“More with Less”
The Sustainable Sugarcane Initiative (SSI)
          in India and Beyond:
     Experience & Future Directions


             Dr. Biksham Gujja
                bg@agsri.com
               www.agsri.com




                                             www.agsri.com
     Cornell University, 8th February 2013
„Modern‟ agriculture is based on
           one thing -- More ..
Farmers need to give more (inputs, water,
   seeds, etc.) to get more (production).
After 5 decades or so of this strategy:
Giving more has become so much more that
   farmers, Governments and ecosystems
   are not able to give any more .. There is
   now a crisis in agriculture -- a ‘more crisis’.
It is NOT about feeding 9 billion people,




                                                     www.agsri.com
   but about feeding the same old research,
   same thinking, and same results
Answer to „More crisis‟ is more
    technology, control, more money..
•   Bio technolokgy
•   GMs
•   High-tech irrigation
•   Industrial agriculture

• Future: focus on even more complicated
  even more expensive solutions?




                                             www.agsri.com
• Conversely: Is More with Less possible??
www.agsri.com
„More with less‟ is major challenge
• First, it is a conceptual challenge, negating
  assumptions on which our agriculture
  research and funding are based on so far
• It is a management challenge: What will
  (we) experts do if solutions are simple?
• It is resource allocation challenge: now
  large investments in fertilisers, pesticides,
  companies, dams.




                                                  www.agsri.com
SSI/ SRI … Back to basics..
• It is about raising the productivity of land,
  labour, water, recognizing that there are
  limits, costs and trade-offs.
• It is not just about how much you produce:
  How do you produce? With what? For
  what? For how long?
  – It is about choices for farmers, consumers
  – It is about reducing our footprint on the
    environment – use less water, create less




                                                  www.agsri.com
    pollution, fewer negative impacts.
  – It is about quality of life..
Sugarcane: India‟s position..
                                 India                    Global
•   Area (m ha):              4.94 (21 %)                 23.82
•   Cane production (m t): 339.17 (20 %)                  1685.44
•   Cane productivity (t/ha): 68.60 (97 %)                70.77
•   Sugar production (m t): 24.39 (18 %)                  135.00**
•   Consumption (m t):        26.73* (20.5%)              130.00**

    * Gur & Khandsari included   ** Beet sugar excluded


Second largest producer in world
Largest consumer!! ... and increasing
Process of liberalisation is going on …




                                                                     www.agsri.com
Comparison of Area, Production
                               and Productivity
                   10,000                                                                                               90
                               9,077
                    9,000                                                                                               80
                                                                                              77.67
                    8,000      79.04            70.10
                                                                                                                        70
                    7,000                                            65.75
Area (000' Ha)


                                                                                                                59.98   60




                                                                                                                             Yield (t/ha)
                    6,000
                                                                                                                        50
                    5,000                4,170
                                                                                                                        40
                    4,000
                                                                                                                        30
                    3,000
                                                               1,695                                                    20
                    2,000
                    1,000                                                               405               267           10
                         0                                                                                              0
                               Brazil    India                 China                 Australia        South Africa

                                                  Area Harvested (000' Ha)           Yield (t/ha)



                   800                                                                                                  90
                             717
                   700                                                                       77.67                      80
                             79.04         70.10
                   600                                                                                                  70
 Production (MT)




                                                                  65.75
                                                                                                               59.98    60




                                                                                                                             Yield (t/ha)
                   500
                                                                                                                        50
                   400
                                        292                                                                             40
                   300
                                                                                                                        30
                   200




                                                                                                                                            www.agsri.com
                                                               111                                                      20
                   100                                                                  31                              10
                                                                                                          16
                     0                                                                                                  0
                             Brazil     India                 China                 Australia         South Africa

                                                   Production (MT)           Yield (t/ha)
World's major sugar consumers




                                           www.agsri.com
Source::Coop Sugar. Vol 42(4), Dec-2010
Distribution of Sugar Mills in India

