Page 1 of 5
STATE OF MINNESOTA
IN COURT OF APPEALS
In Re EastSideRevies DelTaxesI_73pgs RESPONDANT'S 697 SURREY
pg.53 91CHRYSLER,TRAILER,WATER
INTESTATE CPL.JIM ANDERSON
VA WIDOW SHARON ANDERSON
STATEMENT OF CASE
TRIAL COURT CASE NO.62cv09-1163 Medicare #670295
APPELLATE COURT CASE NO. A.09____
1. Court or agency of case origination and name of presiding judge. Ramsey Co.
District Court, Judge John Vandenorth and Kevin McCoy, Supervisor Mark Oswald.
2. Jurisdictional statement 42USC1983 Civil and Criminal Action Deprivation of
Rights re: Supplement. Rule 24.04 Attorney General to Defend
Constitutionality,Elections.
3. State type of litigation and designate and statutes at Issue: Appellant Relator
petitions to redress RICO MS609.43 by Theft,Trespass,Treason MS 609.531 Forfeiture
Laws , triggering Constitutionality of MS429.061,City Ordinance's encompassed to
Taxes,usurious interest, re FIRREA,FFIEC About the FFIEC
4. Brief description of claims,defenses,issues litigated and result below.
Sharon Scarrella aka Peterson aka Anderson has for 30 years Consumer
Advocate, Candidate for various officers, Not to win, but to Whistleblower the Ponzi,
Schemes and Misconduct of Public Officials., This action of 3 thousand property
owners, illegally taxed by Bogus Ordinances, Fees,Assessments,ROW,selectively by
"takings" of Sharon's Propertys by Taking Homestead Credits to inflate Taxes, then by
Heinous takings of Water 2006, stalking by police causing Fractured Ankle over 22
thousand Medical then in a Patterened Enterprise, of Reprisals "taking" Sharons 91
Chrysler with disabled plates, trailer, personal property 2007, without
Warrants,Tickets or Probable Cause. On a Senior, Disabled Woman who paid the
Taxes under protest.
At all times material Sharon has responded when notified> re: July 5th,2007
City Council Agends, Answer/Cross 1/2 Million Dollars, Shaon has been on disability
since 1983, when the Queer Judge Alberto Miero put Sharon in Jail, had her beaten re:
Sharons Property at 2194 Marshall,
Sharon has talked to Election/Tax Supervisor Mark Oswald numerous times re:
Taxes, all documents in pdf format at www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com the
False Statement of Mark Oswald that only $449.93 15May08 taxes for 697 Surrey were
paid, when Oswald bounced the debit, and ran it thro a second time even tho Sharon
ran another debit of $449.13 to pay the property taxes and challenge the "taking" of
MS429.061 in the guise of False Statements, Misconduct of DSI Employees DSI Joel
Sunday, November 01, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 2 of 5
Essling and Cop Tanya Hunter to Steal Cars without the City Attorneys Approval to
prosecute, without Tickets,Warrants, incompassing the Manager of Police Impound
Lot Aaron Foster, implicated in the Murder of Barb Winn. re: MS609.531 Forfeiture
Laws.
Sharon is the only one out of 3 thousand propertys to Answer/Cross putting
the Court in a Felony Case Fixing, re FIRREA AND FFIEC mandates all property taxes
paid to www.usbanks.com are at issue.
THEREAFTER: County Attorney DFL Susan Gaertner Candidate for Governor
and in the Lou McKenna, John Finley Grand Jury Proceedings 20 yrs ago has full
knowledge that the 697 Surrey Property Taxes 2008 were paid in Full, with
Constitutional Challenges. Sharon gave full and Good Faith Proper Notices to appear
on the record's with forensic evidence at the 20 Aug09 Hearing.
At the 20Aug09 hearing Judge John Vandenorth issued Summary Judgment
without reading the records, His Order issued and filed 10Sept09 is based on the
Statute of Fraud, Heinous denial of Trial by Jury, Evidentary Hearings, Constitutional
Issues, FIRREA AND FFIEC mandates the 3 thousand propertys are all given "due
process" on the Bizzare Taxing System plus usurious interest of the City of St.Paul
and County of Ramsey.
5. List specific issues proposed to be raised on appeal
(a) Whether the trial court correctly exercised its discretion by issuing an Order
based on FRAUD. As bank statements and county records prove otherwise.
(b) Whether the trial court correctly granted summary judgment against
defendants based on False Statement, False Affidavits of Mark Oswald and Lynn
Moser,
(c) Whether the trial court by Heinous Bias,Discrimination wilful neglience to
accept the Affidavit of Prejudice against Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin, which
incompass all Judges who were sued by Affiant Defendant Sharon Scarrella in re:
Scarrella for Justice 221NW2d561
(d) Whether the Trial Court by Misfeasance, Malfeasance,Nonfeasance refused to
address the Medicare File #670295 Kevin McCoy and the "takings" of HS Credits by
Auditor Mark Oswald. Election of St.Paul Mayor and the Ballot re: Residence, Titles to
Realestate Eminent Domain Issues.
6. Related Appeals: Re File's
7. Contents of record. Transcript necessary YES (X)
8. Is oral argument requested Pending forensic records on file
JURIST - Paper Chase: Arizona Supreme Court rules electronic data is matter of
public record
Sunday, November 01, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 3 of 5
All parties have been served with process. The's case's is are at issue
1. Estimated trial time: _____ days _____ hours (estimates less than a day must be stated in
hours).
2. Jury is requested by the ☐ plaintiff ☐ defendant. (If this is a change from a court to a jury
request, then a $75 fee must be paid when filing this document).
