S A 23 Dec09 Leg Not Ord Toussaint


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

S A 23 Dec09 Leg Not Ord Toussaint

  1. 1. Page 1 of 6 Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien - a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury. - Lawmen | Google Groups State Court Administrator's Office Sue Dosal (651) 296-2474 (phone) (651) 297-5636 (fax) Send an email via our contact form Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC) Suite #: 135_25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. FAX TRANSMITTAL INFORMAL BRIEF QUITAM_RELATOR fiafea & firrea - Google Search FIAFEA FIRREA Banking Regulations - Google Search Legal Published E-Service: Ed.Toussaint'sCovert OrderTitle18s1951 Ramsey Dist.Crt.File 62cv09-1163(Vandenorth) Appellate A09-2031(ToussaintSt. Paul, MN 5515 www.slideshare.com/sharon4anderson and www.scribd.com/sharon4anderson AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY E-COMMERCE AND FAX: TO: Ramsey Co. Clerk of Court, Lynae.Olson@courts.state.mn.us tel:651-266-8255 F 266-8263 mary.jurek@courts.state.mn.us 2nd Jud.Court Admin. Larry.Dease@courts.state.mn.us 651-266-8266 F 266-8278 Sheriff: bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us 651-266-9333 F 266-9301 Elections@co.ramsey.mn.us mark.oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us 651-266-2171 F 266-2177 Susan Gaertner rca@co.ramsey.mn.us jean.stepan@co.ramsey.mn.us 266-3222 F 266-3010 Lori Swanson MN_AG attorney.general@state.mn.us 651-296-3353 F 282-2155 St.Paul City Clerk shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us 651-266-8688 F 266-8574 and all others as their interest appear. FROM: Sharon4Mayor@aol.com http://taxthemax.blogspot.com 651-776-5835 FAX VIA OUTGOING: SHARON CANNOT RECEIVE FAXES IN COURT APPEALS STATE OF MINNESOTA Saturday, December 26, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  2. 2. Page 2 of 6 A09-2031(Toussaint)-A06-1150(Russell Anderson)-C6-88-859(Huspenie) etal 62CV09- 11693(Gearin) Ramsey Dist Crt. Example Appellant-QuiTam-Relator Sharon4Anderson's Informal Brief pdf Format 62cv09-1163(Vandenorth)SumJudg8Sept09 Ed.Toussaint'sCovert OrderTitle18s1951 QuoWarranto A06 1150 30 Jun06 STATE OF MINNESOTA,ALL AGENCIES, REVENUE,Ward Einess COMMERCE, Glenn Wilson,PUBLIC SAFETY,Michael Campion,CITY ST.PAUL,Kathy Lantry,COUNTY RAMSEY,AUDITOR MARK OSWALD, Elections/Taxes Supervisor, Canvass Board, State of Minnesota, Rule 24.04 by and thro State Attorney General Lori Swanson www.ag.state.mn.us, Michael Campion, Public Safety,Larry Dease,Court Administrator,St.Paul Mayor Chris B. Coleman,City Clerk Shari Moore,Council President Kathy Lantry et al, www.ci.stpaul.mn.us, Janice Rettman res: No 2009-012,Toni Carter Canvass Board and County Commissioners, www.co.ramsey.mn.us DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling John Harrington Chief Police,his agents , Kathy Wuorinen,Don Luna,Tanya Hunter, Aaron Foster, Police Impound Lot, Rapid Towing et al in their Official Capacitys, Individually,Severally, acting in concort with John Doe and Mary Roe. SCAP,Judges Kathleen Gearin,Joanne Smith,Gregg Johnson,Salvador Rosas,Larry Cohen et al, unk at this time 1988 Files 495722 499129 Default 66 Million Dollars. In re Scarrella4 Assoc. Justice 221NW 2nd 562 Plaintiffs V. http://eastsidereviewnews.1upprelaunch.com/SiteImages/FileGallery/Ramsey_Co_Tax_03-18- 09_208.pdf Page 53_697 SURREY AVE$2,499.43 St.Paul,MN.55106 ,Intestate Decedant James R. Anderson et al, www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com ,VA Widow,Senior,Disabled Political Activist Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Chergosky_Scarrella www.sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.com http://sharon4privateattorneygeneral.blogspot.com + 101 Blogs www.sharon4anderson.org , et al as their interest appear , Defendants and 3rd Party Plaintiffs,Intestate Decedants Tenant in Common Wm.O and Bernice A.Peterson. http://crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com Title to Sharons Cars,Trailers,Peterbilt,Realestate in Fee Simple AbsoluteNotice: Ins.Claim Stolen 91 Chrysler V- 1C4GY54R5MX597169 Defendants: 3rd Party Plaintiffs www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 1. Interpretation of a statute is a question of law, and an appellate court's review is unlimited. Accordingly when determining a question of law, the appellate court is not bound by the trial court's interpretation of a statute. or Denial of MN Const.Art.X and Separation of Powers Art. III MS 279 stating "lacked merit" 279 - DELINQUENT REAL ESTATE TAXES, 2008 Minnesota Statutes Affiants Answer/Cross 4 1/2 Million Dollars, overlooked,misapplied by Judge John Vandenorth in a "Patterned Enterprise" of Judicial Fraud upon the Citizenery http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/1679-2007-07- 08T193758Z/5Jul07RatAssLegal_22.pdf July 5th,2007 2. When construing a statute, a court should give words in common usage their natural Saturday, December 26, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  3. 