0701 Experiences with SRI in Cambodia 2000-2007

Experiences with SRI in Cambodia 2000-2007
By Yang Saing Koma
CEDAC
April 2007

Traditional Practice Technical Practice (SRI)

Background of SRI introduction
Cambodia: 14 mill population or around 2.5 families
Around 85 % in the rural areas, depending mostly on agriculture
35 % of the population is under poverty line, most of them are farmers
Around 1.8 million farm-households are rice dependent-households
Most of household with around 1 ha rice field
Rice farming mostly under rainfed condition, yield is generally lower than 2 tons per ha
Intensification of rice production and agricultural diversification are key to improve the livelihood of rice-dependent households

Conventional approaches in rice intensification rely on the developing new or improve varieties, appropriate fertilizer recommendations, safe use of pesticides and irrigation
Farmers are considered to be recipient of technology transferred by research through extension services,
This approach lead to increasing dependency of farmers on external support and input, losing the appreciation of the local resources, decreasing self-confidence and self-reliance
It has become generally-accepted belief that we can get higher rice yield only applying more (modern) inputs

CEDAC was set up in August 1997
SRI was developed in Madagascar in the early 80s by a French Priest, Henri de Lalaunié as innovative methods to increase rice production by using existing resources (water, rice plant, soil/nutrient, organic matter)
CEDAC introduced SRI as strategy of rice intensification in Cambodia after learning from LEISA magazine in 1999
First field experimentation farmers and CEDAC director in his own farm in May 2000
At the beginning there were a lot of resistance and skeptics
28 farmers volunteered to test SRI in 2000

Mr. Mey Som, the first SRI farmer with CEDAC director in 2000

SRI as alternative/innovative system of rice intensification
Recognizing that rice plant has great natural growth potential (more than 50 tillers and panicle per rice plant, larger and deeper root systems)
Focusing on developing methods or management practices that create a conducive environment for rice to unleash its natural potential (to have more roots and more tillers)
Recognizing farmer’s role in experimentation, adaptation and dissemination of innovative methods and management practices

Tillering potential of rice plant

Root growth and tillering of rice with traditional and SRI methods

Tiller development and root growth of rice with traditional and SRI methods

Difference between traditional and SRI practices
Traditional
Rice field is continuously flooded with high level of water during the vegetative stage
Seedling is raised with too much water, and the seedling density is high
Transplanting too many seedlings per clump, mixture of weak and thick seedling
SRI
Only minimal water, preferably keeping the soil only moist and dry/wet condition
Seedling is raised in bed like vegetable bed with lower send density
Only a few seedlings, but preferably one seedling per clump, only vigorous seedling

Tradition method vs SRI method in nursery and seedling management

Difference between traditional and SRI
Traditional
Old seedling, generally more than one month
Seedling is uprooted with damage to root and stem, and is kept for one to two days before transplanting
Seedlings are transplanted with close spacing, and spacing is generally not equal
SRI
Younger seedling, preferably less than 15 days
Young seedling is uprooted and transplanted with care, transplanted immediately after uprooting
Wide spacing and square pattern or at least line transplanting

Transplanting young seedling with care

Traditional vs SRI method in number of seedling to be transplanted

Difference between traditional and SRI practices
Traditional
Weeding is not early enough, not frequent and regularly (weeding is done when there are weeds)
Use of poorly decomposed farmyard manure, and dependent on the use of chemical fertilizers
SRI
Early weeding and frequent weeding to improve soil aeration (weeding before the weed comes out)
Application of compost

Early and frequent weeding

How CEDAC introduced and promoted SRI
Identify and select interested farmers to be pioneer in testing SRI on a voluntary basis and very small-scale
In every village, we focus on working with a small group of genuine interested farmers to experiment SRI in a proper way to get concrete results
Inviting new farmers to see the fields of the experimenting farmers
Inviting experienced SRI farmers to share with other farmers in the villages and other villages
Train best SRI experimenting farmers to be farmer promoter, and support them to train and advise other farmers
Inviting representatives from government and other development agencies to visit and meet SRI farmers
Provide capacity building support to other to disseminate SRI
Support the establishment of national SRI secretariat (with Oxfam and GTZ support)

Progress of number of SRI farmers in Cambodia

Area cultivated with SRI methods (in ha, from 2000 to 2006)

Note: Number of rice growing villages: around 12,000 villages
Number of provinces and municipality: 24
Number of SRI villages and provinces 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Number of villages 18 122 350 815 1397 2500 2685 Number of provinces 4/24 7/24 11/24 14/24 17/24 20/24 24/24

Benefits from SRI
Yield increase from 1.5-1.8 tons per ha to 2.5-3.5 tons per ha (increase of 50% to 150%), with traditional/local varieties
Some SRI farmers achieve yield more than 6 tons per ha

Traditional Practice Technical Practice (SRI)

Benefits of SRI for farmers
Seed requirement reduced by 70-80%, fertilizers use decreased by 50 % (from 150 kg per ha to 75 kg per ha), and most SRI farmers have given up pesticide use
Net income from rice per ha has increased from around 58 $US per ha to 172 $US per ha (almost 200 % increase ).
Under marketing support from CEDAC, increasing number of SRI farmers now market their rice under organic brand, and receive 15 % premium

Change of income earned from rice production ( n=120 farmers, in riel )

Benefits of SRI for farmers
Increased self-confidence and self-reliance as they can get higher production by using only their existing resources
Growing interest among farmers in working on other technical and social innovations (for example saving for self-reliance, joint marketing and joint purchase)
Enabling farmers to diversify by using rice surplus to feed animal and to allocating or converting parts of rice field for other agricultural production (vegetable, fish, animals, tree planting), from SRI to SID (System of intensification and diversification )

Concluding remarks
Consistent positive field results with since 2000 shows that SRI is appropriate option to address problem related to food insecurity and poverty in Cambodia as well as good entry point in rural development
More works need to be done to reinforce this momentum of SRI development and dissemination so that existing farmers can get more benefits from SRI (higher yield, diversification, higher net income), and all rice farmers in Cambodia and other rice growing region have opportunity to use SRI to improve their livelihood

0701 Experiences with SRI in Cambodia 2000-2007

by SRI-Rice, CIIFAD, Cornell University

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Usage Rights

1 Embed 1

Statistics

0701 Experiences with SRI in Cambodia 2000-2007 Presentation Transcript