Budget Discussion PFT Presentation September 9, 2009

2% Scenario Adopted Budget

2% Cuts

2009-10 FTES Targets We are projecting being funded up to only 19,100 FTES for 2009-10. Our 2008-09 FTES was 20,300 resident FTES, we were funded for 19,800. That is a reduction of 1,200 FTES over what we served in 2008-09

We are projecting being funded up to only 19,100 FTES for 2009-10.

Our 2008-09 FTES was 20,300 resident FTES, we were funded for 19,800.

That is a reduction of 1,200 FTES over what we served in 2008-09

2009-10 FTES Targets

2008-2009 Fall Comparisons Sections Students Class Enrollment Res FTES F08 F09 #(+/-) %(+/-) F08 F09 #(+/-) %(+/-) F08 F09 #(+/-) %(+/-) F08 F09 #(+/-) %(+/-) Alameda 438 419 -19 -4% 6,297 7,633 1,336 21% 12,662 16,120 3,458 27% 1,576 1,829 253 16% Laney 960 970 10 1% 13,501 14,835 1,334 10% 32,509 37,215 4,706 14% 3,448 3,990 542 16% Merritt 502 434 -68 -14% 7,237 7,796 559 8% 15,042 16,599 1,557 10% 1,926 1,886 -40 -2% BCC 461 458 -3 -1% 6,373 7,422 1,049 16% 14,048 16,633 2,585 18% 1,582 1,812 230 15% District 2,361 2,281 -80 -3% 27,965 30,337 2,372 8% 74,261 86,567 12,306 17% 8,532 9,517 985 12%

FTES (Cont.) College Productivity Targets have been set at: 2009-10 2008-09 Alameda 16.5 15 Laney 17.3 16.5 Merritt 16.0 14.5 Berkeley 17.5 17.4

College Productivity Targets have been set at:

2009-10 2008-09

Alameda 16.5 15

Laney 17.3 16.5

Merritt 16.0 14.5

Berkeley 17.5 17.4

Productivity- How does it add up?

Per Campus as of Fall 2007 If: COA is 18 % of district enrollment BCC is 18% Laney is 43 % and Merritt is 21 % Then For each 1 point decrease of FTEF/FTES the additional cost or savings per college is: the percentage of $1,500,00 COA: $270,000 BCC: $270,000 Laney: $645,000 Merritt: $315,000 so when Merritt operates at 14.5 vs 17.5 it cost $1 Million more to produce the same FTES as at BCC

Questions?