SSE Fellows Webinar Oct 09

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Notes on slide 1

    Soon to be 400.

    Soon to be 400.

    Soon to be 400.

    - research: the criteria, the grants / investments previously given, the size of organisations they were given to (to help gauge what you should go for) - relationships: use the "could you spare me 15 minutes of your time?" rule to get time with individuals at a funding organisation: the higher-up the better, but all staff can give you a feel for the culture / approach; nurture the relationships, and keep them up-to-date with progress; seek ways in; never submit a blind application without talking to someone - realism: about what you will get; about what you can deliver (the old "underpromise, overdeliver" rule); about the challenges you face; about the mission-money decisions (particularly in current climate) - transparency: (if only it began with 'R') be honest and open in your dealings with people; about your promises; and about the success (or lack of) of your projects; transparent reporting and accountability builds trust, and trust builds credibility...and credibility leads to more funding... I'd add a couple of things to that (Tokunbo had more as well): one is don't take it personally, or think it's (necessarily) about the quality of the funding bid / project. It can be about the level of competition, very subjective trustee opinions or bad timing as much as about what you have written / your idea. The other thing is to be "always on" and don't silo fundraising into one person: everyone in the organisation can spot opportunities, build relationships and develop networks.

    - research: the criteria, the grants / investments previously given, the size of organisations they were given to (to help gauge what you should go for) - relationships: use the "could you spare me 15 minutes of your time?" rule to get time with individuals at a funding organisation: the higher-up the better, but all staff can give you a feel for the culture / approach; nurture the relationships, and keep them up-to-date with progress; seek ways in; never submit a blind application without talking to someone - realism: about what you will get; about what you can deliver (the old "underpromise, overdeliver" rule); about the challenges you face; about the mission-money decisions (particularly in current climate) - transparency: (if only it began with 'R') be honest and open in your dealings with people; about your promises; and about the success (or lack of) of your projects; transparent reporting and accountability builds trust, and trust builds credibility...and credibility leads to more funding... I'd add a couple of things to that (Tokunbo had more as well): one is don't take it personally, or think it's (necessarily) about the quality of the funding bid / project. It can be about the level of competition, very subjective trustee opinions or bad timing as much as about what you have written / your idea. The other thing is to be "always on" and don't silo fundraising into one person: everyone in the organisation can spot opportunities, build relationships and develop networks.

    Soon to be 400.

    Soon to be 400.

    Soon to be 400.

    PURPOSE what are you hoping to achieve? who proposed the idea? (vested interest) does it fit with mission, vision, values, strategy etc? will it add value / bring benefits? FORM FOLLOW FUNCTION Driven by what you’re trying to do / activity (see next slide) Who to lead? REALISTIC? Often partnerships are too ambitious / too much of a rush to deliver Are verbal commitments above and beyond what is possible? INVOLVE RIGHT PEOPLE Right skills / qualities Trust / relationships Similar culture / size / experience? (culture clash is most common barrier) WRITING Particularly re. Roles, responsibilities, reporting, conflict resolution etc And money! How formal (letter, MOU, SLA etc…) The spirit of partnership is not a substitute for accountability Don’t overcomplicate

    Administration Advocacy / development Delivery

    Administration Advocacy / development Delivery

    Administration Advocacy / development Delivery

    Administration Advocacy / development Delivery

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    SSE Fellows Webinar Oct 09 - Presentation Transcript

    1. FUNDING, DECISIONS, PARTNERS
    2. FUNDING
    3. Funding: Sustainability
    4.  
    5. Fundraising: recession
      • Time lag: takes time to filter through to frontline
      • Public sector: 20% cuts across the board?
      • Trusts & foundations: mixed messages
      • Corporates : varied picture
      • Earned income: ever more valuable
      • Pro-bono + in-kind: in plentiful supply
    6. Fundraising: do the same
      • research: criteria, the grants / investments previously given, the size of organisations they were given to
      • relationships: get time with individuals at a funding organisation; seek ways in; never submit a blind application without talking to someone
      • realism: about what you will get; about what you can deliver (the old "underpromise, overdeliver" rule);
      • transparency: be honest and open in your dealings with people; about promises; and about success (or lack of);
      • don't take it personally: not always about your bid
      • be "always on”: and don't put it all on one person
    7. Fundraising: do more
      • value: communicating the added value / measuring your social impact becomes more + more important; what will make you stand out / make you credible?
      • flexible + adaptable: sustainability may depend on ability to adapt: be open + creative in your thinking
      • partner: to access funding you couldn’t alone; to mitigate the risk; to build working relationships
      • get stuff for free / cheaper: negotiate current deals; utilise unused spaces; use pro-bono support etc etc.
    8. DECISIONS
    9. Why does mission matter?
      • Distinguishes social entrepreneurs in absence of purely financial motive
      • Crucial first step for planning / evaluating
      • Communication to people (internal / external)
      • Aid decision-making / avoid drift
    10. Why does mission matter?
      • Distinguishes social entrepreneurs in absence of purely financial motive
      • Crucial first step for planning / evaluating
      • Communication to people (internal / external)
      • Aid decision-making / avoid drift
    11. Mission-Money Matrix majority activity stay out! proceed with caution prime target on mission off mission more money less money
    12. Recession Matrix? minority activity? stay out (where possible) proceed with (less) caution dreamland on mission off mission more money less money
    13. PARTNERS
    14. Partnership: key questions
      • What is the purpose?
      • What form should it take?
      • Are the shared aims realistic?
      • Who should be involved?
      • How formal should it be?
      • (Consortia? Sub-contracts?)
    15. Partnership continuum cooperation coordination merger collaboration Types of activity more less complexity and intensity Sharing info for mutual benefit Referrals Informal support Separate goals, resources, structures
    16. Partnership continuum cooperation coordination merger collaboration Types of activity more less complexity and intensity Sharing info for mutual benefit Referrals Informal support Separate goals, resources, structures Event / short-term project Some planning/ division of roles Some shared resources, risks & reward Individual identities maintained
    17. Partnership continuum cooperation coordination merger collaboration Types of activity more less complexity and intensity Sharing info for mutual benefit Referrals Informal support Separate goals, resources, structures Event / short-term project Some planning/ division of roles Some shared resources, risks & reward Individual identities maintained New structure with common goals All partners contribute resources + gain rewards Longer commitment + durable partnerships
    18. Partnership continuum cooperation coordination merger collaboration Types of activity more less complexity and intensity Sharing info for mutual benefit Referrals Informal support Separate goals, resources, structures Event / short-term project Some planning/ division of roles Some shared resources, risks & reward Individual identities maintained New structure with common goals All partners contribute resources + gain rewards Longer commitment + durable partnerships Most complex Complete integration Most difficult to achieve Least common Multiple variables
    19. www.sse.org.uk http://del.icio.us/SSE [email_address] +44 (0)20 8981 0300

    + SSESSE, 1 month ago

    custom

    60 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    On funding + fundraising, decision-making and partn more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 60
      • 60 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories