studies in memory in
to what we have
already learned on
in terms of strengths and
How will I know if I am learning?
By the end of the lesson…
Will be able to describe the APFC of each
study in detail.
C Will be able to explain the study in relation to
A Will be able to evaluate each study in detail in
terms of strengths and weaknesses.
What does the Spec say?
Study 2 (Selected)
Godden & Baddeley (1975)
Craik & Tulving (1975)
What are AO1 & AO2?
How can you demonstrate them in looking at
You must also try and to compare and contrast
them. What might this mean?
What can you recall about these studies so far?
How do they relate to what we have learned?
Your task is to deconstruct both studies and
create a display poster for each of them..
Imagine you have literally broken
up the study into 4 pieces like a
Aim, Procedure, Findings,
I want a detailed, colourful
poster, referring to the success
criteria for each study. Use the
template to help you!
You can cut out the jigsaw
pieces and piece them together
on the page if you like! Be
Godden & Baddeley (1975) & Craik & Tulving (1975)
Feedback: Fill in Freud…
What can you tell
Create 3 questions to test another
member of the class on the key
Write them on a piece of paper.
Make sure you have the answers!
You will have learned about a number of studies
from the Cognitive Approach.
Answer the following questions using one study you
a)Identify one study from the Cognitive Approach.
b)Describe the findings (results and/or conclusions)
of the study you identified in (a). (4 marks)
c) (c) Outline one strength of the study you
identified in (a). (2 marks)
Now swap with someone
else and peer assess each
other’s using the mark