2013 Search Ranking Factors by Matthew Peters
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

2013 Search Ranking Factors by Matthew Peters

on

  • 1,111 views

From SMX East 2013 #SMX #13B - What are the most important search ranking factors by @mattthemathman

From SMX East 2013 #SMX #13B - What are the most important search ranking factors by @mattthemathman

Slide deck from Matthew Peters of Moz

Statistics

Views

Total Views
1,111
Views on SlideShare
1,111
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
3
Downloads
70
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

2013 Search Ranking Factors by Matthew Peters Presentation Transcript

  • 1. SEARCH RANKING FACTORS 2013 # Matthew Peters Moz @MattTheMathMan #SMX #13B October 1, 2013 #
  • 2. @mattthemathman Lead Data Scientist at Moz Data science is responsible for all of Moz’s metrics: Page/Domain/Social Authortity, etc.
  • 3. @mattthemathman Different feature types include: On-page, links, anchor text, social signals and properties of the URL URL www.mrqe.com
  • 4. @mattthemathman Different feature types include: On-page, links, anchor text, social signals and properties of the URL On-page
  • 5. @mattthemathman Different feature types include: On-page, links, anchor text, social signals and properties of the URL Links
  • 6. @mattthemathman Different feature types include: On-page, links, anchor text, social signals and properties of the URL “movie reviews” Anchor Text
  • 7. @mattthemathman Different feature types include: On-page, links, anchor text, social signals and properties of the URL “movie reviews” Anchor Text Social
  • 8. @mattthemathman Which factors are important? What Google says
  • 9. @mattthemathman Which factors are important? What’s in the algorithmWhat Google says
  • 10. @mattthemathman Which factors are important? What’s in the algorithmWhat Google says What SEOs say
  • 11. @mattthemathman Which factors are important? What’s in the algorithmWhat Google says What SEOs say Characteristics of sites that rank well
  • 12. @mattthemathman Survey Thanks to everyone who participated and Cyrus Shepard and Matt Brown for organizing 120 professional SEOs surveyed in mid-June 2013
  • 13. @mattthemathman Survey
  • 14. @mattthemathman Survey
  • 15. @mattthemathman Correlations • 14,000+ keywords from Google Adwords, all categories/search volumes • Top 50 de-personalized, de-localized results from Google US • Mean Spearman Correlation – compute for each keyword then average • Measures extent to which increases in one factor are related to rank • Correlations between -1 and 1. Values of 0.1 - 0.3 are common.
  • 16. @mattthemathman "Correlation is not causation but it sure is a hint" - Edward Tufte Links Correlation and causation Higher rank ??
  • 17. @mattthemathman "Correlation is not causation but it sure is a hint" - Edward Tufte Links Correlation and causation Higher rank
  • 18. @mattthemathman "Correlation is not causation but it sure is a hint" - Edward Tufte Links Higher rank Correlation and causation Correlation, but causation? Higher rank More words on page ??
  • 19. @mattthemathman "Correlation is not causation but it sure is a hint" - Edward Tufte Links Higher rank Correlation and causation Correlation, but causation? Higher rank Higher quality More words on page ??
  • 20. @mattthemathman "Correlation is not causation but it sure is a hint" - Edward Tufte Links Higher rank Correlation and causation Correlation, but causation? Higher rank Higher quality More words on page Links ??
  • 21. @mattthemathman "Correlation is not causation but it sure is a hint" - Edward Tufte Links Higher rank Correlation and causation Correlation, but causation? Higher rank Higher quality More words on page Links
  • 22. @mattthemathman Survey: Overall
  • 23. @mattthemathman Survey: Links
  • 24. @mattthemathman Correlations: Links Overall PA our highest correlated factor. Page link correlations higher then domain.
  • 25. @mattthemathman Correlations: Anchor Text Partial and exact match have same correlation. Internal anchor text correlations significantly lower then external.
  • 26. @mattthemathman Survey: On-page keyword usage
  • 27. @mattthemathman Correlations: On-page keyword usage
  • 28. @mattthemathman Relevance vs Ranking See http://moz.com/blog/determining-relevance-how-similarity-is-scored
  • 29. @mattthemathman Relevance vs Ranking Relevance See http://moz.com/blog/determining-relevance-how-similarity-is-scored
  • 30. @mattthemathman Relevance vs Ranking Relevance Ranking 1 2 See http://moz.com/blog/determining-relevance-how-similarity-is-scored
  • 31. @mattthemathman Survey: On-page Keyword Agnostic
  • 32. @mattthemathman Correlations: Site speed Zoompf to provided the speed data. Response time has negative correlation, but total load time does not! See: http://moz.com/blog/how-website-speed-actually-impacts-search-ranking
  • 33. @mattthemathman Speed and Users Jonathon Colman: http://www.slideshare.net/jcolman/seo-site-speed-and-battlestar-galactica-searchfest-2012-11735155 • 40% of customers will abandon any site that takes longer than 3 seconds to load • Conversion rate drops by 7% for every 1 second of load time
  • 34. @mattthemathman Survey: Brand metrics
  • 35. @mattthemathman Correlations: Brand metrics
  • 36. @mattthemathman Correlations: Brand metrics
  • 37. @mattthemathman Survey: Exact/partial match domain
  • 38. @mattthemathman Correlations: EMD/PMD Query: “adidas sneakers” Exact Match Domain (EMD): www.adidassneakers.com Partial Match Domain (PMD): www.adidas.com
  • 39. @mattthemathman Exact match domain over time
  • 40. @mattthemathman Exact match domain over time
  • 41. @mattthemathman Exact match domain over time
  • 42. @mattthemathman Exact match domain over time
  • 43. @mattthemathman Exact match domain over time Removal of low quality EMDs??
  • 44. @mattthemathman Survey: Social
  • 45. @mattthemathman Correlations: Social Google +1’s second highest correlation metric (behind PA)!
  • 46. @mattthemathman Correlations: Social, 2013 vs 2011
  • 47. @mattthemathman +1’s are not used in ranking Similar to Facebook Shares, Google +1’s are not used in ranking: Matt Cutts: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6243451
  • 48. @mattthemathman Google+ provides SEO benefits Followed links, relevant anchor text, priority crawling Cyrus Shepard: http://moz.com/blog/google-plus-correlations
  • 49. @mattthemathman Correlation vs Causation revisited Higher rank Higher quality More +1’s, Shares or Tweets Links
  • 50. @mattthemathman Multivariate correlations Spearman correlations between links and social shares Page level links and social shares are correlated
  • 51. @mattthemathman Partial correlations Partial correlations controlling for links, anchor text, keyword usage A simple linear model with a handful of factors removes much of the social correlation with search position.
  • 52. @mattthemathman Overall algorithm Link factors still very important, followed by on-page page. SEO’s don’t think Social important, but it has high correlation.
  • 53. @mattthemathman 1. Quality, authorship, structured data, social all predicted to increase in importance. Future predictions
  • 54. @mattthemathman 1. Quality, authorship, structured data, social all predicted to increase in importance. 1. EMD, paid links, anchor text expected to decrease. Future predictions
  • 55. @mattthemathman Final caution
  • 56. Thanks for watching! Matthew Peters matt@moz.com @mattthemathman 56
  • 57. http://www.slideshare.net/SearchMarketingExpo # see more presentations at: # 57