Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
What Works Personal Tutoring
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

What Works Personal Tutoring

159
views

Published on

What Works Personal Tutoring

What Works Personal Tutoring

Published in: Education

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
159
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Supporting students throughintegrated Personal Tutoring Susan K Robbins BSc PGCE MPhil PhD FHEA Principal Lecturer and University Teaching Fellow Dept of Biological and Medical Sciences Oxford Brookes University Tel: 01865 484192 Fax: 01865 483242 Email: srobbins@brookes.ac.uk
  • 2. Workshop Plan Introductions Groupwork Feedback from groups Presentation: How can we engage staff and students in personal tutoring? Discussion
  • 3. Group 11. Why do we have Personal Tutors?2. Is the concept of Personal Tutors outdated?3. Would students notice if they didn’t have a Personal Tutor?4. What would we lose if we abolished Personal Tutoring?
  • 4. Group 21. Who should be a Personal Tutor?2. Should all academics be Personal Tutors?3. Should all Personal Tutors be academics?4. What functions does the role of Personal Tutor cover?
  • 5. Group 31. What is pastoral care?2. Who needs pastoral care?3. Why should Personal Tutors get involved in pastoral care? Should they?4. What is a Personal Tutor’s role in pastoral care?
  • 6. Group 41. What do students want from Personal Tutors?2. Is this realistic? Can we deliver it?3. Should we give them what they want?4. How does the new fee structure impact on students’ expectations of Personal Tutors?
  • 7. Importance of Personal Tutors Literature evidences relationship- building between academics and students as key to students’ sense of belonging and future academic success (Hixenbaugh, 2006; Tinto, 1993; Yorke and Longden, 2007) The person in pole position to support students is their Personal Tutor
  • 8. Personal Tutor responsibilities Facilitating personal development of their tutees Monitoring their progress Providing a link between student and the university authorities Intervening with the university authorities on behalf of their tutees Being a person in whom the student can confide (Wheeler and Birtle, 1993)
  • 9. Personal Tutor modelsPastoral Model: Specific member of staffassigned to each student, giving guidancethroughout their degreeProfessional Model: Students who approachstaff on personal matters are immediatelydirected to professionals. Requires goodlinks between Faculties and Student ServicesCurriculum Model: Timetabled tutorials withPT within the curriculum. Students learnskills, university procedures, PDP, etc(Earwaker, 1992)
  • 10. What works for students?Effective personal tutors: Have good communication skills ‘listening’ Care about you Make time to see you - accessible Know who you are – relationship building Are knowledgeable – academic systems Offer guidance and advice See you as a person ‘a whole person’ Know where you can go for supportDeveloping a relationship with your personal tutordepends on their commitment to personal tutoring
  • 11. PASS: Personal and AcademicSupport SystemHolistic approach to supporting studentsPro-active personal tutoring throughdiscipline-based group tutorials with PTsDelivers academic skills training whilebuilding cohort identity, good staff-studentworking relationshipsBuilds peer support within disciplinesPicks up students with non-academicissuesSafety net for pastoral support of students
  • 12. PASS Tutorial Programme:Semester 1Week 0 Induction: Introductions: one-to-one meetings between Personal Tutor and new Tutees: understanding your timetableWeek 2 Tutorial 1: Time-task management; set essay assignment; what to do if you are ill; understanding the module timetablingWeek 4 Tutorial 2: Give feedback on lab notebooks; review progress on essay assignment; making notes from written sources; receive feedback from your studentsWeek 6 Tutorial 3: Making notes from lectures; plagiarism (University regulations on cheating); citing sources and referencing practiceWeek 8 Tutorial 4: Feedback on annotated bibliographies, essay plans, draft library research logs; study time expectations; assessment criteriaWeek 11 Tutorial 5: Feedback on essays and library research logs; role of feedback in learning; effectiveness of time management; feedback from students on their Brookes experience
  • 13. PASS Tutorial Programme:Semester 2Week 1 or 2: Individual interviews: Results from Semester 1: how are you getting on? Are you on target?Week 3 Tutorial 6: Review instructions for group poster assignment; devising effective literature search strategies; review groupwork roles; discuss groupwork issuesWeek 6 Tutorial 7: Planning your 2nd and 3rd year programme; review progress with poster assignment; writing scientific reportsWeek 8 Tutorial 8: Peer review of scientific reports; review progress with poster assignment(Week 10: Peer assessment of group posters)Week 11 Tutorial 9: Return and give feedback on reports and posters; review of the year
  • 14. PASS ReferralSafety net for students with personal issuesthat are interfering with their ability to studyAny Personal Tutor can refer students andstudents self-referUse active listening skills to help thestudent talk about their problemsHelp the student to find their solutionRefer students on to specialists:counselling, legal or financial advice,accommodation, etc.
  • 15. The greatest benefit is relational Compared with other possible benefits of PASS tutorials (eg: skills, peer relationships): 89% said they had enough contact with their Personal Tutor through PASS to feel known as an individual. Of these, 67% believe this helped them through their first year. 88% felt comfortable enough to turn to their tutor with academic problems. Of these 77% found this helpful. (N = 68; 38% responses)
  • 16. What students said…“I feel it is a great system to get to know your personal tutor and this makes me feel more involved in the Life Science department.”“you can hear others opinions or difficulties which maybe similar to how you feel or can learn from them”“if you are struggling and you dont email your personal tutor for some reason, you will have the opportunity in a PASS session.”“… made me feel as a first year student that there were people to talk to if needed…”
  • 17. General issues for staffStaff buy in: staff (dis)engagement affectsstudent engagementConsistency between Personal TutorsClearly defined rolesTraining for role: eg. listening skillsAcademic credibilityWorkload planning: proper time allowanceRecognition for ‘student centred’ staff
  • 18. What works?Relationships between students and staff: Accessibility – availability (office hours) Consistency – commitment of all PTs Interest and concern – holistic approachStaff engagement: being alongside studentson their journeysPersonal Tutor training: staff developmentactivities, peer support
  • 19. AcknowledgementsMy thanks to the following people and organisations:Life Sciences’ Personal Tutors: for delivering PASS tutorialsBryony France: Student Support Coordinator: first port of callfor students with questions and problemsAndrew Rendell: For helping to produce the Study SkillsmaterialsPeter Grebenik: For providing me with spreadsheets andunearthing student dataKeith Cooper, Director of Student Services: For support on thepastoral side of PASS; acting promptly with student referralsKirsten Hall: For collecting student and staff feedback onPASSUniversity of Reading: Partners in ‘What Works?’ projectHEFCE/Paul Hamlyn Foundation for funding ‘What works?’project
  • 20. ReferencesEarwaker, J. (1992) Helping and Supporting Students. MiltonKeynes: Open University Press.Hixenbaugh, P. (2006) Relationships and Retention. AcademicExchange, Issue 4, Summer, HEA.Tinto, V. (1993) Leaving College: Rethinking the causes andcures of student attrition. (2nd Ed) (p122) The University ofChicago Press: Chicago.Wheeler, S. and Birtle, J. (1993) A Handbook for PersonalTutors. Buckingham: SHRE and OUP.Yorke, M. and Longden, B. (2007) The first-year experience inhigher education in the UK. Report on Phase 1 of a projectfunded by the Higher Education Academy. York, HEA.