Joseph E. Boxhorn, Ph.D.     Senior Planner     Southeastern Wisconsin Regional     Planning Commission#203624
Partners and Funding Agencies          Municipalities and         Counties of the Root          River Watershed
Background on the Watershed
Milwaukee                                        River                                     WatershedRoot River Watershed  ...
Surface Watersof the Root River   Watershed
Land Use 2000
Issues Identified in the Findings of the RegionalWater Quality Management Plan Update (2007)       and Other Recent Planni...
General Plan Goal—Refine and Detail RWQMPU Identify a set of focus  issues to address over a  relatively short time frame...
Focus issues• Two-part survey of stakeholders  • Part 1 – Identify the issues  • Part 2 – Prioritize the issues• Results –...
Focus issues• Results – Part 2  • 61 responses – Four themes emerged  • Four focus issues
Focus Issues1. Water Quality     Examples    Nutrients, sediment, chloride2. Recreational Use and Access     Examples ...
Plan Approach1. Summarize Recommendations of the Regional Water   Quality Management Plan Update (RWQMPU)2. Evaluate Imple...
Plan Approach6. Identify Targets to be Achieved by the End of the Plan   Period7. For Each Target, Identify Actions to be ...
Summarizing the Recommendations of theRegional Water Quality Management Plan Update
Recommendations of the Regional Water   Quality Management Plan Update     Land Use (5)     Point Source Abatement (9)  ...
Implementation Status of the RegionalWater Quality Management Plan Update Classified recommendations into three groups  1...
Recommendations that      Reflect Regulatory Requirements Examples     Regulation of point sources through the      Wisc...
Recommendations that      Reflect Regulatory Requirements Examples     Local pet litter ordinances     Most of the muni...
Recommendations in      Various Stages of Implementation Most of the recommendations Examples      Construct and mainta...
Recommendations in    Various Stages of Implementation Examples    Collection programs for expired and unused     medici...
Recommendations that         Are Not Yet Implemented Examples     Abandoning the Yorkville wastewater treatment      pla...
Next Steps Goal is to develop specific, targeted recommendations to make improvements in the four focus areas Characteri...
Characterization of the Watershed Assessing conditions at Horlick Dam   To provide information to inform decision making...
Characterization of the Watershed
 Examining Riparian Buffers   Identify sites that could    increase connectivity
Project Timeline Project runs through December 2013 2012   Characterize the watershed relative to focus issues   Ident...
Project Web Site http://www.sewrpc.org/SEWRPC/Environment/Root- River-Watershed-Restoration-Plan.htm   Presentations fro...
Clean Rivers, Clean Lake 8 -- Restoration Issues/Root River Restoration Plan -- Joseph Boxhorn
Clean Rivers, Clean Lake 8 -- Restoration Issues/Root River Restoration Plan -- Joseph Boxhorn
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Clean Rivers, Clean Lake 8 -- Restoration Issues/Root River Restoration Plan -- Joseph Boxhorn

301

Published on

Published in: Technology, Sports
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
301
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
9
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Locate the watershed in the Region.
  • Point out mainstem, major tributaries, no major lakes—but several small lakes and ponds.
  • Clean Rivers, Clean Lake 8 -- Restoration Issues/Root River Restoration Plan -- Joseph Boxhorn

    1. 1. Joseph E. Boxhorn, Ph.D. Senior Planner Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission#203624
    2. 2. Partners and Funding Agencies Municipalities and Counties of the Root River Watershed
    3. 3. Background on the Watershed
    4. 4. Milwaukee River WatershedRoot River Watershed Direct Drainage Area 197.6 square miles Menomonee Tributary River to Lake Watershed Michigan 4 counties Kinnickinnic River 19 municipalities Watershed Nearshore MMSD Area Planning Area Oak Creek Watershed Root River Watershed
    5. 5. Surface Watersof the Root River Watershed
    6. 6. Land Use 2000
    7. 7. Issues Identified in the Findings of the RegionalWater Quality Management Plan Update (2007) and Other Recent Planning Efforts Impairments related to low dissolved oxygen Impairments due to fish consumption advisories High fecal indicator bacteria concentrations Poor quality fishery upstream of Horlick Dam Fragmentation of terrestrial habitat Streambed and streambank erosion Access to the River Invasive species
    8. 8. General Plan Goal—Refine and Detail RWQMPU Identify a set of focus issues to address over a relatively short time frame  Tractable  Small number of focus issues  Five year time frame  Make improvements
    9. 9. Focus issues• Two-part survey of stakeholders • Part 1 – Identify the issues • Part 2 – Prioritize the issues• Results – Part 1 • 31 responses • 318 answers • Distilled to 43 issues
    10. 10. Focus issues• Results – Part 2 • 61 responses – Four themes emerged • Four focus issues
    11. 11. Focus Issues1. Water Quality  Examples  Nutrients, sediment, chloride2. Recreational Use and Access  Examples  Bacteria, access points, fishery quality3. Habitat Conditions  Examples  Buffers, connectivity, passage barriers, invasive species4. Flooding
    12. 12. Plan Approach1. Summarize Recommendations of the Regional Water Quality Management Plan Update (RWQMPU)2. Evaluate Implementation of the RWQMPU3. Inventory Recent and Ongoing Projects, Programs, and Initiatives and Integrate these Into Recommendations4. Review and Refine Initially Identified Focus Issues5. Characterize the Watershed Concentrating on Features Related to the Focus Issues
    13. 13. Plan Approach6. Identify Targets to be Achieved by the End of the Plan Period7. For Each Target, Identify Actions to be Taken8. Identify Foundation Actions9. Present Actions in Addition to those Recommended in the RWQMPU10. Develop an Implementation Strategy
    14. 14. Summarizing the Recommendations of theRegional Water Quality Management Plan Update
    15. 15. Recommendations of the Regional Water Quality Management Plan Update  Land Use (5)  Point Source Abatement (9)  Rural Nonpoint Source Controls (11)  Urban Nonpoint Source Controls (8)  Instream Water Quality Measures (9)  Inland Lake Water Quality (3)  Auxiliary Water Quality Measures (12)  Groundwater Management (4)  Water Use Objectives (2)
    16. 16. Implementation Status of the RegionalWater Quality Management Plan Update Classified recommendations into three groups 1. Recommendations that reflect existing regulatory requirements 2. Recommendations that are in various stages of implementation 3. Recommendations that are not yet implemented
    17. 17. Recommendations that Reflect Regulatory Requirements Examples  Regulation of point sources through the Wisconsin Pollutant Discharge Elimination System  Bans and restrictions on possession, transport, transfer, and introduction of invasive species  Phosphorus fertilizer ban partially implements fertilizer management program recommendation
    18. 18. Recommendations that Reflect Regulatory Requirements Examples  Local pet litter ordinances  Most of the municipalities in the watershed have them
    19. 19. Recommendations in Various Stages of Implementation Most of the recommendations Examples  Construct and maintain local sanitary sewer systems  Implement practices to reduce soil loss from cropland below the tolerable soil loss rate  Establish riparian buffers  Restore and enhance stream channels
    20. 20. Recommendations in Various Stages of Implementation Examples  Collection programs for expired and unused medicines 1. Collection events 2. Drop-off centers and boxes 3. Mail back programs  Most of the watershed is covered by some program
    21. 21. Recommendations that Are Not Yet Implemented Examples  Abandoning the Yorkville wastewater treatment plant at the end of its useful life  Increasing the levels of cost-share funding available for funding barnyard runoff BMPs  Upgrading water use objectives for Hoods Creek, Tess Corners Creek, Whitnall Park Creek
    22. 22. Next Steps Goal is to develop specific, targeted recommendations to make improvements in the four focus areas Characterize the watershed  Finer scale  Examine factors most closely related to the focus issues  Update and expand those analyses that are most closely related to the focus issues
    23. 23. Characterization of the Watershed Assessing conditions at Horlick Dam  To provide information to inform decision making Factors examined  Sediment behind the dam  Elevations  Surrounding area
    24. 24. Characterization of the Watershed
    25. 25.  Examining Riparian Buffers  Identify sites that could increase connectivity
    26. 26. Project Timeline Project runs through December 2013 2012  Characterize the watershed relative to focus issues  Identify targets to be achieved  Identify actions to be taken 2013  Identify actions to be taken  Identify Foundation actions  Develop implementation strategy
    27. 27. Project Web Site http://www.sewrpc.org/SEWRPC/Environment/Root- River-Watershed-Restoration-Plan.htm  Presentations from RRRPG meetings  Draft chapters as they are completed  Comment screen
    1. ¿Le ha llamado la atención una diapositiva en particular?

      Recortar diapositivas es una manera útil de recopilar información importante para consultarla más tarde.

    ×