SAP Big Data Forum 2013 A1 Dietmar Gasch - Bayer
 

SAP Big Data Forum 2013 A1 Dietmar Gasch - Bayer

on

  • 576 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
576
Views on SlideShare
576
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
1
Downloads
7
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    SAP Big Data Forum 2013 A1 Dietmar Gasch - Bayer SAP Big Data Forum 2013 A1 Dietmar Gasch - Bayer Presentation Transcript

    • Thoughts and experiences about a path to SAP Business Suite powered by SAP HANA Dietmar E. Gasch, former Head and Global Process Owner at Bayer MaterialScience Page 1 • DIETMAR E. GASCH • OCTOBER 2013
    • PATH TO HANA CRM parameters of MyCo Reasons for HANA Proof of Concept The Move to HANA CRM after HANA Business Suite on HANA outlook Page 2 • DIETMAR E. GASCH • OCTOBER 2013
    • CRM parameters of MyCo  One single instance each: ERP, SCM, CRM, GTS, MDM, BW  SAP CRM was part of our global system landscape  CRM designed as single source for the 360° customer view  Replaced > 15 legacy systems  Very huge number of functionalities are available and used  Sales, Marketing and Service processes  Interaction Center  Web Shop including process automation (High e-commerce ratio)  Overall approximately 11.500 users internal and external Page 3 • DIETMAR E. GASCH • OCTOBER 2013
    • Reasons for HANA  Speed  CRM is about finding 360° customer data quickly  Non-indexed searches were slow = no acceptance  With HANA most searches hopefully improve. Users acknowledge the improvement and tend to accept the system better.  Analytics  Non-HANA CRM returns information on a detailed document level  With HANA we hoped to leverage analytical capabilities and to present results on aggregate level while enabling drilldown options  Mobility and Web Shop  With HANA the mobile applications can be used  Faster access to relevant information for our customers (via web shop) Page 4 • DIETMAR E. GASCH • OCTOBER 2013
    • Proof of Concept - Method  A copy of the productive CRM system was upgraded to the HANA version  Another copy acted as reference system  Use cases have been defined to compare both versions  The performance of the use cases were measured on the original system  After migration of the data base to HANA, the same use cases were measured in the HANA machine  Non satisfying results were analyzed and optimized in cooperation between SAP and MyCo  High Performance Analytics (in our case: customer segmentation) have been installed and evaluated Page 5 • DIETMAR E. GASCH • OCTOBER 2013
    • Proof of Concept - Results  Increased Performance Results of Test Cases - comparing Any DB, HANA, optimized HANA System  High Stability of the System 90% -27,1s 93% -22,5s Page 6 • DIETMAR E. GASCH • OCTOBER 2013 88% -27,5s 94% -20,2s  No base code adjustments needed  Optimizing code adds performace in some use cases  HPA created high business interest
    • POC PERFORMANCE ERP transaction “Material Document List” (MB51) • processed with several kind of selection criteria  HANA always ~1 second ! Runtime in seconds Any DB HANA Single Batch 64,40 0,12 Material in Plant & Movement Type 22,71 1,07 Plant at Posting Date Single Order 56,17 0,15 1,39 0,26 User in Posting Month 222,04 0,40 240 180 120 60 0 Single Batch • DIETMAR E. GASCH • OCTOBER 2013 P1Z Material in Plant & Movement Type Single Order P1X Plant at Posting Date User in Posting Month 7
    • Move to HANA Sandbox  Gain experience with most recent software versions  Document findings for fast productive Implementation  Interact with SAP for fast solution and optimization  Intensive functional and integrated testing  Load testing in a close to productive setup Development QA System Production  Update system, implementation of solutions from sandbox  Refine and implement optimization recommendations  Integrated business process test  Saveguarding the Go Live Page 8 • DIETMAR E. GASCH • OCTOBER 2013
    • Move to HANA - Result  Hardware  Data base migration is as short and problem free as described by SAP.  Data base compression rate is ca. 66%  The application server might be a bottleneck when sized too small.  SAP standard and self developed coding  Some standard code can reduce the performance advantage. SAP is working on this as part of the Suite on HANA roadmap.  Optimization of some own coding to the HANA development guidelines can increase performance  Data Base Performance: truly a speedy system  In some cases the use of indexes improves even HANA performance Page 9 • DIETMAR E. GASCH • OCTOBER 2013
    • CRM after HANA  User experience  The bigger the search the bigger the gain  Interaction center response times are faster  Web shop response is much faster for information queries of customers  Hyper care and pain points  In 4 weeks after go live not 1 HANA related incident ticket  Account management performance suboptimal, SAP solution is underway  Continuous improvement  Optimization of slowing codes ongoing @ MyCo and SAP  Definition and installation of interesting HPA’s Page 10 • DIETMAR E. GASCH • OCTOBER 2013
    • Business Suite on HANA an outlook  Base code adjustments will continue @ SAP to make HANA as efficient as possible  Hardware will change from appliance to virtualized set up  Application server to run integrated on HANA  One data set for all applications only  Fade out of business warehouse functions will be possible, when external data can be integrated into HANA  Non volatile memory technology in the hardware producer’s pipeline adds final potential for cost saving (no more transactional storage needed)  All of the above will lead to reduced TCO, thus the question for a company will not be if but when to move to HANA Page 11 • DIETMAR E. GASCH • OCTOBER 2013
    • Thank you Page 12 • DIETMAR E. GASCH • OCTOBER 2013