socialweb 2.0: collecting and sharing
links, pictures, places,....social mediatalk about itpresent all of it in your timelinea boost of convergence between pc, tablets, smartphones, ... andbetween people, companies, bots, ...
#2 participation hasalways been 2.0some
principles likeby choiceown activitiestransparencydialogue (betweengenerations)documentation...arge partizipation www.jugendbeteiligung.ccguidelines of youth participation
#3 web 2.0 reinforcesthe active
ones(?)if you are active offline butyou can be active also online you can offer other tools/invitations (eg. shortno guarantee to activate the messaging)passive ones young people find their individual outlets (eg video diaries at youtube)
#4 participation 2.0needs information 2.0young
people are overburdend with theplurality of informationneed to differ between serious andnonserious facts before participation(eg. hoaxes, conspiration theories, urbanlegends)?the more information in the net the moreguidance is needed
#6 make itaccessiblefor persons with
a disability...... the web offers access to „theworld“... the web 2.0 raised walls ofcaptchas and other technicalbarriersbtw: facebook is not entirely accessible
#7 there is no „out
of the box“don t think about facebookdon t think about webdon t think about technologiesrethinkwhy should (young) peopleparticipate in our project, in ourcommunity, in my...?how can I reach them?
#8 participation (2.0) isa mashupwisdom
of the individual „.....containing any or all of text, graphics, audio, video, and animation, whichoffline and/or online recombines and modifies existing digital works to createonline voting a derivative work“maps, pictures, video source: wikipedia(moderated) discussions....
#9 participation is notlike muesliparticipation
like muesli needslots of ingridientscontrary to muesliin a participation process ALLthe ingridients must be liked bythe many participantsa participation process is apermanent changingdevelopment