Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
• Copyright OCM, University of Minnesota- 2006.
  This work is the intellectual property of the
  Regents of the Universit...
Automated Classroom Video
 Streaming Pilot Program
 at the Univ. of Minnesota

              COTF 2006, May 23rd
  James G...
OCM
  University of Minnesota
Office of Classroom Management
   OCM is the central point of contact,
    and single point ...
The UofM Challenge:

 •   Advanced data-projection capability
 •   300+ classrooms
 •   Easy-to-use systems
 •   Reduced m...
PROJECTION CAPABLE
          CLASSROOM STANDARD
   Includes basic tech infrastructure for teaching & learning
    •   fix...
OCM Technology Upgrade Plan

To bring laptop projection capability
 (Phase I) and student wireless
 networking (Phase II) ...
Phase III Concept
Phase III

• Low-End Asynchronous Video
  Streaming capability is also under
  consideration as “Phase III” of the
  ongoi...
“Low-end”

• “Low-end” means a low cost,
  relatively simple capability to
  capture and archive teaching
  activity that ...
“Low-end” asynchronous
video streaming- Priorities
• Operator replaced by affordable
  technology
• Easy to use
• Transpar...
“Low-end” asynchronous
video streaming
• Would support on-demand recall of
  classroom activity
• Would not support live s...
Pilot Project
Project Objective

• To evaluate the concept of adding
  modular technology to the standard
  Projection Capable Classroom...
Project Processes
 •   Develop easy to use system
 •   Demonstrate project feasibility
 •   Develop classroom automation
 ...
Technology
Classroom Technical Services (CTS)                                              OCM
                                      ...
FUNCTIONAL BLOCK DIAGRAM
              CLASSROOM-CAPTURE AUDIO /VIDEO
CLASSROOM &
  ENCODER
                  ENCODE & TRA...
Instructor Camera Design
Considerations
•   Color PTZ AMX controlled
•   Operates as PIP
•   Instructor controlled inserti...
Instructor Screen Layouts
Lectern Monitor Touch Panel
before Streaming
Lectern Monitor Touch Panel
with Password Keypad
Streaming Timer Settings
Pop-Up Page
Instructor Preview Screen
Student Screen Layouts
Issues
Issues

•   Classroom Capture
•   File Transfer Process
•   Automation Process
•   Student Streaming Delivery
•   Faculty ...
Issues
• Initial protocols required the class to be
  MPEG-4 streamed from the classroom and
  asynchronously streamed upo...
Issues
• Hardware specific encoder issues
  determined the server automation
  configuration, and ……………..
• triggered many...
Issues

• Scan converted video vs.
  Hi-Res option
• Future cost benefit analysis will be
  dependent on resolution requir...
Issues

• The Future Campus Streaming
  Server Farm
 – Standard
 – Owner
 – Cost
 – Interface Requirements
 – Automation p...
Preliminary Observations
Video Streaming Pilot
Preliminary Observations
 • Final Evaluation targeted for end of
   Spring Semester
 • Faculty Proje...
Video Streaming Pilot
Preliminary Observations
 • The server solution is more complex
   than the classroom solution
 • Al...
Video Streaming Pilot
 Preliminary Observations
• A low-end fixed instructor camera is
  workable but future instructors m...
Video Streaming Pilot
Preliminary Observations
 • Classroom capture automation
   system successfully functioned
 • Regard...
Video Streaming Pilot
Preliminary Observations
• The pilot indicates we can capture one class
  three times a week for asy...
Related Capture Issues
Hovering in the Wings
• Competing issues of negative effect on
  attendance vs. review aid
• Classr...
Video Streaming Pilot
Preliminary Evaluations
• The Pilot successfully demonstrates the
  feasibility of the low-end video...
Automated Classroom Video
 Streaming Pilot Program
 at the Univ. of Minnesota
                COTF 2006, May 23rd
    Jame...
PPT
PPT
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

