Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
  • Like
Comparing SEO Ranking Factors From 2013 To 2014 By Marcus Tober
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Now you can save presentations on your phone or tablet

Available for both IPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Comparing SEO Ranking Factors From 2013 To 2014 By Marcus Tober

  • 33,280 views
Published

SMX Advanced 2014 Session #SMX #11A - The Periodic Table Of SEO Ranking Factors: 2014 Edition - Comparing SEO Ranking Factors From 2013 To 2014 By Marcus Tober @MarcusTober Of Searchmetrics …

SMX Advanced 2014 Session #SMX #11A - The Periodic Table Of SEO Ranking Factors: 2014 Edition - Comparing SEO Ranking Factors From 2013 To 2014 By Marcus Tober @MarcusTober Of Searchmetrics Inc.

Read up on SEO at http://searchengineland.com

Published in Internet , Technology , Design
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
33,280
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
73

Actions

Shares
Downloads
374
Comments
0
Likes
37

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Comparing SEO Ranking Factors From 2013 to 20142014 MARCUS TOBER 06/11/2014 Seattle
  • 2. Marcus Tober
  • 3. 2014 Edition
  • 4. IRON MAN RANKING
  • 5. Technics Content
  • 6. RANKING FACTORS 2014
  • 7. RANKING FACTORS 2014 Content/ Techniques Social vs 2013
  • 8. OnPage Techniques
  • 9. TECHNICAL ELEMENTS RANKING FACTORS 2014
  • 10. vs 2013 TECHNICAL ELEMENTS RANKING FACTORS 2014
  • 11. 12 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 𝜌2014 = 0.14 Sitespeed 𝜌2014 = 0.14
  • 12. 13 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 𝜌2014 = 0.14 Sitespeed
  • 13. 15 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 Brand Factor 𝜌2014 = 0.16 Number of internal Links
  • 14. 16 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 Number of internal Links
  • 15. OPTIMIZE ! $ $ $ $ $ $ $$ $ $ $
  • 16. Less is More!
  • 17. What‘s even more important?
  • 18. What‘s inside! CONTENT
  • 19. CONTENT ELEMENTS RANKING FACTORS 2014
  • 20. vs 2013 CONTENT ELEMENTS RANKING FACTORS 2014
  • 21. 24 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 Brand Factor ~7.500𝜌2014 = 0.13 Text Length in Characters
  • 22. 25 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 ~6.700𝜌2013 = 0.11 Text Length in Characters vs 2013 ~7.500𝜌2014 = 0.13
  • 23. 27 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 Brand Factor ~650𝜌2014 = 0.13 Word Count
  • 24. 28 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 ~540𝜌2013 = 0.11 vs 2013 Word Count ~650𝜌2014 = 0.13
  • 25. 30 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 Increasing CONTENT ELEMENTS RANKING FACTORS 2014 vs 2013Content Complexity and Quality
  • 26. 32 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 Content Complexity and Quality – NEW 2014 Pretty high correlations! CONTENT ELEMENTS RANKING FACTORS 2014
  • 27. 33 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 𝜇2014 ≈ 73.6 Flesch Reading-Ease
  • 28. 34 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 𝜌2014 = 0.34 Relevant Keywords/ Terms
  • 29. 𝜌2014 = 0.20 35 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 Proof Keywords/ Terms
  • 30. 36 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 Context-dependent nature of meaning „You shall know a keyword by the company it keeps” (Firth, 1957) What’s behind? RANKING FACTORS 2014
  • 31. Proof KW Relevant KW Content Optimization
  • 32. 39 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 Aggregators (few/ no own Content) • Couponing • Press Portals • Celebrity News Pages • Software Portals • Forums • Etc… Google Panda Update 4.0
  • 33. There are no tips and nothing the user expected on the page. Why should it rank?
  • 34. HOLISTIC BE
  • 35. SOCIAL
  • 36. 46 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 SOCIAL ELEMENTS RANKING FACTORS 2014
  • 37. 47 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 SOCIAL ELEMENTS RANKING FACTORS 2014 vs 2013
  • 38. 48 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 More Likes! 𝜌2014 = 0.25 Facebook Likes
  • 39. 49 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 More +1! 𝜌2014 = 0.33 Google+
  • 40. LINK PROFILE
  • 41. 51 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 BACKLINK ELEMENTS RANKING FACTORS 2014
  • 42. 52 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 BACKLINK ELEMENTS RANKING FACTORS 2014 vs 2013
  • 43. 53 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 More Backlinks! 𝜌2014 = 0.31 Number of Backlinks
  • 44. 54 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 Better Links! 𝜌2014 = 0.26 SEO Visibility/ Source URL
  • 45. 55 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 NEW Features 2014 BACKLINK ELEMENTS
  • 46. 56 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 Fewer fresh Backlinks! more 𝜌2014 = 0.20 Number of new Backlinks
  • 47. 57 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 𝜌2014 = 0.16 Anchor = Domain Name
  • 48. 58 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 𝜌2014 = 0.15 Anchor = Brand/ URL
  • 49. MOBILE MOBILE vs DESKTOP
  • 50. 61 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 MOBILE vs DESKTOP Sitespeed
  • 51. 62 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 ~7.500 ~6.000 MOBILE vs DESKTOP Text Length in Characters
  • 52. 63 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 MOBILE vs DESKTOP Number of Backlinks
  • 53. 64 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 MOBILE vs DESKTOP Facebook Likes
  • 54. 65 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 MOBILE vs DESKTOP What’s the difference? RANKING FACTORS 2014
  • 55. USER SIGNALS
  • 56. 67 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 USER TRAFFIC ELEMENTS RANKING FACTORS 2014
  • 57. 68 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 𝜌2014 = 0.06 Time on Site
  • 58. 69 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 Ø 𝜌2014 = 0.01 Bounce Rate
  • 59. 70 www.searchmetrics.com 6/11/2014 𝜌2014 = 0.58 Click-Through Rate
  • 60. Search Experience Optimization
  • 61. Techniques Content
  • 62. twitter.com/searchmetrics facebook.com/searchmetrics
  • 63. twitter.com/searchmetrics facebook.com/searchmetrics THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME