Traveler to journalist: how audience participation could become the new travel journalism. Par Bryan Pirolli
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Traveler to journalist: how audience participation could become the new travel journalism. Par Bryan Pirolli

on

  • 501 views

Article de Bryan Pirolli Bryan, chercheur à l'Université Paris 3 Sorbonne Nouvelle

Article de Bryan Pirolli Bryan, chercheur à l'Université Paris 3 Sorbonne Nouvelle

Proposition pour les SMC Research Awards - Social Media Club - Décembre 2013

Statistics

Views

Total Views
501
Views on SlideShare
344
Embed Views
157

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0

2 Embeds 157

http://socialmediaclub.fr 156
http://feedly.com 1

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Traveler to journalist: how audience participation could become the new travel journalism. Par Bryan Pirolli Document Transcript

  • 1. “Traveler to journalist: how audience participation could become the new travel journalism” Bryan Pirolli - Université Paris 3 Sorbonne Nouvelle Proposition pour les SMC Research Awards - Décembre 2013 Introduction Tourism is continually shifting online, with physical travel agencies closing rapidly and online operators increasingly organizing the major elements for consumers1. As such, the process of deciding where to book is now largely informed by online sources, both journalistic and otherwise. Traditional media are publishing content on the web, but online content, like comments on booking sites and independent blogs, are also supplying consumers with information used to plan trips. We can observe how travel journalism and the discourse surrounding a location, once managed by institutional media and tourism offices, are dictated more by audiences than by professionals. While many journalism studies focus largely on general news, little attention is paid to online journalism specific to niche media like travel (Bruns, 2011; Domingo, Singer, et al., 2011; Rebillard, 2006). We argue that the travel industry deserves special focus when it comes to agenda setting and information distribution. In 2012, the World Travel and Tourism Council reported for the first time, one billion global travelers2. The spending power of these travelers justifies close examination into how the information flows from vendors to clients, and who influences our decisions. 1 http://www.itb-berlin.de/media/itbk/itbk_media/itbk_pdf/WTTR_Report_2013_web.pdf 2 http://www.wttc.org/news-media/news-archive/2012/international-tourism-hits-one-billion/
  • 2. 2 Furthermore, travel journalism is complicated by an overlap between journaling and journalism, between the author looking into a mirror and out a window (Greenman, 2012). Self-publication online is blurring the difference between the two. User-generated content (UGC) like TripAdvisor and blogs could become agenda-setting players for the tourism industry, while questions of ethics and transparency remain an issue for professional journalists. Through a study of blogs in Paris and the public who reads them, we can begin to observe how travelers are using various sources of information, both journalistic and non-professional. Theoretical Framework To understand how UGC is challenging established journalistic norms, we look at the traditional top-down approach of institutional media. Historically corporate media have controlled much of the information that has trickled down to consumers, be it via newsprint, radio, TV, or web. Over the last two centuries, editors and journalists – the professionals – have presented content to the public, acting as the gatekeepers of information, a termed coined in 1940 (Lewin,1940). They were the professionals who decided which content fit into the limited pages of newspapers and precious TV airtime. Over the past few decades, however, this role of the professional journalist has been challenged by the popularity of the web, where both journalists and non- journalists can publish alongside each other. Participatory journalism has managed to reach into niches too nuanced for institutional media to penetrate (Gillmor, 2006). With major newspapers reducing staff, the potential value of participatory journalism is increasingly clear (Gant, 2007). However, many institutional news sites have not yet embraced contributions made by the public, as demonstrated by Singer et al who identified a lack of participation in the creation of online content across several national newspapers (2011). The public, instead, is more often implicated in what the researchers call the “interpretation phase,” leaving comments and sharing content. Fortunately for the public, other sites have opened up access to their contributions. Websites like TripAdvisor have become leaders in the travel industry, in the tradition of the Zagat guides begun in 1979, based on user reviews. Other sites like Blogger and WordPress offer free platforms for self-publication, leading to the now-pervasive practice of blogging (Gant, 2007). The gate-keeping role of journalists, according to some, is changing while navigating a sea of publications produced with varying levels of professionalization. Jane Singer calls the journalist an authenticator, helping readers identify trustworthy information (Singer, 2008).
  • 3. 3 Modifying the terminology, Axel Bruns suggests rethinking the gatekeeper role as a “gatewatcher” role, curating and parsing through the flux of information that can no longer be controlled. Before the widespread use of the internet, there were relatively few outlets and much information that needed to be selected for distribution on the limited pages of newsprint and timeslots on the evening news. Withe endless possibilities for publishing content, users also have access to the same information that journalists do, including press releases and public statements. Journalists, he says, “are engaged in a form of internal gatewatching which tracks the outcomes of this crowdsourced process of investigation to identify any particularly relevant, interesting, or outrageous findings to be explored further through more conventional journalistic activities” (Bruns , 2011, p 122). The process of gatewatching allows the public a greater say in what headlines end up in institutional media, even if they aren’t producing content. Various pureplayer sites – media websites exclusively online – and blogging platforms are giving more of a voice to those who aren’t always connected to the big media brands, but those brands are still major leaders. While audience-powered sites are rewriting the rules, speaking alongside and often over the voices of professional journalists, institutional media still remains some of the most viewed websites, according to Alexa ratings, a trusted source for page rankings worldwide.3 Travel journalism, however, does not fit the same developmental patterns as hard news. Dating back centuries to correspondence from travelers abroad and evolving over time with ship logs, scientific journeys in exotic places, and private journals made public, travel writing has its own peculiarities (Blanton, 1997; Marcil, 2007). Many of the earlier formers of writing – think Flaubert’s exploits in Egypt – were not necessarily destined for publication but were written as more intimate accounts. Over the years, the objectives of such authors evolved, shifting focus more on information and less on reflection as technology opened up tourism to larger audiences. As Catherine Bertho-Lavenir writers, the 19th century bolstered the more objective travel guide with the advent of the steamboat and railway, changes that would only further with commercial airlines in the mid-1900s. She writes, “Travel narratives and then tourist guides teach their readers systematically that which they should admire and how to conduct themselves" (1999, p 41). Guides like the Michelin Guides offered standard information from professional source as the guide industry developed in the 1900s. More recently, shifts in travel have changed as the modern tourist is looking for something beyond the prepackaged tours popular in the first half of the 20th century. Nearly 40 years after writing The Tourist, Dean MacCannell’s theories on the leisure class 3 While the BBC finds itself at number 52, CNN at 58, and The New York Times at number 107, pure players and UGC sites are not far behind. General news sites like the Huffington Post rank at number 73 while top travel related sites like TripAdvisor clock in at 198 with Yelp just ahead at 132.
  • 4. 4 and their quest for “authentic experiences” still resonates with travelers. Based in part on Goffman’s stage theory, MacCannell describes how travelers want to go behind the scenes, examining for example the “work displays” of daily life instead of just monuments and museums (1976, p 36). A visit to the chic but industrial chocolate shop by famed French chef Alain Ducasse in Paris, for example, puts visitors into such a work display, surrounded by machines and kitchen equipment formerly hidden from view. Such experiences attempt to create an authentic experience, but MacCannell downplays their reality, calling it instead “staged authenticity,” evoking the impossibility of truly living like a local. He writes: “It is always possible that what is taken to be entry into a back region is really entry into a front region that has been totally set up in advance for touristic visitation” (1976, p 101). Despite the perceived impossibility, much of this quest is embodied in the lexicological distinction between tourist and traveler. The battle to be a traveler and not a tourist exists, even in French, according to Bertho-Lavenir (p 405). For Jean-Didier Urbain, travelers walk among the natives, while tourists merely walk in the travelers’ footsteps, reiterating a rejection of all that is touristic or touristy (1991, p 103). Travelers, in the popular vernacular sense of the