PPT

364

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
364
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • As a necessary and parallel effort, OCM worked with FM and others to develop a detailed set of Classroom Standards that cover all aspects of classroom design Appendix DD to Facilities Construction Standards – a critically important document in the effort to improve classrooms Included in Appendix DD is the definition of a “Projection-Capable Classroom” This Projection Capable Classroom is the basis of the Tech Upgrade Plan……. These are characteristics….. Highlight Projector Laptop Interface/Control System Accessibility features Modular add on examples
  • As a necessary and parallel effort, OCM worked with FM and others to develop a detailed set of Classroom Standards that cover all aspects of classroom design Appendix DD to Facilities Construction Standards – a critically important document in the effort to improve classrooms Included in Appendix DD is the definition of a “Projection-Capable Classroom” This Projection Capable Classroom is the basis of the Tech Upgrade Plan……. These are characteristics….. Highlight Projector Laptop Interface/Control System Accessibility features Modular add on examples
  • As a necessary and parallel effort, OCM worked with FM and others to develop a detailed set of Classroom Standards that cover all aspects of classroom design Appendix DD to Facilities Construction Standards – a critically important document in the effort to improve classrooms Included in Appendix DD is the definition of a “Projection-Capable Classroom” This Projection Capable Classroom is the basis of the Tech Upgrade Plan……. These are characteristics….. Highlight Projector Laptop Interface/Control System Accessibility features Modular add on examples
  • Transcript of "PPT"