3. Concise statement of the case including facts plaintiff(s) intend to prove and legal basis for
claims: Re above
________________________________________________________________________________________
5. List the names and addresses of witnesses known to either party that either party may call.
Indicate the party who expects to call the witness and whether the party intends to qualify that
witness as an expert. (Attach add
STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF RAMSEY COUNTY COURT
SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT
62cv09-1163 Judge John Vandenorth
MN 62cv09-1163 « Sharon4anderson’s Weblog
All doc. Data Memorandumn
Public Records
JURIST - Paper Chase: Arizona Supreme Court rules electronic data is matter of public record
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY FAX RULE 5.05 ELECTRONICALLY
and US Mails $4.95 postage prepaid Tues 3Nov09 depositing in the Downtown St.Paul PO
FORM 133. 2nd SHORT STATEMENT OF THE CASESRegister of Actions
www.mncourts.gov Sharons_Medicare_Ramsey Co.#670295 Aff6 Apr07indit Coleman
20 Lantry Stalking19 Apr07
Case No. 62-CV-09-1163 Related Case: WritProA06-1150 30Jun06
Answer/Cross/1/2MillionClaim v.CitySt.Paul
Delinquent Real Property Taxes for 2008 Case Type: Administrative File
§
EastSideRevies DelTaxesI_73pgs Date Filed: 02/12/2009
§
pg.53Forfeiture Cars etc.42 USC 3631 Location: Ramsey Civil
§
MS555DeclaratoryJudgmentAct VanDeNorth, John
§ Judicial Officer:
B., Jr.
§
§
john.vandenorth@courts.state.mn.us
Party Information LeadAttorneys jean.@stepan@co.ramsey.mn.us
john.edison@co.ramsey.mn.us
Topic Delinquent Real Property Taxes for Legal Notice TaxLetter 62cv09-1163
(VandeNorth)2008 EastSideReviewnews
2008TaxDelpg53
Events & Orders of the Court Sa 62cv09 1163 1 Apr09
DISPOSITIONS
02/12/2009 Closed administratively
09/10/2009 Judgment (Judicial Officer: VanDeNorth, John B., Jr.)
http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/62cv091163vandenorthsumjudg8sept09
Sunday, November 01, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 4 of 5
The pertinent issue is not whether metadata considered alone is a public record. Instead,
the question is whether a "public record" maintained in an electronic format includes not
only the information normally visible upon printing the document but also any embedded
metadata. ... The metadata in an electronic document is part of the underlying document;
it does not stand on its own. When a public officer uses a computer to make a public
record, the metadata forms part of the document as much as the words on the page.
Arizonia Order
http://www.supreme.state.az.us/opin/pdf2009/CV090036PR.pdf
The State Supreme Court MN has the FormsAPPENDIX OF FORMS
"but for" encryption creates Hardship for Any/All Litigants contrary to Electronical Case
Filings JURIST - Paper Chase: Supreme Court hears arguments on property seizure,
attorney's fees
Sharon Scarrella Anderson Attorney Pro Se_InFact and Private
Attorney General, VA Widow_Whistleblower has for over42 USC 3631 25 years, forensic
evidence of payment of Property Taxes, Chain of Title Documents, Elections Cases etc.
In the Instant Action of 3 thousand Delinquent Property Taxes
http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/tmp/S81FFVMU.pdf 697 Surrey on pg. 53, All 3 thous
encompassed in Ramsey Dist. Court File 62cv09-1163. EastSideRevies DelTaxesI_73pgs
This Short Summary is a 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that when
property is seized " Sharons 91 Chrysler" due process requires that offense. One issue
before the Court was whether in the absence of exigent circumstances, the Due Process
Clause prohibits the seizure of real property without a prior adversarial hearing. The
answer was that a preseizure hearing is required.P]romptly after their vehicles are seized .
. . as alleged instrumentalities of crime, plaintiffs must be given
an opportunity to test the probable validity of the City’s deprivation of the vehicles
pendente lite, including probable cause for the initial warrantlessAll in all, we agree with
Krimstock. The private interest involved, particularly in the seizure of an automobile, is
great. Our society is, for good or not, highly dependent on the automobile. The hardship
posed by the loss of one’s means of transportation, even in a city like Chicago, with a well-
developed mass transportation system, is hard to
calculate. It can result in missed doctor’s appointments, missed school, and perhaps most
significant of all, loss of employment.
seizure.
Sharon an her Mother Decedant Tenant in Common Bernice A.
Peterson had sued in Tax Court and Won 1981
http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/sharonandersonbernicepeterson821292taxfight
Sharon4Council
A. www.sharonanderson.org Water Shut Off Apr.Sharons Water Shut off v. City
St.Paul MN - Google Search
Shames-Yeakel v. Citizens Financial Bank: Failure to Expeditiously Implement State-of the Art
Sunday, November 01, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson

Page 5 of 5
Security Measures Can Create Li..
Fn1 The Court agreed with the OTC that the Electronic Funds Transfer Act did not cover the
plaintiffs' claim because a credit, not a deposit account was involved in the illegal funds
transfer. However, it rejected the OTC's facile conclusion that a Truth in Lending Act claim
was barred because the line of credit had been linked to the plaintiffs' business checking
account. disagreed with the OTC. Rather, because the funds from the line of credit had been
used for personal purposes, the Court found that the TILA could go forward. The Court also
let the plaintiffs' Fair Credit Reporting Act claim to go forward, because there was sufficient
evidence that the Bank failed to note the disputed nature of the debt in their reports to the
credit bureaus and that it had failed to properly investigate their complaints.
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson - Google Profile Candidate AG2010
www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo! iGoogle
Sunday, November 01, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson