Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Thermal Analysis and Design Optimization using ProMechanica
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Saving this for later?

Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime - even offline.

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Thermal Analysis and Design Optimization using ProMechanica

3,162
views

Published on


0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
3,162
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
101
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Thermal analysis and Design optimization using Pro Mechanica
    CAD Applications (MAE 477/577) - Final Project
    Sasi Bhushan # 35763829
    Srikanth # 35762927
  • 2. Objective
    Explore the capability of Mechanica to study the conduction/convection heat transfer analysis by considering simple examples and quantifying the ProM results with analytical calculations.
    And the second part of the study involves exploring the design optimization capabilities of Mechanica.
    The Game Plan
    For the first part of the study we consider simple geometries like:
    • Flat Plate
    • 3. Long Cylinder
    • 4. Two Cylinders of different cross sections
    For the second part of the study, we considered a Finned Plate and optimized its shape and size for a given set of constraints.
  • 5. Case Study 1: Flat Plate
    Material: Copper
    Dimensions:
    l = 95 mm, b = 100 mm, t = 10 mm
    heat transfer coefficient of air:
    H = 0.01 N/mm Sec S
    Thermal Conductivity of Copper:
    K = 121.223 N/Sec C
    The above plate is subjected to a uniform temperature of 100 C on one surface and the other surface is exposed to atmosphere at a temperature of 25 C. Therefore, there is convective heat transfer from the surface.
  • 6. Steady State Analysis
    Analytical Calculations:
    Temperature of hot surface: T1 = 100 C
    Temperature of Surroundings: 25 C
    Area of the plate: A = l*b = 9.5E-03 m^2
    Heat flux across the plate:
    q = k*A*(T1-T2)/t  a) Conduction equation
    Heat transfer to the environment:
    q = h*A*(T2-Tatm)  b) Convection equation
    At steady state both conduction and convection should be equal. Solving the above two equations we get T2 = 99.9 C.
    Temperature distribution in Flat Plate
  • 7. Analysis 2: Transient
    One end maintained at 100 C and other end exposed to air at temp of 25 C through a convection heat transfer coefficient of 0.01 N/mm Sec C.
    The primary question we want to answer is to find the eventual temperature of the cold end of the plate, and the time it takes to reach the steady state.
  • 8. Analysis 3: Thermally Induced stresses
    VonMises stresses induced
    By fixing all degrees of freedom except displacement in X and Y direction on the hot surface we get : Maximum Stress: = 9.351600e+12 N/mm2
  • 9. Case Study 2: Cylindrical Rod
    The above cylindrical rod is given a uniform heat flux of 100 mW on end and the other is exposed to convection to the atmospheric air.
  • 10. Analytical calculations for Flat Plate study:
    Heat transfer coefficient of air :h = 0.01 N/mm Sec C
    Specific heat capacity: 3.77186e+08 mm^2/sec^2
    Thermal Conductivity: K =121.223 N/Sec C
    Density : 8.21395e-06 kg/m^3
    Poisson’s ratio: 0.35
    At Surface 1
    Heat Flux Q: k*A*(T1-T2)/L  a) (Conduction)
    k= 121.223 N/Sec C
    A = π*r^2 = 7.065E-04 m^2
    At Surface 2
    Heat Flux Q: h*A*(T2-25)b) (Convection)
    Q = 0.1 W
    Therefore, solving the above two equations for T1 and T2 :
    T1 = 39.5 C
    T2 = 39.15 C
  • 11. ProM results: Steady State Analysis
    Temperature distribution
    Heat Flux
  • 12. Analysis 2: Transient
    As expected the temperatures at both the ends come down to 25 C as the heat load is shut off. Time = 1.06896e+07 sec
  • 13. Analysis 3: Thermally Induced stresses
    VonMises stresses induced
    By fixing all degrees of freedom except displacement in X and Y direction on the hot surface we get : Maximum Stress: = 1.970081e+02 N/mm2
  • 14. Case Study 3: 2Cylindrical Rods with interface
    The combined cylindrical rod is given a uniform heat flux of 100 mW on end and the other is exposed to convection to the atmospheric air.
  • 15. Steady State Analysis:
    • Convection Coefficient: h = 0.01 N/mm Sec C
    • 16. Heat load: q = 100 mW
    • 17. Area of Rod1: A1 = 7.065E-04 m^2
    • 18. Area of Rod2: A2 =3.14E-04 m^2
    • 19. Length of Rod1:L1 = 0.3 m
    • 20. Length of Rod2:L2 = 0.4 m
    • 21. Tatm = 25 C
    Steady state equations:
    At surface 1:
    • q = k1*A1*(T1-T2)/L1 a)
    At Surface 2:
    • q = K2*A2*(T2-T3)/L2 b)
    At Surface 3:
    • q = h*A2*(T3-Tatm) c)
    Solving the above three equations we get,
    Temperature distribution
  • 24. Analysis 2: Transient
    Heat Load is turned on. And we want to find the time to reach the steady state temperatures.
  • 25. Analysis 3: Thermally Induced stresses
    VonMises stresses induced
    By fixing all degrees of freedom except displacement in X and Y direction on the hot surface we get : Maximum Stress: = 4.449016e+02
    N/mm2
  • 26. Finned Plate
    In this study we will add fins for the flat plate discussed earlier and determine the optimum height and thickness of the fins to maximize heat transfer and minimize mass along with the steady state and transient thermal analysis.
  • 27. Finned Plate
  • 28. Steady State Analysis
    For the given boundary conditions the temperature distribution in the fin is given by the equation:
  • 29. Sensitivity Analysis
    We run the global sensitivity analysis to determine the variation of Min Temperature and Mass with respect to the design variables.
    Variation of temperature with respect to thickness and height of the fins
  • 30. Optimization Analysis
    The optimization problem can be formulated as shown below:
    Objective function: f = Mass
    Constraints: g = Min Temp <= 80 C
    Design variables:
    height of the fins: 20<=h<=100
    thickness: 2<=t<=8
    Optimized vs. Initial Design
  • 31. Results
  • 32. Conclusions
    In this project, we explored the design optimization, thermal stress, conduction/convection heat transfer analysis capabilities of ProE. We went through this process by taking a few simple examples for steady state/transient analysis and validating the obtained ProM results with analytical calculations. We can infer from the coincidence of the final results that our analysis calculations are true and thus validate the overall process.
    The next step was taking up a more complex problem and exploring the design optimization capabilities of ProM. The finned plate problem is taken up and the whole previous process is went through to obtain thermal analysis data, which is used for optimizing the plate design for particular parameters. The thermal analysis of the final optimized design shows the improved performance with better design parameters.