54% of accessible freshwater is currently diverted for human use (UN WWAP 2003). Of the diverted water, globally around 70% is used for agriculture (which is why it is the focus of WWF’s water demand management work), 20% by industry and 10% for domestic use. The quote comes from the 2004 report of the Stockholm and International Water Management Institutes. It highlights the imminent threat to the survival of many freshwater ecosystems if water productivity is not dramatically improved in agriculture.
0724 Scaling Up SRI The Need for a Major Strategic Shift for Ecologically Sustainable Rice Production in India - Presentation Transcript
Scaling Up SRI The Need for a Major Strategic Shift for Ecologically Sustainable Rice Production in India Dr. Biksham Gujja Policy Advisor, Global Freshwater Programme Gland, Switzerland 5 th October 2007, Agartala, Tripura
Water: A global challenge
1.1 billion people presently without safe water supply
2.4 billion people without sanitation
3-10 million deaths from waterborne diseases
Ecosystem are being rapidly destroyed
Most species-rich ecosystems are in the greatest danger and decline
A water-scarcity crisis
70% agriculture
20% industry
10% urban use
Eradicating malnutrition by 2025, with current productivity, would require additional diversions of water “close to all the water withdrawals at present”, according to IMWI & SIWI WWF LPR 2002
Percentage of area under irrigation in A.P.
Water Conflicts in India
Driving water demand
Rural areas are dumping grounds
Water conflicts are simmering and
occasionally erupt in violence
Last three years… WWF getting infected!!
Evaluating SRI and establishing that it really works
Excitement over large numbers of tillers and grains
Some indication of significant water-saving potential
Some adoption by farmers,
but still not widespread
SRI: From Hyderabad to Agartala?
Lot of awareness among politicians, farmers, others
Civil society and government collaboration
SRI practiced in almost all the states to some extent
Some solid research is being done
Independent confirmation
Tripura has progressed
with clear targets
SRI: From Hyderabad to Agartala?
Still at national level, very small percentage of area covered
Major rice-growing states are not able to push SRI to the greater extent
Water-saving has not been clearly measured and quantified
Still some scientists and professionals are critical
Some have gotten infected, but
SRI is not spreading fast enough,
and even some are dis-infected!
SRI presents an opportunity, but major challenges lie ahead
Informing the rice research establishment
Proper information and extension
Research, monitoring and evaluation
Modifications to irrigation infrastructure
Assured power supply enabling farmers
to manage their crop with less total water
Potential link to climate change documented
Partnerships of many kinds to be formed
Rice Yield (t/ha) in India District-wise during 2004-05
India – China Comparison for Rice Area and Production
India – China Comparison for Rice Paddy Yield
Mini-mission good start, but not ambitious enough??
11 mt increase by 2012
Goal of improving productivity on 20 m.ha. by 500 kg/ha – is this enough?
Allocation of Rs. 12,000 crores (Rs. 2,500/ha -- US$ 700)
SRI is one of the most promising interventions, but
how to be spread?
what to be done?
where? and with
whom?
Targets for infection… 20 (or 10) by 2020 for 200
20 m.ha under SRI management by 2020
To produce 200 mt of paddy
Rs. 20,000 crores investment
Cost: Rs.2,500/t production, or Rs.1,300/y/5y
Average: 5 t/ha with irrigation; with SRI, 6 t/ha
Can India achieve this??
India needs a big, ambitious and practical approach. The question is HOW??
Conclusions
Need major strategic shift
Very ambitious mission
Rs. 20,000 for five years
Direct support to farmers
Target of 200 mt increase
Save 100 billion cubic m. water
SRI one option, but a major one
Save money and ecosystems
Some Publications on SRI
Thank You Let’s Achieve Quickly “ More Rice Per Drop”
0 comments
Post a comment