word, inform themselves differently than cookie-cutter tourists – though regardless of the exact interpretation, this general notion is a guiding principle in our research. We hypothesized that tourists would favor online content, and in particular blogs for their access to these more “authentic” experiences, however they be defined. Field of Study and Method With such predominance of web use, we are examining how this audience informs themselves while executing a trip. We are interested in knowing what sources of information travelers in a digital era use when planning their trips and if certain outlets – specifically blogs – offer increased access to “authentic experience.” Additionally, among these sources, do non-professional authors resemble their professional counterparts at all? What journalistic standards can be observed in non-professional media? Our questionnaire and interviews reveal that English-speaking travelers to Paris still adhere to traditional sources, such as guides and magazines, but look to blogs for insight into more “authentic” experiences, a debated notion discussed above (MacCannell, 1976; Urbain, 1991). The very nature of such UGC hypothetically permits a timelier, honest, and informed view into a destination, offering the “authentic” or “local” aspect that a guide book, restricted by editorial constraints, may not. We
  • 5. 5 therefore explore where the agenda-setting comes from and what influence UGC sources have, specifically blogs, compared to traditional journalists. We also simultaneously studied the content that our audience was reading – blogs about Paris. We developed a content analysis by constructing a checklist of common journalistic practices used to evaluate a blog sample. Through the analysis, we observed how these non-professionals might be acting like professional journalists. Blog and content analysis With an understanding of the evolving nature of online journalism and the amplification of user-generated content in travel communication, we looked at both online users’ practices and the content itself. Our preliminary study in 2012 explored the interpretations of blog readers by employing an online questionnaire followed by interviews with individuals to understand how the public is using various media while planning a trip. At the same time, a sample of eleven blogs written by English-speaking authors in Paris was analyzed to determine the extent to which the bloggers adhered to certain journalistic practices. The blogs spanned different themes, but all dealt with foreigners living or traveling in Paris. The blogs were selected using web cartography methods available online from a French organization, WebAtlas. An application called a navicrawler, downloaded from WebAtlas’s homepage, was used to scan the links found on a popular Parisian blog, TheParisBlog.com. By reviewing the linked sites collected and continuing this process, we were able to click through thousands of pages to find material available to English- speakers about Paris. Most sites, like links to social media and vendors, were eliminated from the sample since they did not contain content to analyze, resulting in about 160 actively maintained blogs. Using this information, we could visualize the blogosphere using a program called GEPHI which creates a graphic depiction of the sites. Ultimately we were left with Figure 1, from which we were able to isolate the most highly linked blogs to choose from our sample (in green) at the center of the blogosphere without including our starting point (in red) TheParisBlog.com, which simply aggregates blog posts instead of creating original content.
  • 6. 6 Figure 1: English-speaking blogosphere in Paris. Points denote a blog homepage. We chose eleven such blogs for our content analysis, several of which also appeared on the Tourism Office of the Ile de France website under a section called “Our Favorite Blogs.” While not necessarily the most visited or most influential blogs, the cartography provides a justification for the analysis of these blogs since they are among the most referenced and the most active in referencing other blogs. Then, a checklist of journalistic practices was compiled from several authors, allowing us to investigate some general practices that have developed over the last few centuries, helping journalists to identify with each other (Kovach and Rosenstiel, 2007; Neveu, 2009; Zinser, 2001). Such practices included writing lead or introduction sentences, depending on official sources, writing in relationship to news events, and avoiding using the first person in the blog posts. The checklist was a sample of practices considered standard for journalists and by no means exhaustive. The posts examined were those appearing in each of the eleven blogs during February 2012, resulting in 95 total posts examined. Once the survey and interviews were completed, to be discussed in the next paragraph, we were able to compare the results of the interrogation to the results of the blog analysis. Essentially we could isolate certain features common to the blogs and then discern which are important to readers, leading us to several conclusions about how non-professionals, as opposed to professional journalists, present their content.
