/FAX RE: CLASSIFICATION 697 SURREY AVE 32.29.22.41.0053 published 18Mar09 www.review-news.com Tues for 1Apr09 Related Court File Ramsey Dist.Crt. 62cv09-1163 Further to reopen the Grand Jury Proceedings against Lou McKenna former Auditor. 697 Surrey 08 Assess/TaxValueStmt.asp?pin=32292 To Mark.Oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us Auditor/Taxes/Elections,his Agents,Assigns,Employees,et al. Ramsey County PRR If you have questions regarding your Notice of Valuation and Classification for Taxes Payable in 2010, you may call the Assessor’s Office at 651-266-2000, prior to March 27, 2009, to discuss your concerns with an appraiser over the phone. Please be aware that you will: Pursuant to Affiants call today to karen.norgaard@co.ramsey.mn.us, re: Supervisor bonnie.andrews@co.ramsey.mn.us to Challenge the quot;takingquot; of Homestead credit at 697 Surrey Ave. St. Paul, MN.55106, Continuous Homestead from 1992 up to and including the present, apparantly quot;takenquot; 2008 for taxes payable 2009, again 2009 payable 2010., without change in ownership and or Sale. Affiant is not objecting to the Valuation, as the single little cottage is insured for over $100,000.00. Questioned What is Row Maintance 01000032 $112.68 Water Drain 01000080 $67.84 Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  14. 14. Page 4 of 5 Delq Util 01008416 $78.92 Recycle 01009996 $27.04, was told they were city issues. Sha Answer/Cross 5Apr07 THEREFORE: http://taxthemax.blogspot.com working a a pdf legal brief to challenge the City of St.Paul, Fraudulent Theft,Trespass,Treason to have Joel Essling of DSI 42USC1988 - Google Search and Tanya Hunter cop packing a gun steal my car,traileCode-Corruption 19Apr07 Lantry r,personal property SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 Sharon TrustTrilogy_21 Michael Campion v. Mpls,Rybak Sa Beale Answ 07 278 - REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX; OBJECTION, DEFENSE, 2008 Minnesota Statutes 278.14 REFUNDS OF MISTAKENLY BILLED TAXES. Subdivision 1.Applicability. 697 Surrey Illegal Assessments_09 A county must pay a refund of a mistakenly billed tax as provided in this section. As used in this section, quot;mistakenly billed taxquot; means an amount of property tax that was billed, to the extent the amount billed exceeds the accurate tax amount due to a misclassification of the owner's property under section 273.13 or a mathematical error in the calculation of the tax on the owner's property, together with any penalty or interest paid on that amount. This section applies only to taxes payable in the current year and the two prior years. As used in this section, quot;mathematical errorquot; is limited to an error in: (1) converting the market value of a property to tax capacity or to a referendum market value; (2) application of the tax rate as computed by the auditor under sections 275.08, subdivisions 1b, 1c, and 1d; 276A.06, subdivisions 4 and 5; and 473F.07, subdivisions 4 and 5, to the property's tax capacity or referendum market value; or (3) calculation of or eligibility for a credit. The remedy provided under this section does not apply to a misclassification under section 273.13 that is due to the failure of the property owner to apply for the correct classification as required by law. Subd. 2.Procedure. A refund of mistakenly billed tax must be paid upon verification of a claim made in a written application by the owner of the property or upon discovery of the mistakenly billed tax by the county. Refunds of overpayments will be made as provided in section 278.12. Subd. 3.Appeals. If the county rejects a claim by a property owner under subdivision 2, it must notify the property owner of that decision within 90 days of receipt of the claim. The property owner may appeal that decision to the Tax Court within 60 days after receipt of a notice from the county of the decision. Relief granted by the Tax Court is limited to current year taxes, and taxes in the two prior years AFFIANT'S DEMAND'S OF TAKING FOR THE PAST 21 YEARS MANDATES 21 MILLION RE: RICO ACTS. Cop- Corruption-Minnesota: Notice: Ins.Claim Stolen 91 Chrysler V-1C4GY54R5MX5 Not his car, but still his tickets? It's man versus state database - TwinCities.com Sharon's Quitam Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  15. 15. Page 5 of 5 LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower,Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson AllMN | Sharon Anderson's Blog neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home | FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.comknowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4Anderson St.Paul City Council Ward2 SA-Blogs2007 Blogger: Dashboard http://sharons- copywrite.blogspot.co A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! Sunday, April 05, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  16. 16. STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT 2ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF RAMSEY File No. 62-cv09-1163 Case Type: Other Civil and Criminal JURY TRIAL-FORPERSON GRAND JURY DEMAND To: All Persons with legal interest in the Parcels of Real Property described in the Following Delinquent Tax List, Filed with District Court Administrator Lynae.K.E. Olson 651-2202, published 18Mar09 MapleWood Review www.review-news.com ****************************************************************************** STATE OF MINNSOTA, DEFENDANTS JOINT ANSWER/CROSS AUDITOR MARK OSWALD 697 SURREY AVE 32.29.22.41.0053$2,499.43 State of Minnesota, Rule 24.04 by and thro State Attorney General Lori Swanson www.ag.state.mn.us, Michael Campion, Public Safety,Mark Oswald,RamseyCo.Auditor/Tax/Elections,Larry Dease,Court Administrator,St.Paul Mayor Chris B. Coleman,City Clerk Shari Moore,Council President Kathy Lantry www.ci.stpaul.mn.us, Janice Rettman res: No 2009-012,Toni Carter Canvass Board and County Commissioners, www.co.ramsey.mn.us DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling in their Official Capacity‘s, Individually,Severally, acting in concort with John Doe and Mary Roe. SCAP,Judges Kathleen Gearin,Joanne Smith,Gregg Johnson,Salvador Rosas,Larry Cohen et al 1988 Files 495722 499129 Default 66 Million Dollars. Plaintiffs V. 697 Surrey Ave St.Paul,MN.55106 ,Intestate Decedant www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com ,VA Widow,Senior,Disabled Political Activist Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Chergosky_Scarrella www.sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.com http://sharon4privateattorneygeneral.blogspot.com + 96 Blogs www.sharonanderson.org , et al as their interest appear , Defendants and 3rd Party Plaintiffs,Intestate Decedants Tenant in Common Wm.O and Bernice A.Peterson. *************************************************************** TO THE ABOVE NAMED PLAINTIFF’S AND THEIR ATTORNEYS
  17. 17. Beale v. McClure LORI SWANSON,STATE CAPITOL,SUSAN GAERTNER,JOHN CHOI,AT THEIR RESPECTIVE OFFICES . Defendants, as and for their Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint, state: 1. Deny each and every matter,allegation and thing contained in Plaintiffs Vague,Arbitrary, False Assessments, by Theft,Trespass,Treason, except as hereinafter specifically admitted,qualified or otherwise answered. 2. Defendants admitted to having Homestead Classification since 1992, (17 yrs), Ex. http://sharon4privateattornygeneral.blogspot.com pg 8 Paid the full property taxes of $949.86, for 2008. Challenge thAT Title 18 USC 1001 False charges. By Mark Oswald to “take” HS Credit, INTENT It is the intent of this fiduciary to challenge the Assessment,Ratifications, findings, and conclusions made by the DSI Inspector Joel Essling, City Council President Kathy Lantry acting in concort with Marcia Moermond in proper venue and forum Art. II US Constitution an First Amendment right to petition for redress of reievances: and it is my intent to preserve all Constitutional rights, either by amendment,supplement or future litigation and or Removal’s to protect property interest rights under Constitutional and Statutory Law: Court File 62cv09-1163 apparently is an Administrative without Filing Fees, to Simulate Legal Process, causing irreparable intentional infliction of emotional stress, anti-trust by government official, Sharons intent to preserve minimal or full- blown due process rights to an Administrative Hearing with FOIA Disclosure of Warrants, Tickets, signed off by City Attorneys, to Steal Cars,Trailers,, in US Supreme Court decisions it has been determined that it is clearly unlawful to seize or levy funds absent a prior fully disclosed proof of lawful claim or judicial due process through judicial courts with proper jurisdiction. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp. 337 US 682 (1949) Kelo Decision Stands 3. As to the Allegations “taken” in the form of Summary Judgment, published Falsely in the Maplewood Review, www.review-news.com 18Mar09 pg.53 Sharon Anderson 697 Surrey Ave. 32.29.22.41.0053 Lyman Dayton Add. Lot 5 Blk 46 2008 $2,499.43 without proper citation of any statute,ordinance,rule,or regulation which Defendants alleged to have violated contrary to Crim Rules , as to the required specificity of an apparent crimial accusation of “not paying taxes” US v. Cruikshank,92 US 542 at 558 (1876) COUNT I CONSPIRACY Title 18 s. 241,242 Page 2 of 2
  18. 18. Beale v. McClure Between April 2006 up to and including the present The Stalking of Sharon by shutting off Water www.sharonanderson.org, Stalking causing Fracutured Ankle, Sharon ran for State Ag from her Wheel Chair, Plaintiffs, Lantry,Moore,Coleman,Kessler,Essling, did unlawfully combine,conspire,confederate and agree to Steal Sharons Car, Trailer, Realestate http://sharonvaitkin.blogspot.com and obstruct justice in connection with the Homicide of Cpl James R. Anderson www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com starting 1996, when Sharon paid the property taxes on her Cabin in Itasca Co. legally in the Corporation of Anderson+Advocates, by altering and orchestrating the crime scene, disposing of,altering and planting evidence, commitments to Brainard for 1 year by the SCAP Panel Gearin and Smith, lying to law enforcement authorities and others about the true circumstances surrounding Sharons RealEstate, Disabilitys,Disparagment of Title and Death of Tenants in Common and Sharons 2nd Husband. 4. Defendants are without sufficient information in order to judge the truth or falsity of the allegations contained in the Tax Statement’s 2008,2009 and the 2010 The Valuation is not challenged, but the Classification,Assessments,Fees,Row Maintainance,Delq Utilitys, Usurious interest is.and hold the Plaintiffs to the strictest proof thereof. http://sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com 5. Defendants deny the False Assessments,False Fees, Ratification thereof obtained by Fraud and Murder to Steal Sharon’s Realestate, Car’s,Trailers, Personal Property, reducing her to utter Poverty, Standing in Food Lines, for over 2 years, Heinous Hardship of taking Commerce Rights to drive to get grocerys, medical care and the Aitkin,Itaska Cabins. “taken under color of corrupt Judges” AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 6. As its First Affirmative Defense, Defendants state Plaintiffs complaints of Non Payment of Property Taxes fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 7. As its Second Affirmative Defense, Defendants state insufficiency of service of process. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY PUBLICATION AFFIDAVIT OF INFORMIA PAUPERIOUS Faxed>Mon.30Mar09 to Lynae.Olson@courts.mn.us 651-266-8263 ON SHARONS BLOGS, PDF FILES: BY E-COMMERCE: E-MAIL Page 3 of 3
