Using FME to Refine Electric
Company Facility Data




Louis Panzer, Locate Support Systems
Overview



      Introduction
      You have GIS – how is it being utilized?
      Review of the damage prevention com...
You Have GIS:
How is it being utilized?


  For many companies, GIS is used to fulfill many
   important functions (asset...
Review of Damage
Prevention Components



  Areas in which maps are utilized in the process
   include:
     One Call re...
Preliminary Background




    Tampa Electric Company previously utilized a
     service territory that was registered us...
Preliminary Background Cont.




       YEAR	
       2006	
      2007	
       2008	
      2009	
  

       BUDGET	
     $1...
Customized Application
One Call Registration



  STEP 1: Refined database with Sunshine One Call
   of Florida (IRTH sys...
One Call Registration



•    LSS utilized FME to
     extract UG lines and
     features from Tampa
     Electric Oracle
...
One Call Registration



  Two sets created:
   100 foot buffers (for
   Sunshine), 25 foot
   buffers (for
   screener)
...
One Call Registration Results



          ACTUAL REDUCTION: 28% avg. (Calculated using
           the last 3 months of t...
Results - Step 1:
Ticket Reduction from One Call


  ACTUAL REDUCTION: 28% avg. (Calculated using
   the last 3 months of...
Integration with Internal Data
  Use of 25 Foot Buffers


Using the 25
foot buffers, the
screener is able
to review
recomm...
Integration
  Use of 25 Foot Buffers



A closer detailed
view of the 25 foot
buffers
Integration (Results)
Ticket Reduction with Internal Data


  ADDITIONAL REDUCTION: 50% AVG.
  BRINGS TOTAL DAILY SAVING...
Results



  ADDITIONAL REDUCTION: 50% AVG.
  BRINGS TOTAL DAILY SAVINGS TO: $1,500 AVG.




           Estimated total ...
Integration with Internal Data



FIRST:
  Review all
   tickets
   using
   IRTHNet
  Check
   work type,
   depth and
...
Integration Using All the Tools



SECOND
  Use GIS,
   CIS and
   Google to
   verify
   clears




                    ...
Integration Using All the Tools



SECOND
  Use GIS,
   CIS and
   Google to
   verify
   clears




                    ...
Integration Using All the Tools



SECOND
  Use GIS,
   CIS and
   Google to
   verify
   clears




                    ...
Integration Using All the Tools



THIRD
  Make
   phone
   calls if
   needed.
  WHEN IN
   DOUBT...
  SEND IT
   OUT!
How Does This Process Help
Further Protect Facilities?


    Helps GIS to keep database updated
     •    Full circle GIS...
How Does This Process
Reduce Costs?


  ROI within 3 months
  System can be automated to generate new
   shape files whe...
Conclusions



  Ticket management remains a critical piece to the
   efficiencies and improved protection
  Ticket mana...
Questions




                     Louis Panzer
                       President
            louis@locatesupportsystems.co...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Using FME to Refine Electric Company Facility Data

1,323 views

Published on

LSS utilized FME to create a workspace designed to dramatically reduce the facility footprint of an electric company. Using the workspace, the company reduced their One Call ticket volume by roughly 25%. This presentation will provide an overview of the problem and how FME was used as the solution.

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,323
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
4
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
10
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Using FME to Refine Electric Company Facility Data