                                                                     N



                                 No. of
    Sl. No.        State
                               Sugar Mills
       1      Maharashtra             201
       2      Uttar Pradesh           156
       3      Karnataka                 63
       4      Tamil Nadu                44
       5      Andhra Pradesh            43
       6      Bihar                     27
       7      Punjab                    24
       8      Gujarat                   23
       9      Madhya Pradesh            18
      10      Haryana                   16
      11      Uttarakhand               10
      12      Orissa                     8




                                                                         www.agsri.com
Source: Department of Food & Public Distribution
www. dfpd.nic.in/fcamin/sites/.../Profile%20of%20sugar%20mills.xls
Trends in Area and Productivity of
                      Sugarcane in India




                                                    www.agsri.com
Source: Sugarcane Breeding Institute, India
Trends: Sugar Recovery Rate in India




                                                 www.agsri.com
Source: Sugarcane Breeding Institute, India
Trends: India's Export and Import of Sugar




                                                       www.agsri.com
Source: Sugarcane Breeding Institute, India
Per capita Consumption of
             Sugar and Gur & Khandsari in India




                                                  www.agsri.com
Source: Sugarcane Breeding Institute, India
Distribution of Sugar Mills
                              (Co-operative & Pvt.)
                                                                                                    N



   Maharashtra




                                                            Total Sugarcane Area: 0.96 Million Ha




                                                                                                        www.agsri.com
                                                            Total Sugar Factories Operated: 170
                                                            Sugarcane Growing Districts: 26

Source: Aug 2012, Commissionerate of Sugar, Maharashtra State, Pune
Sugarcane Production: Issues
• Water, water & water     • High input costs
• Climatic change          • Absence of
• Water-logging &            interculture
  drought                  • Diseases and pests
• Low cane yields          • Neglected ratoons
• Low rates of sugar       • Soil degradation
  recovery from cane       • Lack of micronutrients
• Old varieties in use       and application of
                             inputs




                                                       www.agsri.com
Most of the sugarcane cultivation area is irrigated!
Crop water use


             3,000- 5,000
 1kg    =
             litres water


             3,000 – 5,000
 1kg    =    litres water


             1,500 - 3,000
 1kg    =




                                       www.agsri.com
             litres water

So, we eat, wear and drink .. water…
Water Availability: 1975
Water Availability: 2025




                                                                                                         www.agsri.com
 Extreme Scarcity Scarcity      Stress      Adequate    Abundant      Surplus      Ocean/      No Data
      <500       500-1,000   1,000-1,700   1,700-4,000 4,000-10,000   >10,000   Inland Water
                                                m3/person/year
SSI: What is it?
• Less seed, fertiliser and water
• Farm-based method using
  targeted inputs
• Encouragement of inter-crops
• Improves productivity of
  land, water and labor -- all at
  the same time
• Climate-, ecosystem- and
  socially-friendly
• Opens up new business




                                    www.agsri.com
  opportunities
The SSI Process: Version 1.0




Removing leaves from healthy canes   Cutting buds from canes




                                                               www.agsri.com
     Cutting buds from canes              Bud treatment
The SSI Process: Version 1.0




Filling buds in gunny bag for pre-sprouting   Covering of buds filled in gunny bags for
                                                    pre-sprouting by cane trash




                                                                                          www.agsri.com
Covering of buds filled in gunny bags for            Pre-sprouted buds (3 days)
     pre-sprouting by plastic sheet
The SSI Process: Version 1.0




  Partly filling of coco-pith in the tray    Placing the pre-sprouted buds in the
                                            tray and covering the buds completely
                                                        with coco-pith




                                                                                    www.agsri.com
Stacking: placing trays one above the other        Stacking (for 5-8 days)
The SSI Process: Version 1.0




Stacking opened after 5 days)   Watering (20-25 days)




                                                        www.agsri.com
    Well-maintained nursery         Grading
The SSI Process: Version 1.0
  Transplanting of 25-35 day-old Seedlings




Seedlings ready for transplanting   Safe transportation to field




                                                                   www.agsri.com
Sugarcane: Seed cane planting

 •   Requires12-15% of annual production
 •   Bulky, cumbersome and costly
 •   Labour-intensive, ineffective
 •   Constrains promotion of new varieties
 •   Seed treatment is impossible
 •   Not possible to fix plant population
 Result of cane planting:
 • Poor tillering
 • Poor yields
 • More input costs
 • Pest attacks




                                                                www.agsri.com
AgSri is a sugarcane seed company - opens whole new business!
SSI: Experience so far..1
• Farmers buy in
• One-month-old seedlings are
  best
• Labour is saved
• Water is saved in 1st month
• Uniform tillering
• Yield increase
• Better sugar formation




                                       www.agsri.com
 Most difficult part of the work
 has been done…
SSI: Experience so far..2
• Seedling cost is higher than seed
  cane, but planting costs less
• Training required
• Demand exists; willingness to pay
  is developing
• Mills like it and are willing to
  promote
• Needs considerable process
  improvement

 Scaling up, reaching out improving quality…




                                               www.agsri.com
Case Study 1
•   Name of farmer: Bastapure Sagar Narsingh
•   Place: Sakhra, Latur, Maharashtra
•   Experience in sugarcane farming: 20 years
•   Experience on SSI: 1 year
•   Total agricultural land: 13 acres
•   SSI area: 4 acres
•   Variety: Co- 86032
•   No. of seedlings planted: 20,000
•   Spacing: 5 x 2 ft
•   Date of transplantation: 06-Nov-2011
•   Avg. no. of millable canes: 13
•   Avg. length & girth of canes: 9 feet / 2.6 cm
•   Date of crop harvested: 17-Nov-2012
•   Avg. yield: 57 t / acre
•   Rate for cane sold: Rs. 2500 per ton
•   Total income: Rs. 142,500




                                                    www.agsri.com
•   Cost of cultivation: Rs. 47,000
•   Net income: Rs. 95,500
•   Cane sold: To factory
Case Study 2
•   Name of farmer: Rajkumar Jadhav
•   Place: Dhanori, Nilangna, Maharashtra
•   Experience in sugarcane farming: 5 years
•   Experience on SSI: 1 year
•   Total agricultural land: 15 acres
•   SSI area: 6 acres
•   Variety: Co- 671
•   No. of seedlings planted: 33,000
•   Spacing: 6 x 1.5 ft
•   Date of transplantation: 14-Jan-2012
•   Avg. no. of millable canes: 8
•   Avg. length & girth of canes: 8 feet / 2.7 cm
•   Date of crop harvested: 25-Dec-2012
•   Avg. yield: 50 t / acre
•   Rate for cane sold: Rs. 2500 per ton
•   Total income: Rs. 125,000




                                                    www.agsri.com
•   Cost of cultivation: Rs. 60,000
•   Net income: Rs. 65,000
•   Cane sold: To factory
Cost-Benefit Analysis of 2 Case Studies
             SSI vs. Conventional (per acre)
                                         SSI vs. Conventional
                        Bastapure Sagar Narsingh          Rajkumar Jadhav
     Particulars
                            SSI      Conventional        SSI      Conventional
Land Cost                Own land     Own land       Own land       Own land
Seed Cost                 10,000         7,000         11000          7,500
Land Preparation Cost      2,000         2,000          3,000         6,500
Transplantation             500          2,000          1,000         1,500
Fertilizer Cost           18,000        18,000         25,000         25,000
Weeding/Earthing up        8,000        15,000          9,000         15,000
Propping-up                 NA            NA            1,000         1,000
Irrigation                 8,500        10,000         10,000         15,000
Harvesting              By factory    By factory     By factory     By factory
TOTAL COST                47,000        54,000         60,000         71,500
Output (t/acre)              57            40             50            40
Total Income             1,42,500      1,00,000       1,25,000       1,00,000




                                                                                 www.agsri.com
NET INCOME                95,500        46,000         65,000         28,500


Avg. yield of Latur district: 28 t/acre
SSI experiences so far..
•   Andhra Pradesh
    – 25 acres (10 ha) in Zaheerabad, A.P., 2009-10
    – 40 acres (16 ha) in Zaheerabad, A.P., 2010-11
    – 100 acres (40 ha) in Zaheerabad, A.P., 2011-12
•   Uttar Pradesh
    – 25 acres (10 ha) in Triveni Sugar factory, 2009-10
    – 381 acres (154 ha) in 7 districts of Triveni Sugar units, 2010-11
    – 757 acres (305 ha) in 7 districts of Triveni Sugar units, 2011-12
•   Odisha
    –   5 acres (2 ha) in Nayagarh, Odisha, 2009-10
    –   27 acres (11 ha) in Nayagarh, Odisha, 2009-10
    –   60 acres (24 ha) in Nayagarh, Odisha, 2010-11
    –   135 acres (55 ha) in Nayagarh, Bargarh, Ganjam, Odisha, 2011-12
    –   200 acres (81 ha) in Nayagarh, Bargarh, Ganjam, Odisha, 2012-13
•   Punjab
    – 9 acres (3.6 ha) in Gurdaspur, Punjab, 2010-11
•   Maharashtra




                                                                          www.agsri.com
    – 124 acres (50 ha) in Latur, Maharashtra, 2011-12
    – 422 acres (170 ha) in Sholapur, Maharashtra, 2012-13
    – 102 acres (41 ha) in Beed, Maharashtra, 2012-13
Increase in Cane Yield
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. 2009 – Zaheerabad, AP (WWF-ICRISAT Project)
          25 SSI plots  15 Traditional plots
          138 t/ha      115 t/ha (increase of 20%)

                   (Published in Sugtech Journal, Aug, 2012)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. 2010 – Demo plots -17 AP, TN, Orissa, UP by AgSri
             SSI plots             Traditional plots
             112.4 t/ha             86.6 t/ha (increase of 29.7%)

(Published as booklet by AgSri:-




                                                                                                www.agsri.com
http://www.agsri.com/images/documents/ssi/AgSri_SSI%20
casestudy%20book_low%20res15-03-12.pdf)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Benefits
• Seed cane saving – reduce requirements
  Conventional 7-10 t/ha; SSI only 1.25 t/ha

• Water saving in nursery – 90 % in the first month

• Water saving in main field – Use of drip system
  & wide spacing saves up to 30-60%

• Scope for Intercropping… improve soil fertility

Saving in conventional fertilisers and pesticides




                                                      www.agsri.com
  due to scope for more targeted doses, with high
  intake methods
Contd..
• Faster varietal spread –
 Conventional 1:6 to 1:8; SSI 1: 100

• Water essentially confined to the root zone
 - Salinity build-up reduced

• Healthy growth from the beginning -
 Pest and disease incidence lower




                                                www.agsri.com
• Intercropping is possible –
 Additional/interim income for the farmer
SSI: Potential and Market Size

• $1-1.5 billion in India alone
• SSI will re-define sugarcane cultivation
• Once farms switch to SSI, it is difficult to
  go back because of economic advantage
• Other benefits – social, ecological and
  economic – need to be studied and
  communicated
• Integration and development of




                                                 www.agsri.com
  appropriate equipment still not complete
Business opportunity in Maharastra…
                                                                                                              N



   Maharashtra




                                                                      Total Sugarcane Area: 0.96 Million Ha
                                                                      Total Sugar Factories Operated: 170
                                                                      Sugarcane Growing Districts: 26




                                                                                                                  www.agsri.com
                                               10% of the area.. 100,000 ha/ y..
Source: Aug 2012, Commissionerate of Sugar, Maharashtra State, Pune
SSI: Challenges for V.2
• Extending bud life:
• Establishing optimal bud
  size
• Improve germination
• Storage protocols
• Standardization of growth
  medium and of micro-
  nutrients




                                   www.agsri.com
• Nursery protocol for
  optimal results
SSI: Future Direction

• Reaching at least 100,000 farmers
• Improving the process, V2.0
• Quantification of water
  saving, yields, labour, and other benefits
  to farmers, ecosystems and society
• Integration of appropriate machines in
  planting & weeding




                                               www.agsri.com
The business world is very curious..