  19. 19. Beale v. McClure STATE OF MINNESOTA ET AL V. 697 SURREY ET AL NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FILE: 62-cv09-1163 Please take legal notice, pending Full Disclosure, Tickets,Warrants, Constitionality, Demand for Grand Jury Indictments against the Plaintiffs QUESTIONS PRESENTED : Whether a state violates the dormant Commerce Clause by providing an exemption of Homestead Credits, Old House Credits, Disabled, Senior Credits, re: MN Const. Art.X to the citizenry, yet Denial to a Political Candidate for State Attorney General, Judge,State Rep64a ? /s/ Sharon Anderson Private Attorney General, Attorney Pro Se_InFact will Move the Jurisdiction/Authority of the Court for Dismissal, Recover of Car,Trailer,Personal Propertys, Attorney Fees $240.00 pr hour, WHEREFORE< Defendants pray that Plaintiff take nothing by their pretended cause of action and that the sam be dismissed and that Defendants recover their costs,disbursements,herein attorney pro se fees, quiet title actions,on all Sharon Scarrella Anderson dba Church of Justice Reform, Rose of Sharon Ministrys, Anderson+Advocates, “taken” without Just Compensation, under color of Authority, by the Corrupt Judiciary. Dated: Wed. 1Apr09 /s/ Sharon Anderson ECF MEMORANDUM OF LAW ENCOMPASSED HEREIN Page 4 of 4
  20. 20. Beale v. McClure In the Saint Paul City Council Agenda thurs,July5,2007 Items 35 Resolution Assessments 07-601“from May17 to June12th,2007 public hearing Aug.15th,07 (GS3041156) Notice to combine with Item 51 Res.Ratifying Assessments 07-609 from 12Apr to 27Apr07 (J0707A Notice to remove from Agenda refer To City or County Attorneys Notice of Damages over ½ Million Dollars State of Minnesota, County of Ramsey, City of St. Paul Owner- Taxpayer Co Dist.File#J0707A- J0708A:Assm.#8337 697 Surrey ID 32-29-22-41-0053 VA Widow Candidate Ward (2) Sharon Anderson aka Peterson-Scarrella http://sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com ,Attorney Pro Se: Private Attorney General Decedant http://cpljimanderson.blogspot.com , http://sharon4council.blogspot.com all others similarily situated Quitam Whistleblower-Fidicuary Watchdog Victim Relator vs. St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman,DSI and Bob Kessler,Joel Essling and 168 employees, union Supervisory, John Choi, all agents,city attorneys,assigns, in their personal and official capacities, executive branch Kathy Lantry as President of the City Council,enbanc Thune,Bostrom,Harris,Benanav,Montgomery,helgen,her agents,assigns specifically shari moore, Marcia moermond,enbanc in the legislative Page 5 of 5
  21. 21. Beale v. McClure branch in their personal,official capacities, sued individually, severally, John Doe and Mary Roe. Matt Smith www.ci.stpaul.mn.us ) Relatees Sharon’s discovery of Treason by city officials in all realestate matters: Forcing repeal of State and Federal Laws. Cooking the Fidicuary Books by Mail Fraud , Extortion, Complicity, Theft of Personal Property,defrauding the State of Minnesota and the United States of America, http://sicko-citystpaul.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.com by mail fraud, confusion,stacking,blatant trespass on private property in a “Patterned Enterprise” for Greed, to conspire to commit Murder by WATER SHUTOFF www.sharonanderson.org. FIRST AMENDED PETITION AND COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF A SUIT FOR DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER AUTHORITY OF ARTICLE I, SECTIONS 1, 2, 4, 7, 8 & 10 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA JUDICIAL NOTICE re: MS2.724 of City and County Attorneys, Lawyer Mayors Treasonable Bad Behavior. BACKGROUND; 1. Officers of the court who may come in contact with the matters of city attorneys simulating legal process without warrants, tickets, due process , are noticed under authority of the supremacy and equal protection clauses of the United States Constitution and the common law authorities of Haines v Kerner, 404 U.S. 519-421, Platsky v. C.I.A. 953 F.2d. 25, and Anastasoff v. United States, 223 F.3d 898 (8th Cir. 2000). In re Haines: pro se litigants are held to less stringent pleading Page 6 of 6
  22. 22. Beale v. McClure standards than bar licensed attorneys. Regardless of the deficiencies in their pleadings, pro se litigants are entitled to the opportunity to submit evidence in support of their claims. In re Platsky: court errs if court And St. Paul City Council to assess fees willfully, knowingly, to Steal Car’s, Trailers, constituting a Restraint of Trade, Heinous, Repugnant without a probable cause complaint which contains an accusation or charging language, distinct from the statement of probable cause constituting of a statemebnt of essential facts constituting a public offense or public offenses charged or sought to be charged. Contrary to Rules 2.01 and 2.03 of Minn. Rules of Criminal Procedure., Taxaction without Representationd, kickbacks, bribery scheme involving the Department of Safety and Inspections involving non-profits:, Defendants Steve Magner residence Stillwater Minnesota, Defendants Dick Lippert, living in Inver Grove, technically under RICO Indictments Steinhauser, et al v. Randy Kelly et al File No 04-2632, Harrilal et al v. Magner et al File 05-461, Gallagher et al v. Magner et al File No 05- 1348 (JNE/SRN), City has dismissed the Sharon Andersons Answer/CrossComplaints without instruction of how pleadings are deficient and how to repair pleadings. In re Anastasoff: litigants’ constitutional rights are violated when courts City attorneys representing City Council and the Mayor depart from precedent where parties are similarly situated. 2. A court-city council (quasi-judicial) may dismiss a assessments for failure to state a claim quot;only if it appears to a certainty that no facts, which could be introduced consistent with the pleading, exist which would support granting the relief demanded.quot; N. States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395, 122 N.W.2d 26, 29 (1963), In re Milk Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Litigation, 588 N.W.2d 772, 1999.MN.42154, A claim prevails against illegal “takings” 5th Amend, Illegal Search Page 7 of 7