    1. 1. • Copyright OCM, University of Minnesota- 2006. This work is the intellectual property of the Regents of the University of Minnesota. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright statement appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the University of Minnesota. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the University of Minnesota.
    2. 2. Automated Classroom Video Streaming Pilot Program at the Univ. of Minnesota COTF 2006, May 23rd James Gregory, Classroom Technical Services John Knowles, Office of Classroom Management University of Minnesota jgregory@umn.edu knowl014@umn.edu
    3. 3. OCM University of Minnesota Office of Classroom Management OCM is the central point of contact, and single point of responsibility, for all general purpose classroom issues on the three Twin Cities campuses. Classroom Technical Services (CTS) operates as the technical support organization for OCM.
    4. 4. The UofM Challenge: • Advanced data-projection capability • 300+ classrooms • Easy-to-use systems • Reduced maintenance costs • Improved classroom uptime • Ability to interface new devices
    5. 5. PROJECTION CAPABLE CLASSROOM STANDARD  Includes basic tech infrastructure for teaching & learning • fixed data/video projection capability • internet connectivity at instructor station • wireless student networking • smart control system with networking option • user friendly laptop interface • standardized operating protocol familiar to UofM faculty • standard input devices (VCR and DVD) • may have other modular “add-on” capabilities • “Hotline” phone for instructor • accessibility features • flexible growth potential - able to interface new devices  Baseline for UMTC general-purpose classroom technology • Included in Facilities Construction Standards (Appendix DD)
    6. 6. OCM Technology Upgrade Plan To bring laptop projection capability (Phase I) and student wireless networking (Phase II) to all centrally scheduled Twin Cities classrooms (approx. 307) at the University of Minnesota under a Classroom One- Stop umbrella.
    7. 7. Phase III Concept
    8. 8. Phase III • Low-End Asynchronous Video Streaming capability is also under consideration as “Phase III” of the ongoing Tech Upgrade program for UMTC central classrooms.
    9. 9. “Low-end” • “Low-end” means a low cost, relatively simple capability to capture and archive teaching activity that occurred in a classroom.
    10. 10. “Low-end” asynchronous video streaming- Priorities • Operator replaced by affordable technology • Easy to use • Transparent from the instructor’s perspective
    11. 11. “Low-end” asynchronous video streaming • Would support on-demand recall of classroom activity • Would not support live streaming • Relatively simple capture and archive • Would be scalable from installation, support and lifecycle cost perspectives
    12. 12. Pilot Project
    13. 13. Project Objective • To evaluate the concept of adding modular technology to the standard Projection Capable Classroom system that would provide faculty with the capability of capturing and asynchronously streaming classroom activity without the requirements of an additional operator.
    14. 14. Project Processes • Develop easy to use system • Demonstrate project feasibility • Develop classroom automation • Develop server process automation • Utilize faculty input • Evaluate outcomes • Make recommendations
    15. 15. Technology
    16. 16. Classroom Technical Services (CTS) OCM Monitoring Operator OCM Management Server OCM Hotline Classroom System QA & System Data Problem Response Network Network Phone Network Classroom SOURCES System Data Central System Laptop Classroom Wireless QA & Hotline Hub Problem Response DVD, VCR, other media Encoder Additional I/O Instructor Camera UofM Low-End Streaming Classroom System A/V Switching and Processing Control Panel AMX Netlinx DATA/VIDEO Controller PROJECTOR Streaming Touch Panel Volume Control Audio Amp © 2005 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota
    17. 17. FUNCTIONAL BLOCK DIAGRAM CLASSROOM-CAPTURE AUDIO /VIDEO CLASSROOM & ENCODER ENCODE & TRANSFER FILE NETWORK RECEIVE & ARCHIVE FILE STREAMING SERVER ASYNCHRONOUSLY MULTI-CAST FILE NETWORK STUDENT STUDENT VIEWS COMPUTER STREAMING DELIVERY
    18. 18. Instructor Camera Design Considerations • Color PTZ AMX controlled • Operates as PIP • Instructor controlled insertion • Multiple camera position pre-sets • Against the wall parking default • Auto-tracking option
    19. 19. Instructor Screen Layouts
    20. 20. Lectern Monitor Touch Panel before Streaming
    21. 21. Lectern Monitor Touch Panel with Password Keypad
    22. 22. Streaming Timer Settings Pop-Up Page
    23. 23. Instructor Preview Screen
    24. 24. Student Screen Layouts
    25. 25. Issues
    26. 26. Issues • Classroom Capture • File Transfer Process • Automation Process • Student Streaming Delivery • Faculty Perception • Student Perception • Use Statistics • Future Applicability/Projections
    27. 27. Issues • Initial protocols required the class to be MPEG-4 streamed from the classroom and asynchronously streamed upon demand from the server • QTSS (Quick Time Streaming Server) can’t both archive a captured stream and multicast from an archive • Archive at the Encoder, Stream at the Transcoder • Solution had to target a file transfer protocol, not a captured stream cont’d
    28. 28. Issues • Hardware specific encoder issues determined the server automation configuration, and …………….. • triggered many specific solutions for dealing with streaming failures, archiving difficulties, remote access problems, processing procedures and firmware upgrades. Cont’d
    29. 29. Issues • Scan converted video vs. Hi-Res option • Future cost benefit analysis will be dependent on resolution requirements driven by students, faculty and/or administration • Technology improvements will continue to drive hardware price down
    30. 30. Issues • The Future Campus Streaming Server Farm – Standard – Owner – Cost – Interface Requirements – Automation process – Authentication method – CMS interface (Vista)
    31. 31. Preliminary Observations
    32. 32. Video Streaming Pilot Preliminary Observations • Final Evaluation targeted for end of Spring Semester • Faculty Project Partner indicates positive instructor experience • Initial informal student feedback is positive, awaiting formal survey • Pilot demonstrates feasibility of automated technology system Cont’d
    33. 33. Video Streaming Pilot Preliminary Observations • The server solution is more complex than the classroom solution • Although operational server solution was developed, future server farm will be by others • The future server farm solution will drive future encoder and process requirements Cont’d
    34. 34. Video Streaming Pilot Preliminary Observations • A low-end fixed instructor camera is workable but future instructors may demand auto-tracking camera system • Low-end scan converted video is adequate but future requirements and stakeholders may demand higher resolution • Once faculty are operator assisted, they have no motivation to retrain. Cont’d
    35. 35. Video Streaming Pilot Preliminary Observations • Classroom capture automation system successfully functioned • Regardless of future server requirement, classroom capture system should interface • Manual streaming start control was requested, but automated start may be a future feature/requirement Cont’d
    36. 36. Video Streaming Pilot Preliminary Observations • The pilot indicates we can capture one class three times a week for asynchronous recall by 250 students…….. • It also indicates that to capture many classes for recall by large numbers of students would require a different server configuration and methodology. • This and many other reasons indicate the need for a central server farm by others.
    37. 37. Related Capture Issues Hovering in the Wings • Competing issues of negative effect on attendance vs. review aid • Classroom Visual Aid versus Distant Ed Delivery • ROI with regard to increased tuition revenues • Fair Use – Determination on classroom DVD/media content streamed over Network – Fair Use requirement on archived file time limit
    38. 38. Video Streaming Pilot Preliminary Evaluations • The Pilot successfully demonstrates the feasibility of the low-end video streaming concept. Final configuration of future implementation will depend on input from many stakeholders, but the lessons learned in this project will aid in answering questions regarding functional, operational, technical, financial and usability issues. • Final project survey evaluations will be posted at: • http//:www.classroom.umn.edu
    39. 39. Automated Classroom Video Streaming Pilot Program at the Univ. of Minnesota COTF 2006, May 23rd James Gregory, Classroom Technical Services John Knowles, Office of Classroom Management University of Minnesota jgregory@umn.edu knowl014@umn.edu
    1. A particular slide catching your eye?

      Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

    ×