Technology Transfer Impact on SMME Development - Perspectives from a Small/Micro Enterprise Point of View by Mr Alphons Du Toit

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Technology Transfer Impact on SMME Development - Perspectives from a Small/Micro Enterprise Point of View by Mr Alphons Du Toit - Presentation Transcript

    1. Technology Transfer Impact on SMME Development - Perspectives from a Small/Micro Enterprise Point of View Alphons du Toit: Technimark
    2. History in the making: 1995 • Alphons du Toit is an employee of the CSIR on newly acquired CAD and FDM RP systems • Deon de Beer (from the then TFS) spends a sabbatical at the CSIR to study the significance of RP on the manufacturing industry
    3. Funny co-incidence in 1995? • Alphons du Toit decides to resign and start an own company in Cape Town • Deon de Beer convince the TFS to start an RP centre, which resulted in one of the best organised research teams, as well as one of the best equipped centres in the world • Prior experience creates a platform for research collaboration – almost similar to a spin-off company. • TFS/CUT benefited from industrial inputs, whilst Technimark benefited from the R&D inputs/results
    4. Some Product Development Examples:
    5. Total Cost of Project R 112 000 SLA Masters R 8 500 Finishing + Spraying R 23 000 Silicone Moulds R 34 500 Castings of Parts R 38 000 Finishing + Spraying R 5 500 SLS Functional R 3 500 Parts Injection Mould R 1,3 M
    6. Isuzu tail-light development
    7. WIZCAM Q/A SYSTEM
    8. The development team was approached during December 1999 to design and develop a complete line trimmer. The time-scale set out by the client, implied that all design development and tooling had to be completed by mid-April 2000. The deadline was crucial, as the client could not obtain any orders for the upcoming summer season, without the final manufactured and tested product.
    9. Concept Design: 6 - 10 December: Development and presentation of 3 concept design options; Final Design: 10 - 14 December: Presentation of final design to the client. The concept sketches were signed off. Componentry design: 10 - 14 January: All relevant componentry to be used were converted into 3D models. Detail design: 15 - 28 January: Detail handle design started on 15 January with final evaluation and approval given on 28 January. Detail Base Design: 28 January - 18 February: The detail base and guard section design commenced on 28 January and final evaluation and approval was given on 18 February 2000.
    10. Conclusion: The following items directly contributed towards the success of the project: The team’s in-depth knowledge of the manufacturing processes involved, as well as experience and know-how of all relevant technologies to aid the design and development cycle; The prototyping, which highlighted some improvements that could be made prior to release of the design for tooling; Modern RP and CAD technologies: Based on the RP parts and modifications implemented, the final CAD data could be signed off and implemented much more effectively and with minimum risk with regard to form, fit and function of the final design solution. Proper project planning and design- and manufacturing management within the established network of facilities and capabilities. Finally, experience, dedication and commitment of all relevant parties contributed towards the success of the project.
    11. Body IQ Some of the world’s first Rapid manufacturing examples? (before it even had a name, Technimark/CUT has done it!)
    12. Some of the world’s first architectural case studies – even published in an accredited RP Journal
    13. Injection Moulding is normally associated with: Finalised designs Economies of scale Tight budgets Long lead-times Material removal – Aluminum or Steel Sometimes (rather often?) bad experiences
    14. Rapid Tooling? EOS: Alumide case-study – another world first through collaboration
    15. Challenges: 4 Moulds needed Less than 4 weeks Tight budget – tendering purposes only Results 23 hours of prototyping 4 days of finishing & fitting R 23 000 as opposed to R 90 000
    16. 30 trial samples Flame-retardant ABS 200 components done Initially air-cooled No visible mould damage
    17. Exhibition Products
    18. Using Rapid Tooling (Direct Metal Sintering) to render a cutting-edge tooling service
    19. Funny co-incidence in 1995? • Resulted in a text-book example of how an SMME can collaborate with a university through support programmes such as NRF, THRIP & Tshumisano • Sincere thanks to the CUT’s CRPM & PDTS teams for the support and collaboration over approximately 15 years especially for – Deon de Beer and Gerrie Booysen for continuation what Deon de Beer has started.
    20. Thank You
    SlideShare Zeitgeist 2009

    + SATNSATN Nominate

    custom

    120 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    Mr Alphons Du Toit’s (Director, Technimark, South more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 120
      • 116 on SlideShare
      • 4 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 5
    Most viewed embeds
    • 4 views on http://www.satnconference.co.za

    more

    All embeds
    • 4 views on http://www.satnconference.co.za

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories