Active Wedge Behind A Gravity Retaining Wall Complete 2011
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Active Wedge Behind A Gravity Retaining Wall Complete 2011

on

  • 2,230 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,230
Views on SlideShare
2,229
Embed Views
1

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0

1 Embed 1

http://www.linkedin.com 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Active Wedge Behind A Gravity Retaining Wall Complete 2011 Active Wedge Behind A Gravity Retaining Wall Complete 2011 Presentation Transcript

  • Modeling of the Active Wedge behind a Gravity Retaining Wall
    By: Rex Radloff
    14.531 Advanced Soil Mechanics
    University of Massachusetts Lowell
    Department of Civil Engineering
  • Rankine Active Wedge
    • Wall friction is neglected
    • Active force acts 1/3H from the base
    • Front face angle (θ) is 90⁰
    • Overburden slope (β) is 0⁰
    • Back face angle (α) is 45 + φ/2
    φw
    Rankine wedge behind a gravity retaining wall.
    What if the above was not held constant?
    • How would the magnitude and location of Pa change?
    • What are its effects on the failure criteria?
    • To what degree?
    Rankine stress distribution behind a gravity retaining wall.
    University of Massachusetts Lowell 14.531 Advanced Soil Mechanics
    2
  • Active Wedge with Reactions
    W
    Note:
    The weight and centroid of the active wedge is a function of H, Wh, WBs, γ, α, θ, and β
    The weight and centroid of the backfill is a function of H, WBs, Wh, γ, θ, and β
    Active wedge with consideration towards θ, β, and φw
    University of Massachusetts Lowell 14.531 Advanced Soil Mechanics
    3
  • Modeling the Active Wedge
    Known
    Wall dimensions and materials.
    Soil and wall shear strength parameters.
    Grade of overburden soil.
    Solve for
    • Angle θ of the front face of the active wedge.
    • Angle α of the back face of the active wedge.
    • Active force, Pa, that is produced by the active wedge.
    • The location of the Pa resultant.
    • FS against overturning and sliding.
    • Eccentricity
    • Maximum stress, qMAX underneath the foundation.
    University of Massachusetts Lowell 14.531 Advanced Soil Mechanics
    4
  • Example Retaining Wall: Case 1
    University of Massachusetts Lowell 14.531 Advanced Soil Mechanics
    5
    γ1 = 117 pcfγconc = 150 pcf
    φ1’ = 34⁰
    δ’ = 18⁰
    Ca = 800 psf
    Assume firm underlying soil
  • γ= 117 pcf, Cs = 0 psf, Cw = 0 psf, H = 20.75 ft., Wh = 6.00 ft., φ = 34⁰, β = 0⁰
    θ = 90⁰, φw = 34⁰  Pa = 6.51 Kips, α = 56.8⁰
    θ = 90⁰, φw = 0⁰  Pa = 7.12 Kips, α = 62.0⁰  (45 + φw/2)
    θ = 71⁰, φw = 34⁰  Pa = 11.24 Kips, α =61.2⁰
    θ = 71⁰, φw = 0⁰  Pa = 10.84 Kips, α = 71.2⁰
    University of Massachusetts Lowell 14.531 Advanced Soil Mechanics
    6
  • Failure Analysis: H/Wh = 3.4
    |e| ≤𝑏6 2.08 ft
     
    The increase in Pa lead to a below acceptable FS for overturning.
    The greater distance between the Pa vector and pt.O led to a below acceptable eccentricity.
    University of Massachusetts Lowell 14.531 Advanced Soil Mechanics
    7
  • Example Retaining Wall: Case 2
    University of Massachusetts Lowell 14.531 Advanced Soil Mechanics
    8
    γ1 = 117 pcfγconc = 150 pcf
    φ1’ = 34⁰
    δ’ = 18⁰
    Ca = 800 psf
    Assume firm underlying soil
  • γ= 117 pcf, Cs = 0 psf, Cw = 0 psf, H = 20.75 ft., Wh = 20.75 ft., φ = 34⁰, β = 0⁰
    θ = 90⁰, φw = 34⁰  Pa = 6.51 Kips, α = 56.8⁰
    θ = 90⁰, φw = 0⁰  Pa = 7.12 Kips, α = 62.0⁰  (45 + φw/2)
    θ = 45⁰, φw = 34⁰  Pa = 29.03 Kips, α =57.2⁰
    θ = 45⁰, φw = 0⁰  Pa = 21.41 Kips, α = 84.50⁰
    University of Massachusetts Lowell 14.531 Advanced Soil Mechanics
    9
  • Failure Analysis: H/Wh = 1.0
    |e| ≤𝑏6 4.46 ft
     
    University of Massachusetts Lowell 14.531 Advanced Soil Mechanics
    10
    +58%
  • Pa vs. α vs. θ
    φw = 34⁰
    Line of intersection
    φw = 0⁰
    Produced using Mathematica
    University of Massachusetts Lowell 14.531 Advanced Soil Mechanics
    11
  • Conclusion
    The active force (Pa) depends on the angles θ, α, and φw found among the active wedge.
    Any deviation between the calculated active force behind the same retaining wall depends on the combining effects of θ, α, and φw found among the active wedge.
    As the angle θ decreases, the Pa will increase as well as the variance between the Pa calculated with and without wall friction.
    Hard to openly predict the influence on the failure criteria
    University of Massachusetts Lowell 14.531 Advanced Soil Mechanics
    12
  • Is it worth consideration?
    University of Massachusetts Lowell 14.531 Advanced Soil Mechanics
    13
    Yes
  • References
    University of Massachusetts Lowell 14.531 Advanced Soil Mechanics
    14
    Das, B.M., (2006). “Principles of Geotechnical Engineering – Sixth Edition”
    Lambe, T.W., and R.V. Whitman, (1969). “Series in Soil Engineering - Soil Mechanics”
    Mangano, Sal, (2010). “Mathematica Cookbook”
    AutoCAD 2011®
    Wolfram Mathematica®