Pennsylvania and the Future of Nuclear Power - Presentation Transcript
Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Power Industry Sarah Young Digital Media Project Biology 103: Environmental Science
Explanation of Nuclear Power
Nuclear power is created through a series of nuclear reactions and a process called fission. During this process, Uranium-235 isotopes absorb neutrons, causing the U-235 to become unstable and split into 2 lighter parts called fission fragments. These 2 new parts are lighter because some of the mass is converted into energy and released as heat. Along with the heat, more neutrons are released. The neutrons continue to disrupt more U-235 atoms in a self-sustaining chain reaction, while the heat from the fission is used to boil water. Boiling water turns turbines and creates electricity, thus generating nuclear power. The leftover fission fragments gather to form nuclear waste, and the safe disposal of this waste is one of the biggest challenges in the nuclear power industry.
Pennsylvania’s Nuclear History: The Main Events ? Penn State University obtains a license for its TRIGA “Training Research, Isotopes, General Atomics” reactor, creating Pennsylvania’s first nuclear research facility. 1955 1960 Shippingport Power Plant, located in southwestern Pennsylvania, is opened and Pittsburgh becomes the world’s first nuclear-powered city. 1979 Three Mile Island, located near Middletown, experiences a partial meltdown of #2 reactor’s core. Although crisis is averted, the event leads the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to modify its oversight of the entire nuclear industry, with changes centered around emergency response planning, reactor operator training, engineering, and radiation protection. 2003 The NRC grants a 20-year license extension for Peach Bottom Power Plant’s reactors and talks begin about a renewal application for TMI, whose operating license ends in 2014. 1982 Shippingport Power Plant, Pennsylvania’s first nuclear power plant, is decomissioned and Beaver Valley Power Station takes over nuclear service of Pittsburgh and surrounding areas.
Pennsylvania’s Role in the Nuclear World Source: http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/nuclear/page/at_a_glance/states/statespa.html Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Power Generation (millions of kilowatt-hours. Currently, 31 states use commercial nuclear facilities but a third of the country’s nuclear capacity lies in just 4 states: Illinois, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and South Carolina. In terms of total nuclear capacity and generation, Pennsylvania ranks second only to Illinois. As of 2004, 36% of Pennsylvania’s entire electricity market is fueled by nuclear power.
A Tour of Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Facilities Beaver Valley Power Plant Limerick Generating Station Source: http://www.co.berks.pa.us/ema/lib/ema/images/limerick_effects.jpg Source: http://www.powermag.com/Assets/Image/110108_Beaver_Fig1.jpg Source: http://www.esm.versar.com/PPRP/powerplants-new/images/peach.jpg Peach Bottom Power Station Source: http://www.powermag.com/Assets/Image/Imports/2008-02/06-03.jpg Susquehanna Nuclear Power Plant Three Mile Island Source: http://www.ohiocitizen.org/campaigns/electric/2004/ph_three_mile_island500.jpg Nuclear Power Plant
Beaver Valley Power Plant Source: http://www.powermag.com/Assets/Image/110108_Beaver_Fig1.jpg
Owned and Operated by First Energy Nuclear Operating Corporation
Site Size: 500 acres
Total Number of Operating Reactors: 2 Pressurized Light-Water Reactors
Net Capacity: 1,652 Electrical Megawatts
Net Generation: 13,970 Million Kilowatt Hours
Share of State Nuclear Generation: 18%
Shippingport, Pennsylvania Return to Main
Peach Bottom Power Station Source: http://www.esm.versar.com/PPRP/powerplants-new/images/peach.jpg York County, Pennsylvania
Owned and Operated by Exelon Corporation
Site Size: 620 acres
Total Number of Operating Reactors: 2 Boiling Water Reactors
Net Capacity: 2,224 Electrical Megawatts
Net Generation: 18,393 Million Kilowatt Hours
Share of State Nuclear Generation: 24%
Return to Main
Limerick Generating Station Montgomery County, Pennsylvania Source: http://www.co.berks.pa.us/ema/lib/ema/images/limerick_effects.jpg
Owned and Operated by Exelon Corporation
Site Size: 600 acres
Total Number of Operating Reactors: 2 Boiling Water Reactors
Net Capacity: 2,268 Electrical Megawatts
Net Generation: 18,906 Million Kilowatt Hours
Share of State Nuclear Generation: 25%
Return to Main
Susquehanna Nuclear Power Plant Luzerne County, Pennsylvania Source: http://www.powermag.com/Assets/Image/Imports/2008-02/06-03.jpg
Jointly Owned by Pennsylvania Power & Light and Allegheny Electric
Cooperative, Operated by PPL Susquehanna, LLC.
