0322 International Development and Cooperation: Common Issues and Challenges - Presentation Transcript
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND COOPERATION: Common Issues and Challenges Norman Uphoff, Cornell University, FASID Course on ‘Introduction to Development Cooperation’ Tokyo, August 1, 2003
PERSPECTIVE
‘ Grassroots’ perspective -- desire to help people improve their lives and their futures, and the conditions and futures of their communities
What is the role and contribution of outsiders?
My initial perspective was more “macro” -- more policy-oriented, more interested in planning than in participation (Princeton, UC Berkeley)
PhD thesis research in 1968 on Ghana’s use of foreign aid (external assistance) under Kwame Nkrumah, 1957-1966 -- all sectors, all donors
CONCLUSION OF THESIS
Unless and until less-developed countries use their OWN resources well, they will not get much benefit from OTHER countries’ resources
More than matter of increasing their ‘absorptive capacity’ -- need to improve their own operations
Need to improve accountability, efficiency, realism, honesty, innovativeness, etc. -- external resources not a substitute for own efforts
Opportunity at Cornell University to work on RURAL DEVELOPMENT, from 1970 to now
ANALYSIS OF STRATEGY
Opportunity to teach course on rural development (with an anthropologist and agricultural engineer)
We formulated a ‘meta-model’ for rural development:
Micro factors: local level -- household, community, farm unit, influences of culture, social organization
Macro factors: national and international levels -- government, economy, policies, trade, etc.
Technical factors: material processes -- infrastructure, technology, natural resources, etc.
Development involved all three (dimin. returns?)
FURTHER ANALYSIS
Study of rural local organizations across Asia (funded by USAID) -- 16 case studies + analysis
Conclusions about multiple channels and levels -- importance of system of organization -- very evident impact on development performance (even or esp. controlling for GNP p/c differences)
Historical introduction to analysis:
1950s: technology gap technology transfer
1960s: resource gap resource transfers
1970s: institutional gap institutional transfers?
REFLECTION
Systems perspective : different sets of knowledge and practice -- all important and interacting
Interdisciplinary cooperation needed, but more than this -- supradisciplinary perspective (transdisciplinary, cross-disciplinary)
Importance of connecting theory and practice -- not a sequential process -- more interactive
Action research -- reciprocal relation between knowledge and practice
Problem-based research -- real world > literature as point of departure and objective for contributions
THIRTY YEARS OF WORK
Local organization as first focus in early 1970s
Participation as next focus of work in mid-70s
Local institutions and decentralization as further subject of work
Natural resource management as applied sector for participation and local institutions (CBNRM) with special concern for irrigation sector
Social capital as a more recent concern
System of rice intensification (SRI) as current focus, and biological approaches to agriculture
HOW HAS SUBJECT CHANGED?
All of these subjects continue to be important, but
Other subjects have emerged over the years:
‘ Appropriate technology’/Labor-intensive development
Human rights and good governance, NGOs, ‘civil society’
Post-conflict reconstruction
HOW HAS DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE CHANGED?
Unfortunately, assistance has not changed as much as development theory has changed
Gradual shift from ‘foreign aid’ to ‘development assistance’ to ‘international cooperation’
Greater role of NGOs in assistance and in country development efforts
Reduction in agency capacities/professionalism
Issue of ‘debt forgiveness’ now on the agenda, critiques of ‘tied aid,’ funding of recurrent costs?
‘ Aid fatigue,’ loss of confidence in effectiveness
International Development and Cooperation
Huge subject -- would prefer to respond to and discuss questions that you are interested in -- many topics have been introduced already
And/or could make some prepared presentations:
Social Capital: What is it? -- an analytical approach
Establishment of Participatory Irrigation Management -- a case study of successful social ‘engineering’
The System of Rice Intensification -- how to raise the productivity of land, labor, water and capital, without needing to use chemical fertilizers or new varieties, and with positive environmental benefits
0 comments
Post a comment