3. Page 3 of 6 and ordinary meaning. MS429.061 429.061, 2009 Minnesota Statutes Theft,Trespass,Treason is NOT IMPROVEMENT. Sharon4Anderson v. City St.Paul taking 91 Chrysler - Google Search Cop- Corruption-Minnesota: Notice: Ins.Claim Stolen 91 Chrysler V- 1C4GY54R5MX597169 3. The fundamental rule to which all other rules are subordinate is that the intent of the legislature governs if that intent can be ascertained. When language is plain and unambiguous, there is no need to resort to statutory construction. An appellate court merely interprets the language as it appears; it is not free to speculate and cannot read into the statute language not readily found there. MS 645.Canons of Construction Lower Court Vandenorth Treasonable Act's 4. If a city or county governing body has a two-thirds majority vote of its membership, it may modify a recommendation from its planning commission without first returning the proposal to the commission. or in MN Issues of MS609.43 Misconduct of Public Officials to exploit the Seniors,Elderly,Vunerable Homeowners in their Bizzare Taxing Methods of Illegal Fees/Assessments by Theft,Trespass,Treason? in this RICO Case for over 25 years.....re: C6-88-859 (Doris Huspeni) with Clerk Chris Coleman, now City St.Paul Mayor. www.sharonswater.blogspot.com 5. Under the facts of this case, the Board of County Commissioners' alleged Administrative Hearing without "due process" or Civil/Criminal S&C triggering Constitutional Challenge of Jurisdiction/Authority of Judge John Vandenorth File 62cv09-1163,amendment's published 2008 Tax Delinquency's was a legislative action. Quitam Relator Sharon4Anderson is the only homeowner to challenge out of 3 thousand propertys? giving rise to Major Corruption in the State of Minnesota,City of St.Paul and County of Ramsey Google Lawmen Cases MN 62cv09-1163 « Sharon4anderson’s Weblog 6. Aesthetics and conformance with a governing body's comprehensive plan may be considered as bases for zoning and Tax rulings. 42 USC 3631 7. Zoning is not to be based upon a plebiscite of the neighbors; neighborhood objections alone are not legally sufficient to support land use regulation. Nevertheless, their views remain a consideration in a governing body's ultimate decision. 8. A county-wide "takings" "Condemnations" by Water,Electric Shutoff , Stalking causing Fractured Ankle, taking 91 Chrysler, Trailer, Contents, Porta Potty by Theft, Trespass,Treason since 1988 Ramsey Dist. File 495722 and 66 Million Default Judgment File no 499129 giving rise to AFFIDAVITS OF PREJUDICE AGAINST NOW Saturday, December 26, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  4. 4. Page 4 of 6 CHIEFAffidavitPrejudice Kathleen Gearin Judge JUDGE KATHLEEN GEARINSCAP IN her capacity-conflict as Commitment Judge, triggering DEATH,DISABILITY,DISPARAGMENT OF TITLES AND on all citizens in a "protected class" of Social Security Receipants, Disability, in the instant case is unreasonable per se and therefore improper. Summary Judgment taken without Evidentary Hearings, List of Witness's 62CV-09-11693 Amicus 20brief 9. The district court is vested with broad discretion in supervising the course and scope of discovery. 10. In actions to review the final zoning decision of a governing body, the admission of evidence not presented to the governing body is subject to the district court's discretion. 11. Although strongly encouraged, a governing body is not required to make formal findings of fact concerning its decisions regulating land use. It is more important that there exists a record of what the governing body considered before making its decision so that the reviewing court is not left in a quandary as to why the decision was made. 12. The test for determining whether a state law violates the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution is: (1) whether the state law has, in fact, operated as a substantial impairment of a contractual relationship; (2) whether there is a significant and legitimate public purpose behind the legislation; and (3) whether the adjustment of the contracting parties' rights and responsibilities is based upon reasonable conditions and is of a character appropriate to the public purpose justifying the legislation's adoption. 13. Despite a court finding of substantial impairment of a contractual relationship, legislation may still be upheld under an analysis of the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution if there is a significant and legitimate public purpose behind the legislation and if the adjustments to the contracting parties' rights and responsibilities are based upon reasonable conditions and are of a character appropriate to the public purpose justifying the legislation's adoption. 14. For the threshold issue in an analysis of the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution—whether the regulation has, in fact, operated as a substantial impairment of a contractual relationship—a court must consider whether the industry the complaining party has entered has been regulated in the past. This consideration is required because one whose rights, such as they are, are subject to state restriction, cannot remove them from the power of the State by making a contract about them. 15. In an analysis of the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution, whether the adjustment of rights and responsibilities of contracting parties is based upon reasonable conditions and is of a character appropriate to the public purpose Saturday, December 26, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  5. 5. Page 5 of 6 justifying the legislation's adoption, the courts properly defer to legislative judgment as to the necessity and reasonableness of a particular measure when the State is not a contracting party. 