  1. 1. Using FME to Refine Electric Company Facility Data Louis Panzer, Locate Support Systems
  2. 2. Overview   Introduction   You have GIS – how is it being utilized?   Review of the damage prevention components   Case study: preliminary background   Customized application   Integration of solution with internal data   How are facilities protected better?   How are costs reduced at the same time?   Conclusions
  3. 3. You Have GIS: How is it being utilized?   For many companies, GIS is used to fulfill many important functions (asset inventory, outage, repairs, new construction)   The question to ask is, “if digital facility maps are available, why aren’t they being used for locate registration and ticket review?”   Some possible answers might be:   GIS department unaware that this need exists   Update issues: what is a correct frequency?   No system in place to regulate ticket flow   Mapping confidence level
  4. 4. Review of Damage Prevention Components   Areas in which maps are utilized in the process include:   One Call registration   One Call ticket review   Field Locating (but not as a replacement for a locate)
  5. 5. Preliminary Background   Tampa Electric Company previously utilized a service territory that was registered using grids   These grids resulted in tickets being sent for the entire Hillsborough county area   100% of these tickets were sent to the field   Due to over notification, $900,000 of 2008 $1.15M budget was spent for no conflict tickets to be field visited whether a visit occurred or not   This method of ticket management also resulted in more risk to facilities
  6. 6. Preliminary Background Cont. YEAR   2006   2007   2008   2009   BUDGET   $1.3M   $1.2M   $1.15M   $1.1M   Ticket count from Sunshine One Call for 2009: 88,500 tickets Used IRTHNet to pass the tickets through for reports
  7. 7. Customized Application One Call Registration   STEP 1: Refined database with Sunshine One Call of Florida (IRTH system) to register facilities using buffered polygons instead of grids. Polygon Grid size
  8. 8. One Call Registration •  LSS utilized FME to extract UG lines and features from Tampa Electric Oracle database •  Workspace carved up data into chunks, collapsed and merged the data. Rob? •  These lines and features were converted into polygons to meet IRTH requirements (size and vertices) Just the pure 100 foot polygons
  9. 9. One Call Registration   Two sets created: 100 foot buffers (for Sunshine), 25 foot buffers (for screener)   Can be created weekly or even daily if needed Zoomed view to show improved coverage Note facility polygons in blue, grids in red.
  10. 10. One Call Registration Results   ACTUAL REDUCTION: 28% avg. (Calculated using the last 3 months of tickets as an average. Before After Estimated savings over a year: $150,000
  11. 11. Results - Step 1: Ticket Reduction from One Call   ACTUAL REDUCTION: 28% avg. (Calculated using the last 3 months of tickets as an average Estimated savings over a year: $150,000
  12. 12. Integration with Internal Data Use of 25 Foot Buffers Using the 25 foot buffers, the screener is able to review recommendation s from the system first. In a high volume situation this is a good combination of mapping and ticket management “pre-screening.”
  13. 13. Integration Use of 25 Foot Buffers A closer detailed view of the 25 foot buffers
  14. 14. Integration (Results) Ticket Reduction with Internal Data   ADDITIONAL REDUCTION: 50% AVG.   BRINGS TOTAL DAILY SAVINGS TO: $1,500 AVG. Estimated total savings over a year: $390,000 +* * will be higher when excavation stabilizes.
  15. 15. Results   ADDITIONAL REDUCTION: 50% AVG.   BRINGS TOTAL DAILY SAVINGS TO: $1,500 AVG. Estimated total savings over a year: $390,000 +* * will be higher when excavation stabilizes.
  16. 16. Integration with Internal Data FIRST:   Review all tickets using IRTHNet   Check work type, depth and location
  17. 17. Integration Using All the Tools SECOND   Use GIS, CIS and Google to verify clears CIS Address OH/UG Service Check
  18. 18. Integration Using All the Tools SECOND   Use GIS, CIS and Google to verify clears G-Tech GIS Viewer
  19. 19. Integration Using All the Tools SECOND   Use GIS, CIS and Google to verify clears Google maps check: using front and overhead views
  20. 20. Integration Using All the Tools THIRD   Make phone calls if needed.   WHEN IN DOUBT...   SEND IT OUT!
  21. 21. How Does This Process Help Further Protect Facilities?   Helps GIS to keep database updated •  Full circle GIS review:the process provides a regular review of the maps (against CIS and G- tech GIS) to identify when areas need to be added.   Provides a higher degree of confidence: every ticket is either thoroughly reviewed or field located
  22. 22. How Does This Process Reduce Costs?   ROI within 3 months   System can be automated to generate new shape files when areas have been added   Improves the overall efficiency of the one call ticket process   Directly reduces locate costs, whether internal or contracted
  23. 23. Conclusions   Ticket management remains a critical piece to the efficiencies and improved protection   Ticket management works best when integrated with accurate mapping   Not every company has GIS   Those that do many can use this functionality to reduce costs   Those that don’t can consider building a GIS system and funding it with the savings
  24. 24. Questions Louis Panzer President louis@locatesupportsystems.com www.locatesupportsystems.com

×