  23. 23. Beale v. McClure and Seizure 4th Amend,it is possible on any evidence which might be produced, consistent with the pleader's theory, to grant the relief demanded. The purpose of a motion to dismiss and or the alleged tax assessments thro the back door of the executive branch of the Mayork, then to be approved by the Legislative Branch “AFTER THE FACT” is not only TREASON but Domestic Terrorism Sharon is to test the law’s support for a claim, not the sufficiency of the underlying facts, Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc., Okla. 987 P.2d 1185 (1999). The burden to show legal insufficiency of petition is on party moving for dismissal, and motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim must separately state each omission or defect in petition; if it does not, motion shall be denied without hearing, Indiana Nat. Bank v. State Dept. of Human Services, Okla., 880 P.2d 371 (1994). And demurrers have been abolished – see Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 7(c). 3. Minnesota Rule 8001.9 incorporates the Federal Internal Revenue Code into the Minnesota Rules by reference. The State of Minnesota has entered into agreement with the Federal government to establish their qualified state income tax particularized in 5 USC 5517 and 31 CFR Part 215. Administration of qualified state income taxes is governed by regulations published in 26 CFR Part 31. The State of Minnesota has abdicated both administrative and judicial remedies to the Federal Government under 26 CFR §301.6361-2. Therefore, the Federal Debt Collection Procedure, 28 USC §3001, is the exclusive remedy for tax related debt. It provides substantive rights secured by the fourth, fifth, Sixth, and Seventh amendments to the United States Constitution, restricting administrative and judicial powers and the government bears the burden of proof for whatever claim is made. 4. The MDR consistently quotes Minnesota statutes as authority for their behavior. However, courts have consistently stated that statutes have no force or effect without implementing regulations. In accordance with Minnesota Rule 8001.9, Page 8 of 8
  24. 24. Beale v. McClure Minnesota’s regulations are the Federal regulations for the state income tax. There are no other Minnesota rules implementing most of Minnesota Statutes, chapters 270, 271, 290 and 290A. Therefore, the MDR is required to submit to the Federal regulations that provide substantive rights under the Constitution of the United States and due process of law. 4(a) In order for there to be (1) liability for any given tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code,and in this instance Assessments for What by the St. Paul City Council or (2) a requirement to collect any given tax imposed by the Internal Revenue Code, an implementing regulation must apply to the fact circumstance of the person liable. The requirement for implementing regulations is restated in the general rule that controls 26 U.S.C. § 6011(a): “When required by regulations prescribed by the Secretary any person made liable for any tax imposed by this title, or with respect to the collection thereof, shall make a return or statement according to the forms and regulations prescribed by the Secretary. Every person required to make a return or statement shall include therein the information required by such forms or regulations.” 4(b) California Bankers Assn. v. Schultz, 39 L.Ed. 2d 812 at 820: “Because it has a bearing on some of the issues raised by the parties, we think it important to note that the Act’s civil and criminal penalties attach only upon violation of regulations promulgated by the Secretary; if the Secretary were to do nothing, the Act itself would impose no penalties on anyone.” In U.S. v. Murphy, 809 F.2d 1427 at 1430 (9th Cir. 1987), following California Bankers Association rationale, the court said “The reporting act is not self-executing; it can impose no reporting duties until implementing regulations have been promulgated.” In U.S. v. Reinis, 794 F.2d 506 at 508 (9th Cir. 1986) the court said, “An individual cannot be prosecuted for violating this Act unless he violates an implementing regulation … The result is that neither the statute nor the regulations are complete without the other, and only together do they have any force. In effect, therefore, the construction of one necessarily involves the construction of the other.” U.S. v. Mersky, 361 U.S. 431, 4 L.Ed. 2d 423, 80 S.Ct. 459 (1960), agreed with in Leyeth v. Hoey, supra, U.S. v. $200,00 in U.S. Currency, 590 F.Supp. 866; U.S. v. Palzer, 745 F.2d 1350 (1984); U.S. v. Cook, 745 F.2d 1311 (1984); U.S. v. Gertner, 65 F.3d 963 (1st Cir. 1995); Diamond Ring Ranch v. Morton, Page 9 of 9
  25. 25. Beale v. McClure 531 F.2d 1397, 1401 (1976); U.S. v. Omega Chemical Corp., 156 F.3d 994 (9th Cir. 1998); U.S. v. Corona, 849 F.2d 562, 565 (11th Cir. 1988); U.S. v. Esposito, 754 F.2d 521, 523-24 (1985); U.S. v. Goldfarb, 643 F.2d. 422, 429-30 (1981). “For Federal tax purposes, the Federal Regulations govern. Lyeth v. Hoey, 1938, 305 U.S. 188, 59 S.Ct. 155, 83 L.Ed. 119,” quoted in Dodd v. U.S., 223 F.Supp. 785 (1963). 5. The Supreme Court of Minnesota has determined that the Minnesota Legislature has not provided adequately for trial by jury in the statutes and that trial by jury is always available to review statutory law and administrative decisions. 5(a) Abraham v. County of Hennepin, 2002,639 N.W.2d 342. (“one form of action” procedure is anathema to due process in the course of the common law), however, “Provision in Minnesota Constitution regarding trial by jury is intended to continue, unimpaired and inviolate, the right to trial by jury as it existed in the Territory of Minnesota when constitution was adopted in 1857.” The prohibition against depriving people of property without proper adjudication is secured by Article I § 2 of the Minnesota Constitution: “No member of this state shall be disfranchised or deprived of any of the rights or privileges secured to any citizen thereof, unless by the law of the land or the judgment of his peers…” CAUSES OF ACTION 6. On Apr. 24th,2007 The City of St. Paul trespassed on Property at 697 Surrey without Probable cause, warrant, tickets, caused irreparable harm injury, intentional infliction of Emotional Stress on Candidate Sharon Anderson, Defendants Joel Essling and policewoman Tanya Hunter to Steal Sharons Car, fully licensed and to date 2ndJuly07 fully insured: Towing company Rapid Towing as on numerous blogs, web sites, Again 16May07 during the Police Memorial at mears Park Essling or Harold Robinson with pistol packing cop Tanya hunter again trespassed on Sharons and intestate decedants property at 697 Surrey ,stealing Page 10 of 10