16. An appellate court review of whether a board of county commissioners' resolution is preempted by statute is, like interpretation of statutes and ordinances, a question of law. The standard of review is therefore unlimited. 17. State law preemption of a particular field cannot be implied but must be expressed by a clear statement in the law. 18. There is a presumption that the legislature does not intend to enact useless or meaningless legislation. 19. Absent an express statement by Congress that state law is preempted, federal preemption occurs where (1) there is an actual conflict between federal and state law; (2) where compliance with both federal and state law is, in effect, physically impossible; (3) where Congress has occupied the entire field of regulation and leaves no room for states to supplement federal law; or (4) when the state law stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full objectives of Congress. 20. In the absence of express preemption in a federal law, there is a strong presumption that Congress did not intend to displace state law. APPELLANT_QUITAM_RELATOR SHARED ISSUES: 1. Did the district court err in determining that the City Council and Ramsey Co. Board's decision "takings" by Theft,Trespass,Treason without Improvements on Homestead, Disabled Property Owners, amending the taxing regulations by Illegal Fees/Assessment, Summary Abatements without "due process" was lawful, i.e., that it did violate the 42 USC 3631 2. Did the district court err with Libel with Malice in determining that the Full Taxes of Homestead Property at 697 Surrey, 2008 were paid and that Title is in the name of Decedant James R. Anderson et al and decision amending the online banking statement of regulations was reasonable? Property taxes paid $949.86 Property taxes paid Sharon paid taxes 697 Surrey Ave St.Paul MN 2008 - Google Search SharonsSanction Attorneys_Fraud on Court 697Surrey3May09_15.pdfGreen23 No.4. Did the district court err in dismissing the claim alleging that the property taxes for 697 Surrey 2008 were paid in full? Judge John Vandenorty complicity with Auditor Mark Oswald to violate the Contract Clause of the United States Constitution? YES. ISSUES: 5. Did the district court CRIMINALLY err by having a Student Attorney who failed to research the Case in its entirety alleging preemption of the Bank and Wire Fraud regulation's amendment by Fraud unpon the Court and Fraud on the United States of America on a Protected Class of Citizens. Techinally Repealing State Laws Saturday, December 26, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson
  6. 6. Page 6 of 6 thus Treason YES. 6. Did the district court err in dismissing Attorney Pro Se's pdf. Forensic Files to expose Major Corruption of the Judgescomplicit with Auditor, and DFL Gubnatorial Cadidate, Ramsey Co Attorney Susan Gaertner who is claiming alleging preemption of the Banking laws and regulation amendments by federal law? YES Memorandumn Bill Dahn's Banking Regulations Morton Ave St.Paul MN - Google Search Concurrent with the release of A09-2031 Order (toussaint) court has ordered Affiant to submit Informal brief on certain questions raised in the issues originally presented on appeal by both Plaintiff State of Minnesota and Respondant. Those original issues are: whether the district court erred in Summary Judgment dismissing the claims alleging that the taxing decision's amending the regulations violated the Takings Clause and the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. YES. Minnesota's Strike Force "taking" our Cars for Profit, involving Aaron Foster, Manager of St.Paul Police Impound Lot, without Public Improvements, taxing to forclosure without Tickets,Warrants,Approval to Prosecute Bill Dahn: Bud Shaver Stole Bill'sCampaign Bus? Our order requiring supplemental briefing on takings necessarily stays our resolution of the following issues originally presented on appeal by Intervenors: whether the district court erred in dismissing their claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and inverse condemnation. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME EXCEPT ACCESS TO THE COURTS MUST BE IN PDF FORMAT, FORENSIC FILES FOR PUBLIC SCRUNITY. These Criminal Charges against the State do not have to have Filing Fees, Bill Dahn: USDist02-0332(Rosenbaum)(FIAFEA&FIRREA) LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835: Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Sharon4 Anderson - Google Profile Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: User Profile: Sharon Anderson SharonsYahoo! iGoogle Homestead Act of 1862 Twitter / Sharon4Anderson Shar1058's Buzz Activity Page - My Buzz Activity - Yahoo! Buzz neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home | FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26 The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers kare11.com_SA Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06- 2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.comknowledge gained as financial journalists , http://taxthemax.blogspot.com securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade Public domain recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting Google Search Times v. Sullvian Libel with malice - on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in Google Search BlogItBabe2007 Candidate profile Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefs Sharon4And Saturday, December 26, 2009 AOL: Sharon4Anderson