Awesome Comments


Published on

What's wrong with current comment systems and how can we do better?

We have built a new comment system from the ground up designed to support genuine conversation.

Published in: Design, Technology
1 Comment
1 Like
  • ___________________
    Insert your ad on

    It's very easy!

    New Lebanese Buy & Sell Marketplace Online where Privates and Businesses in Lebanon can place ads to sell, buy and rent all kinds of things!
    For free.

    Cars, motorcycles, books, travels, electronics, land, furniture, clothes and much more! The ads can be about both new and used stuff.

    No Registration, just insert your ad! And you can still have your own store!
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Awesome Comments

    1. Xianhang Zhang Bumblebee Labs dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    2. <ul><li>2 person team </li></ul><ul><li>3 months old </li></ul><ul><li>Goal is to build “provocative social software” </li></ul><ul><li>1 product release, 2 more in the pipeline </li></ul><ul><li>Happy to talk more after this about collaboration. </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    3. dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    4. <ul><li>For many people, commenting is their first </li></ul><ul><li>and possibly only foray into the social web </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    5. <ul><li>“ Communications tools don't get socially </li></ul><ul><li>interesting until they get technologically boring ” </li></ul><ul><li>– Clay Shirky </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    6. <ul><li>There has not been much innovation in the comment space </li></ul><ul><li>Slashdot pioneered their “Karma” system in 1997 </li></ul><ul><li>To this day, I’m not aware of any other system of that level of complexity </li></ul><ul><li>most major sites are still using the most basic commenting systems despite their obvious flaws </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    7. dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    8. dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    9. <ul><li>Signal/noise ratio is too low </li></ul><ul><li>Insightful comments get lost </li></ul><ul><li>Lack of readership due to low quality </li></ul><ul><li>Hard time keeping track of the narrative thread of the conversation </li></ul><ul><li>Despite this, people yearn for conversation (Herring ) </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    10. <ul><li>Small, personal blogs read largely by friends and family </li></ul><ul><li>Social networking apps </li></ul><ul><li>Highly targeted blogs aimed at a professional audience </li></ul><ul><li>Sites cultivating return audiences rather than drive by, search engine traffic </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    11. <ul><li>Large sites </li></ul><ul><li>Sites with high traffic per page </li></ul><ul><li>Sites with low traffic per page </li></ul><ul><li>Entertainment sites </li></ul><ul><li>Sites with an influx of new users </li></ul><ul><li>Sites with controversial topics </li></ul><ul><li>Sites with low community involvement </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    12. <ul><li>Poor explanation: </li></ul><ul><li>There’s a lot of stupid people out there </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    13. <ul><li>Better explanation: </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    14. <ul><li>We rely on social cues to determine acceptable behavior </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    15. <ul><li>We rely on social cues to determine acceptable behavior </li></ul><ul><li>Online environments lack a richness of cues </li></ul><ul><li>There are no repercussions for pathological behavior online </li></ul><ul><li>Gresham’s law applied to commenting: </li></ul><ul><li>Bad conversation drives out good </li></ul><ul><li>Some small percentage of misanthropic users (ie: trolls) ruin it for the rest of us </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    16. <ul><li>Moderation </li></ul><ul><li>Increasing barriers to participation (registration, captchas etc.) </li></ul><ul><li>Rating </li></ul><ul><li>Filtering </li></ul><ul><li>Disemvowelling </li></ul><ul><li>ROBOT 9000 </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    17. <ul><li>For conversation to happen, there must be a narrative thread . </li></ul><ul><li>If I refer to Comment X, you must have read Comment X to understand my reference </li></ul><ul><li>Rating systems must keep the chronology intact while making highly rated comments visible </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    18. <ul><li>This is most often done via threading </li></ul><ul><li>Heavyweight approach, lots of intricacies </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    19. <ul><li>Initial site developed over 12 hours </li></ul><ul><li>Very simple concept </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    20. dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    21. dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    22. <ul><li>How do we prevent this site from being just a flash in the pan? </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    23. <ul><li>Build remarkable content </li></ul><ul><li>Remarkable </li></ul><ul><li>adjective </li></ul><ul><li>Pronunciation: i-ˈmär-kə-bəl </li></ul><ul><li>Something which people will remark about. </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    24. <ul><li>Initial user impressions are generally very positive </li></ul><ul><li>But the site can quickly lose its appeal </li></ul><ul><li>In order to support long term growth, we needed to build conversation around each question </li></ul><ul><li>Constraints: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Anonymous everything </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Heavy reliance on external/search engine traffic </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Many questions, long tail of quality </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Primary navigation is random </li></ul></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    25. <ul><li>Large sites </li></ul><ul><li>Sites with high traffic per page </li></ul><ul><li>Sites with low traffic per page </li></ul><ul><li>Entertainment sites </li></ul><ul><li>Sites with an influx of new users </li></ul><ul><li>Sites with controversial topics </li></ul><ul><li>Sites with low community involvement </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    26. <ul><li>Commenting system designed from the ground up. </li></ul><ul><li>Goals </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Drive out poor comments </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Support remarkable content </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Support real conversation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Give people a sense of ownership </li></ul></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    27. <ul><li>Every comment has vote up and vote down buttons </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    28. <ul><li>New comment </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Registered users: 2.0 points </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Unregistered users: 1.0 points </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Vote button </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Registered users: 1.0 points </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Unregistered users: 0.1 points </li></ul></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    29. <ul><li>Progressively degrade comment readability at lower scores </li></ul><ul><li>Show undegraded comment to original poster </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    30. <ul><li>Voting is unbounded both up and down </li></ul><ul><li>but… </li></ul><ul><li>Makes it easy to find and promote remarkable comments </li></ul><ul><li>We are using the lack of information as a design feature </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008 Actual Score Displayed Score -2.3 -2.3 1.7 1.7 3.5 3.0+ 98.6 3.0+ 100.1 Awesome
    31. <ul><li>Non threaded </li></ul><ul><li>Comments are sorted by displayed score, then by date posted </li></ul><ul><li>Reply button on all comments </li></ul><ul><li>All replies to your comment are highlighted </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    32. <ul><li>Original posters are highlighted </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    33. <ul><li>Identity can be established while maintaining anonymity </li></ul><ul><li>Visiting a question/comment you made automatically upvotes all it’s children </li></ul><ul><li>Returning to a question/comment rewards your repliers </li></ul><ul><li>You are personally in charge of voting your repliers correctly </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    34. <ul><li>All comments at 3.0+ are displayed in chronological order </li></ul><ul><li>Conversation can happen at 3.0+ </li></ul><ul><li>This is the default if you post as a registered user (2.0) who replies to a poster who regularly returns (1.0) </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    35. <ul><li>Commenting systems are generally horribly designed from a sociability perspective </li></ul><ul><li>Better conversation is a force multiplier for the social web </li></ul><ul><li>Awesome comments is a ground up rethinking of how commenting should be implemented </li></ul><ul><li>Still very much an experiment, details will change as the system matures </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008
    36. <ul><li>Bumblebee Labs: </li></ul><ul><li>Am I Normal or Not?: </li></ul><ul><li>Email me: [email_address] </li></ul><ul><li>Need a designer? [email_address] </li></ul>dub talk - October 2nd 2008