• THE PERFECT HARVEST
 Outlook Business | Sept. 1, 2012




• CANE DONE RIGHT
 Entrepreneur | Nov. 2012 | Vol. 4 | Issue
 3




                                             www.agsri.com
     http://www.agsri.com/news_events.html
Thank You




www.agsri.com

1308- The Sustainable Sugarcane Initiative (SSI) in India and Beyond

  • 1.
    “More with Less” TheSustainable Sugarcane Initiative (SSI) in India and Beyond: Experience & Future Directions Dr. Biksham Gujja bg@agsri.com www.agsri.com www.agsri.com Cornell University, 8th February 2013
  • 2.
    „Modern‟ agriculture isbased on one thing -- More .. Farmers need to give more (inputs, water, seeds, etc.) to get more (production). After 5 decades or so of this strategy: Giving more has become so much more that farmers, Governments and ecosystems are not able to give any more .. There is now a crisis in agriculture -- a ‘more crisis’. It is NOT about feeding 9 billion people, www.agsri.com but about feeding the same old research, same thinking, and same results
  • 3.
    Answer to „Morecrisis‟ is more technology, control, more money.. • Bio technolokgy • GMs • High-tech irrigation • Industrial agriculture • Future: focus on even more complicated even more expensive solutions? www.agsri.com • Conversely: Is More with Less possible??
  • 4.
  • 5.
    „More with less‟is major challenge • First, it is a conceptual challenge, negating assumptions on which our agriculture research and funding are based on so far • It is a management challenge: What will (we) experts do if solutions are simple? • It is resource allocation challenge: now large investments in fertilisers, pesticides, companies, dams. www.agsri.com
  • 6.
    SSI/ SRI …Back to basics.. • It is about raising the productivity of land, labour, water, recognizing that there are limits, costs and trade-offs. • It is not just about how much you produce: How do you produce? With what? For what? For how long? – It is about choices for farmers, consumers – It is about reducing our footprint on the environment – use less water, create less www.agsri.com pollution, fewer negative impacts. – It is about quality of life..
  • 7.
    Sugarcane: India‟s position.. India Global • Area (m ha): 4.94 (21 %) 23.82 • Cane production (m t): 339.17 (20 %) 1685.44 • Cane productivity (t/ha): 68.60 (97 %) 70.77 • Sugar production (m t): 24.39 (18 %) 135.00** • Consumption (m t): 26.73* (20.5%) 130.00** * Gur & Khandsari included ** Beet sugar excluded Second largest producer in world Largest consumer!! ... and increasing Process of liberalisation is going on … www.agsri.com
  • 8.
    Comparison of Area,Production and Productivity 10,000 90 9,077 9,000 80 77.67 8,000 79.04 70.10 70 7,000 65.75 Area (000' Ha) 59.98 60 Yield (t/ha) 6,000 50 5,000 4,170 40 4,000 30 3,000 1,695 20 2,000 1,000 405 267 10 0 0 Brazil India China Australia South Africa Area Harvested (000' Ha) Yield (t/ha) 800 90 717 700 77.67 80 79.04 70.10 600 70 Production (MT) 65.75 59.98 60 Yield (t/ha) 500 50 400 292 40 300 30 200 www.agsri.com 111 20 100 31 10 16 0 0 Brazil India China Australia South Africa Production (MT) Yield (t/ha)
  • 9.
    World's major sugarconsumers www.agsri.com Source::Coop Sugar. Vol 42(4), Dec-2010
  • 10.
