SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 40
VV&A för flygsimulatoranläggningar Jan Tegnér
VV&A projektet ,[object Object],[object Object]
Grundläggande entiteter i M&S och deras relation Source System Experimental Frame Model Simulator Modeling Relation Simulation Relation Bernard Ziegler
Testdriven utveckling ,[object Object],[object Object]
GM VV Worldview
Basic VV&A Processes ACCEPT/accredit acceptability criteria simulation referent user needs conceptual model development products input data simulation results executing simulation validate validate verify verify validate V&V products
Distributed Simulation Engineering & Execution Process (DSEEP) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
MIL-STD-498 Artefacts MIL-STD-498 Data Item Descriptions Plans Concept/ Requirements Design Qualification Test Products User/ Operator Manual Support Manuals Software SDP SIP STRP OCD SSS SRS IRS SSDD SDD DBDD IDD STP STD STR SUM SCOM SIOM COM CPM FSM SPS SVD
Hierarchical document structure System C System B System  A Sub-system  A1 Sub-system  A2 Sub-system  A3 Sub-system  A4 Subsystem A5 Sub-system  C2 Sub-system  C3 Sub-system  C4 Subsystem B1 Subsystem B2 1/SSDD – SSDD for System of Systems  2/SSDD – SSDD for System A 3/SSDD – SSDD for System B 4/SSDD – SSDD for System A Subsystem C1
Utökning av MIL-STD-498 – ett exempel MIL-STD-498 Data Item Descriptions Plans Concept/ Requirements Design Qualification Test Products User/ Operator Manual Support Manuals Software/ Hardware SDP SIP STRP OCD SSS SRS IRS SSDD SDD DBDD IDD STP STD STR SUM SCOM SIOM COM CPM FSM SPS SVD HDP IP HRS HDD HTP HTD HTR HPS HVD MMS MMP HUM ATD ATR
Relationer mellan huvuddokument i MIL-STD-498 OCD SSDD SSS SRS STD SDD IRS IDD IRS IDD MMS HRS ATD HTD STR ATR HTR
Krav på Systemnivå SSS MMS IRS ? HRS OCD
Systemutveckling för M&S
Att utveckla en simuleringsanläggning ,[object Object]
Att utveckla en simuleringsanläggning ,[object Object]
Att utveckla en simuleringsanläggning ,[object Object]
Scenariobeskrivning  ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Mål med simuleringen ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Vilka modeller behövs?
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Vilka modeller behövs?
Konceptuell analys av utvalda modeller ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Experimental frame Blue Force’s System of System Fighter Radar Missile
Fidelitet ,[object Object],[object Object],SISO Fidelity Study Group
Analysera behov av fidelitetsnivå för simulatorerna ,[object Object]
Fidelitet ,[object Object],SISO Fidelity Study Group
Fidelitet ,[object Object],SISO Fidelity Study Group
Fidelitet ,[object Object],SISO Fidelity Study Group
Fidelitet ,[object Object],[object Object],SISO Fidelity Study Group
Fidelitet ,[object Object],[object Object],SISO Fidelity Study Group
Aerodynamics – fidelitet? Max range? Escape maneuvers? Wind tunnel test? Flight tests? CFD? Semi- empirical? Theoretical? Bingo fuel? Handling qualities? Performance? Max ceiling? Climb rate?
Missile ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Sensor-atmosfär-signatur ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Avionics och “out side view” ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Terrain ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
V-modellen Define Requirements for, 1  4: 1. SYSTEM OF SYSTEM 2. SYSTEM IN DUEL 3. SYSTEM 4. SUB-SYSTEM 4. SUB-SYSTEM 3. SYSTEM 1. SYSTEM OF SYSTEM 2. SYSTEM IN DUEL Verify Requirements 4  1 During verification, only continue to higher system level when requirements on lower system level are fulfilled.
System i duell CORRELATION GOOD ENOUGH? IF NOT: - INCREASE ENVELOPE OR - IMPLEMENT RULES OF ENGAGEMENT OUTSIDE ENVELOPE    RULES OF ENGAGEMENT Y X CORRELATION BETWEEN BLUE AND RED SYSTEM OF SYSTEM
Blue force versus Red Force  Manned versus CGF Fair fight
Component based development and VV&A
Sammanfattning ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Jan Tegnér Email:  [email_address] 0730-929977  FRÅGOR ?

More Related Content

2011.11.01 - VV&A 3.3

  • 2.
  • 3. Grundläggande entiteter i M&S och deras relation Source System Experimental Frame Model Simulator Modeling Relation Simulation Relation Bernard Ziegler
  • 4.
  • 6. Basic VV&A Processes ACCEPT/accredit acceptability criteria simulation referent user needs conceptual model development products input data simulation results executing simulation validate validate verify verify validate V&V products
  • 7.
  • 8. MIL-STD-498 Artefacts MIL-STD-498 Data Item Descriptions Plans Concept/ Requirements Design Qualification Test Products User/ Operator Manual Support Manuals Software SDP SIP STRP OCD SSS SRS IRS SSDD SDD DBDD IDD STP STD STR SUM SCOM SIOM COM CPM FSM SPS SVD
  • 9. Hierarchical document structure System C System B System A Sub-system A1 Sub-system A2 Sub-system A3 Sub-system A4 Subsystem A5 Sub-system C2 Sub-system C3 Sub-system C4 Subsystem B1 Subsystem B2 1/SSDD – SSDD for System of Systems 2/SSDD – SSDD for System A 3/SSDD – SSDD for System B 4/SSDD – SSDD for System A Subsystem C1
  • 10. Utökning av MIL-STD-498 – ett exempel MIL-STD-498 Data Item Descriptions Plans Concept/ Requirements Design Qualification Test Products User/ Operator Manual Support Manuals Software/ Hardware SDP SIP STRP OCD SSS SRS IRS SSDD SDD DBDD IDD STP STD STR SUM SCOM SIOM COM CPM FSM SPS SVD HDP IP HRS HDD HTP HTD HTR HPS HVD MMS MMP HUM ATD ATR
  • 11. Relationer mellan huvuddokument i MIL-STD-498 OCD SSDD SSS SRS STD SDD IRS IDD IRS IDD MMS HRS ATD HTD STR ATR HTR
  • 12. Krav på Systemnivå SSS MMS IRS ? HRS OCD
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22. Experimental frame Blue Force’s System of System Fighter Radar Missile
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30. Aerodynamics – fidelitet? Max range? Escape maneuvers? Wind tunnel test? Flight tests? CFD? Semi- empirical? Theoretical? Bingo fuel? Handling qualities? Performance? Max ceiling? Climb rate?
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35. V-modellen Define Requirements for, 1  4: 1. SYSTEM OF SYSTEM 2. SYSTEM IN DUEL 3. SYSTEM 4. SUB-SYSTEM 4. SUB-SYSTEM 3. SYSTEM 1. SYSTEM OF SYSTEM 2. SYSTEM IN DUEL Verify Requirements 4  1 During verification, only continue to higher system level when requirements on lower system level are fulfilled.
  • 36. System i duell CORRELATION GOOD ENOUGH? IF NOT: - INCREASE ENVELOPE OR - IMPLEMENT RULES OF ENGAGEMENT OUTSIDE ENVELOPE  RULES OF ENGAGEMENT Y X CORRELATION BETWEEN BLUE AND RED SYSTEM OF SYSTEM
  • 37. Blue force versus Red Force Manned versus CGF Fair fight
  • 39.
  • 40. Jan Tegnér Email: [email_address] 0730-929977 FRÅGOR ?