Site Size: 1,075 acres
Total Number of Operating Reactors: 2 Boiling Water Reactors
Net Capacity: 2,275 Electrical Megawatts
Net Generation: 18,264 Million Kilowatt Hours
Share of State Nuclear Generation: 23%
Return to Main
Three Mile Island Nuclear Power Plant Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Owned and Operated by Exelon Corporation
Site Size: 814 acres
Total Number of Operating Reactors: 1 Pressurized Light-Water Reactor
Net Capacity: 810 Electrical Megawatts
Net Generation: 6,755 Million Kilowatt Hours
Share of State Nuclear Generation: 9%
Source: http://www.ohiocitizen.org/campaigns/electric/2004/ph_three_mile_island500.jpg Return to Main
An Uncertain Future Nuclear Power Pros: Nuclear Power Cons:
High and rising capital costs, possibly causing electricity price hikes
Long construction periods to build new facilities
Competition with unlimited geothermal, solar, and wind power sources.
Limited space for safe and secure waste storage
Location restrictions due to nuclear power’s large-scale water use
Low operational costs
Sustainable, carbon-free source of power with zero emissions
Safer working conditions than electric plants fueled by coal or oil
Decrease in demand for foreign oil
Advanced security to ensure safe use and transport of nuclear material
The Wave of the Future Source: http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN_A_look_at_the_future_of_nuclear_power_0311082.html Source: http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN_A_look_at_the_future_of_nuclear_power_0311082.html Engineers are developing plans for future nuclear facilities that take on a more earth-friendly appearance, like those pictured above and below. “Green” barriers on the plant’s main structures would protect from external hazards and scientists could use bio-skins, sustained by rainwater, to turn cooling towers from an eyesore into a natural feature that changes through the seasons. Nuclear plants of the future may also take the shape of pyramids or function as underwater factories. Undersea facilities have easy access to cooling water while pyramid-shaped plants provide safety against seismic activity. Source: http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN_A_look_at_the_future_of_nuclear_power_0311082.html South Africa boasts an innovative, new generation of nuclear power plant called the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor. The reactor encases Uranium or Plutonium in cermic spheres the size of a tennis ball. The heat that is generated is transferred into a helium gas. The pressure from the safe helium gas is then used to turn a turbine and create electricity. To melt the ceramic spheres containing Uranium and release radioactive material, it would take temperatures of 3000°C but the inside only ever rises to temperatures of about 900°C.
Sources “ A Look at the Future of Nuclear Power.” World Nuclear News . 03 Nov. 2008. <http://www.world-nuclear- news.org/NN_A_look_at_the_future_of_nuclear_power_0311082.html>. Lehr, Jay. “Testimony on the Future of Nuclear Power.” The Heartland Institute . 16 Sept. 2008. 16 March 2009 < http ://www.heartland.org/policybot/results/23772/Testimony_on_the_Future_of_ Nuclear_Power_.html>. Little, E. A. “Development of Radiation Resistance Materials for Advanced Nuclear Power Plant.” Materials Science and Technology 22 (2006): 491-518. Academic Search Premier. EBSCOhost. Harrisburg Area Community College Library, York, PA. 12 Feb. 2009 <http://www.ebscohost.com>. Romm, Joseph. “The Self-Limiting Future of Nuclear Power.” Center For American Progress Action Fund . 02 June 2008. 16 March 2009 <http://www.americanprogressaction.org/issues/2008/nuclear_ power_report.html>. Moens, John. “State Nuclear Industry – Pennsylvania.”18 Aug. 2006. Energy Information Administration . 12 Feb. 2009 <http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/nuclear/page/at_a_glance/states/statespa.html>. “ The Future of Nuclear Power.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology . 2003. 16 March 2009 <http:// web.mit.edu/nuclearpower>.
0 comments
Post a comment