    Distribution of SugarMills in India N No. of Sl. No. State Sugar Mills 1 Maharashtra 201 2 Uttar Pradesh 156 3 Karnataka 63 4 Tamil Nadu 44 5 Andhra Pradesh 43 6 Bihar 27 7 Punjab 24 8 Gujarat 23 9 Madhya Pradesh 18 10 Haryana 16 11 Uttarakhand 10 12 Orissa 8 www.agsri.com Source: Department of Food & Public Distribution www. dfpd.nic.in/fcamin/sites/.../Profile%20of%20sugar%20mills.xls
  • 11.
    Trends in Areaand Productivity of Sugarcane in India www.agsri.com Source: Sugarcane Breeding Institute, India
  • 12.
    Trends: Sugar RecoveryRate in India www.agsri.com Source: Sugarcane Breeding Institute, India
  • 13.
    Trends: India's Exportand Import of Sugar www.agsri.com Source: Sugarcane Breeding Institute, India
  • 14.
    Per capita Consumptionof Sugar and Gur & Khandsari in India www.agsri.com Source: Sugarcane Breeding Institute, India
  • 15.
    Distribution of SugarMills (Co-operative & Pvt.) N Maharashtra Total Sugarcane Area: 0.96 Million Ha www.agsri.com Total Sugar Factories Operated: 170 Sugarcane Growing Districts: 26 Source: Aug 2012, Commissionerate of Sugar, Maharashtra State, Pune
  • 16.
    Sugarcane Production: Issues •Water, water & water • High input costs • Climatic change • Absence of • Water-logging & interculture drought • Diseases and pests • Low cane yields • Neglected ratoons • Low rates of sugar • Soil degradation recovery from cane • Lack of micronutrients • Old varieties in use and application of inputs www.agsri.com Most of the sugarcane cultivation area is irrigated!
  • 17.
    Crop water use 3,000- 5,000 1kg = litres water 3,000 – 5,000 1kg = litres water 1,500 - 3,000 1kg = www.agsri.com litres water So, we eat, wear and drink .. water…
  • 18.
    Water Availability: 1975 WaterAvailability: 2025 www.agsri.com Extreme Scarcity Scarcity Stress Adequate Abundant Surplus Ocean/ No Data <500 500-1,000 1,000-1,700 1,700-4,000 4,000-10,000 >10,000 Inland Water m3/person/year
  • 19.
    SSI: What isit? • Less seed, fertiliser and water • Farm-based method using targeted inputs • Encouragement of inter-crops • Improves productivity of land, water and labor -- all at the same time • Climate-, ecosystem- and socially-friendly • Opens up new business www.agsri.com opportunities
  • 20.
    The SSI Process:Version 1.0 Removing leaves from healthy canes Cutting buds from canes www.agsri.com Cutting buds from canes Bud treatment
  • 21.
    The SSI Process:Version 1.0 Filling buds in gunny bag for pre-sprouting Covering of buds filled in gunny bags for pre-sprouting by cane trash www.agsri.com Covering of buds filled in gunny bags for Pre-sprouted buds (3 days) pre-sprouting by plastic sheet
  • 22.
    The SSI Process:Version 1.0 Partly filling of coco-pith in the tray Placing the pre-sprouted buds in the tray and covering the buds completely with coco-pith www.agsri.com Stacking: placing trays one above the other Stacking (for 5-8 days)
  • 23.
    The SSI Process:Version 1.0 Stacking opened after 5 days) Watering (20-25 days) www.agsri.com Well-maintained nursery Grading
  • 24.
    The SSI Process:Version 1.0 Transplanting of 25-35 day-old Seedlings Seedlings ready for transplanting Safe transportation to field www.agsri.com
  • 25.