  26. 26. Beale v. McClure Sharons Trailer. The cop corruption involves Aaron Foster, Murder of Barb Winn, as the city employs an indicted Murder Aaron Foster to steal Cars, at the St. Paul police Inpound Lot. Again thro the US Mails June 5th, stating Fence and Paint with another inspection by Badge 322 joel Essling on 5July07 Again Because all these complaints fail to set forth an accusation in separate counts for separate offenses charged or sought to be charged, contrary to Rule 17.02 of Mn Rules Crim. In a patterned enterprise are falsely claimed that Sharon Anderson is a criminal without the required specificity of a criminal accusation, re: US v. Cruikshank,92 US 542 at 558 (1876) As to the prohibition of duplicity in a criminal accusation (ie: charging m9ore than one offense in one accusation without separate counts for each offense charged US 73F2d795 (10Cir.1934) The right to a specific accusation including separate counts for distinct offenses charged has been incorporated by the 14th Amend. To the US Constitution re: Cole v. Arkansas 33 US 196 at 201 (1948) and Faretta v. California 442 US 806 at 818 (1975) The City of St. Paul apparently has 25 million for Housing Programs,DSI has conducted a program against the elderly, disabled, vunerable persons, mandating the federal government audit the 1065 vacant buildings manulipated by defendants Magner and Moermond. Sharon Anderson has established in the past 30 years the continuing pattern of taking realestate for pecuniary gain without quiet titles, marketable propertys without investigation, evidence, or a competent witness with first-hand knowledge. Page 11 of 11
  27. 27. Beale v. McClure The claims are demonstrably false, since Sharon Anderson has submitted affidavits that she has been harmed injured along with 1065 vacant Minnesota Rule 8001.9 which puts the burden of proof on the government to prove their claims. MS 289A.37, Subd. 3, which puts the burden of proof on the victim, is unconstitutional on its face, since it directly contradicts Article I, Sections 2, 4, 6, 7, and 10 of the Minnesota Constitution. The constitution places the burden of proof on the government to establish their claim that Sharon Anderson has with intent violated any Criminal, or Ordinance Violations for the past 30 years.Furthermore 26 USC 7403 requires the The city of St. Paul as a government entity, to prove their claim in Court. Common law process also places the burden of proof on the advocate, particularly when the plaintiff is government. 6(a) Wright v. Commissioner of Revenue, MN Tax Court, Docket No. 2620 June 4, 1980, quot;A person who leaves his home to go into another state for temporary purposes only is not considered to have lost his residence. But if a person removes to another state with intention of remaining therefore an indefinite time as a place of permanent residence, he shall be considered to have lost his residence in this state.quot; Sharon Anderson has never abandoned her legal domicile at 1058 Summit, 2194 Marshall,325 N. Wilder, 448 Desnoyer, 697 Surrey 1/3rd of 309 Pelham Blvd,St. Paul Minnesota or her Buck Lake Cabin Itasca Co. 42741- 321st pl (GunLake ) Aitkin or Gull Lake in Brainard. http://sharonvaitkin.blogspot.com 6(b) The character of acts that suppose to bypass judicial process is articulated in United States v. Lovett (1946), 328 U.S. 303; 66 S. Ct. 1073; 90 L. Ed. 1252: We hold that § 304 falls precisely within the category of congressional actions which the Constitution barred by providing that quot;No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.quot; In Cummings v. Missouri, 4 Wall. 277, 323, this Court said, quot;A bill of attainder is a legislative act which inflicts punishment without a judicial trial. If the punishment be less than death, the act is termed a bill of pains and penalties. Within the meaning of the Constitution, bills of attainder include bills of pains and penalties.quot; … On the same day the Cummings case was decided, the Court, in Ex parte Garland, 4 Wall. 333 also held invalid on the same grounds an Act of Congress which required attorneys practicing before this Court to take a similar oath. Neither of these cases has ever been overruled. They stand for the proposition that legislative acts, no matter what their form, that apply either to named Page 12 of 12