  • 7. 7 The survey and interviews A main goal of this study was to explore how a specific audience informs itself before a trip using various sources, focusing largely on blogs. There are several studies on the consumption of travel information (Gretzel, 2007, Chhabra, 2010. Yagi and Pearce, 2007), but few are in the specific field of travel journalism or travel blogging. Our questionnaire and more importantly, our interviews, look to enrich existing literature. To interrogate an online public, we used the online questionnaire platform Survey Monkey. We proposed four parts in the questionnaire with the possibility of free responses or graded responses depending on the question. The questions focused on general travel planning and a discussion of authenticity in travel. The questionnaire was shared on Twitter and Facebook in early February 2012 with the help of Paris-based bloggers that we would later study in the analysis. Ten subjects were then chosen from the responses for face-to-face, in-depth interviews. Our subjects were mostly North American, females, between 20 and 60 years old, all living in Paris for varying periods of time. In general, the interview began with a discussion of the respondent's online habits when preparing for a vacation. The conversation focused largely the information they value, the blogs they follow, and each person’s personal interpretation of an “authentic experience.” The lack of many true temporary Parisian vacationers (as opposed to expats) did not seemingly skew the results, as initial questionnaire responses were akin to those by the dozens of questionnaire respondents who were not expatriates or long-term tourists. Jean-Didier Urbain suggests, “An expat is just a traveler in an interrupted voyage : a person living abroad, a traveler outside of his travels” (1991,p 273). For the moment, we considered all non-French natives in our study, since travel information is not uniquely printed and consumed abroad as before. The internet has opened local publications up internationally, with The New York Times travel section as consultable in Paris as in the US.
  • 8. 8 Results and Discussion Online users react How do users’ comments help define travel experiences and do online contributors hold more clout than journalists? According to our study, comments and other UGC are vitally important to travelers who plan online, but they are not the only source. Nor do they closely resemble journalistic content. In the free response sections of our survey, when asked about sources of information that they trust, there was an unsurprisingly large variety of websites, media outlets, and social networks (physical and virtual) cited. With travel information available in diverse forms, respondents ranked newspapers travel sections, magazines, guidebooks, travel TV shows, blogs, and online news sites as more or less equally trustworthy when researching information. They make little distinction in the dependability of professional and non-professional sources for basic elements of a trip. Both travel blogs and travel guides were ranked exactly the same, for example (see figure 2). After introducing the question of authenticity, however, respondents ranked travel blogs above other traditional forms of media for their ability to offer information concerning more “authentic” experiences. We also asked the respondents to define what they mean by authentic, which yielded results ranging from “local” and “non- Figure 2 Trustworthy rankings (left) vs. Authenticity rankings (right) [blogs in green]
  • 9. 9 touristy” to “off beaten path” and “unexpected.” This range of responses further emphasizes the lack of a unique definition of an authentic experience. Still, respondents in the questionnaire and in the interviews attest that online blogs, as opposed to institutional media, are more useful for finding that authentic experience in Paris. When asked where they look for such experiences, nearly 80% said they take word-of-mouth advice or suggestions from locals, helping to clarify why bloggers, as “local reporters,” might be more attractive than corporate media and travel guides. Bloggers as journalists? While these bloggers may be more attractive sources for the online public, how can we qualify the information they are disseminating? When analyzing the content of the blogs, specifically looking for journalistic practices, it becomes clear that bloggers do not adhere to most, at least not consistently. While by no means requisite, it is interesting to observe how these sources do not adhere to similar practices while audiences are increasingly looking to them for information as they once looked