Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
SCC 2012 Evaluating games: learning through play?; Formative evaluation (Hannah Clipson)
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

SCC 2012 Evaluating games: learning through play?; Formative evaluation (Hannah Clipson)

191

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
191
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Evaluating Online Museum Games– Formative EvaluationHannah ClipsonAudience Research and Advocacy Unit, May 2012
  • 2. Introduction Using a case-study to explore the benefits of evaluating online museum games during the development stage – Formative Evaluation. Methodologies.
  • 3. Why Develop Museum Online Games? To go beyond the walls of the museum – reach out to a large, diverse audience, providing those that can’t or won’t visit with an experience of your content or collections. To articulate and engage the user with difficult / boring science content. To deliver enjoyable learning experiences. The market for games is huge!
  • 4. Formative Evaluation – What’s the Point?Why do we evaluate a game during the development stage? To improve it! To investigate if the game is meeting the objectives you set at the start of the project. To explore if the game is meeting the needs of your target audience. To identify and remove the barriers to usability, motivation and comprehension.
  • 5. Futurecade
  • 6. Futurecade An online suite of arcade style games where teenagers can explore the way contemporary science and technology affects their everyday lives.Brief Overview:To communicate specific areas of complex science content: Space Junk Synthetic Biology Geoengineering – Cloud Brightening Robo-LobstersLearning embedded in the gameplay – subtlety essential. Primarily targeted at teenagers, both inside and outside the classroom.
  • 7. Aim: To foster critical thinking, informed decision-making and interest in science.Objectives: To be thought-provoking, stimulate and promote discussion. To provide challenges and rewards. To result in the players walking away from it wanting to find out more.Learning Outcomes: An understanding that developments in science and technology will affect our lives. An understanding that there will be upsides and downsides of new science technologies.
  • 8. MethodologyEvaluation Strategy – Why: To enable you to understand how you will create a high quality game that meets your objectives and meets the needs of your audience.When developing your strategy, what to consider: Who is the target audience? What do you want to find out from the evaluation? How will you find this out? What are you going to do with your findings?
  • 9. MethodologyConcept Testing Thoughts on the game proposal, the science and the look and feel. Focus Group – 6 teenagers.
  • 10. MethodologyWireframe Testing Focusing on navigation, content, suitability for the target audience and engagement. 6 participants to test.
  • 11. MethodologyPrototype Testing 2 prototypes – focusing on comprehension of the science, usability and engagement. Game testing with small groups of teenagers.
  • 12. MethodologyRobustness Testing Identifying bugs. Recruit as many testers as possible!
  • 13. MethodologyUsing your findings – feeding back to designers. After each stage, findings used to inform direction and to make positive changes. Ideal to meet face-to-face with designers to enable conversation.
  • 14. MethodologyWhy Conduct the Formative Evaluation? ‘Cloud Control’ representing inaccurate science to users.
  • 15. Hannah Clipson Audience Advocate Audience Research and AdvocacyLearning and Audience Development Unit Science Museum Exhibition Road London SW7 2DD 020 7942 4826hannah.clipson@sciencemuseum.org.uk

×