  28. 28. Beale v. McClure individuals or to easily ascertainable members of a group in such a way as to inflict punishment on them without a judicial trial are bills of attainder prohibited by the Constitution. Adherence to this principle requires invalidation of § 304. We do adhere to it. Those who wrote our Constitution well knew the danger inherent in special legislative acts which take away the life, liberty, or property of particular named persons because the legislature thinks them guilty of conduct, which deserves punishment. They intended to safeguard the people of this country from punishment without trial by duly constituted courts. See Duncan v. Kahanamoku, 327 U.S. 304. And even the courts to which this important function was entrusted were commanded to stay their hands until and unless certain tested safeguards were observed. An accused in court must be tried by an impartial jury, has a right to be represented by counsel, he must be clearly informed of the charge against him, the law which he is charged with violating must have been passed before he committed the act charged, he must be confronted by the witnesses against him, he must not be compelled to incriminate himself, he cannot twice be put in jeopardy for the same offense, and even after conviction no cruel and unusual punishment can be inflicted upon him. See Chambers v. Florida, 309 U.S. 227, 235-238. When our Constitution and Bill of Rights were written, our ancestors had ample reason to know that legislative trials and punishments were too dangerous to liberty to exist in the nation of free men they envisioned. And so they proscribed bills of attainder. Section 304 is one. Much as we regret to declare that an Act of Congress violates the Constitution, we have no alternative here. 6(c) See 26 CFR 601.106 (f)(1), Wayman v. Southard, 23 U.S. 1, 6 L.Ed. 253, 10 Wheat 1 and Federal Maritime Commission v. South Carolina Ports Authority, 535 U.S. ___, 122 S. Ct. 1864. In Miranda v. United States, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed. 2d 694 (1966), former Chief Justice Earle Warren penned the following: “As courts have been presented with the need to enforce constitutional rights, they have found means of doing so. That was our responsibility when Escobedo was before us and it is our responsibility today. Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.” 7(a) In Brafman v. United States of America, 348 F.2d 863 (5th Circuit, 1967), the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff because an assessment officer did not sign a certificate of assessment. “For a tax to be collected upon any deficiency, an assessment must be made against the taxpayer within three years after his return is filed… If the estate is not assessed within the statutory period there can be no transferee liability. United States v. Updike, 1930, 281 U.S. 489, 50 S. Ct. 367, 74 L. Ed. 984. We therefore adhere to our pronouncement in United States v. Fisher, 5 Cir. Page 13 of 13
  29. 29. Beale v. McClure 1965, 353 F.2d 396, 398-399, that: In the absence of any better test, we give effect to the generally recognized rule that Regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury, pursuant to statutory authority, and when necessary to make a statute effective, although not a statute, may have the force of law. Fawcus Machine Co. v. United States, 282 U.S. 375, 51 S. Ct. 144, 75 L. Ed. 397; Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. South Texas Lumber Co., 333 U.S. 496, 501, 68 S. Ct. 695, 92 L. Ed. 831. The Treasury Regulations are binding on the Government as well as on the taxpayer: quot;Tax officials and taxpayers alike are under the law, not above it.quot; Pacific National Bank of Seattle v. Commissioner, 9 Cir. 1937, 91 F.2d 103, 105. Even the instructions on the reverse side of the assessment certificate, Form 23C, specify that the original form quot;is to be transmitted to the District Director for signature, after which it will be returned to the Accounting Branch for permanent filing. * * *quot; Case after case has quoted Treasury Regulation § 301.6203-1 and cited it approvingly, and the treatises on taxation take its literal application for granted. Finally, where state taxation is involved, compliance with a statutory provision requiring an assessment list to be signed by the assessors is usually considered essential to the validity of further proceedings. 84 C.J.S. Taxation § 473 (1954).” 7(b) The requirement for IRS, and therefore the MDR, to provide assessment certificates was defined by the court in Huff v. United States of America, 10 F.3d 1440 (9th Cir.,1993):” the IRS failed to respond to the Huffs' request for a copy of an assessment under § 6203. See 26 C.F.R. § 301.6203-1… the record contains no evidence indicating that the Huffs received copies of their assessments pursuant to their request under § 6203, we conclude there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether the IRS has complied with the requirements of § 6203. See Farr, 990 F.2d at 454; Geiselman, 961 F.2d at 5-6; Brewer, 764 F. Supp. at 315-16. Accordingly, we reverse the district court's grant of summary judgment as to count II. 7(c) Date of assessment is date when summary record is signed by assessment officer in district director's office or in service center. Welch Ins. Agency v Brast (1932, CA4 W Va) 55 F2d 60, 10 AFTR 1041, cert den 285 US 555, 76 L Ed 944, 52 S Ct 457; Davidovitz v United States (1932) 75 Ct Cl 211, 58 F2d 1063, 11 AFTR 347. 7(d) Assessment is complete as soon as record is signed by assessment officer. Filippini v United States (1961, ND Cal) 200 F Supp 286, 62-1 USTC P 9144, 9 AFTR 2d 313, affd (CA9 Cal) 318 F2d 841, 63-2 USTC P 9548, 11 AFTR 2d 1720, cert den 375 US 922, 11 L Ed 2d 165, 84 S Ct 267. 7(e) Assessment of estate tax deficiency was not timely filed and was invalid where it had not been signed by the proper official, and the authenticity of the document and admissibility at trial had no effect on the validity where the requisite signature was missing. Brafman v United States (1967, CA5 Fla) 384 F2d 863, 67-2 Page 14 of 14