to journalists. On one end, the content produced does not exemplify many standard practices. For example, official sources are a mainstay of journalism, but only 19% of blog posts analyzed referenced any human sources, while only 1% cited a report or study (Neveu, 2009). Additionally, at least in many news sources, journalists avoid using the first person, yet 73% of the posts were written in the first person narration. Given the personal nature of blogs, this is unsurprising, though two in particular did write in a more journalistic, distanced voice. In considering the journalistic principle of objectivity, an ideal more than a reality, only 30% of the posts inserted facts, 34% had a concrete or developed idea in their posts (as opposed to musings), and only 33% had any relationship to news items or current events (Kovach and Rosenstiel, 2001). As far as writing structure is concerned, only about half of the posts featured anything resembling a lead introductory sentence and only about a quarter gave a news context via a nutgraf, a short paragraph early in the story that situates the reader. Nearly all blogs contained different sections for their content, including 88% with links to online social networks and 95% with space for comments. And nearly all sites contained links to outside websites, blogs, or pages within the blog itself. Like most media pages, 95% of the blogs also contained advertising. While people are increasingly looking to these blogs for information, our study suggests that bloggers are a genre apart from journalism. Few of the bloggers studied are actually trained professional journalists. By not adhering to certain journalistic principles, we do not suggest that bloggers offer impertinent information, but this critical look at certain practices stresses the need for further study of user generated content. If
  • 10. 10 bloggers are not acting like journalists through their reporting, are they adhering to principles of transparency and honesty? Are they disclosing everything? Greenman suggests that disclosure is essential especially for journalists who take subsidized travel experiences or press trips. “Credibility with the readers is the most important reason,” he says, to make disclosure a common practice (2012 p 143). Journalistic sources persist Are travelers looking for an online consensus while planning or instead for one trustworthy voice? While the questionnaire demonstrated a plurality of sources, the interviews shed light on how users rely on these sources. Some use guide books and news sites as starting points, while others go to blogs. It depends on the traveler. For example, a majority of TripAdvisor users report using it at the beginning of their planning to get inspiration as well as in the middle to narrow choices (Gretzel, 2007). Few use the site during or after trips. This detail helps demonstrate how the site influences buying choices, playing a larger role before a purchase than after. While tourists still use both types, sometimes reviews, both journalistic and non- professional, may have an adverse effect on consumers. One interviewee stated that a favorite Parisian restaurant became too popular once big-name blogs and the media covered it, for example. The interviewees overall expressed a disdain towards travel guides and brand name media for their effect on certain experiences that they once deemed authentic. Additionally, in terms of style and content, interviews revealed an aversion to “professional” travel information, preferring the personal feel of bloggers. Many aspects of the blog came up during the interviews, specifically the personal writing style, the possibility of dialoguing in comments and on social networks, and the amateur-feel of the blogs which aren’t as saturated with corporate advertising and design like The New York Times. Again, this population of online travel planners reported depending largely on word of mouth recommendations, and the intimacy of blogging helps attract readers to such content. The results from the content analysis demonstrate, for example, that most blogs employed the first person in posts, a practice that journalists avoid in many forms of reporting, and interviewees report that they desire such a personal writing style. Journalists, in attempting to be objective, do not always inject their voice into stories, though travel writing seems dependent on more of the author in the writing (Blanton, 1997). Journalists, however, still have their place in informing travelers. As one respondent said, “The Louvre is still the Louvre,” continuing to explain that certain experiences in Paris are not going to change much, but need continual updating. She argues that guides are still important for perennial information, to keep cornerstones of the tourism circuit fresh