    Sugarcane: Seed caneplanting • Requires12-15% of annual production • Bulky, cumbersome and costly • Labour-intensive, ineffective • Constrains promotion of new varieties • Seed treatment is impossible • Not possible to fix plant population Result of cane planting: • Poor tillering • Poor yields • More input costs • Pest attacks www.agsri.com AgSri is a sugarcane seed company - opens whole new business!
  • 26.
    SSI: Experience sofar..1 • Farmers buy in • One-month-old seedlings are best • Labour is saved • Water is saved in 1st month • Uniform tillering • Yield increase • Better sugar formation www.agsri.com Most difficult part of the work has been done…
  • 27.
    SSI: Experience sofar..2 • Seedling cost is higher than seed cane, but planting costs less • Training required • Demand exists; willingness to pay is developing • Mills like it and are willing to promote • Needs considerable process improvement Scaling up, reaching out improving quality… www.agsri.com
  • 28.
    Case Study 1 • Name of farmer: Bastapure Sagar Narsingh • Place: Sakhra, Latur, Maharashtra • Experience in sugarcane farming: 20 years • Experience on SSI: 1 year • Total agricultural land: 13 acres • SSI area: 4 acres • Variety: Co- 86032 • No. of seedlings planted: 20,000 • Spacing: 5 x 2 ft • Date of transplantation: 06-Nov-2011 • Avg. no. of millable canes: 13 • Avg. length & girth of canes: 9 feet / 2.6 cm • Date of crop harvested: 17-Nov-2012 • Avg. yield: 57 t / acre • Rate for cane sold: Rs. 2500 per ton • Total income: Rs. 142,500 www.agsri.com • Cost of cultivation: Rs. 47,000 • Net income: Rs. 95,500 • Cane sold: To factory
  • 29.
    Case Study 2 • Name of farmer: Rajkumar Jadhav • Place: Dhanori, Nilangna, Maharashtra • Experience in sugarcane farming: 5 years • Experience on SSI: 1 year • Total agricultural land: 15 acres • SSI area: 6 acres • Variety: Co- 671 • No. of seedlings planted: 33,000 • Spacing: 6 x 1.5 ft • Date of transplantation: 14-Jan-2012 • Avg. no. of millable canes: 8 • Avg. length & girth of canes: 8 feet / 2.7 cm • Date of crop harvested: 25-Dec-2012 • Avg. yield: 50 t / acre • Rate for cane sold: Rs. 2500 per ton • Total income: Rs. 125,000 www.agsri.com • Cost of cultivation: Rs. 60,000 • Net income: Rs. 65,000 • Cane sold: To factory
  • 30.
    Cost-Benefit Analysis of2 Case Studies SSI vs. Conventional (per acre) SSI vs. Conventional Bastapure Sagar Narsingh Rajkumar Jadhav Particulars SSI Conventional SSI Conventional Land Cost Own land Own land Own land Own land Seed Cost 10,000 7,000 11000 7,500 Land Preparation Cost 2,000 2,000 3,000 6,500 Transplantation 500 2,000 1,000 1,500 Fertilizer Cost 18,000 18,000 25,000 25,000 Weeding/Earthing up 8,000 15,000 9,000 15,000 Propping-up NA NA 1,000 1,000 Irrigation 8,500 10,000 10,000 15,000 Harvesting By factory By factory By factory By factory TOTAL COST 47,000 54,000 60,000 71,500 Output (t/acre) 57 40 50 40 Total Income 1,42,500 1,00,000 1,25,000 1,00,000 www.agsri.com NET INCOME 95,500 46,000 65,000 28,500 Avg. yield of Latur district: 28 t/acre
  • 31.