  30. 30. Beale v. McClure USTC P 12494, 20 AFTR 2d 6008. 7(f) Radinsky v. United States of America, 622 F.Supp. 412 (USDC, Colorado, 1985). 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1) confers jurisdiction upon this court and waives the sovereign immunity of the United States regarding claims for sums wrongfully collected under the internal revenue laws. In a suit under this section, a plaintiff quot;may challenge the constitutionality, legality or fairness of any tax statute or amount assessed or collected.quot; White v. C.I.R., 537 F.Supp 679 (D.Colo. 1982). In the two briefs filed in this action, the IRS has not explained where it finds statutory authority to employ its tax collection procedures to collect from the plaintiffs a sum of money that has never been assessed as a tax. Since the IRS had no authority to adjust the plaintiffs' account or employ deficiency procedures in these circumstances, it is self-evident that the collection of the sum in this manner was wrongful. under 26 CFR 301.6361-2 (d)(3) the MDR does not have subject matter jurisdiction to determine an increase in income tax: “all administrative determinations shall be made by the Federal Government without review by the State.” Therefore the ST. Paul City Council judgments are void for both violation of Constitutional rights and lack of subject matter jurisdiction under MRCP 60.02 (d) and can therefore be vacated at any time and cannot be time barred. Including over 1065 vacant building in the city of St. Paul et al. 8(a) Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, MSC, 612 N.W.2d 862, C1-98-2200, 2000. “The traditional rule is that there is no time limit for challenging a final judgment that is void for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 12 James W. Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice §á60.44 (3d ed. 1997). The principle underlying this rule is that a judgment's validity is of utmost importance. Minnesota courts have adhered to this traditional rule. In Lange v. Johnson and its progeny, we held that judgments are void if a court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and that there is no time limit for bringing a motion to vacate such a judgment. 295 Minn. 320, 323-24, 204 N.W.2d 205, 208 (1973); see also Peterson v. Eishen, 512 N.W.2d 338, 341 (Minn. 1994)”. Page 15 of 15
  31. 31. Beale v. McClure 8(b) Mesenbourg v. Jerome, 1995.MN.20775, 538 N.W.2d 489, Although the language of the statute and the rule indicate that motions to vacate void judgments must be made within a reasonable time, the supreme court has held that there is no time limit for commencing proceedings to set aside a judgment void for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter or over the parties. Id. A void judgment is legally ineffective; it may be vacated by the court which rendered it at any time, and a void judgment cannot become valid through the passage of time. Id 8(c) Peterson v. Eishen, 1994.MN.21542, 512 N.W.2d 338, A judgment rendered without due service of process upon the defendant is void and may be vacated at any time. Although the language of the rule and the statute indicate that motions to vacate void judgments must be made within a reasonable time, we have previously held that there is no time limit for commencing proceedings to set aside a judgment void for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter or over the parties. Lange v. Johnson, 295 Minn. 320, 204 N.W.2d 205 (1973) (applying Minn. R. Civ. P. 60.02); Beede v. Nides Finance Corp., 209 Minn. 354, 296 N.W. 413 (1941). A void judgment is legally ineffective; it may be vacated by the court which rendered it at any time. United States v. Boch Oldsmobile, Inc., 909 F.2d 657, 661 (1st Cir. 1990); Misco Leasing, Inc. v. Vaughn, 450 F.2d 257 (10th Cir. 1971) (holding defendant's failure to move to vacate default judgment within reasonable time after its entry did not preclude motion to vacate the judgment for lack of personal jurisdiction). A void judgment cannot gain validity by the passage of time. In re Center Wholesale Inc., 759 F.2d 1440 (9th Cir. 1985); Austin v. Smith, 114 U.S. App. D.C. 97, 312 F.2d 337, 343 (D.C. Cir. 1962). given notice by regular mail is a rebuttable assumption, and is therefore not on the record. violation of Minnesota Rule 8001.03. St. Paul Executive Branch complicity with St. Paul Legislative branch mandates FBI or Justice Intervention for false tax assessments to acquire Property rights of the citizenry denied constitutional right of notice and the opportunity to be heard. They also violated Sharon Andersons rights under Minnesota Constitution, Article I, Sections 6 and 7 to be confronted by competent witnesses with first-hand knowledge and evidence that she owe’s any money. Administrative decisions must be based on testimony and evidence in the hard-copy case file, per 5 U.S.C. §§ 556 & 557. However, according to the Minnesota Supreme Court, the Tax Court has no jurisdiction in matters of fact or law if it is not a) granted by the appealing Page 16 of 16
  32. 32. Beale v. McClure individual, or b) granted by the District Court. Also, a void administrative judgment cannot be time barred. 10(a) “In analyzing the framework created by the tax statutes in question, it is crucial to note that the taxpayer always has the option to file in district court. See, Minn.St. 278.01; Note, 4 Wm. Mitchell L.Rev. 371, 406. 10(b) Wulff v. Tax Court of Appeals, 288 N.W.2d 221 (Minn. 1979). “This is perhaps the saving feature of this statutory scheme. Because a tax suit may be initiated in district court, and because transfer of that suit to the tax court is discretionary with the district court, the exercise of jurisdiction of the tax court on transfer does not violate Minn. Const. art. 6, § 3, which provides that the district court has original jurisdiction in all civil and criminal cases”. 12(a) The Notice of Levy does not apply to income tax. It is a search and seizure instrument used in criminal violation of internal revenue laws exclusively related to regulated industries and authorized by 26 U.S.C. §§ 6321, 6331 and implementing regulations 27 CFR Part 70 under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. Sharon Anderson has not been accused of any criminal activity or violating any Internal Revenue Laws. Therefore, the St. Paul City Officials fraudulently seized Sharon Andersons assets, under the color of law, by pretending that she violated laws related to unknown at this time.. 12(b) The Federal Government must sue to secure a judgment prior to executing a levy if an alleged tax liability is contested, initiated in compliance with 26 U.S.C. § 7401. Then procedure must comply with requirements of the Federal Debt Collection Act at 28 U.S.C. § 3201 as the exclusive remedy for collection of tax- related debt. The Notice of Levy must conform to requirements specified by 28 U.S.C. § 3201(a) that a notice of levy, filed subsequent to judgment, must include an abstract of the judgment. A notice of levy is evidence of a levy only when it identifies the underlying judgment. The City of St. Paul has consistently violated Sharon Page 17 of 17
  33. 33. Beale v. McClure Andersons constitutional rights by denying her due process of law. 12(c) Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, 82 (1972): The requirement of notice and an opportunity to be heard raises no impenetrable barrier to the taking of a person's possessions. But the fair process of decision-making that it guarantees works, by itself, to protect against arbitrary deprivation of property. For when a person has an opportunity to speak up in his own defense, and when the State must listen to what he has to say, substantively unfair and simply mistaken deprivations of property interests can be prevented. It has long been recognized that quot;fairness can rarely be obtained by secret, one-sided determination of facts decisive of rights . . .. And no better instrument has been devised for arriving at truth than to give a person in jeopardy of serious loss notice of the case against him and opportunity to meet it.quot; Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath, 341 U.S. 123, 170-172 (Frankfurter, J., concurring). For more than a century the central meaning of procedural due process has been clear: quot;Parties whose rights are to be affected are entitled to be heard; and in order that they may enjoy that right they must first be notified.quot; Baldwin v. Hale, 1 Wall. 223, 233. See Windsor v. McVeigh, 93 U.S. 274; Hovey v. Elliott, 167 U.S. 409; Grannis v. Ordean, 234 U.S. 385. It is equally fundamental that the right to notice and an opportunity to be heard quot;must be granted at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.quot; Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545, 552. Sharon Anderson has never been served with The Order for Writ of Entry and seizure was an in rem, admiralty action; there is nothing comparable in common law procedure. Minnesota Statute 270.70 and 26 U.S.C. § 7302, relate only to property used in violation of internal revenue laws, so it is necessarily predicated on the presumption that the seized property was being used in violation of or was the fruit of criminal activity. The implementing regulation is 26 CFR Part 403, which applies only to drug-related commercial crimes listed in the regulation. Article III § 2 of the U.S. Constitution secures exclusive admiralty and maritime jurisdiction to the United States and that the Minnesota Constitution authorizes law and equity only. Therefore, the April 24th, 2007 and May 16th,2007 property seizure’s and Minnesota Statute § 270.70 are patently unconstitutional. Sharon Anderson has not been accused of violating an State, County, City or Federal Internal Revenue laws. Therefore the seizure of Sharon Andersons property without Page 18 of 18
  34. 34. Beale v. McClure probable cause of criminal activity is pure criminal behavior characteristic of a totalitarian government. 17(b) Per The Sarah, (1823) 21 U.S. 391, it is simply necessary to declare that the seizure was on land to abort an admiralty seizure. Cans of Egg Product v. U.S., 226 U.S. 172, 1912.SCT.40400, 57 L. Ed. 174, 33 S. Ct., “Although this statute prescribes that the proceedings shall conform quot;as near as may be to the proceedings in admiralty,quot; the proceeding being a seizure on land is, in its nature, a common- law proceeding”. Hendry v. Moore, (1943) 318 U.S. 133, 63 S. Ct. 499, 87 L. Ed. 663: “, since a judgment in rem to enforce a lien is not a remedy which the common law is competent to give, a ruling which has since been consistently followed.” Morris' Cotton v. U.S., 8 Wall. 507, “Property on land was seized under the acts of 1861 and 1862, passed for suppression of the rebellion, according to which the claimants were entitled to a trial by jury.” 17(c) State of New Jersey v. One 1990 Honda Accord, (New Jersey Supreme Court, 1998) 154 N.J. 373, 712 A.2d 1148, The Appellate Division reversed, holding that McDermott was entitled to a jury trial in a forfeiture action and that the statutory proceeding for summary Disposition was unconstitutional. 302 N.J. Super. at 227. In reaching that result, the court relied on an historical analysis of the right to trial by jury in England and the American colonies. Id. at 230-34. In New Jersey, forfeiture never existed at common law and remains a disfavored remedy. State v. Seven Thousand Dollars, 136 N.J. 223, 238 (1994); State v. 1979 Pontiac Trans Am, 98 N.J. 474, 480-81 (1985); Farley v. $168,400.97, 55 N.J. 31, 36-37 (1969); State v. One Ford Van, 154 N.J. Super. 326, 331 (App. Div. 1977), certif. den., 77 N.J. 474 (1978). Its existence depends on the enactment of a statute. The State argues that because forfeiture is a creature of statute, McDermott has no common-law right to a jury trial. Although forfeiture depends on a statute for its existence, it remains subject to common-law principles. When analyzing the right to trial by jury, the term quot;common lawquot; refers to those principles of English law that evolved in the common- law courts such as the Court of the Exchequer, as opposed to those applied in the Admiralty, Chancery, or Ecclesiastical Courts. People v. One 1941 Chevrolet Coupe, 231 P.2d 832, 836 (Cal. 1951); In re Forfeiture of 1978 Chevrolet Van, 493 So.2d 433, 435 (Fla. 1986); Commonwealth v. One 1984 Z-28 Camaro Coupe, 610 A.2d 36, 39 (Pa. 1992); Page 19 of 19

×