  • 11. 11 and pertinent. In a way, institutional media works well to curate and maintain institutional tourism through guidebooks and updates on the iconic experiences and monuments that one will inevitably visit in Paris. A look at our study reveals that bloggers don’t often cover topics that are considered “touristy”—Versailles, Notre Dame, the Louvre. While a more in-depth look at bloggers’ motives could help shed light on this point, our sample of 95 posts shows little attention paid to such topics. Conclusion While institutional media still has a grasp on travel information, even attracting large amounts of followers on social media networks, these brands are not the sole purveyors of travel information. Nor do readers want them to be. Our research shows that travelers seek consumer feedback in addition to professional recommendations, using both in different ways. While observing user generated content like blog posts and review comments, our research suggests that such information is more pertinent to the off-the-beaten-track experiences that travelers are looking for, and not standard routine travel. Journalists are still able to provide honest information, adhering to principles of transparency and disclosure that non-professionals might not. Furthermore, beyond looking for authentic experiences at a destination, travelers need other standard information related to transportation, local customs, and news-related stories that journalists are prepared to supply. Still, travelers are relying on these comments and blog posts to help them decide where to book a room and where to eat, two necessary parts of a voyage, in addition to searching for other experiences. As Gretzel and our own study demonstrated, travelers are increasingly looking to the multitude of user comments before making spending decisions, looking less to professional sources and more to the personal and relatable writers who give their opinions online. Further study can investigate the practices of content creators, including bloggers and comment writers in order to understand their methods. Also, how have social networks, like FourSquare, Twitter, and geosocial networking applications responded to traveler’s needs? This sort of hyper-local connection is creating an ever widening gap between the professional and the destination in question, furthering opening up the conversation over who is a travel journalist.
  • 12. 12 Bibliographie Bertho-Lavenir, Catherine, 1999, La Roue et le Stylo: Comment nous sommes devenus touristes, Paris, Editions Odile Jacob. Blanton, Casey, 1997, Travel Writing: The Self and the World, New York, Simon and Schuster Press. Bruns, Axel, 2011, “Gatekeeping, Gatewatching, Real-Time Feedback: new challenges for Journalism,” Brazilian Journalism Research, Brasilia, University of Brasilia, 117-136. Chhabra, Deepak., 2010, “Back to the past : a sub-segment of Generation Y’s perceptions of Authenticity,” Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Taylor and Francis,793-809. Gant, Scott, 2007, We’re All Journalists Now, New York, Simon and Schuster Press. Gillmore, Dan 2006, We the Media: Grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People, California, O’Reilly Media. Gretzel, Ulrike, “Online Travel Review Study: Role and Impact of Online Travel Reviews,” Texas A&M University, Laboratory for Intelligent Systems in Tourism. Greenman, John F., 2012, Introduction to Travel Journalism, New York, Peter Lang Publishing, 2012. Kovach, Bill and Rosenstiel, Tom, 2001, The Elements of Journalism, New York, Three Rivers Press. Lewin, Kurt, 1943, “Forces behind food habits and methods of change,” Bulletin of the National Research Council, Washington D.C., National Research Council, 35-65. MacCannell, Dean, 1976, The Tourist, United States, University of California Press. Marcil, Yasmine, 2007, “Le lointain et l’ailleurs dans la presse périodique de la second moitié du XVIIIe siècle,” Le Temps des medias, Paris, Nouveau Monde, 21-33. Neveu, Eric, 2009, Sociologie du journalisme, Paris, La Découverte. Rebillard, Franck, 2006, “Du traitement de l'information à son retraitement : La publication de l'information journalistique sur l'internet,” Réseaux, Paris, La Découverte, 29-68. Ruellan, Denis, 2007, Le Journalisme ou Le Professionnalisme du Flou, Grenoble, Presse universitaire de Grenoble, 2007.
  • 13. 13 Singer, Jane; Domingo, David; Paulussen, Steve et al., 2011, Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers, United Kingdom, Wiley-Blackwell, United Kingdom. Singer, Jane B., 2008, “The Journalist in the Network. A Shifting Rationale for the Gatekeeping Role and the Objectivity Norm,” Trípodos, Barcelona, 61-76. Urbain, Jean-Didier, 1991, L’idiot du voyage: Histoires de touristes, Paris, Petite Bibliothèque Payot. Yagi, Chiemi and Pearce, Philip, 2007, “The Influence of Appearance and the Number of People Viewed on Tourists’ Preferences for Seeing Other Tourists,” Journal of Sustainable Tourism, Taylor and Francis, 28-43. Zinser, William, 2001, On Writing Well: The Classic Guide to Writing Nonfiction, New York, Harper Collins Publishers.