    SSI experiences sofar.. • Andhra Pradesh – 25 acres (10 ha) in Zaheerabad, A.P., 2009-10 – 40 acres (16 ha) in Zaheerabad, A.P., 2010-11 – 100 acres (40 ha) in Zaheerabad, A.P., 2011-12 • Uttar Pradesh – 25 acres (10 ha) in Triveni Sugar factory, 2009-10 – 381 acres (154 ha) in 7 districts of Triveni Sugar units, 2010-11 – 757 acres (305 ha) in 7 districts of Triveni Sugar units, 2011-12 • Odisha – 5 acres (2 ha) in Nayagarh, Odisha, 2009-10 – 27 acres (11 ha) in Nayagarh, Odisha, 2009-10 – 60 acres (24 ha) in Nayagarh, Odisha, 2010-11 – 135 acres (55 ha) in Nayagarh, Bargarh, Ganjam, Odisha, 2011-12 – 200 acres (81 ha) in Nayagarh, Bargarh, Ganjam, Odisha, 2012-13 • Punjab – 9 acres (3.6 ha) in Gurdaspur, Punjab, 2010-11 • Maharashtra www.agsri.com – 124 acres (50 ha) in Latur, Maharashtra, 2011-12 – 422 acres (170 ha) in Sholapur, Maharashtra, 2012-13 – 102 acres (41 ha) in Beed, Maharashtra, 2012-13
  • 32.
    Increase in CaneYield --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. 2009 – Zaheerabad, AP (WWF-ICRISAT Project) 25 SSI plots 15 Traditional plots 138 t/ha 115 t/ha (increase of 20%) (Published in Sugtech Journal, Aug, 2012) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. 2010 – Demo plots -17 AP, TN, Orissa, UP by AgSri SSI plots Traditional plots 112.4 t/ha 86.6 t/ha (increase of 29.7%) (Published as booklet by AgSri:- www.agsri.com http://www.agsri.com/images/documents/ssi/AgSri_SSI%20 casestudy%20book_low%20res15-03-12.pdf) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  • 33.
    Other Benefits • Seedcane saving – reduce requirements Conventional 7-10 t/ha; SSI only 1.25 t/ha • Water saving in nursery – 90 % in the first month • Water saving in main field – Use of drip system & wide spacing saves up to 30-60% • Scope for Intercropping… improve soil fertility Saving in conventional fertilisers and pesticides www.agsri.com due to scope for more targeted doses, with high intake methods
  • 34.
    Contd.. • Faster varietalspread – Conventional 1:6 to 1:8; SSI 1: 100 • Water essentially confined to the root zone - Salinity build-up reduced • Healthy growth from the beginning - Pest and disease incidence lower www.agsri.com • Intercropping is possible – Additional/interim income for the farmer
  • 35.
    SSI: Potential andMarket Size • $1-1.5 billion in India alone • SSI will re-define sugarcane cultivation • Once farms switch to SSI, it is difficult to go back because of economic advantage • Other benefits – social, ecological and economic – need to be studied and communicated • Integration and development of www.agsri.com appropriate equipment still not complete
  • 36.
    Business opportunity inMaharastra… N Maharashtra Total Sugarcane Area: 0.96 Million Ha Total Sugar Factories Operated: 170 Sugarcane Growing Districts: 26 www.agsri.com 10% of the area.. 100,000 ha/ y.. Source: Aug 2012, Commissionerate of Sugar, Maharashtra State, Pune
  • 37.
    SSI: Challenges forV.2 • Extending bud life: • Establishing optimal bud size • Improve germination • Storage protocols • Standardization of growth medium and of micro- nutrients www.agsri.com • Nursery protocol for optimal results
  • 38.
    SSI: Future Direction •Reaching at least 100,000 farmers • Improving the process, V2.0 • Quantification of water saving, yields, labour, and other benefits to farmers, ecosystems and society • Integration of appropriate machines in planting & weeding www.agsri.com
  • 39.
    The business worldis very curious.. • THE PERFECT HARVEST Outlook Business | Sept. 1, 2012 • CANE DONE RIGHT Entrepreneur | Nov. 2012 | Vol. 4 | Issue 3 www.agsri.com http://www.agsri.com/news_events.html
  • 40.