Awesome Comments

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Awesome Comments - Presentation Transcript

    1. Xianhang Zhang Bumblebee Labs iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • 2 person team
      • 4 months old
      • Goal is to build “provocative social software”
      • 2 product releases, 1 more in the pipeline
      • Happy to talk more after this about collaboration.
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
    2. iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • For many people, commenting is their first
      • and possibly only foray into the social web
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • “ Communications tools don't get socially
      • interesting until they get technologically boring ”
      • – Clay Shirky
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • There has not been much innovation in the comment space
      • Slashdot pioneered their “Karma” system in 1997
      • To this day, I’m not aware of any other system of that level of complexity
      • most major sites are still using the most basic commenting systems despite their obvious flaws
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
    3. iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
    4. iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • Signal/noise ratio is too low
      • Insightful comments get lost
      • Lack of readership due to low quality
      • Hard time keeping track of the narrative thread of the conversation
      • Despite this, people yearn for conversation (Herring )
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • “ When all you have is a hammer,
      • all you can see are nails”
      • Sociability problems CAN be fixed through design. But…
      • They cannot be fixed through Interaction Design , a new discipline is needed
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • As HCI researchers, we have been neglecting the development of tools to help designers solve sociability problems
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • Small, personal blogs read largely by friends and family
      • Social networking apps
      • Highly targeted blogs aimed at a professional audience
      • Sites cultivating return audiences rather than drive by, search engine traffic
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • Large sites
      • Sites with high traffic per page
      • Sites with low traffic per page
      • Entertainment sites
      • Sites with an influx of new users
      • Sites with controversial topics
      • Sites with low community involvement
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • Poor explanation:
      • There’s a lot of stupid people out there
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • Better explanation:
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • Human behavior is governed by sets of constraints
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008 Laws of Physics Evolution/Genetics Cultural Norms/Legal Systems Contextual Norms Other People Free Will = Hard constraint = Soft constraint
    5. iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • With virtual systems, there are an additional set of constraints:
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008 Hardware Interface Software Social Systems = Hard constraint = Soft constraint
      • Individual constraints can be accomplished at different layers
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
    6. iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008 Works Doesn’t Work Personal Blogs Large Sites Social Networks Mostly new users Professional Audiences Entertainment Sites Returning Users Low community Involvement
      • Comments work when there are strong social constraints and weak interface constraints
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008 Hardware Software Interface Social Systems = Weak layers = Strong layers
      • Comments fail when there are weak social constraints and weak interface constraints
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008 Hardware Software Interface Social Systems = Weak layers = Strong layers
      • Could Comments work when there are weak social constraints and strong interface constraints?
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008 Hardware Software Interface Social Systems = Weak layers = Strong layers
      • Increasing barriers to participation (registration, captchas etc.)
      • Moderation
      • Disemvowelling
      • ROBOT 9000
      • Rating
      • Sorting/Filtering
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • For conversation to happen, there must be a narrative thread .
      • If I refer to Comment X, you must have read Comment X to understand my reference
      • Rating systems must keep the chronology intact while making highly rated comments visible
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • This is most often done via threading
      • Heavyweight approach, lots of intricacies
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • Initial site developed over 12 hours
      • Very simple concept
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
    7. iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
    8. iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • How do we prevent this site from being just a flash in the pan?
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • Build remarkable content
      • Remarkable
      • adjective
      • Pronunciation: i-ˈmär-kə-bəl
      • Something which people will remark about.
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • Initial user impressions are generally very positive but the site can quickly lose it’s appeal
      • In order to support long term growth, we needed to build conversation around each question
      • Design constraints:
        • Anonymous everything
        • Heavy reliance on external/search engine traffic
        • Many questions, long tail of quality
        • Primary navigation mode is random
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • Large sites
      • Sites with high traffic per page
      • Sites with low traffic per page
      • Entertainment sites
      • Sites with an influx of new users
      • Sites with controversial topics
      • Sites with low community involvement
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • Commenting system designed from the ground up.
      • Goals
        • Drive out poor comments
        • Support remarkable content
        • Support real conversation
        • Give people a sense of ownership
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • Every comment has vote up and vote down buttons
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • New comment
        • Registered users: 2.0 points
        • Unregistered users: 1.0 points
      • Vote button
        • Registered users: 1.0 points
        • Unregistered users: 0.1 points
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • Progressively degrade comment readability at lower scores
      • Show undegraded comment to original poster
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • Voting is unbounded both up and down
      • but…
      • Makes it easy to find and promote remarkable comments
      • We are using the lack of information as a design feature
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008 Actual Score Displayed Score -2.3 -2.3 1.7 1.7 3.5 3.0+ 98.6 3.0+ 100.1 Awesome
      • Non threaded
      • Comments are sorted by displayed score, then by date posted
      • Reply button on all comments (coming!)
      • All replies to your comment are highlighted
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • Original posters are highlighted
      • Identity can be established while maintaining anonymity
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • Visiting a question/comment you made automatically upvotes all it’s children
      • Returning to a question/comment rewards your repliers
      • You are personally in charge of voting your repliers correctly
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • All comments at 3.0+ are displayed in chronological order
      • Conversation can happen at 3.0+
      • This is the default if you post as a registered user (2.0) who replies to a poster who regularly returns (1.0)
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • Commenting systems are generally horribly designed from a sociability perspective
      • Better conversation is a force multiplier for the social web
      • Awesome comments is a ground up rethinking of how commenting should be implemented
      • Still very much an experiment, details will change as the system matures
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008
      • Bumblebee Labs: http://blog.bumblebeelabs.com
      • Am I Normal or Not?: http://www.aminormalornot.com
      • Email me: [email_address]
      • Need a designer? [email_address]
      iSchool Research Conversation - October 24th 2008

    + ShalmaneseShalmanese, 2 years ago

    custom

    643 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 643
      • 643 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 4
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories